Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Is crypto era over?

  • 22-01-2022 5:37pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,839 ✭✭✭masterboy123


    Hi All,

    I see massive losses in the last month and wonder if it's the end of golden crypto era?

    Would love to hear your thoughts.



«13456710

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,251 ✭✭✭massdebater


    Not sure what you mean by era? Crypto is certainly not finished, if that's what you meant. There's far too much work going on in the space for it to disappear. Its future seems inevitable, but no one knows the timeline.

    As for whether this is the end of this bull run, no one knows. Macro conditions are causing a lot of volatility across lots of asset classes right now, with riskier assets taking a bigger hit.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,839 ✭✭✭masterboy123




  • Registered Users Posts: 457 ✭✭Dont Be at It




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 427 ✭✭HGVRHKYY


    Christ above, people have said similar after each of the previous crashes, and people will say the same in the future when it rallies and crashes again. How are people not aware it's all cyclical at this stage, look at the historical price charts. Everything is down at the minute, not just crypto



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,760 ✭✭✭el diablo


    This is the dumbest **** I've ever read. FIAT money and pensions are also massive Ponzi schemes in that case.

    We're all in this psy-op together.🤨



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 457 ✭✭Dont Be at It


    More than an ounce of truth in that sentiment perhaps 😂



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,269 ✭✭✭Ubbquittious


    Ah shur it had to end at some point





  • Stocks are crazy atm, a lot of tech has plummeted.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,536 ✭✭✭touts


    Anyone joining the Crypto Ponzi scheme now is very foolish. Listen to the latest David McWilliams podcasts if you want to understand Crypto. He nails the lunacy of the scam.



  • Registered Users Posts: 19 cryptcrapto


    I've listened to his podcast since he first started. I think he has very interesting insights on many different areas and has great guests on. Every so often he has featured cryptos but it was always clear that he didn't know anything much about them. Even the guests that he featured on that topic were pretty bad - either people who thought it was a scam or in the case of Ezra Klein people who are so super pro-BTC that they're basically away with the fairies.

    McWilliams seemed to be on the fence himself. I think he was torn between his urge not to be a luddite (and particularly not to be out of touch with the youth of the day) whilst also really eager to declare that that they're a big scam. One recurring theme of his is his obsession with the "currency" element of it - basically some variant of "bitcoin can't be a real currency because it's finite and scarce" even though most proponents of crypto have moved beyond seeing it as a form of money particularly in the era of web3.

    That podcast last week seemed to be him finally deciding to come down off the fence and declare it all as a scam once and for all. He's nailed his colours to the mast now and will have to live with it. For some reason Off the Ball then had him an as if he was some kind of expert on cryptos. I suspect he'll be dining out on this for a while, especially in a Bear market. I'll be very interested to see what he does during the next bull market (and yes there will be another bull market - cryptos aren't going anywhere OP - have a look at the log curve for the price of BTC since it's inception)



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,910 ✭✭✭daheff


    In my view crypto is overdone right now.


    A lot of the inflows of money over the past few years has been money seeking higher returns due to lowering interest rates.


    Now interest rates look like increasing, some of that money is being pulled out of crypto.


    I can see some bigger coins having big falls as rates go up.



  • Registered Users Posts: 757 ✭✭✭generic_throwaway


    Did anybody see HBO's recent documentary about Beanie Babies? The timeline might be different, but the psychology is the exact same.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,760 ✭✭✭el diablo


    This is the 435th time that Bitcoin has "died". 😉

    https://99bitcoins.com/bitcoin-obituaries/

    We're all in this psy-op together.🤨



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,031 ✭✭✭antimatterx


    I'm not worried about Crypto this year. I've changed strategy a little though. My monthly DCA is being reduced by 50% with the other 50% used to build a cash position.

    It's going to be a bearish Q1, and probably Q2. I suspect we'll find a bottom sometime in Q2. This is when I'm going to use my cash position to hopefully catch it somewhere around the bottom. I think the marker will flip bullish in Q3, because of the mid-term elections in the US, and Biden will not want to head into that with a beaten stock / crypto market. The feds money printer will be out in action again.

    We'll probably see a new ATH in Q3 or Q4. I do think that the lengthening cycles theory that has been spoken about will play out. We might even stretch out the run until 2023. Could we break 100K this cycle, I absolutely believe we will.

    Time will tell if I'm right,



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,567 ✭✭✭Irish_rat



    With high volatility you get either huge gains or massive losses. That's the beauty of crypto.

    It will harden you up over time to the kind of drops you can take, this is nothing, now another 50% drop and then we'll be talking.

    Those in 6 figure hell holding crypto assets are hardcore.

    As regards ponzi, buying stocks, gold, silver and other assets is basically the same thing. FUD is designed to shake out the paper hands.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,314 ✭✭✭BOHtox




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,997 ✭✭✭Shapey Fiend


    I like McWilliams podcast generally but his crypto stuff is very surface level and a bit dated. He's been trying to bait people a bit on twitter, then declare crypto heads as touchy and I couldn't see a whole ton of people reacting.. at least directly on the tweet. He's covering it cos it generates clicks. This is why he's covered derelict property about 6 times in the last two years.

    Latest podcast he backed off his negativity about Bitcoin in the last episode. Just said he was warning people to be careful with it for the next while. Which I wouldn't say is terrible advice at this point in the market.

    Blockchain tech is going to be useful the way I see it. But it's maybe going to be slower executing on its promise than I initially thought. I'd still say its probably the best thing you could do with your money if only stable farming cos putting it in a bank account doesn't have a ton to recommend it and the property markets has potential to put you hundreds of thousands in the hole faster than crypto if you time it poorly.

    Post edited by Shapey Fiend on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,410 ✭✭✭Potatoeman


    What isn’t a Ponzi scheme? Art, stocks, precious minerals or property, they all require someone willing to pay more for the asset. Same for NFTs, they are valuable as long as people believe they are. I guess with property at least you can live in it. The detractors do seem to be overly bullish on one of the alternatives though.



  • Registered Users Posts: 778 ✭✭✭Pdoghue


    Good posts on McWilliams above, most of which I'd agree with.

    A problem I'd have with him is that he presents his arguments in a very self-confident manner as if the rest of us just need to catch up with his perceived wisdom and everything will be grand. Crypto and money are complex topics that can't be distilled into easy soundbites. His latest article in IT and related podcast about how crypto can't be a currency (inspired by a Stephen Diehl article) is so outdated it's laughable.

    Another podcast I listen to is The Other Hand by Chris Johns and Jim Power and they've been pontificating about crypto too but at a very superficial level. They've started to mention the BTC price now in their bi-weekly podcasts and disparage it in the context of its volatility, but neglect to mention its price rise since March 2020, or 2008 for that matter! To me it's clear that they don't understand anything substantial about crypto.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 546 ✭✭✭dirk_dangler




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,526 ✭✭✭✭MEGA BRO WOLF 5000




  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 92,789 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    Money for old rope.

    comment - Can someone explain to me, preferably using small words, why the everliving fúck someone would pay $200 million for a failed crypto coin property? Trying to figure it out is making my brain feel like it's dividing by zero.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 546 ✭✭✭dirk_dangler


    For the tech.

    imagine Samsung announced it was going to make a console to rival PlayStation and Xbox, billions invested on this new cutting edge tech and then after 5 years they decided not to release it, so say fûck it , we will sell the tech and try get some of the money invested back, Sony & Microsoft would snap it up to complement their own research, same thing going on here.

    You been working on some complex problem and here is a solution you can just buy and save years of development, why would you not buy it if you could afford it?

    Imagine you had a team working on the following and a ready made solution was offered to you, be mad not to take it and move on to the next step, get a lead on your rivals developing a similar project. First to market advantage and all the benefits that brings


    Post edited by dirk_dangler on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,636 ✭✭✭celtic_oz




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 417 ✭✭NiceFella


    Crypto isn't going anywhere and I have mixed feelings on it if I'm honest. While I do agree that many coins are a scam and should be avoided some have genuine revolutionary concepts behind them.

    Bitcoin could be a pan global currency that can be used in times of uncertainty and protect individuals against a rapidly devaluing currency.

    Ethereum is trying to incorporate smart contracts that basically code into the blockchain.

    The space has obviously expanded massively since and the ideas that are generated by some brightest people around are not going to go by the way side. Smart people who are passionate are going to make some good stuff.

    Adoption will take time of course and who knows what and how long it will take to be used broadly.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,760 ✭✭✭el diablo


    Peter Schiff is the very last person you should be listening to for anything crypto related and is a joke figure and a meme in the crypto "community".

    He's a bitter old gold bug who has consistently doubles down on being wrong about Bitcoin etc. He absolutely loves all the attention and notoriety though.

    We're all in this psy-op together.🤨



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,707 ✭✭✭✭fritzelly


    Crypto is becoming the next dot com bubble at the mo - there is massive amounts of money being poured into it - lots will lose all their money and this includes big big companies etc. Personally think HEX and ADA are highly risky tokens, many tokens were on their way to the moon only to crash land and never be heard of again...BTC continues onwards, ETH should as well but history says it's not guaranteed. Metaverse is interesting, NFT's all look scammy but could lead to digital identities or something of a similar ilk or could be all nothing next year


    But crypto is here to stay, it's maturing, the cream will rise and on the back of those other avenues will open up with wiser investment and not just pumping into what someone with more money than sense thinks will be the next big thing. There are too many big companies involved for it to fail completely


    Too many people look at the sh*t coins and think that's what it's all about whilst most in crypto know better, scams (nothing to do with crypto) have been happening way before crypto, continue to happen and will never stop



  • Posts: 17,378 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    NFTs being the first real world public application of blockchain technology after buying drugs etc. is obviously damaging to crypto in general. But it’s the markets in general that will damage its speculative value this year I suppose.

    It needs to find some utility pretty soon if it’s going to remain long term. I myself have only used it for an international transfer which I couldn’t legally make otherwise, and that is a lot more (1>0) uses of it than the vast majority of people who hold Bitcoin. I guess I also used mining to keep my apartment warm.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,251 ✭✭✭massdebater


    Defi is a great real world application too but regulation uncertainty is holding it back from being more widely used.

    International transfers has been game-changing for me too. What used to take 3-6 days, now takes less than an hour.

    Western countries care more about the day-to-day price of their coins, but real world applications will benefit poorer countries first.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,113 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    Crypto, shares, property, gold and silver bullion, fine art, classic cars, rare whiskeys - anything people invest in with the hope of future gain in value is a Pozi scheme by the loose definition of ponzi being applied here.

    And no, the 'era' is not over. it's barely getting started. How can people ask such dumbe questions when nation states have issued official crypto currencies, adopted existing ones or are planning on rolling their own, like the UK, US and Australia?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,410 ✭✭✭Potatoeman


    It’s like someone signing a bad contract and deciding contracts should be illegal. Look here are more bad contacts therefore all contracts are bad.



  • Registered Users Posts: 778 ✭✭✭Pdoghue


    Super article here - interview with Yanis Varoufakis on  Crypto, the Left, and Techno-Feudalism.

    He's known for being against BTC and crypto generally - but he makes some good points here about CBDCs and the threat to Wall St, European bankers, etc.

    'That last move, the digital yuan, constitutes a revolution: when fully-fledged, it will equip every resident in China, but also anyone from around the world who wants to trade with China, with a digital wallet – a basic digital bank account. In one move, therefore, the commercial banks will have been ‘dis-intermediated’; or, in plain English, they will have lost their monopoly over the payments system. This is genuinely a radical break from finance as we have known it. And, yes, it is one that we should emulate in Europe and in the United States – which is, of course, why Wall Street and the rest of the West’s financiers will do their best to stop it, preferring to blow up the world rather than allow themselves to be… dis-intermediated.'



  • Registered Users Posts: 9 John M00re


    Crypto era is still in diapers, the industry keeps evolving at a very intense and interesting rate. I think we've only seen the start, not everything is good, obviously, but it doesn't mean the development of cryptos and blockchain isn't useful or attractive. I do believe the growth and stability of the crypto world will rely soon on amazing blockchain projects that use cryptocurrencies as a form of payment or investment. Lately, I've been impressed by the amount of investment options available for crypto holders https://www.cryptousage.com/invest/ I found some amazing options especially in the tokenized real estate market. I can't wait to see the next applications and benefits we'll have for cryptos in the near future.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,251 ✭✭✭massdebater


    Reminder to everyone to not be clicking spammy links in posts, especially from users with nearly no post history...



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Crypto kept money out of real assets like gold/silver over the last few years. .

    It paved the way for government issued digital currency too, which people probably wouldn't have accepted without it..

    A few are getting rich while enslaving the rest of us..

    A recent study showed crypto enthusiasts are pretty much psychopaths who don't care for anyone but themselves..That's what i would have thought knowing a few..



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,251 ✭✭✭massdebater


    Really? Gold and silver have both outperformed the S&P over the past 3 years, when crypto was at it's most popular. Gold's market cap increase in that time was close to 4T. Total crypto market cap today around 2T...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,450 ✭✭✭Shedite27


    Nice work finding the only period that Gold beat S&P. Every other period S&P is up...

    10 year - 150% v 17%

    5 year - 61% v 53%

    2 year - 39% v 13%



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,251 ✭✭✭massdebater


    The poster was saying crypto has kept money out of gold in the last few years, looking back 10 years isn't really relevant. Crypto has only really become mainstream in the last 4/5 years, and especially since 2020. Gold also beat the S&P over the last 12 months too. Fwiw, I own 0 gold, but plenty of S&P ETFs, it's just something I've noticed.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,459 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump



    Where are you getting your numbers from and are you sure you are comparing like-with-like for your three year period?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,251 ✭✭✭massdebater


    Getting the numbers from google/any of the stock price apps, when I checked a couple of days ago it was something like gold +50% and S&P +45% over the previous 3 year period. Are you seeing different numbers for that timeframe?



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators Posts: 10,454 Mod ✭✭✭✭Jim2007


    Why would you be surprised? Outside the crypto bubble, smart money always goest to instruments with intrinsic value, it’s the only hedge against inflation. Telling a wealth client that you have a brilliant hedge for inflation based on putting his money into something who’s value is based on public perception is not going to fly.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,450 ✭✭✭Shedite27




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,459 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,459 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump



    I never said I was surprised. I just had a quick look and asked because I presumed the poster was not comparing like with like in saying gold outperformed the S&P for that window


    FYI, gold trades above its "intrinsic value" so to speak anyway.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,450 ✭✭✭Shedite27


    What do you mean? Are you saying S&P500 V S&P?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,459 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump



    Total return assumes dividends are reinvested when received. There are total return tickers as well for major indices. If you just look at the price then you are ignoring the dividends - as you received them you blew them on coke and hookers. But you should still count them if you receive them. Gold can be leased as well but it's probably not that common for retail investors. You're probably not ever taking physical delivery yourself.

    If I buy an index at 100 today and it is 150 in three years, well the actual return to me is more than the 50 - it will also include any dividend yield.

    You can probably buy retail products that just pay on the price of the index too but that isn't buying the index - just referencing it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,410 ✭✭✭Potatoeman


    Who funded this study, what exactly is the definition of a crypto enthusiast? The people selling this line will invest in the military weapons and cheer on the next war as their investment grows on the suffering of others but sure it’s crypto that’s the real villain. Same nonsense for the green angle, the same people pushing this will hop on a private jet to their next meeting.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    The CIA are behind Bitcoin..a few of ye might get rich, but you're just paving the way for digital state/bank run currencies that can be programmed for the rest of us..



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,251 ✭✭✭massdebater




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,410 ✭✭✭Potatoeman


    “Many crypto supporters believe governments are corrupt, and crypto avoids government corruption.”

    Maybe the problem is with government, why has it lost peoples trust?

    The sample size is also just 500. What a non-story.



  • Advertisement
Advertisement