Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

The media and male violence

Options
12345679»

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 23,922 ✭✭✭✭One eyed Jack



    I got what you were saying alright, my point was, even using your example - that while there are undoubtedly some people of both sexes who are that paranoid, it takes a hell of an imagination to think anyone knows the mind of anyone else or what their fears are or aren’t.

    Jason Bourne for example, I am not. I don’t have any fears that I’m going to be attacked when I’m out and about in public, and that’s not just because I’m a man, which is often the response to that point - it’s because I’m not so paranoid. I do know people who are though, of both sexes. Other people have their own fears which I wouldn’t have known about, and until they told me, I never would have imagined it.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,781 ✭✭✭zv2


    I got my lip busted open one day rolling a punctured bicycle home. Things like that sensitize you to violence on the street.

    “Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.” — Voltaire



  • Registered Users Posts: 23,922 ✭✭✭✭One eyed Jack



    I’m not being obtuse or anything, but yeah, I can completely understand how something like that might affect someone.

    The key word in that sentence is ‘might’. Different people will be affected differently, or not at all, by different circumstances pertaining to the individual. It depends entirely upon their own thought processes.

    That’s what makes it so difficult for rational people who would never think to attack anyone, to understand the thinking of anyone who has carried out an attack, often described as ‘senseless’, because they can’t make any sense of it or understand what the person who carried out the attack was thinking.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    The woman who was stabbed to death in Maida Vale has been named, Yasmin Chfaiki. Her family are hailing the driver of the car as a hero.

    “The deceased murderer, Leon McCaskre, was wanted for allegedly breaching a stalking restraint order and not turning up for a court hearing.” Police had issued a warrant for his arrest three weeks ago.

    “The Independent Office for Police Complaints has been asked to investigate the force's previous contact with Ms Chkaifi to see if it could have done more to protect her.”

    https://news.sky.com/story/maida-vale-met-police-refers-itself-to-watchdog-after-woman-stabbed-to-death-and-her-attacker-fatally-hit-by-car-12525965



  • Registered Users Posts: 516 ✭✭✭BattleCorp1


    If someone (made up scenario) was in the process of stabbing you and/or your child, and I ran over them with my car to prevent them from continuing their attack, I doubt you'd say "Ah Jaysus, that was above reasonable force".



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 18,749 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    No of course not! And I hope 100% he will not be charged/convicted, more people need to get involved. People are afraid, and the reason being is because prosecutors and courts, do think like that. I would imagine it will depend on whatever other items were available and what the drivers intention was. reasonable force is very subjective.

    And he still killed someone so he has to be.arrested and the incident investigated properly.



  • Registered Users Posts: 516 ✭✭✭BattleCorp1


    If you don't think it was above reasonable force, why did you say the following:

    "I would think running them over is above reasonable force however"

    My made up scenario is not much different to the example being discussed.



  • Posts: 18,749 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Because I think, under the law it will be.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,940 ✭✭✭bmc58




  • Registered Users Posts: 6,673 ✭✭✭Feisar


    The problem is the word reasonable has no place in a conversation around violence. To survive a violent encounter one should follow the three F's. First, fast and furious. Why be thinking about a reasonable level of force when it's time better spent steam rolling through the threat.

    First they came for the socialists...



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 8,400 ✭✭✭BrianD3


    You still haven't said what would be reasonable force - apart from some vague comments about using a different weapon.

    Most improvised weapons that people have on their person in a public place are of little/no value and we're not allowed carry actual weapons for self defence.

    There are videos on YouTube which show US police deliberately running over armed suspects instead of getting out of their cars and shooting them. A very effective way to neutralise a threat in certain situations.

    Mash the right foot into the carpet and get that V8 singing!




  • Registered Users Posts: 6,673 ✭✭✭Feisar


    Concrete is a great one that's always to hand in an urban enviorment. Fùck throwing jabs, get in close and crack their head on the ground. Note, tarmac won't be as good, conc ftw.

    First they came for the socialists...



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Abraham was the driver of the car in tragic circumstances in Maida Vale. He is seeking to be de-arrested. Surely in a story like this it should be top priority. He should be treated as a hero, not a criminal. Imagine the message it sends to men everywhere when they help a woman being attacked.




  • Posts: 18,749 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    He killed someone, maybe two people? That has to be investigated. If he did nothing wrong, he doesn't need to worry.

    It doesn't send any message to men anywhere.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Oh it sends a message pop, the opposite one to what has been in the media following the tragic deaths recently. Help women? Get treated like a criminal. There were many bystanders there and everything is on camera, what left is there to investigate.

    The man he killed was not supposed to be anywhere near that woman as she had a restraining order against him.



  • Posts: 18,749 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    No.

    kill someone? Expect an investigation. That's what it says. If you have done nothing wrong, then everything will be ok.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,614 ✭✭✭WrenBoy


    Gentlemen, if you see a woman in danger call the police and keep on walking, You'll only get thrown under the bus afterwards anyway, if you make it out at all.



  • Registered Users Posts: 728 ✭✭✭foxsake


    they could investigate without arresting him regarding murder.



  • Site Banned Posts: 2,799 ✭✭✭Bobtheman


    The media storm over the tragic death in Ireland has abated. Nothing much will change. We don't have the prison space for low level violent offenders. So we can't instigate a zero tolerance agenda. Though im not sure if one is necessitated.

    Meanwhile in my opinion a rather negative view of males will continue to be propagated by the media. In particular the Irish Times.

    Certain males will continue to call themselves feminists just to seem right on and curry favour with the matriarchy. This is just my view but it's a widely held one.



Advertisement