"Green" policies are destroying this country
Comments
-
-
-
-
-
-
Advertisement
-
-
-
-
-
-
Advertisement
-
-
-
-
Attempting to have a discussion with you is like watching an episode of The Twilight Zone. It only makes sense if you suspend belief in reality.
At least you now know how much natural gas we currently have and that following the idiotic greens intentions in 3 years time we will be totally dependent on an unsecure source from a country whose own supply is diminishing rapidly and are under no obligation to keep us supplied.
Your 3 years to build this infrastructure is pie in the sky. The only increase in renewable electricity supply for the 3 years 2017 - 2020 has been through wind, which has shown just how unreliable it is. That increased from 25.4% in 2017 to 33.5% in 2020. An 8.1% increase over those years, yet here you are peddling some magic potion that will give us 100% reliable renewable energy in 3 years without us needing fossil fuel back-up.
It`s complete nonsense.
3 -
-
-
-
-
-
-
Advertisement
-
![linear_trend_problem[1].jpg](https://us.v-cdn.net/6034073/uploads/7VF332M954UT/linear-trend-problem-5b1-5d.jpg)
Those photos are about emotion, emotion and emotion. They are not a logical presentation of facts linked by you to any IPCC science. Scientists will discuss such events in terms of statistical probability over time. You don't do that.
If states don't manage a forested area with controlled burns then it's population should not be surprised when it goes up in an inferno because of all the dead material available that has not been cleared. When houses are built on flood plain owners are often surprised when the property is inundated with water when the statistical 100 year flood happens. Most urban populations have expanded into these areas in the post world war II era, the population being recent arrivals have no memory of similar events that happened outside living memory in the previous century.
A recent project by volunteers in the UK and Ireland to collate data from the 19th century paper records revealed many weather events that set records that had been unavailable since modern recording began. Most of the worlds weather data recording only began with the growth of air travel in the 20th century. Prior to that weather data recording is few and far between only really gaining traction in the latter half of the 19th century.
What you are looking is temperature data from Valentia Island observatory, which is one of the few rural stations that has a long data sequence not affected by urban heat island effect. The measurements switch between periods of cooling and warming. Yet the narrative presented in the media does not reflect this.
NASA then takes that data set in their GISS data set and homogenises it (i.e. mixes other station data, including from Paris) such that all temperatures prior to 1967 have been arbitrarily reduced by 0.4C. There is nothing in the actual Valentia temperature record to suggest any break points. This becomes garbage in garbage out when fed into computer models. There is no skill in the climate models to project future temperatures or weather patterns, it is acknowledged they run too hot when compared with real world empirical recorded data. The models value for prediction of future trends is 0.
Because your methodology is flawed you cannot tell us with any level of certainty what future temperatures will be.
Net Zero means we are paying for the destruction of our economy and society in pursuit of an unachievable and pointless policy.
1 -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Advertisement
-
