Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

If the DUP collapse Stormont...

Options
13

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 13,365 ✭✭✭✭McMurphy


    So those who refuse to adapt and accept any new democratically chosen new landscape could be offered assisted passage to Britain = "kick them out" ?

    Your post is just disingenuous shìt stirring. Go away.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,668 ✭✭✭ittakestwo


    And what happens under the GFA when the majority in the North vote for a UI? Do you think the North should be gerrymandered again to give unionists a separate territory where they form the majority and screw the people who want to be part of a UI in that territory. Thankfully the GFA does not allow this and any attempt to create a new NI breaks the GFA. Also when London washs it's hand of Ireland it will never want any part back. In a UI we will all start to quickly identify as, Irish like we did when united within the UK. The 20th century apartheid will die out and we will revert to being one homogeneous people again who govern themselves independently.



  • Registered Users Posts: 27,971 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    You see, I don't think a majority in the North will ever vote for a UI. I think an independent Northern Ireland member of both the EU and the Commonwealth is actually more likely, but the combined probability of both is less than 10%. The border with the North is now nearly the oldest unchanged border in Europe, which says a lot about the long-term stability. Countries have come and gone since partition and there are now as many differences between North and South as there are similarities.

    We will never be one homogenous people again - that was the type of ideology that was defeated in WWII. There is a British identity on this island, and it will always be with us. As for the 20th century apartheid, that is already gone, except in areas such as education, where it is the Sinn Fein party in the North who have worked hardest to preserve the sectarian approach.



  • Registered Users Posts: 10,117 ✭✭✭✭Junkyard Tom


    There will be no re-partition of the northern part of our country and there will be no sham independence either to keep the United Ireland haters in the south happy, the days of appeasing you lot are over.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,668 ✭✭✭ittakestwo


    All your first paragraph is subjective. That border is not stable. show me two other countries in Europe that have an international peace agreement where one of the terms is how the border will be ended . And we have seen from Brexit that it cant even be a hard border. The Irish nation has to flow freely effectively limiting the meaning of the border.


    ''We will never be homogeneous'' why? we were Irish pre partition and in a UI we will start to identify as just Irish again. Also as time goes on and the apartheid slowly ends there will be more inter marrying between green and orange...the products of this will not identify as british. Time is very much on a UI side.

    ''There will always be a british identity on Ireland'' just like there will always be an Irish identity in Britain or the US. The British idenity just means they are identifying as coming from Britain? I don't mind any foreign identity on Ireland whether it be polish or british. What is your point? perhaps in the case of a UI we could give the 5th July a bank holiday to celebrate all the foreign identities in Ireland



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    In a United Ireland there would be more Polish or Brazilians than Unionists!



  • Registered Users Posts: 27,971 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    That is such old thinking around identity.

    As for time being very much on a UI side, I have heard the same since the early 1970s, and it is no nearer.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,668 ✭✭✭ittakestwo


    Again that is your subjective view and not one that polls are showing or even of peoples opinion in the North of which the majority think will happen in the next 20 years. Your post are always hypocritical too. You think the idea of a UI is nationalistic but the idea of the north staying part of the UK is not..... both are as nationalistic as each other Blanch.

    BTW i dont think unionists are foreign to Ireland as they are from Ireland. I think they're Irish like their grandparents would have said. But this idea of getting offended to be called irish when your factually from Ireland whilst also getting offended at then being called foreigner to Ireland is hypocritical. Ireland is not Britain. Either you are from Ireland and therefore can be referred to as Irish or you are not from Ireland and thus a foreigner to Ireland.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,788 ✭✭✭Charles Babbage


    OK, then exactly what differences are there between Belcoo and Blacklion, other than those created by partition itself? Or between Carrickmacross and Crossmaglen, if you prefer. Or you could try Strabane and Lifford. Elucidate us, please, we await with interest.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 26,996 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    UI has less support than Scottish independence as an example and the latter doesn't seem all that close in reality. I think people are far too optimistic of it happening any time soon - it is a massive change and generally there needs to be a swell of sustained support for those and we are nowhere near that. The idea of that collapse of Stormont might lead in a "hop, skip and a jump to a United Ireland" just seems disconnected from reality. Though maybe I'm misjudging what the OP meant by the phrase.

    No SoS is going to call a referendum until there is a sustained period of greater than 50% support.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 14,719 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    Well most of us are not stupid, we can read between the lines in what you are actually saying, which is actually one of the first steps to ethnic cleansing.

    If a population with a unique and separate culture doesn't like their future, they can lump it and move.

    History is littered with such examples of such talk, where it never ended well. We should be beyond such talk of Irish nationalist supremecy.



  • Registered Users Posts: 14,719 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    100% Correct. People seem to think it's a given and foregone conclusion when it's decades off at best. The continued Balkanisation of the debate by the DUP and SF don't help matters. If SF really wants a UI, they should STFU for a decade or two about it and reform themselves from their PIRA/Criminal past. Get past the land grab mentality.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,417 ✭✭✭MrMusician18


    It's obviously closer to happening than at any point in the last 50 years, since it's being openly discussed in the mainstream. Brexit is going to force a reckoning one way or the other.



  • Registered Users Posts: 27,971 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    It was discussed in the mainstream 50 years ago as well!!! And nothing happened.



  • Registered Users Posts: 27,971 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    It is incredible that people still come up with that sort of thinking in this day and age. Here, look, a few thousands pounds, put your belongings on your back and be on your way. Stunning lack of empathy, stunning lack of cop-on, a really really stupid proposal.

    Every time it has been suggested on here, it has been chased out of town as the most ignorant proposal to address the NI problem, yet it still surfaces every now and again. It says it all about the poisonous nature of the exclusionary Irish nationalist ideology.

    Have these posters learned nothing from the millions of people displaced in Afghanistan, Syria, the former Yugoslavia, Rwanda and many, many more and all they want to do is add to the toll of misery of displaced people who will yearn for their home. Do they not realise that to Ulster unionists, Ulster is their home??



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,365 ✭✭✭✭McMurphy



    My post was quite clear, when the time comes to unite the island, those who identify themselves as British will have their rights to identify as British protected, and their will most likely be concessions on either side to facilitate folk In a new United island.

    The belligerent unionists, the lads who won't ever be happy in anything other than a partitioned state could be offered assisted passage to relocate to Britain.

    I see what's happening here, not content with the failure at trying to wedge in the obvious spurious homophobic accusations in a different thread, aim for a sectarian one in this thread...

    "Ethnic cleansing" your hoop.



  • Registered Users Posts: 27,971 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    You see, it doesn't matter that you think that unionists are Irish like their grandparents, it matters what they think. They think they are British and they are entitled to their identity. You trying to deny them is just another example of exclusionary nationalism at its worst.

    What you and others don't realise is that 100 years have passed and a person from Northern Ireland is entitled to say that they are not Irish, and that they are British and that Northern Ireland is their home. We explicitly recognised this in the GFA, which some of you seem to have forgotten.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 26,996 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Would you support assisted passage for nationalists to Ireland at the moment?


    This is all getting a bit general and off the point. The collapse of Stormont in the grand scheme of things means almost nothing. The biggest impact of the last collapse was probably the alignment of NI laws re marraige and abortion with the rest of the UK. Brexit and the DUP actions have probably increased the long term likelihood of reunification and potentially shortened the timetable. But we are still talking decades and it is still far from certain.



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,365 ✭✭✭✭McMurphy


    I wasn't around the first time it happened, and dont believe a return to those times will ever happen.

    Catholics fleeing from violence arrive south of the border in Dundalk, Co. Louth. The report shows people at the train station where women and nuns provide them with assistance in the form of food and clothing.



    There's actually posts on this very forum where one poster still refers to people originally from the north as "refugees" btw.

    Post edited by McMurphy on


  • Registered Users Posts: 27,971 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    So you were horrified at Catholics and nationalists fleeing Northern Ireland fifty years ago, but you have no problem with "assisted displacement" of British people from their homes now.

    Fifty years is a long time to refuse to learn.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 13,365 ✭✭✭✭McMurphy


    Assisted passage (assisted relocation/migration)

    not assisted displacement.

    Ask the hundreds of thousands of expats who availed of assisted passage to Australia and New Zealand back in the day if they had "assisted displacement" and stop wasting everyone's time being deliberately obtuse for Christ sake.


    The fact that you are deliberately twisting words to say what you want them to say, suggests you know what you're at here (shîit stirring and deliberately misrepresenting) tells me all I need to know about you and your motives.

    If you can't argue your point honestly, do it dishonestly.

    I'll know better next time.

    NEXT.

    Post edited by McMurphy on


  • Registered Users Posts: 27,971 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    "But upon arrival, migrants were placed in basic migration hostels and the expected job opportunities were not always readily available."

    That would work all right, not.

    Stop digging.



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,191 ✭✭✭RandomViewer


    See Boris scrapped his tunnel across the sea idea,



  • Registered Users Posts: 10,117 ✭✭✭✭Junkyard Tom


    Unionism's historic hatred of the concept of the self-determination of the Irish people (of which they were/are) and its morphing into a pseudo-British counter-culture is meeting with its high noon. 'Smash Sinn Fein' used to be the DUP's mantra...



    now SF is the largest party in our country (including the northeastern enclave) and belligerent Unionism doesn't know how to deal with it.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,997 ✭✭✭blackcard




  • Registered Users Posts: 10,770 ✭✭✭✭padd b1975




  • Registered Users Posts: 13,365 ✭✭✭✭McMurphy


    Have you a point you would like to try and get across, or perhaps counter one of mine pad, or are you here to just act the seagull?



  • Registered Users Posts: 14,719 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    Talking about a fund, any fund to ship off belligerent Unionists back to Britain is a version of White Irish Supremecy. Like it or not, they were born on this Island and have been here for hundreds of years. This is their home as much as yours.

    Its Ethnic Cleansing 101.




  • Registered Users Posts: 27,971 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Mark, they just don’t get this, they actually think their modern version of ethnic cleansing is a good idea.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,244 ✭✭✭hawley


    2018 Election: Michael D Higgins will never be the cause of any diplomatic incidents and will not offer any opinions on national issues that could cause difficulties for the government.



Advertisement