Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Interesting articles

Options
1356765

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 24,173 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    Too priceless a response not to post.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,468 ✭✭✭Dohvolle


    Apparently it sums up the situation very accurately.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,953 ✭✭✭sparky42


    Though it's behind a Paywall, the Times is suggesting that the Commission may not even be able to produce a Unanimous report, and the possibility of a Minority counter report.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,772 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    The below is taken from the article you speak off. Nothing to worry about😬

    The commission sent draft versions to senior officials in the Department of Defence and Defence Forces in November. Civilian and military officials believed the draft did not adequately address the commission’s terms of reference.

    They described the report as vague and contradictory in places, including in relation to Army command structures, the future of the Defence Forces’ headquarters and future interactions between civilian and military officials.

    The Defence Forces’ criticisms were the most severe and included complaints about a lack of focus on developing future capabilities and a lack of ambition on how to address the retention crisis



  • Registered Users Posts: 24,173 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    Fun little story coming out of the 30 year State Papers release.

    John Major was invited to Dublin for talks with Albert Reynolds towards the end of 1991. The security plan involved flying him from Baldonnell directly to Government Buildings in a British Army Westland Wessex and landing on the helicopter pad on the roof of the Dept of An Taoiseach (which is still there)

    Although the Wessex was nominally a 6.1 ton machine, a couple of ex Pilots in Dept of Transport advised that the armoured version that would come (presumably from the North) was likely considerably heavier than delivery spec and that the pad, which was commonly used by the 4.3 ton IAC Dauphin, may structurally fail.

    Among alternative solutions being looked at were Merrion Square Park and the pitches at UCD Belfield, although it doesn't say what solution was arrived at.

    Personally I'd have thought the playing fields at Trinity College Park would be ideal, being easy to secure and just a two or three minute drive to Government Buildings.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,953 ✭✭✭sparky42


    The Times has a new article:

    [QUOTE]

    The government has no plan to increase the military in a significant way, according to sources

    The government is making plans to turn the Defence Forces into a leaner and smarter military backed by advanced technology to protect the state in the decades ahead.

    The Commission on the Future of the Defence Forces is due to report later this month but it is understood the government is already preparing for reform of the army, naval service and air corps.

    The plan hopes to transform the Defence Forces into an “interoperable fighting force” capable of fulfilling its mission using new technology. The government has no plan to increase the military in a significant way, according to sources familiar with the issue.

    The commission, which is chaired by the former civil servant Aidan O’Driscoll, is due to meet this month to agree on a series of recommendations that are the subject of ongoing debate and intense behind-the-scenes lobbying. The report was due to be submitted to the government last month but this was postponed because of disagreements over its contents.

    The Defence Forces is seeking to establish a “tech-enabled” military force capable of detecting and responding to threats in multiple domains.

    In written submissions, it had sought significantly enhanced capabilities for the Air Corps and Naval Service to allow them to respond to threats in Irish-controlled air space and Ireland’s maritime territory, while the army is seeking enhanced protection for overseas operations. The commission is unlikely to make all of these recommendations.

    Closures of barracks are unlikely to be proposed.

    The role of the Defence Forces in protecting the state against international terrorist groups and hostile states has been considered.

    The Department of Justice and garda headquarters did not make any formal submissions to the commission during its research phase but have made representations concerning the role of military intelligence, known as J2, asking that it be more legally defined, according to political sources.

    The military has for decades monitored the activities of foreign intelligence services from countries such as Russia on Irish soil.

    The issue of what J2 does with such intelligence has become the focus of some debate.

    Intelligence gathered by J2 is shared with European countries and the United States but limited information is shared with garda headquarters, who themselves provide limited information to the Defence Forces, which has a long standing expertise in the area.

    The two agencies have also mounted simultaneous operations against the same targets, leading to inter-agency conflict and duplication of resources.

    The Representative Association of Commissioned Officers (Raco) had urged the commission to recommend the establishment of a national intelligence service but this is unlikely to happen.

    Conor King, the Raco spokesman, said if granted this would have brought Ireland into line with other EU countries. The military itself has campaigned for the creation of a civilian intelligence agency since the 1970s.

    Declan Power, an independent security analyst, said he feared the commission was a missed opportunity to develop and advocate for a new agile defence force for the state.

    “Why put together a commission on defence when they feel they may have to discard or ignore their contribution, which begs the question on how much serious thought was put into the composition of this commission in the first place,” he said.

    Ger Guinan of the Permanent Defence Forces Other Ranks Representative Association said he believed the government was making advance plans for what the commission was likely to report.

    “The Defence Forces have been in such bad condition so it doesn’t surprise me that aspects of the commission’s report have been planned for already,” he said.[/QUOTE]

    Given the issues just trying to hold onto specialists right now, the idea of "leaner and smarter" seems a sick joke, not too mention that even if you got both the NS and AC up to establishment figures, it won't be enough.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,772 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    I Taught J2 & Garda National Crime & Security Intelligence Service worked well together




  • Registered Users Posts: 3,953 ✭✭✭sparky42


    Don't know, could just be an argument over resources, maybe the Gardaí are worried about J2 getting more money?



  • Registered Users Posts: 24,173 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    Depressingly predictable. Predictably depressing.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,468 ✭✭✭Dohvolle


    It seems the overlap is the problem to some extent. When everyone has scarce resources, everyone doing the same thing from different directions is never a good use of them.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 207 ✭✭BuildTheWall


    I was always under the impression that lads in the DF were threaders because there was little to no scope for deployments. Sounds like a good problem to have, frankly you’d be loaded after a 12 month tour, never mind 16.



  • Registered Users Posts: 24,173 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    DF insta post of an ARW unit in a Polaris M-RZR complete with OEM MG mount and FN 7.62

    A vehicle I had no clue we had.



  • Registered Users Posts: 22,329 ✭✭✭✭Esel


    Do they still have the GPMG in regular use?

    Not your ornery onager



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,953 ✭✭✭sparky42


    The company actually leaked that we had it last year I think during one of the defence expos as they were promoting the vehicle...



  • Registered Users Posts: 24,173 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    So I read this evening. Had passed me by at the time.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,772 ✭✭✭roadmaster




  • Registered Users Posts: 24,173 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    These few days mark the 40th anniversary of the extraordinary snow storm of 1982 which blanketed the Eastern two third of Ireland in depths not seen for decades prior and only maybe once since.

    The TV report above shows the Air Corps Aerospatiale SA330 Puma (242) busy dropping supplies to isolated locations and ferrying dialysis patients and mothers in labour to hospital. Another four Alouette type, not shown, were tasked to other similar work around the Country, according to the report.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,468 ✭✭✭Dohvolle


    Report expected to call for new Cork Army Ranger Wing base to counter maritime terror threat (thejournal.ie)

    Happy days! Had heard this proposed many times in the past. We are after all an Island.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,953 ✭✭✭sparky42


    Never made sense to me from the creation of the Wing that it didn't have something along this line tbh.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,772 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    I presume they will need a helicopter based with them if there is an issue in the irish sea or of the north west



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,468 ✭✭✭Dohvolle


    No real advantage in that, but presumably they'll have use of the Naval helis... 😉



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,468 ✭✭✭Dohvolle




  • Registered Users Posts: 24,173 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    Not yet anyway!

    Makes sense that this should be the case. Hopefully it's pursued quickly.

    In America they have Sea, Air and Land Teams. SEALs.

    We can have Farraige, Aer agus Talamh. FATs.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,468 ✭✭✭Dohvolle


    Nice try, but as a gaeilge purist, no.

    The Sea: Farraige, fair enough.

    The Air (where birds fly, not what we breath): Aer

    However the land on which we reside is : Tír. (talamh is more of the Floor, rather than the ground)

    But their role will be as Special operations: Maritime

    They are already known officially as Fiannoglach, so adding the maritime capability makes them Fiannóglach Muirí.

    FMs for short.

    However if they are going to be our Maritime Special Operations, then surely Oibríochtaí speisialta muirí or OSM?



  • Registered Users Posts: 24,173 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    I was joking....

    But I can't see them being anything other than the ARW / Fiannóglach they already are, that just so happen to do a rotation with the NS. If you divide what is alresdy a very small command, notionally or administravely, then it uses its integrity.

    Presumably within the Wing you have some lads that train to specialise in sniping, or demolitions, or field medical, or negotiation etc. Surely the maritime ops become an enhanced speciality with improved interoperability, but not an actual Naval special operations group doesn't it?

    It does make me laugh though that this is (rightly) being considered, but at the same time any talk of naval helicopter ops being reintroduced is played down by the DoD



  • Registered Users Posts: 24,173 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    Well, this is interesting if true.

    Humiliating, but interesting.

    Right in the middle of our Exclusive Economic Zone. And what can we do to oppose it, prevent it, monitor it?

    Sweet **** all.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,113 ✭✭✭jonnybigwallet


    An absolute disgrace. I will post my thoughts on this later,when I've had time to process this.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,468 ✭✭✭Dohvolle


    Well, judging my the DFCoS posing for a photo during the Russian Ambassador's & Defence Attache's visit to DFHQ yesterday, the DF are fine with it....



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,772 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    An also the russians have told IAA well in adavance and also its not our soverign teritory



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,953 ✭✭✭sparky42


    I wonder will anyone make it from Shannon to the Russian Embassy to complain about the build up on the Ukrainian border or this exercise?



Advertisement