Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

UK Supreme Court: No to gender-neutral passports

Options
1457910

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 25,557 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr


    No need, you haven't been able to name one bad thing that has happened since several countries introduced gender neutral passports.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    You yourself argued before that sex-gender shouldn't even matter for passports.

    If anything, you should be arguing against sex-gender entries on passports on those grounds alone.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Gender is a social construct rather than biological though. As a result more than two genders have and do get recognised in plenty of culturess. And I really don't see why it shouldn't be recognised. It literally has no impact on any of us.



  • Registered Users Posts: 25,557 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr


    As I said before, what someone has on thier passport is neither mine nor your business. It doesn't impact either of our lives in any way so let them have what they want, it's worked fine in other countries and I'm sure it will work fine for both yours and mine when it eventually happens.



  • Registered Users Posts: 438 ✭✭Dublinandy3


    I was reading this thread and a question came to me, I didn't read all 7 pages though so if it was asked/answered apologies.


    Forgetting the question for the moment if it should happen in Ireland or not. Those countries that do have gender neutral passports already, or similar, could it ever cause an issue turning up at a countries border when that country doesn't legally recognise the gender that shows on your passport, or if you wanted a visa and didn't have the right box to tick on the application so when they processed it didn't match.


    Just thinking out loud here, does anyone know?



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    But you're arguing the case, "Well, what's the harm?".

    But what is the positive case for including gender neutral identities on passports? For instance, what advantage does it serve society at large to have identities such as neutrois and two-spirit person on passports? Does it serve a function?

    Not a neutral case; but an actively positive case for including it. Making people feel better is not a positive case. I'm referring to societal and legal and objective benefit.

    I've made the argument that the negative case against this inclusion is that it interprets biological sex as subjective gender identities; that it undermines the idea that law is undergirded by science and objectivity.



  • Registered Users Posts: 41,066 ✭✭✭✭Annasopra


    In the UK and Ireland it says sex but effectively already means gender though so you've long since lost the argument anyway. A person assigned female at birth can have male marked on his passport. Its been happening in the UK for nearly 20 years and Ireland for roughly 10 years. The world hasnt caved in.

    It was so much easier to blame it on Them. It was bleakly depressing to think that They were Us. If it was Them, then nothing was anyone's fault. If it was us, what did that make Me? After all, I'm one of Us. I must be. I've certainly never thought of myself as one of Them. No one ever thinks of themselves as one of Them. We're always one of Us. It's Them that do the bad things.

    Terry Pratchet



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    So, you want Sex changed to Gender on passports, I assume?

    Because they're not interchangeable terms, no matter how arguments are "lost" on a legal level.



  • Registered Users Posts: 41,066 ✭✭✭✭Annasopra


    I'm not overly bothered at all whether sex or gender is on a passport. Trans people already have their preferred gender identity marked in the sex category already so what I am saying is that you hopping up and down about it really is a waste of your time. The judge made the point that sex and gender are used interchangeably. He's not wrong there. They may not be interchangeable terms but they are often used interchangeably.

    It was so much easier to blame it on Them. It was bleakly depressing to think that They were Us. If it was Them, then nothing was anyone's fault. If it was us, what did that make Me? After all, I'm one of Us. I must be. I've certainly never thought of myself as one of Them. No one ever thinks of themselves as one of Them. We're always one of Us. It's Them that do the bad things.

    Terry Pratchet



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    How many sexes are there, in your opinion? I ask this because the current entry on passports is, "Sex = ______________".

    I'm not asking what the law says, because the law can state anything - and law and truth do not always align. For example: the law could state that Sex is only for males, but that wouldn't make it right.

    So, in your personal view, how many sexes are there?



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 17,378 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    That's the only thing that came to my mind. This would close off a lot of the world to you.

    I don't care if people want to get it. Let them. But a passport is just a passport. It is used primarily to travel. The details on it match my birth cert and it proves my nationality. I don't understand why some people want it to reflect more. It's been the most important document I own having not been in Europe for over ten years, and I cannot fathom the hassle and impossibility of so many things if I wasn't male or female on it.



  • Registered Users Posts: 23,764 ✭✭✭✭One eyed Jack



    Your given name has nothing to do with science, and your name on your passport doesn’t necessarily have to correspond to your name on other legal documents.

    Also the sex or gender description on passports is certainly not based upon science, it’s based upon legal recognition of a persons identity. That was the whole reason for the campaign to have the Home Office recognise a third option on UK passports.

    The reason for it’s refusal had nothing to do with science, and everything to do with how it would create an administrative headache for other Government departments -


    Christie Elan-Cane said the application process breaches human rights laws by not allowing an "X" option.

    But the court said applicants' gender was "a biographical detail which can be used to confirm their identity".

    Lord Reed, president of the Supreme Court, said in the ruling that gender could be checked against birth, adoption or gender recognition certificates as part of confirming an applicant's identity.

    "It is therefore the gender recognised for legal purposes and recorded in those documents which is relevant," he said.

    He said Christie Elan-Cane's interest in having an "X" passport was outweighed by other considerations, including "maintaining a coherent approach across government".

    "There is no legislation in the United Kingdom which recognises a non-gendered category of individuals," he said.

    He said legislation "across the statute book" assumes all people can be categorised in two sexes or genders - "terms which have been used interchangeably".



    Your piss poor understanding of law is only matched by your piss poor understanding of science.



  • Posts: 17,378 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    In an Irish embassy, you can make an affidavit that your passport and documents with a different name are the same person. But it depends on each country whether or not they'll accept that.



  • Registered Users Posts: 41,066 ✭✭✭✭Annasopra


    As already explained trans people can already change the "sex" category on their passport so it makes no difference really.

    It was so much easier to blame it on Them. It was bleakly depressing to think that They were Us. If it was Them, then nothing was anyone's fault. If it was us, what did that make Me? After all, I'm one of Us. I must be. I've certainly never thought of myself as one of Them. No one ever thinks of themselves as one of Them. We're always one of Us. It's Them that do the bad things.

    Terry Pratchet



  • Registered Users Posts: 41,066 ✭✭✭✭Annasopra


    Passports for many years have documented trans peoples preferred gender in many countries so your arguments are irrelevant really.

    It was so much easier to blame it on Them. It was bleakly depressing to think that They were Us. If it was Them, then nothing was anyone's fault. If it was us, what did that make Me? After all, I'm one of Us. I must be. I've certainly never thought of myself as one of Them. No one ever thinks of themselves as one of Them. We're always one of Us. It's Them that do the bad things.

    Terry Pratchet



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    They may not be interchangeable terms but they are often used interchangeably.

    Do you see a problem here?



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    What's law is not always what's right.

    You can quote the extant law all you wish, but it doesn't make that law the right course of action.



  • Registered Users Posts: 41,066 ✭✭✭✭Annasopra


    I never said you can change your sex. Legally effectively the law allows you to change it though.

    It was so much easier to blame it on Them. It was bleakly depressing to think that They were Us. If it was Them, then nothing was anyone's fault. If it was us, what did that make Me? After all, I'm one of Us. I must be. I've certainly never thought of myself as one of Them. No one ever thinks of themselves as one of Them. We're always one of Us. It's Them that do the bad things.

    Terry Pratchet



  • Registered Users Posts: 41,066 ✭✭✭✭Annasopra


    The UK law has been in place 17 years why are you only complaining now?

    It was so much easier to blame it on Them. It was bleakly depressing to think that They were Us. If it was Them, then nothing was anyone's fault. If it was us, what did that make Me? After all, I'm one of Us. I must be. I've certainly never thought of myself as one of Them. No one ever thinks of themselves as one of Them. We're always one of Us. It's Them that do the bad things.

    Terry Pratchet



  • Registered Users Posts: 41,066 ✭✭✭✭Annasopra


    You misunderstood. I am saying your arguments make no difference because the law was changed about 20 years ago in UK and roughly 10 in Ireland. A trans person in both jurisdictions can have their preferred gender identity recognised in the sex category on their passport.

    It was so much easier to blame it on Them. It was bleakly depressing to think that They were Us. If it was Them, then nothing was anyone's fault. If it was us, what did that make Me? After all, I'm one of Us. I must be. I've certainly never thought of myself as one of Them. No one ever thinks of themselves as one of Them. We're always one of Us. It's Them that do the bad things.

    Terry Pratchet



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 468 ✭✭Shao Kahn


    The same reason they play this silly game of "why do you care?" or "what impact does it have on your life?"

    Basically, nothing to see here, move along... they're trying to bring through changes with minimal or zero opposition. They're trying to passive aggressively bully anyone who opposes their view of the world.

    Government sponsored lying on official documents, is of concern to every citizen in society. Not just the owners of those documents.

    "Tomorrow is the most important thing in life. Comes into us at midnight very clean. It's perfect when it arrives, and it puts itself into our hands. It hopes we've learned something from yesterday." (John Wayne)



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]




  • Registered Users Posts: 41,066 ✭✭✭✭Annasopra


    It was so much easier to blame it on Them. It was bleakly depressing to think that They were Us. If it was Them, then nothing was anyone's fault. If it was us, what did that make Me? After all, I'm one of Us. I must be. I've certainly never thought of myself as one of Them. No one ever thinks of themselves as one of Them. We're always one of Us. It's Them that do the bad things.

    Terry Pratchet



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Pro-gender-neutral passport advocates have consistently avoided all questions relating to this subject, and this is yet another example of the kind of evasion that I'm talking about.

    As another poster has said, that side of the argument don't want to address the facts or arguments against their position. They want these kinds of passports smuggled-through-customs as fast as possible, without challenge and without addressing the key facts that impact the topic.

    The triad is:

    • argue that those who oppose it are, by default, 'transphobic'
    • evade all questions that are against their position
    • claim 'what harm will it do' as a response


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Well if its totally acceptable to lie on your official passport then why can't we change our age too? What's that got to do with anyone else? Why can't I identify as 21? Why isn't that officially recognised on my government issued ID?

    Not too long before I can identify as having my booster on my Covid passport if we keep going on with this nonsense.



  • Site Banned Posts: 12,341 ✭✭✭✭Faugheen


    Ha! All the chatter about forcing other people's choices on you (false) and not only have you admitted this isn't happening, but you also want to force your choices and beliefs on other people.

    So f*cking see-through.



  • Registered Users Posts: 25,557 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr


    This is the whole argument


    "I don't like it so it shouldn't happen!"


    Cancel culture from the same side who claim cancel culture is terrible 🤣



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    'Cancel culture' is about the ostracism of people from polite society for the crime of holding a perfectly respectable opinion.

    Having an opinion about gender-neutral passports does not 'cancel culture' make. But when you are trying to force this through and accusing anyone who disagrees with you as 'transphobic', that is more resonant with cancel culture than anything else.

    The irony...



  • Registered Users Posts: 25,557 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr


    "'Cancel culture' is about the ostracism of people from polite society for the crime of holding a perfectly respectable opinion."


    Yup, which is exactly what you are doing, just because you don't agree with that opinion doesn't make it any less respectable.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 41,066 ✭✭✭✭Annasopra


    Noone accused you of being transphobic. You claimed you support trans rights. I have shown how this is demonstrably untrue.

    It was so much easier to blame it on Them. It was bleakly depressing to think that They were Us. If it was Them, then nothing was anyone's fault. If it was us, what did that make Me? After all, I'm one of Us. I must be. I've certainly never thought of myself as one of Them. No one ever thinks of themselves as one of Them. We're always one of Us. It's Them that do the bad things.

    Terry Pratchet



Advertisement