Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Turning Left in a left turn lane

1235

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,333 ✭✭✭blackwhite


    No it isn't, and one can think you're being deliberately misleading at this stage as well given you very deliberately quote Part 2, but leave out Part 1.


    23.—(1) Whenever a driver intends to slow down, stop or alter course, he shall either give a hand signal in accordance with the following Table or give a signal by using a direction indicator or stop lamp :

    SIGNALS TO OTHER ROAD USERS.

    Intended course of action

    Signal to be given

    I am going to slow down or stop.

    Extend the right arm and hand fully with the palm turned downwards, and move the arm slowly upwards and downwards.

    I am going to turn to the left.

    In the case of a vehicle other than a cycle or animal-drawn vehicle, extend the right arm and hand to the right, and rotate them in an anticlockwise direction.

    In the case of a cycle or animal-drawn vehicle, extend the left arm and hand fully to the left with the palm to the front, and hold them rigid in a horizontal position straight out from the left side.

    I am going to turn to the right.

    Extend the right arm and hand fully to the right with the palm to the front, and hold them rigid in a horizontal position straight out from the right side.




    So shocking to see a taxi driver arguing to the death, and lying about it, to try and justify not using their indicators 🙄



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 51,933 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    i was answering the question 'where is the reference to using an indicator'. you've quoted subsection 2, this is subsection 1:

    (1) Whenever a driver intends to slow down, stop or alter course, he shall either give a hand signal in accordance with the following Table or give a signal by using a direction indicator or stop lamp :



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,160 ✭✭✭✭HeidiHeidi


    If you're going to make it so that cyclists are on the left of potentially left- turning cars, you need to make it an entirely separate lane, not this half-assed effort.

    The only place I've seen it is at the junction from the Rock Road onto Monkstown Road (not sure I've got those names right, I'll see if I can get a Google maps link), where bikes have their own independent set of traffic lights that prevents vehicles crossing them

    ETA I meant Temple Hill i think

    6 R113

    https://maps.app.goo.gl/iSsLEP7DPJVuog9R9



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,681 ✭✭✭the_pen_turner


    Sorry supposed to say following the road straight v following it around to the left.

    They dont need advance warning. Its bloody obvious where your going. You following the road. That junction screws that up by crossing a cycle lane across the left turning lane



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,896 ✭✭✭✭Spook_ie


    The question and reply were in relation to how to signal going straight, please ensure you understand the reply before asserting that I'm lying



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,896 ✭✭✭✭Spook_ie


    Please in future clarify which section of a post you are replying to, then I might respond by replying to the correct intention of your post.


    I see we are now at the usual risk of this turning into a bashing exercise rather than a discussion about the salient points of the law



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    If I was sat at traffic lights in a left turn or a right turn only lane I would not be sitting there with the indicator on



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,160 ✭✭✭✭HeidiHeidi


    At the junction that started this thread, it isn't bloody obvious where cars are going to go, unless they indicate. There are two lanes to continue on into if you go straight, or you can go left.

    The only indicator of an left turn,apart from the driver indicating, is one arrow painted on the road a distance from the junction, that is covered by cars most of the time.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 51,933 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder




  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Would rather not sit there with the ticking sound. Quite loud in my car. And there no point. As it’s a left turn only or right turn only lane



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 51,933 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    you are joking, right?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,568 ✭✭✭TheChizler


    Some of the junctions in Cork with new cycle lanes have this, its a bit frustrating as the cycle time is lengthened but ultimately a lot safer.

    Of course changing the layout would be safer again.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 42,549 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    oops, I misread your line about cyclists getting a red to allow for left turning traffic:

    They need to add a third for cyclists, which can be green for straight on when the car light is red for turn left, and Green for turn left in sync with the car light.

    So you are proposing that cyclists should have to wait while cars turn left. What would cars in the right hand lane be doing at this time - travelling straight ahead? So effectively you are de-prioritising people who are on bikes at this junction as they will have a shorter traffic light window to cross the dual carriageway. Why? Because many people in cars aren't observing their surroundings properly and aren't signalling.

    How does that fit in with DMURS? What about international best practice? How will it work in reality?



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 42,549 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    Out of curiosity, do you have a radio or music player in use when driving?



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 196 ✭✭UID0


    I agree with you completely. As I said, I think the motorist should indicate, but I don't know if the law says they must. In general, I think that you should indicate anytime where indicating doesn't create confusion.

    The legal minimum requirements are a minimum, not a target. No situation will be made more dangerous by people around you knowing what you intend to do.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,212 ✭✭✭Allinall


    You've arrived at your own conclusions, so I'll leave you to it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 196 ✭✭UID0


    If there is an advance stop box, then the situation is different. There is a place for a cyclist to go that doesn't end up with them sitting to my left. The road positioning I use is so that I don't end up with a cyclist inside me when I'm turning left.

    I spend more time cycling than driving, especially in the city, and the number of times I have seen cyclists cycle up the inside of a bus that is pulling into a bus stop on the quays is ridiculous. While the majority of cyclists are able to avoid placing themselves in harms way, there is a minority that don't seem to pay attention to what is happening around them. Unfortunately, in order to avoid a collision there are times when the car has to be put in a place that inconveniences cyclists who are paying attention.

    Looking at it from the cyclists point of view, I like when I can predict what a car is about to do. If they are in the left of the lane with their indicator on, I know that they are turning left. If they're far out and have their indicator on, I don't know if they are actually turning left, or if they've accidentally turned the indicator on and can't hear it over whatever music they have blaring.

    What is really needed is properly designed infrastructure which provides a safe and efficient path for cyclists and which minimises the potential for conflict with vehicles. Unfortunately, despite many occasions where our elected officials have said they are going to invest more in cycling infrastructure, it ends up with something that isn't suitable for purpose, and which in some instances, the junction at the start of this thread being an example, increases the danger for cyclists. Our elected officials need to realise that paint is not infrastructure, and when planning improvements that they need to look at all possible paths traffic will take through the junction.

    I think that we should also change the rules so that cyclists can turn left on a red light or have a separate set of lights that turn green for cyclists before they turn green for motorised traffic. They have some of these lights already installed on the quays. This is to get cyclists out of the danger area when the lights go green. If you allow cyclists to turn left on red, then it also means that motorists know if the cyclist is sitting there, they are going straight. It reduces the uncertainty on where traffic is intending to move when the lights go green.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 51,933 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    I think Paris introduced the Idaho stop/turn right on red for cyclists a few years ago.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,681 ✭✭✭the_pen_turner


    I agree that junction is a disaster . Way better signage needed.

    Just because there is 2 lanes in front doesn't mean anything.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,160 ✭✭✭✭HeidiHeidi


    If you haven't/can't see the left arrow on the road, it's a logical assumption that traffic in both lanes might go straight on if there are two equivalent lanes ahead, or turn left from the left-hand lane.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,277 ✭✭✭km991148


    Maybe it's better you don't drive then? If you find it difficult to interact with others, since that is what you are doing sitting in traffic.

    There are lots of examples where the indicator is useful in a queue of traffic, I doubt you (or anyone) is able to monitor all the scenarios for change.


    It's kinda crazy that there are a significant amount of people who are are arguing against not indicating. A chance to communicate while you perform complex operations that can severely cause harm when done incorrectly.

    No wonder the state of Irish road use is as it is.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,462 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    I find the "headlights on" lamp on my dash to be awfully glaring so I'm going to drive around with no headlights for these winter evenings. Sure you can all see me anyhoo.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,681 ✭✭✭the_pen_turner


    You can assume all you like. It wont change the law.

    If the car assumed it could go straight and crashed who would be responsible. The car that left its lane and entered another illegally



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,896 ✭✭✭✭Spook_ie


    Well it's almost answered but we do need to tease out the actual wording used in the SI relating to turning left.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    That’s an equivalence that is not even worthy of a response



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,462 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    It makes just as much sense as your 'I don't like the ticking' approach.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,141 ✭✭✭monkeybutter




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,160 ✭✭✭✭HeidiHeidi


    Oh FFS, I wasn't talking about the cars 🙄

    But you knew that, I'm sure.

    That's enough of that for me. I'll give my spidey-senses radar an extra polish before I next go out on the bike after this thread!!



Advertisement