Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Russia - threadbanned users in OP

Options
19589599619639643691

Comments

  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,145 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    At the barest minimum there is a known hitlist of at least 2 million Ukrainians who make up the core of their civil society who are to be expunged. This list was compiled before the invasion and was know to close Russia watchers.

    A bare minimum of two million Ukrainians eh? Citations please. The Washington post printed a story that US inteligence sources said that putin had a hitlist of prominent opposition Ukrainians(and Belarusians in exile), which I do not doubt for a moment, but nobody was talking about "two million at a barest minimum". More hyperbole.

    And hello Grozny indeed. Russia absolutely flattened there and other areas in Chechnya and gave no fúcks to world opinion and operated with near impunity killing pretty much who they liked. Death toll over three wars? around 40,000.

    Rejoice in the awareness of feeling stupid, for that’s how you end up learning new things. If you’re not aware you’re stupid, you probably are.



  • Registered Users Posts: 20,047 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    No it wouldn't, at least not to me. He's an awful person.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,658 ✭✭✭storker


    That may be less of a discouragement to Putin than we like to think. All the arguments against interfering in Ukraine would still hold true even for a NATO country being attacked. One can say, "Ah, but Ukraine isn't a member of NATO, " but that's a an argument for a debate, and we're not in a debate or even a courtroom; we're in the mind of a very dangerous individual.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,034 ✭✭✭Amprodude


    You know that sanctions alone won't stop this war Russia started on Ukraine. Everyday the west are increasing sanctions it would make you question what exact sanctions are on Russia and what effect do they actually have on Russia military and economy going forward. I haven't seen Russia falling of the map due to the impact these sanctions were supposed to have on Putin and its country. Nobody knows exactly what sanctions are on Russia by the West and what impact they really are having.



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,712 ✭✭✭✭briany


    I had worried that NATO would shy away from invoking article 5 if push came to shove, but pretty much every spokesperson for NATO has been adamant on the point that if Russia move toward NATO territory, NATO would respond without reservation. I expect some bend on that rhetoric, such as if a stray missile fell inside Poland would have NATO looking to confirm if it was the opening hostility of Russia opening up a new front or just an accident. But if Russia moved to link friendly territory with Kaliningrad, there's no room for interpretation, there. NATO would either have to respond militarily or else lose pretty much all credibility.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 18,512 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    On the subject of Russian generals being killed, one wonders how the Russian "media" are even managing to cover this up. One would have thought the military funeral of a general would be a big deal and hard to keep a lid on. Are they forcing through private funerals or something without all the state trappings?



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,145 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    Ah eight years ago. That makes them now all whiter than white then? Doesn't take that long it seems.

    But wait.... Here's a Time article from 2021. Here's another from RadioFreeEurope(a US government funded outlet) in 2019. Describing how Facebook banned the Azoz movement because "Azov -- which includes many war veterans and militant members with openly neo-Nazi views who have been involved in attacks on LGBT activists, Romany encampments, and women's groups -- is now officially banned from having any presence on Facebook, the social network has confirmed to RFE/RL". Of course now when things have shifted Facebook did an about face. and will "allow its billions of users to praise the Azov Battalion, a Ukrainian neo-Nazi military unit previously banned from being freely discussed under the company’s Dangerous Individuals and Organizations policy" Funny how all that got so easily washed away...

    Like I said when push comes to shove, "our" nazis are better than "their" nazis and we'll throw out the rule book and actively support them when it suits, call them far right dangerous group when it doesn't. They're still nazis though.

    And I wouldn't stop former paramilitaries from fighting, it would be expedient to let them, but they'd still be thugs and murderers. I'd need a neck as hard as a jockeys bollocks to claim otherwise or leave them to their own devices after the war ended.

    Rejoice in the awareness of feeling stupid, for that’s how you end up learning new things. If you’re not aware you’re stupid, you probably are.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,034 ✭✭✭Amprodude


    True but he couldn't argue the point he had back then with now.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Indeed. If NATO doesn’t respond with ground forces the moment a Russian boot touches NATO soil, or a missile or drone attack on NATO territory is considered to be deliberate, it is utterly finished as an organisation. And then there are suddenly a lot of countries hanging out there on their own.

    NATO would only likely ever push back to its existing borders though, so I wonder whether Putin thinks it would be with a small sacrifice of men an equipment in order to try to call NATO’s bluff



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,969 ✭✭✭Christy42


    Relevance to the war? Are you also going to bring up every murderer in Ukraine?


    Any nazis should be dealt with according to their crimes. It is however a tad difficult to do this when a country is being invaded.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,089 ✭✭✭TheRepentent


    Wanna support genocide?Cheer on the murder of women and children?The Ruzzians aren't rapey enough for you? Morally bankrupt cockroaches and islamaphobes , Israel needs your help NOW!!

    http://tinyurl.com/2ksb4ejk


    https://www.btselem.org/



  • Registered Users Posts: 873 ✭✭✭Addmagnet


    That's 4 Generals and 6 Colonels killed so far.

    I wonder if Lukashenko is still keen to be made a Colonel? 🤔



  • Posts: 18,749 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Of course they would still be thugs and murderers. It's irrelevant though. Same as it's irrelevant at this moment what this unit did at any other time.

    When this war ends, things will again be different.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,049 ✭✭✭Mecanudo


    I can't think what being in those place at those times must have been like even where someone was not not aware of everything that was taking place.

    But on a lighter note and not to be overtly flippant maybe a bit like Kate Addy you're a bit of a jinkx or even a latter day Walter Mitty 🙂



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,204 ✭✭✭combat14




  • Registered Users Posts: 23,656 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog



    Reports the attendees are being paid and bussed in. Putin due to speak later.



  • Registered Users Posts: 894 ✭✭✭Bayonet


    The sanctions will reduce wealth in Russia, make it a bit harder to get specialised parts for things etc. However, Russia will adapt and find loopholes. I believe the Democrats with their love affair for Iran, are talking about giving Russia sanctions free access to Iran. At least that's what's being leaked. The bumbling useless Biden admin are putting the idea up the flagpole to see what the reaction is going to be. Given that the vocal progressive 'squad' that has a big influence now all oppose sanctions on Russia (but want sanctions on Israel) then I think you're going to see Russia survive just fine under sanctions.

    Additionally, sanctions have to be actively enforced. They aren't something that are just turned on and that's it. Do America and the EU have the will to actually enforce sanctions? well again with Iran we can see Biden hasn't bothered enforcing them, hence why Iran has the funds to send spy satellites into orbit and build a massive proxy army infrastructure across the M.E

    A lot of the sanctions on Russia that were deliberately trumpeted in headline news, were a cover for the impotence of no military response. In other words, the global public were shocked at Russia's invasion, the west can't do much militarily - so they tell their people we slapped Russia with the MOST SANCTIONS EVAR!! to placate and reduce calls for military intervention. Much of it is theatre.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Er, do you realise the sanctions are only in a few weeks? There will be a huge impact, this may be beyond your capacity to comprehend. Their impact won't be as fast as some like, but they will be severe.

    Either way NATO itself won't put boots on the ground in Ukraine before a NATO country is attacked first. And that won't happen. So, to get your desired vicarious adrenaline hit go for a jog.



  • Registered Users Posts: 12,033 ✭✭✭✭Richard Hillman


    They have been talking a big game but I still struggle to believe that if Russia entered Lithuania to bridge Kaliningrad, that Joe Biden or Boris Johnson would go full dicks out and go to war with Russia. If you are Joe Biden especially, how to justify potential nuclear war to your people over a piece of land that very few people in their country has heard about.

    I think the Poles, the other Baltic's and maybe even the Germans would intervene. Maybe the Americans would offer similar Ukraine style support with weapon's. Maybe even Air Support. I can't see regular US troops in the front line. Maybe special forces.

    I would imagine they do have some sort of plan in place that doesnt lead to Armageddon.



  • Registered Users Posts: 15,353 ✭✭✭✭Vicxas




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 11,053 ✭✭✭✭Furze99


    Who said anything about NATO?? People are obsessed with NATO.

    The ideas mooted is a Polish UN peacekeeping force. We are members of the UN, currently on security council and routinely pat ourselves on the back for our UN peacekeeping duties. Why would we not send Irish troops to a UN peacekeeping/ enforcing force?



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,053 ✭✭✭✭Furze99


    Yes an escalation of a European war that would see other European states engaging on their own terms.



  • Registered Users Posts: 894 ✭✭✭Bayonet


    North Korea, severe sanctions - still building ICBMs

    Iran, severe sanctions - spending billions on Yemen, Gaza, Lebanon, Syria, Iraq conflict theatres, sending spy satellites into orbit, seeing GDP growth.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,250 ✭✭✭EltonJohn69




  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    AFAIK, that would be acceptable under article 5. It's not an all out war declaration required by all NATO countries.

    All NATO would do is push Russia out of NATO countries and probably Ukraine. This may be done in short order. The Poles would likely be in before the echo of the first Russian boot hitting NATO soil reached the nearest eardrum.

    Even then, the greatest damage done to Russia, apart from damaged pride, would be the continued sanctions.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,475 ✭✭✭bennyineire


    I don't think you understand what NATO actually stands for, also there are many thousands of troops already mobilized close by NATO. Any Russian advance would be wiped out in minutes



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    First of all NK... practically a medieval economy. What's your point here? Most recent rocket blew up on launch. Contrast to South Korea. Who's winning?

    You don't think Iran isnt hurting? Contrast to Saudi Arabia for quality of life.

    Russian quality of life is going to make the noise of a Stuka Dive Bomber.

    They certainly won't be as big a help to Iran and NK.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,652 ✭✭✭greenpilot


    Because our reputation as UN peacekeepers is not "supposed", its pretty solid. Visit the UN school in the Curragh. We currently have troops in Syria, which many are unaware. We would be exactly one of the countries called upon due to our experience across the Middle East and Africa.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Looks like trains in Ukraine needs to be armed with NLAWs and Javelins too soon,lol




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 18,512 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    From some of the tweets below, it seems attendance at the event was obligatory i.e. many people were literally taken from their place of work on a working day and made attend it (I'm assuming non compliance would not be a good idea). Very North Korea.



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement