Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Keeping marriage name after divorce

  • 28-01-2022 10:32PM
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22


    My friend and I are having this discussion on women who still use the marriage surname after a marriage is gone… the scenario is..

    a couple married with 1/2 kids, he tells the wife he doesn’t love her anymore and goes off with the woman he’s seeing, they are together a few years built a house together and have a couple of kids and engaged.. the ex wife hasn’t been with anyone since the break up and the 1/2 kids are now in their 20’s.

    my opinion is you take up your husbands name in marriage but why keep using it if the marriage is over, maybe some keep it when kids are young for school etc but when the kids are grown up and gone why? To me it screams of trying to hold onto the husband, I don’t get it.. In my case I dropped it after my husband left for another woman I just started using my maiden name, rang revenue and when passport needed to be renewed I updated it then it’s no big deal to revert, just looking for opinions…



«1

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,447 ✭✭✭✭Pawwed Rig


    Depends why you took it in the first place. Otherwise I would guess it is a lot of hassle changing ones name so some can't be arsed



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 665 ✭✭✭goldenmick


    Depends.

    If its an easier surname than your own, well possibly keep it.

    If its something like Mrs Boaty McBoatface well then its a no-brainer.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,623 ✭✭✭El Tarangu


    If you were a barrister or something, and are well-known professionally using your married name, it would not make sense to go back to the name that you used 20+ years ago which no-one in your professional circle would link to you.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,673 ✭✭✭wench


    My mother married at 18 and moved to Dublin.

    When she got divorced some 40 years later, why would she change to a name nobody here knows her by?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,411 ✭✭✭✭woodchuck


    If her kids are in their 20s, I'm going to assume she changed her name well over 20 years ago. I can see why someone wouldn't want to change their name after decades. It's how they're known to everyone, both personally and professionally, for the majority of their adult life. It's basically the same reason I don't want to change my name now at 36 years old and newly married!



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Like has been said above, when you've been known by a name for a long time, either in your personal or professional life, changing it may be more trouble than its worth.

    I've known several women in this scenario (professionally).

    Less so nowadays, as more women seem to keep their own names after marriage.



  • Posts: 18,749 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I have no idea why anyone would want to change their name when they actually get married, but if they did why would they go through all the hassle of changing again?

    My mother got married around 45 years ago, and divorced around 35 years ago, she still used her married name and believe me, it has absolutely nothing to do with holding onto her husband😂😂



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,745 ✭✭✭notAMember


    Well, the reason some women change their name is to have the same surname as their children. That reason remains whether you are divorced or not.


    Your OP assumes the name has to do with the man, rather than her own children.


    Name changing is a lot harder to do these days, when women have fuller identities. Email addresses, bills and bank accounts in their own names.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,852 ✭✭✭✭road_high


    as a man it never made sense to me why women change their surnames to their husbands. It’s the ultimate act of submission to the supposed superiority of the man. If it were the other way around not a chance it would happen. One of life’s bizarre “traditions” to me



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,124 ✭✭✭mrslancaster


    Couldn't agree more especially as there is no legal requirement, women seen as a possession given by one man to another in marriage, grrrr. Women have fought for equality in all areas for decades yet still do this, baffling.

    As far as children are concerned, I know many families where wife kept her own surname, kids have dads, never caused any problems. It doesnt seem to cause problems for co-habiting families either.

    As for people like colleagues and neighbours knowing the woman by a particular surname so its too awkward to change, shur that's exactly what happens when taking a husbands name in the first place, everyone has to get used to the change and bank accounts, passports etc need to be changed.

    Keeping a former husbands family name after divorce makes absolutely no sense to me. IMO, women should be proud to use their own surname, family and friends know they're divorced and their surname doesn't make any difference to strangers.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,447 ✭✭✭✭Pawwed Rig


    That is a fairly bleak way of looking at it. I would see it more as becoming part of a new family unit whereby you have left your own family and are joining a new one. Also it makes sense that everyone in your family unit has the same second name.

    I would be indifferent to who takes whose name or if they made up a new surname but please no double barrelling



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,124 ✭✭✭mrslancaster


    Not bleak at all, just practical, because the reality is that many couples divorce so taking on someone elses name should not be done lightly.

    As for everyone in a family unit having the same surname, well its a nice idea but in modern life its not always possible. People with kids who are in second or subsequent relationships are blended families who already have different surnames, its very common. For everyone to have the same surname, one partners kids would have to change, so Deed Poll or maybe adoption?? Good luck with that if you had teens or young adults and asked them to change their name because you'd met a new partner...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 475 ✭✭mickuhaha


    Two things and disclaimer, I am not a solicitor but have discussed this with one. I may have picked up the information incorrectly. A marriage certificate is also a legal name change. So once you put what ever name on the form, that's your legal name and is technically fraud using any other name on legal documents. It is also rare that this is enforced. A second thing this remains your legal name unless it's changed including during divorce by the judge which normally restores it to before the marriage, at which point the former name is now the legal name again.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,745 ✭✭✭notAMember


    I’m afraid you’ve definitely picked that up incorrectly. Here is the citizens information.

    https://www.citizensinformation.ie/en/birth_family_relationships/problems_in_marriages_and_other_relationships/changing_your_name_by_deed_poll.html


    Names in Ireland are by common usage, nothing to do with marriage certificates, name changes are not in law at all, your solicitor friend needs to go back to college. You can call yourself Mr MonkeyPants from tomorrow on, absolutely no legal impediment to it.

    Women who don’t change their name are definitely NOT commuting fraud.


    And if you’ve seen a marriage certificate, you will see that it is the unmarried names on there.


    Matchy matchy surnames is an English colonial hangover. It was from the property transfer rules the British culture had. Women were part of the property transferred from parents to husband with a marriage contract. Former British colonies are the countries it’s popular in. (Ireland, India, US, Canada, Australia) Traditional Irish names didn’t do it, Spanish names have never done it, Greeks don’t do it, etc. some in the anglophone world attach sentimentality to it now. Much of the rest of the world sees it as confusing or odd to be named as a sister / child / property of your husband.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,447 ✭✭✭✭Pawwed Rig


    We don't live in America though and the family unit is still the predominant norm in Ireland. Equally our divorce rates are very low by international standards. Your blended families are not that common although do exist at a higher rate than previous generations.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,411 ✭✭✭✭woodchuck


    Getting a bit off topic, but I hate this idea that you all need the same last name to be a "family unit". My husband and I are no less of a family unit, even though we have different last names.

    An ex of mine was adamant that I should take his last name if we married. I was very open about the fact that I didn't want to change my name. He used the "family unit" argument. I told him that if it was that important to him that we have the same last name, I'd be perfectly happy for him to change his last name. He didn't even entertain that suggestion. I think it's funny how there are men that want the family to all have the same last name, but are aghast at the mere suggestion of changing their own name!!

    Post edited by woodchuck on


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I think it comes down to personal preference. I know a guy who took his wife's name on marriage and adopted her children from a previous relationship so they would all have the same family name. It worked for them and its what they wanted.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,124 ✭✭✭mrslancaster


    thankfully we have moved away from the previously held, narrow definition of what constitutes a family unit, ie husband, wife and kids.

    We have all sorts of family units here, traditional, blended families, cohabiting couples, same-sex couples, individuals parenting alone, whether they are separated, divorced, widowed, unmarried. We dont need to look to the US or anywhere else for evidence. The big difference between Ireland and other countries is that it took so long for our legislators to finally catch up with the reality of peoples lives and change the law to give them legal recognition.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,447 ✭✭✭✭Pawwed Rig


    Ireland was on of the first countries to recognise same sex marriage?? There are still a huge amount of countries that criminalise these relationships but in Ireland they are fairly normal. The big difference between Ireland and other countries is the complete opposite of what you say.

    Currently only about 10% of the countries in the world allow ssm. Ireland is a leader in this regard

    Post edited by Pawwed Rig on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,124 ✭✭✭mrslancaster



    IMO, an example of why its a bad idea to mess around with names. Ok the man in this relationship choose to start using the wife's name and that's his personal preference, but it's not a legal change and he can stop using it if he decides or if they divorced at some future time. Adoption on the other hand is a very legal process with far reaching consequences, and changing any child's name in that way would need to be for a very good reason and not just that they wanted to have the same surname. What happens if this marriage ended up in divorce? Her male kids now have a surname they have no biological connection to and their future offspring/grandkids bear the family name of a man their mother was married to for a few years. Not a great scenario..



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    If this marriage ends in divorce the kids still have the exact same family name as they had before the marriage.

    The only person who changed name, was the husband and adoptive father.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 605 ✭✭✭zedhead


    I don't think people say you NEED to have the same last name to be a family unit, but for some people it feels right to all have the same name for THEIR family unit. Its a personal decision on the reasons for it are personal and unique to everyone.


    Obviously with blended family the decision becomes more complicated but its still a personal decision and none of anyone elses business.


    I took my husbands name, he thinks its not worth the hassle for me but I like the symbolism of it personally - and if we have children I would like the same name as them. Both my sisters have different surnames to their children and I see no issue with that as it works for them, I don't think they are any less of a family unit or lesser mothers for the decisions they made. I respect their choice and they both respect my choice.


    It didnt bother me which name we took; his, mine or a made up name - but his name is easer than mine (i do not missing having to spell my surname multuple times for people still to get it wrong) and he doesnt place the same symbolism i do, so he wouldnt have gone through the hassle of changing. Plus my surname is not my surname - its my dads, so whether I change to my husbands or keep my original name I am still taking a mans name. What annoys me more is the default setting that children get the fathers name when parents have different names. I think that maybe should be challenged a little more but again to each their own.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,447 ✭✭✭✭Pawwed Rig


    Is that the default? Is is not up to the parents (or mother) to determine what surname goes on a birth cert?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 605 ✭✭✭zedhead


    I meant more the default in society. The only time i have seen/heard of children taking the mothers name instead of fathers is where the father is not involved. It seems to always be father or double barrelled - in my experience anyway.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 356 ✭✭Bobsammy


    I cannot wrap my head around this argument and it's not the first time I've heard it. Why is your birth surname your father's yet your husband's is his own? Surely by that logic it should be his father's?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 605 ✭✭✭zedhead


    I dont think my husbands name is his own, i think its his fathers too - or whoever so far down the male line of the familys where it may have started. WHen I say his name, i mean the name he uses.

    My point is for me I dont actually care so much where the name originated, i don't subscribe to the notion that taking my husbands name is anti feminist because I am taking a mans name - most of the surnames out there are originally (in ireland) mens names.

    I like the idea of all of us in the family having the same name. Thats it - no deeper meaning, I would have happily changed both our names, but my husband doesnt care if we have the same name or not and so it made more sense for me to take his.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,447 ✭✭✭✭Pawwed Rig


    Is 'the name he uses' not his name??

    And what is wrong with having your Father's name? It is not like a venereal disease.

    Sad that someone would be ashamed to have their family name

    Post edited by Pawwed Rig on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 356 ✭✭Bobsammy


    I guess we just view things differently so.

    I really feel that whatever name a child is given at birth becomes their name, regardless of where the name originated. I hate the narrative of people (women) not owning their own name, just borrowing it from a husband, father, mother or whoever.

    My children have the same name as me, their mother, the same name I've had since birth. But it's their name now every bit as much it it's mine.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 356 ✭✭Bobsammy


    Actually to add to what I wrote above, I also feel that if someone changes their name, whether it's after marriage or for any other reason, then that is also their name and getting divorced shouldn't mean they have to 'give back' the name if they don't want to.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22 Misty moo


    Thanks for all the replies and I can see both sides of the argument, the person I was referring to (let’s call her Joan) doesn’t need her marriage name for business reasons etc I just don’t understand why keep the name your husband is gone and he ain’t coming back, the one daughter is in her 20’s.. I got divorced years ago I immediately dropped my marriage name, everyone that knew me knew the marriage had ended and I said I’m using my maiden name so over time everyone called me by my maiden name so there is no big deal saying your using maiden name, I rang revenue etc that took a couple of minutes, I didn’t have to go near a solicitor or anything like that, anything I signed up for I used my maiden name, utility bills etc was just a phone call too, people seem to think it would be a really big deal changing back but it really isn’t. When you get married you take his name if you want and when the marriage ends that should be the end of the name too, I just feel it’s joan clinging onto the last straw, her father gave her her name and that’s the name she should use, sorry to say this but basically marriage is just a piece of paper and anyone who has gone through a divorce will know that, a judge stamps a piece of paper (takes about 20secs) and the marriage is legally finished, she’s nothing got to do with her exhusband anymore.



Advertisement