Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Ireland's defensive frailty exposed by Russian exercise

2456715

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,657 ✭✭✭CalamariFritti


    I dont think so Kermit. I think the real 'issue' is money and sense. As in having sense.

    A country like Ireland just needs a token force to keep potential marauders and pirates out. And thats what we got.

    After that ask yourself the question what are the possible scenarios for an armed conflict?

    A country we could actually fend off sizewise is not going to attack us randomly. Like Portugal or Cuba or whatever. If we ever were going to be attacked it would be one of the big guns during what would probably be an all out war. So a) is not going to happen and b) well how big a force would you need to bloody the nose of a big gun? More than we can afford for sure. And what would the point of it be? Anyone who defends themselves too well usually has the sh1t bombed out of their population. Its a no win situation.

    It just doesnt make sense. We'd be just lining more defence industry pockets with tax payers money that could go towards constructive things.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,108 ✭✭✭CGI_Livia_Soprano
    Holding tyrants to the fire


    Yeah and Limerick aren't going to be playing any u8 teams anytime soon anyway.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,651 ✭✭✭rock22


    All the tension has been caused by NATO reneging on a commitment given to Russia not to encircle it with NATO weapons and countries. Perhaps we should start with asking for the disburdenment of NATO. It's raison d'etre is surely expired.



  • Posts: 533 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Well, we do seem to imagine we are still the strategically and economically irrelevance we were in the mid 20th century. A lot has changed, particularly as we’ve become a significant financial hub, IT centre, host some very high tech manufacturing (pharma, very cutting edge biotech/biopharma and on the electronics side notably Intel) and we’re a huge data host for very important regional and even global internet services.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,108 ✭✭✭CGI_Livia_Soprano
    Holding tyrants to the fire


    That's why people are getting the horn in here about the Russian military exercises. You're more likely to see the Queen of England's tits than see Ireland get invaded by any foreign powers.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling




  • Posts: 533 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    You don’t have to invade Ireland to cause chaos, you have to snip about 10 cables and we’re offline and major global operations of mostly US companies are badly disrupted.

    That is our vulnerability. Not being actually invaded. That would be fairly pointless.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,984 ✭✭✭ebbsy




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 68,317 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    The cables are much deeper and better shielded than most of us can imagine. As they get closer to the shoreline, they switch to much thicker shielding to protect against impacts from ships and other such fun.

    It's not really a case that a couple of depth charges from a Russian boat could kill them. They're tougher than that. They could of course have specialist equipment and teams, but at that location these cables are 1-4km below the surface. So you're not talking just a couple of lads in wet suits with blowtorches.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 Bobby Shy Swinger


    No one said we’re going to be invaded, but the fact of the matter is we couldn’t stop it— or even see it coming before it was too late.

    the long and short of it is at the moment, Russia doesn’t even have to ask for our input on this and all we can do is ask them to stop. Jesus, we’re like fcuking Apu when Homer was eating all his krusty club bars for the golden ticket.


    *russia launching missiles in our seas*

    hey! Hey! Hey!! I have asked you nicely to stop testing missiles in my waters! You leave me no choice but to ask you nicely again!



    reckon I’d make a fine meme of this mind.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,375 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    Everyone knows about the feckin GDP issue, that's why we use MGNI and it still makes us one of the richest countries in the World. That MGNI figure is also a very severe measure that undervalues certain activities and so we are being beyond cautious is using it.

    We're about as far from broke as its far to get. We have debt to MGNI of 105% at end 2021, which if you used the equivalent measure on all EU members would put us about mid-table, *BUT* our economy is in a far more fundamentally strong position than almost any in the EU.

    You'll often hear talk, especially in the Trump years, complaining about NATO members not meeting a 2% GDP defence spending target.

    So for the record Ireland's current defence spending is 0.17% of GDP or 0.36% of MGNI.

    We can do much better without it taking the shoes off of the kiddies feet or taking the social houses or the hospital treatment out from under people.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    Russia has submarines who's sole task is to attack Cables even at serious depths, even the American were able to access Russian underwater cables for 3 decades before someone leaked it to the Kremlin.

    Undersea cables can be damaged and destroyed



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,186 ✭✭✭Elmer Blooker


    Can we not finish that children’s hospital first before we take on those bad Russians?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling




  • Posts: 533 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    They’ve been allegedly sniffing around those cables for months. There were reports is mysterious boats in that area last year. We aren’t even able to properly scan or patrol those areas regularly.

    The cables are vulnerable until they get into very deep ocean and we don’t know what kind of specialist equipment they have. The Russians have always had very high developed submarine and space tech. It’s hardly beyond their capabilities. You’re talking about a country that has successfully landed probes on the surface of Venus. A few fibres off Bantry, defended by what amounts to a badly resourced coast guard by naval standards, is hardly going to be that big a challenge.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 Bobby Shy Swinger


    I think the point being made is that an effort to destroy them would be noticeable and an immediate halt would be placed on the efforts.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    Not by us though ,by the Time an attack was detected and another EU State reacted the damage would be done ,

    The fact we have significant amount of undersea cables and no way of protecting them is a red flag



  • Posts: 13,688 ✭✭✭✭ Seamus Gentle Lava


    You think that Russia or China could park an aircraft carrier 100KM from UK territory and Westminster would just sit and swivel?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 146 ✭✭Staleturnips


    I wonder if people in the rest of Europe are aware of how limped-dick Ireland actually is in terms of its own defence.

    There definitely are tribes in the amazon who could defend their patch of ground better than we can ours.



  • Posts: 533 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Most of those cables ultimately terminate in the U.K. or France but are used for most of Western Europe, and are multinational, not specifically Irish terminations (other than a small few).

    If there is a risk you can expect an intervention by the British and/or French Navy, in their own interests.

    Our major weakness is a lack of even being able to see what’s going on. We need to invest in radar, even just to keep our civil aviation safer from military stuff flying with no beacons.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,381 ✭✭✭Yurt2


    In a broader European conflict, Ireland is a juicy prize. Nice little staging post in the back garden of a cornerstone NATO member.

    The post WW2 peace Europe has mostly enjoyed is a historical abberation. We don't know what's coming in the next 30,40,50 years.

    No one is talking about aircraft carriers or a 50 strong fleet of F35s, but a little bit more attention to defence matters and respect for our defence forces to provide a serious insurance policy for our military neutrality wouldn't go astray.

    Defence spending looks like a luxury until we're in a serious crisis and we'll have no option but to go cap in hand to NATO to join the fray.

    A major security crisis that threatens our way of life on the continent may not happen tomorrow or in 10, 20 years, but the way things stand, we'll always be unprepared for it and be left with only bad options when the day comes.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 146 ✭✭Staleturnips


    What do we offer militarily in the treaty? A catalogue of rebel songs?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,122 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    If there is ever a nuclear war none of this defense spending talk matters any more cause life as we know it is over.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 68,317 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    Most of the cables in that area connect the UK and US. We specifically have no need of a large military presence to protect them, they serve as critical infrastructure for many, many countries, who all have more than enough military capacity to look after it.




  • Posts: 533 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    The point still remains, why are the Russians in that particular spot, right as they are assumed to be about to invade Ukraine and as a war of words flies between them and NATO?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,122 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    What are the militaries of equivalent countries like ? It's not something I'm up to date on.

    But if we do have money floating around i'de rather we put it towards achieving free A&E or upgrading our shocking transport infrastructure



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,122 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    And Ireland being in NATO will be what keeps Putin's hand off the button ?

    If someone actually actually launches their arsenal or all sides do I think it's time we just call it quits as a species.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,085 ✭✭✭rn


    Can you just imagine how excited Jeffery Donaldson and his crew would be, if Russia or China had an invasion force off the west coast of Ireland! Of course they would definitely stop rolling the T72s when the road markings go from yellow to white... So the UK would only send "Strongly worded letters" and implement sanctions.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,009 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    The answer to this post is this:

    Why spend anything on Defence? Just scrap the entire Defence Forces as sure, we are fucked if a big power wants to have their way with us, or there is 0 chance it will ever happen because we can sponge of the UK, EU, US....

    So just get rid of the defences forces altogether... its a waste of money.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,375 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    They would to protect their own territories and interests, which we near enough to benefit from.

    In fact that's what we've always relied on, right or wrong.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,108 ✭✭✭CGI_Livia_Soprano
    Holding tyrants to the fire


    The last time Ireland was invaded prior to the end of World War II was 1798 when the French invaded. 220 years without an invasion doesn’t indicate that we have anything to worry about in modern historical terms.



  • Posts: 5,121 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    The roles of the Permanent Defence Forces are:

    To defend the State against armed aggression

    To assist the Garda Síochána when requested

    To participate in peacekeeping missions in support of the United Nations

    To contribute to maritime security, including the delivery of a fishery protection service

    To provide ceremonial services on behalf of the Government



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 68,317 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    Our defence forces do actually do things internally. They serve a vital role as part of the emergency services, and fill niches that other services don't. To a certain extent the fulfill a role as swiss-army knife (no pun intended), providing backup capacity for other emergency services. Our pandemic response - especially vaccinations - would have been a complete shambles without military support.

    Just because they're not out scaring off foreign invaders, doesn't mean they don't provide value.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,381 ✭✭✭Yurt2


    That's grand so. Our economic , sovereign interests and our military neutrality are well protected in the case of a European conflict conflagration then.

    Apropos of nothing, I've never crashed my car, my insurance is up for renewal - don't think I'll bother this time.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    yeah let's spend the money it would require to make an actual difference to any outcome in the event of a Russian decision to invade

    *checks bill*

    *reaches for russian dictionary, furry cap with hammer and sickle motif and bottle of vodka*



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,418 ✭✭✭BluePlanet


    How much more in taxes are you willing to pay for "Defence spending"?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 68,317 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    Well, you've got two options. You can pay €500 a year for 3rd party fire and theft. Or you can pay €3,500 a year for the same insurance except it covers other people driving your car so they don't have to buy their own.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,108 ✭✭✭CGI_Livia_Soprano
    Holding tyrants to the fire


    Passive aggressive rants? This is your idea of debate? Stick to Pokemon cards, mate, the grown ups are talking.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,381 ✭✭✭Yurt2


    ?

    Do one.

    You don't like my replies, respond to the substance of them. Mate.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,375 ✭✭✭Boulevardier


    An important consideration is that the US already has a de-facto Air base at Shannon, so we can hardly blame the Russians if they consider us as part of the "Western" bloc.

    Why not lets ban all foreign military use of our airports and then extend that to our airspace?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,786 ✭✭✭brickster69


    It would be far cheaper to go on Ebay and invest in a few million white flags.

    "if you get on the wrong train, get off at the nearest station, the longer it takes you to get off, the more expensive the return trip will be."



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,009 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    I think you are overplaying the hand here, but couldn't the money be redirected to another organisation, say civil defence to do what the army do in Ireland?


    What is the primary role of the Irish Defence Forces?

    From their Website:

    "To defend the State against armed aggression; this being a contingency, preparations for its implementation will depend on an ongoing Government assessment of the security and defence environment."

    So if they cannot do that, and we are unwilling to fund them to do that, just scrap it and stop living a lie...



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,108 ✭✭✭CGI_Livia_Soprano
    Holding tyrants to the fire


    Your posts are totally insubstantial. Absolute rubbish about car insurance and long-winded pseudo-intellectual nonsense about peace since World War II being an aberration. Ireland didn’t even fight in World War II.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,418 ✭✭✭BluePlanet


    The fact that NATO have their knickers in a twist right now over Ukraine is proof positive that the Russians are 100% correct, Nato already had planned on Ukraine joining that alliance. Exactly like they had with Georgia.

    The only thing that is preventing further NATO encirclement is Russia's aggressive position and putting boots on the ground in both those countries.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,381 ✭✭✭Yurt2


    Do one slowpoke. No one is listening to your boring drivel, least of all me. Mate.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling




  • Registered Users Posts: 693 ✭✭✭cheezums


    No amount of defence spending would have stopped Russia there unless you want Ireland to spend billions on pointless battleships that we dont need. Complete waste of money. We're a tiny completely irrelevant island in geopolitical terms, acting otherwise is just stupid.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,009 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    We have a defence force because that is what nation-states do, but we 'really' don't have a defence force because we are Ireland....



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,418 ✭✭✭BluePlanet


    They aren't conducting exercises in our seas though.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,108 ✭✭✭CGI_Livia_Soprano
    Holding tyrants to the fire


    “Boring drivel” is what happens when you post substantial, informed posts based on historical events and current affairs. You should give that a go some time instead of crying about car insurance and getting pissy when someone tells you you’re wrong.



  • Advertisement
Advertisement