Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Was Muammar Gaddafi a hero or a villain?

  • 03-01-2022 12:03pm
    #1
    Registered Users Posts: 1,037 ✭✭✭Harryd225


    I believe he was a hero, before and during the NATO led campaign western media tried to portray him as a monster to promote and justify the war against him by making endless ridiculous claims that he was using mass rape as a weapon of war and that he supplies his troops with Viagra so they are able to keep up with all the rapes, unfortunately the gullible public fell for all of this and war cheering on the US and UK to get in there and civilise Libya.

    Fair play to Amnesty International who ran their own investigations and claimed none of it was true apart from maybe some isolated acts by individuals.

    Gaddafi led one of the most prosperous countries in Africa with one of if not the highest standard of living in Africa, he was a revolutionary and his memory will not be forgotten.

    Human rights organisations have cast doubt on claims of mass rape and other abuses perpetrated by forces loyal to Colonel Muammar Gaddafi, which have been widely used to justify Nato's war in Libya.

    https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.independent.co.uk/news/world/africa/amnesty-questions-claim-that-gaddafi-ordered-rape-as-weapon-of-war-2302037.html%3famp



«1

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 2,639 ✭✭✭completedit


    More than likely a scumbag but had his good sides. Libya was once a country I'd have visited(I was meant to spend a summer there in 2006) whereas today I wouldn't go near it.

    The way the west flip flopped on their view on him is so eye-opening.



  • Posts: 18,962 [Deleted User]


    He liked to visit schools and handpick young girls and boys who would have to privilege to serve as his personal sex slaves in his "sex dungeon" so yeah....

    villain

    Victims and witnesses state in the documentary that Gadhafi would choose his targets on visits to schools or colleges, patting on the head those who caught his eye.


    His security officials would then take the victim to one of several specially designed suites of rooms, where they would be abused and raped by the dictator. In one such suite at Tripoli University, there is a fully-equipped gynecological examination room, where victims were tested for sexually transmitted diseases before being sexually abused.


    "Some were only 14," recalled one teacher at a Tripoli school. "They would simply take the girl they wanted. They had no conscience, no morals, not an iota of mercy, even though she was a mere child."


    Some of the girls were held for years, while others were dumped with appalling injuries.


    "One just disappeared and they never found her again, despite her father and brothers searching for her. Another was found three months later, cut, raped and lying in the middle of a park. She had been left for dead."




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 83,516 ✭✭✭✭Atlantic Dawn
    M


    Not a million miles away from something currently in the news.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,037 ✭✭✭Harryd225


    Do you really believe that? You seriously believe it? I thought most people would have realised by now that that along with the claims of mass rape by his troops which were false and lacked any evidence, it was merely used as propaganda to justify the war.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,033 ✭✭✭✭bnt


    If you failed to remain on his good side, you could end up in Abu Salim Prison. Not a very nice place.

    Death has this much to be said for it:
    You don’t have to get out of bed for it.
    Wherever you happen to be
    They bring it to you—free.

    — Kingsley Amis



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,567 ✭✭✭Risteard81




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,503 ✭✭✭✭Mad_maxx


    its all relative , compared to the kind of ghouls who led and lead much of the arab world and Africa , He wasnt so bad

    he certainly should not have been ousted



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,111 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    All dictators are really incredibly nice people who are just misunderstood by the surviving press.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 765 ✭✭✭techman1


    I think if NATO knew then what they know now and the repurcussions from toppling Gadaffi they would have left him in place. Gadaffi was acting as the european border force stopping migrants using Libya as a staging post to get into Europe. Millions have now used this route into Europe . These migrants are now causing big problems now between France and UK the bedrock of NATO. France is basically trying to dump its migrant problem onto the UK. Gadaffi would have been much cheaper than 6 billion euros the EU had to pay Turkey in order to stop them allowing migrants cross into Greece.

    Also Libya was a major oil and gas exporter under Gadaffi, now it is a failed state and that oil production is badly needed by Europe in order to control inflation and reduce its dependance on Mr Putins oil and gas.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,211 ✭✭✭✭Danzy


    At one stage he confiscated all Bank accounts that held more than a months average wage.


    Killing of people was random and often without reason and constant.


    He did some good things, he helped Ireland when it needed it, but everything was secondary to his extreme narcissism and desire for control.


    His evil outweighed the good things significantly.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 18,962 [Deleted User]


    "that" has absolutely nothing to do with his troops so please don't try to conflate something completely irrelevant to my point

    so the witnesses in the BBC doc were just made up?


    along with the personal gyno suite that he had where his victims were examined for std's and unwanted pregnancies aborted?




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,503 ✭✭✭✭Mad_maxx


    all true but compared to the rules of Saudi Arabia etc , a civilised forward thinking visionary



  • Posts: 18,962 [Deleted User]


    This has been documented since the 1990's - book originally published in 1999

    In 2011, Annick Cojean, senior reporter at Le Monde and special correspondent for Tripoli, wrote a shock article, titled 'Gaddafi's sexual slave', which told the story of Soraya, a twenty-two-year old Libyan woman who had been kidnapped and held captive since the age of 15. Soraya was a schoolgirl in the coastal town of Sirte, when she was given the honour of presenting a bouquet of flowers to Colonel Gaddafi, the Guide, on a visit he was making the following week. This one meeting - a presentation of flowers, a pat on the head from Gaddafi - changed Soraya's life forever. Soon afterwards, she was summoned to Bab al-Azizia, Gaddafi's palatial compound near Tripoli, where she joined a number of young women who were violently abused, raped and degraded by Gaddafi.


    In 2012, Cojean returned to Libya to continue her investigation. Her book, Gaddafi's Harem, takes Soraya as its starting point to recount the fates of so many other women. She has gone to remarkable lengths - rape is the highest taboo in Libya - to collect these women's stories. Heartwrenchingly tragic but ultimately redemptive, Soraya's story is the first of many that are just now beginning to be heard.


    In Gaddafi's Harem, Le Monde special correspondent Annick Cojean gives a voice to Soraya's story, and supplements her investigation into Gaddafi's abuses of power through interviews with other women who were abused by Gaddafi, and those who were involved with his regime, including a driver who ferried women to the compound, and Gaddafi's former Chief of Security.


    Gaddafi's Harem is an astonishing portrait of the essence of dictatorship: how power gone unchecked can wreak havoc on the most intensely personal level, as well as a document of great significance to the new Libya



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,396 ✭✭✭mikethecop


    i see the shinnerbot are trying to reduce the crimes of former ally and rouge state


    hardly trying to divert from the recent links to putins boys ??


    lol



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,412 ✭✭✭Jequ0n


    Neither hero nor villain. He simply did what many would have done had they had the same opportunity.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,211 ✭✭✭✭Danzy


    In some ways he was but he was incredibly controlling and murderous to his own people as well.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,211 ✭✭✭✭Danzy


    At some stage he was an ally. Enemy and ally again of every country in the West, including Ireland.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Didn't his own people torture and string him up... or was that Western propaganda also?

    What is debatable is whether he was the lesser evil.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,274 ✭✭✭Hangdogroad


    What reputable source are you getting your info on him from?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,409 ✭✭✭corner of hells


    The ICC in the Hague must have made a mistake issuing arrest warrants for him .



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 506 ✭✭✭Freddie Mcinerney




  • Registered Users Posts: 506 ✭✭✭Freddie Mcinerney


    Did he encourage the chefs in Libya to make pasta dishes spicy? Whoever did is great in my book.

    Post edited by Freddie Mcinerney on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,205 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    Certain individuals can't comprehend it's possible to be critical of the West and critical of opposing dictators, it's not mutually exclusive. That's often the "source" of this.

    Anyway these threads are usually just excuses to bash the same old basket of countries



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,554 ✭✭✭LeBash


    I suppose a better question, is Libya/Europe/the world better off since he was killed.

    I think the answer is no, it's not.

    If left alone, the people themselves would eventually have overthrown him if they felt he was bad enough. Plus, I dont think he had a super long lifespan and could have been replaced by a more moderate leader.

    Comparing the world to European standards doesn't work. We are super lucky the way we have things. Gaddafi isn't even close to the worst leader in the North of Africa.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,205 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    The people would have overthrown him?

    Not so sure, they haven't overthrown Maduro, Assad, Jong Un, Lukashenko, the Myanmar Junta and any number of unpleasant leaders. Not saying intervention is the answer at all, but it's wrong to assume people can and will overthrow these people.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,071 ✭✭✭Notmything




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,578 ✭✭✭Markcheese


    I don't think one cancels out the other - (might tarnish a reputation though )

    He may have done many heroic things -and be a total bastard -

    Slava ukraini 🇺🇦



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    He may have done things that seemed heroic, but were likely self serving and therefore not heroic. Same can be said for Hitler, Mao or Stalin.



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,412 ✭✭✭Jequ0n


    That applies to most people, not just dictators. It’s human nature



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    So... not heroic... which is the topic of the thread.



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,412 ✭✭✭Jequ0n


    But also not villain, which is likewise topic.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Which of Gadaffi, Hitler, Mao or Stallin weren't villains? aside from degree...



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,412 ✭✭✭Jequ0n


    You suggested these people as a comparison, I simply pointed out that most people are self serving. If you are happy to call large parts of society villains then go ahead



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    No, I'm not...you're the one that brought in the general public.


    I said that some of the things Gaddafi did that some might consider heroic were only self serving. But, he was a villain because he was a brute, and a serial rapist (sounds sociopathic to me) and ultimately his own people tortured and killed him. At no time do I think Gaddafi acted heroically, contrary to his own interests.



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,412 ✭✭✭Jequ0n


    Ah I see.

    I agree that there is nothing heroic about him, but I also don’t see him as a villain.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,033 ✭✭✭✭Richard Hillman


    Liberal democracy isn't for every country. There are places where it just doesn't work.

    People ultimately want safety and stability, with the ability to earn money. Libya was safe, stable and reasonably prosperous under Gadaffi. He kept the show on the road. The same with Saddam, Assad, Putin etc. They hold the country together.

    You can't just roll a Tony Blair or Leo Varadkar into these places otherwise they would be pissed all over. Strong, masculine leaders is what the people of these respective countries want.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Okay.

    But, not sure what your definition of villain is. Do you think his brutality of his own people was untrue or if true doesn't make him a villain.



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,412 ✭✭✭Jequ0n


    To me it is simply a word that is used to label someone whose actions are deemed immoral. He didn’t do anything to me so I can’t see any reason to call him anything.



  • Posts: 18,962 [Deleted User]


    At least he went out on a high

    Colonel Gaddafi 'killed by bayonet stab to the anus'





  • Registered Users Posts: 1,037 ✭✭✭Harryd225


    And these are the so called ''freedom fighters'' the UK and US were supporting.

    They simply backed a minority group of hard-line extremists and used them as proxy to overthrow Gaddafi.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,037 ✭✭✭Harryd225


    ''his own people killed him'' a group of hard-line extremists that were given support and backing by the UK.



  • Posts: 18,962 [Deleted User]


    It was a fitting end for a tyrannical rapist murdering arsehole who ruled purely by fear and terror for most of his reign -

    The fact that he gave a few tonnes of semtex to the 'ra doesn't make him a hero to me.

    At one point he just decided to murder and completely disappear over 1,000 political prisoners

    How could jorry adams et al reconcile the hyprocrisy of taking a load of money, guns and explosives off a guy that murders en masse his own political opponents with impunity as the oppressor when they were self-styling themselves as the very same vs the British oppressor?!

    (or maybe it doesn't matter a jot - it was all "grand" - doesn't matter a jot if you're the oppressor or the plucky terrorist underdog!)




  • Registered Users Posts: 506 ✭✭✭Freddie Mcinerney


    Was he okay if a non Muslim painted pictures of Allah?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,578 ✭✭✭Markcheese


    I think the hero label is often down to timing - you take power - you do some amazing stuff and then tragically die before you get time to be considered a despot or settle in to nepotism , or just conservative old age -

    Lenin was often considered a hero while Stalin was a mass murderer -

    Moa would be all things to everyone if he'd shuffled off before the great leap forward - Bertie Ahern would have been the greatest thing since bread came sliced if he'd bowed out a few years earlier ( nearly got away with it )

    Slava ukraini 🇺🇦



  • Registered Users Posts: 506 ✭✭✭Freddie Mcinerney


    The Feckhim Manure jersey would still be protrayed.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,037 ✭✭✭Harryd225


    The Daily Times of Nigeria for instance stated that while undeniably a dictator, Gaddafi was the most benevolent in a region that only knew dictatorship, and that he was "a great man that looked out for his people and made them the envy of all of Africa". The Nigerian newspaper also reported that while many Libyans and Africans would mourn Gaddafi, this would be ignored by Western media and that as such it would take 50 years before historians decided whether he was "martyr or villain".



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,037 ✭✭✭Harryd225


    I don't believe the story about Gaddafi and his secret sex dungeon where kept hundreds of young girls captive for the purpose of ''sexual torture'' I just don't believe it.

    You may say well the BBC said it themselves well the word of the BBC doesn't mean much to me, just like all the claims of ''mass rape'' being ordered by Gaddafi and that he would give his troops Viagra so they could ''keep up'' with all the rape, the BBC has told so many lies recently I barely believe the football results off them any more.

    I'm not saying that western media are completely making these claims up, what I'm saying is that what they generally do is they will take the information which suits their agenda most and report on that information as if it is fact with little to no evidence , while at the same time any claims that don't suit the agenda are strongly scrutinised and tested before they are given any credibility.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,715 ✭✭✭corks finest




  • Posts: 18,962 [Deleted User]


    As I already showed, there is absolutely no need to believe the bbc on this - as I posted a French investigative journalist literally wrote the book on it!

    Soraya was just fifteen, a schoolgirl in the Libyan coastal town of Sirte, when she was given the honor of presenting a bouquet of flowers to Colonel Gaddafi on a visit he made to her school. This one meeting—a presentation of flowers, a pat on the head from Gaddafi—changed Soraya’s life forever. Soon, she was summoned to Bab al-Azizia, Gaddafi’s palatial compound near Tripoli, where she joined a group of young women who were raped and humiliated by Gaddafi, forced to watch pornography, drink alcohol, and entertain Libya’s debauched elite, along with the foreign dignitaries who turned a blind eye to the most monstrous aspects of Gaddafi’s regime. 

    Annick Cojean gives Soraya a voice, and adds to her story through interviews with other women who were abused by Gaddafi, as well as with people in his administration, including a driver who ferried women to and from the Bab al-Azizia compound, and Gaddafi’s former chief of security.




  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    He done nuffink ta me, so he's cushty in my book.


    Or that, it's all lies, he was a peace loving Patsy.


    Bizarre thinking.



  • Advertisement
Advertisement