Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

DF Commission Report

17810121316

Comments

  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 16,476 Mod ✭✭✭✭Manic Moran



    Can that not be dealt with by benefit of allowances, like "at-sea-allowances" or "Shooting hazard pay allowances" or "family separation allowances" or some other such jiggery which most civil servants wouldn't be getting unless they hop on a UN tour?" That would leave the base pay scales unaffected.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,003 ✭✭✭sparky42


    Are they? This has been getting worse throughout their time in government this time, and given their positions, they were ideally placed to push through some stopgap measures if not actually start pushing through ways to fix this, instead we get soundbites about how Recruitment must be stepped up with no actually effects.

    I mean even now, we should be deep into deciding budgets for October, where the implementation plan would be needed, and instead we get another holding statement, and likely another missed year of investment.



  • Registered Users Posts: 248 ✭✭mupper2


    Delete, doesn't matter.



  • Registered Users Posts: 340 ✭✭Grassy Knoll


    Let’s see if Michael Martin has a backbone in the next few months …. as has been suggested sidestep the issue of pay via allowance’s- the guards have been making out like bandits for years on that basis …



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,389 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    The Guards got effed over on that front by FEMPI too and have yet to see full restoration.

    Thats one of the reasons I wouldn't be optimistic about a load of compensatory allowances being set up to fill the gap.

    In any case, public sector Unions and non-union representative groups alike are very wary about allowances after they were detonated the last time. The ask will be core pay and pension entitlements. As it should be.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,877 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    Allegedly 2028 for the Radar which is not to bad when you consider Tender-Construction-Training-operations




  • Registered Users Posts: 4,003 ✭✭✭sparky42


    Surely that comes with some very big question marks, I mean the clock is ticking on this government at this stage realistically, so unless we get a tender within 12 months or so, its likely to be punted to the next government and who knows what they decide. Same for the suggestion of refreshing the AC Helicopter fleet, is that to start in 2028 or be in service by 2028, cause if in service then again the tender should be starting relatively soon.

    Still seems plenty "soft" to me with lots of HR speech and promises of future outcomes.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,877 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    Yeah it seamed very light and a rehash of what was said before . The detailed implementation plan still has to come in the coming weeks



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,877 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    With the budget next week will they have to release the implementation plan by monday to allow for how much they need from he budget?



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,003 ✭✭✭sparky42


    Its far too late for anything released to have an impact on the budget, whatever the DF gets has already been decided (most likely with little input by anyone who actually knows anything about the DF), why do you think it was kicked back so far?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,877 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    Yes was thinking that. You would also think that after last week with only 1 military helicopter availble to the state there would be alarm belts ringing



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,003 ✭✭✭sparky42


    Sure the minister of defence has already said that everything was fine and everyone should stop moaning about any imagined shortcomings in the operation. Why would you need alarm bells?



  • Registered Users Posts: 248 ✭✭mupper2


    "Sure you did the job with what you had...in fact did you need 3 aircraft?"



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,003 ✭✭✭sparky42


    And a ship, I mean talk about spare resources! That's almost waste, DPER might have to have another look at cutting costs...

    And I wish that was a joke or just sarcasm.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,003 ✭✭✭sparky42


    To be realistic, given when we are and the only thing that has been suggested is the report about the Sea Going Allowance going up, how low are people's expectations? 10%-20% below inflation increases? And straight up headline cut of budget? Selling off the Navy? Shutting Baldonnel as that's being blamed for noise around Dublin Airport??



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,003 ✭✭✭sparky42


    So the prebriefings of the budget are in hand already but I haven’t seen a single mention of anything defence related other than the comment from Berry regarding the Sea Going Allowance, so any bets on what we see? I mean it’s not like the world has got anymore unstable since the Commissions report…



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,003 ✭✭✭sparky42


    Feck all increase in the headlines from DPER.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,389 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    €200 million headline increase and a specific target of 400 additional head.

    Its not in line with a curve to achieve the LoA2 commitment, but we don't have the capacity to do that anyway, until the structures are in place.

    This is almost entirely a management challenge for the next 2 to 5 years, not a money one.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,132 ✭✭✭jonnybigwallet


    Fiddlers money I'd call it.



  • Registered Users Posts: 340 ✭✭Grassy Knoll


    Finance little to do with it, D/Per controls expenditure policy. Anyway on the budget strikes me commitments re advertising for 400 more staff - and poss MRV is delusional stuff.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 4,003 ✭✭✭sparky42


    I think at this stage keeping mentioning the MRV is more an accountancy trick than anything else, if its supposedly in the Capital expenditure plan already and was circa €200 million, if they tell the truth and kill it, then the already lack of spending collapses into the pack of lies that it is.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 83 ✭✭RavenP


    Genuine big question here. With the current government financial position and other departments getting above inflation increases, no one would have batted an eyelid at a couple of hundred mil extra for the DF. One has to ask why this has not happened. Is there one element of the government or civil service who have a particular dislike of the DF? Is there some kind of hangover from post-civil war politics going on? Or is there a bigger influence on government or alternatively fear of the PANA types than usually credited and are the government going to find additional funds from the unallocated two billion later on? Are the DF not structured to actually spend the money right now? Is there some organisational issue within the way the government or civil service that mitigates against spending on Defence?



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,003 ✭✭✭sparky42




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 83 ✭✭RavenP


    @sparky42 I really do not know. If the public finances had been really tight in the run up to the election, I could understand other departments with very good reason squeezing defence, but this is the least tight spending round in a long time. The exasperation of Cathal Berry in the Dail yesterday spoke volumes. If the management issues in the DF were so bad that they could not usefully spend any increased money, then I imagine Berry would not have made the statement he did, almost suggesting he would support an alternative government after the election, by whom I presume he means SF. It might simply because they are afraid to addressing DF pay and conditions in advance of an election unless there is a cascade of other calls for money from other sectors. Berry was right to compare himself to David MacWilliams though. This is criminal negligence by the government at a time of such risk for Ireland.



  • Registered Users Posts: 248 ✭✭mupper2


    It's a fitting metaphor for the state of the DF that the day after the budget this forum is dead quiet because nothing was done...



  • Registered Users Posts: 248 ✭✭mupper2




  • Registered Users Posts: 4,003 ✭✭✭sparky42


    Boo **** Hoo, at this stage the Navy should just go for a full safety stand down and dare the Government to complain.



  • Registered Users Posts: 340 ✭✭Grassy Knoll


    I make it a less than 2% yo-yo increase from the 2023 allocation, about half the rate of inflation €21m - no more needs to be said.

    The problem IMHO is at this stage there is hardly the capacity to absorb any spend so the money can’t really be given to Defence. Money for wages is allocated for men and women who are not there. we buy ships, they will rust at the quay wall for lack of key personnel to crew them, aircraft , we are limited to only small numbers of basic models as the more complex gear requires tech support we don’t possess or training / operational frameworks we are years away from. Army may be a little more different as the equipment is smaller and arguably less complex in scale. In all cases there has been a historic neglect as manifest in underequipment across all services, lack of investment as seen in crumbling facilities, poor pay and conditions.

    it seems to be fair DoD is undergoing a gradual cultural change, albeit from a very low base. Furthermore the officials there traditionally did not ‘game’ the system as per Health, Housing social protection etc where money has gone literally on old rope. Instead they should be fighting to increase their budget etc , almost’ expand an empire’ rather than infighting with the military side. Also the transformation programme seems impressive on one level, a lot of structures etc which might serve the process well over the long term.

    However, the key issue of pay and conditions is the elephant in the room and they are at nothing, zero, zilch until that is addressed. It is well over a year since the Commissions report was published - a very realistic and practical blueprint- except it didn’t get into the pay issue - it is alright to be delivering the report recommendations as a tick box exercise but the key horizontal enabler - pay - needs to be addressed swiftly and decisively - words with respect I wouldn’t associate with Martin or McGrath etc

    Certainly if progress was made on this we could begin to see gradual improvements, probably never reach the full establishment level, but at least staunch the flow. Talk of high end radars at this stage, MRVs etc is pie in the sky - who will man them, they will prob rust away for lack of technical crew at this point. The point that militaries are highly skilled, technical organisations operating complex platforms still has not registered in my view.

    I hope Dr Cathal Berry keeps it up, the man is a high achieving, high credibility individual with an elite military pedigree. He might well ask what good is he doing, but it would be worse in my view without his public contributions. The only criticism I would have is he is perhaps too reasonable. Helped by his interventions any informed, reasonable individual you meet has well absorbed the message that our defence is sub par and needs urgent attention. Martin is becoming rattled as seen by reports of his press conference.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 340 ✭✭Grassy Knoll


    I see some commentary here is that the increase for 2024 is €55m = 21 current +34 capex extra - presumably taken as gospel from press releases etc. However, I would like to point out this is an accounting sleight of hand, from the published Budget expenditure report book p25 table D sets out that the original NDP capital allocation for 2023 was cut by 34m from 176m to 142m, (which is actually close to the 2022 capex outurn. So 2023 capex is to be flat y-o-y)

    in effect all that has been done in the budget is this has been restored to 176m for 2024, so in net terms we are getting the original 2023 capital allocation a year late. There may be reasons for this (delayed equipment payment ?) however to present this as an increase is disingenuous. There was no effort to reallocate this to other defence projects. IMHO 2024 allocations should be compared to the original 2023 capital one as published in the REV which is the basis of voted government expenditure. All of this is verifiable by looking at some online docs - buried in plain sight of course.

    so if we are to compare on a like for like basis, defence spend is actually only rising by 21m on the current side. Let there be some honesty on the figures please …



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,877 ✭✭✭roadmaster




  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 16,476 Mod ✭✭✭✭Manic Moran


    So I've scanned it twice... Does it actually say anything?



  • Registered Users Posts: 248 ✭✭mupper2




  • Registered Users Posts: 3,877 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    They are still working on the detailed implementation plan which is at "Advanced stage". The same plan which was suppouse to ready at the latest of January 2023.

    Its not like they need to rush or that there are any issues in the defence forces such as only 1 full strenght unit in the state whose troops are being sent from Bundorn to all over the country to cover duties. So nothing to worry about.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,003 ✭✭✭sparky42


    So after the budget the “Implementation Plan” is reportedly finally going to cabinet and will be published, DOD and Finance will be happy about pushing things back another few years:

    How low are the expectations?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,877 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    Will they propose to commision a report on how to implement the Implementation Plan?



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,003 ✭✭✭sparky42


    With a review as well into the report, and then perhaps a public consultation, and then maybe a panel to correlate the findings?



  • Registered Users Posts: 248 ✭✭mupper2


    Have we asked the AG if any of this is allowed by the Constitution?



  • Registered Users Posts: 248 ✭✭mupper2


    You forgot the vital trips to see how other countries do it, so junkets to Australia, Mexico, Spain, etc will have to be made



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,877 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    The year is 2026.

    Sec Gen: Minister we are now able to put the plan in place.

    Minister: Excellent when do we Start.

    Sec Gen: Thats the problem the last service member finished up last week and we now have no Military.

    MInister: Can the guards step in a form a paramilitary Unit like in Spain.

    Sec Gen: Funny Story the Guards have all quit aswell the Justice Sect Gen tells me



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 248 ✭✭mupper2


    Oh you can't over burden them with too much hol...work....



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,877 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    Following on from sparkys post theres mention in the sun today about the plan but no details.




  • Registered Users Posts: 3,877 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    Probably not leaking it because they are still typing it up and adding in bits



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,003 ✭✭✭sparky42


    Ah good, the DOD is to get an implementation management office to oversee the plan. Any bets on that being the only part of this that gets fully funded?



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,003 ✭✭✭sparky42


    Adding bits? More likely having DOD, DPER and Finance each pulling as much of it out as possible or at the very least trying to push any spending well into the future/never.



  • Registered Users Posts: 248 ✭✭mupper2


    The extremely frustrating thing is we can all see how more chaotic and dangerous the World is getting and will continue to get worse....but no these lads continue to think its 2000 and the good times will never stop.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,003 ✭✭✭sparky42


    Hell, even then they missed 9/11 and everything that followed, I’m sure they figure the current situation is just minor. After all it would be a shame to break tradition, Dev and the Cabinet only figured out there were some “concerning tensions” in Europe in the Spring of 1939…



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,003 ✭✭✭sparky42


    Look the person with the keys for the locked filing cabinet got transferred to Finance so the Department doesn’t even know what the 2000 WP said…



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,877 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    This Plan is going to be interesting considering the messing in AGS at the moment. Closing date for the No.2 job has being extended again but no AGS have applied because of the money issue. Dept of Fianance have said they are reviewing issue but review wont be complete untill summer 24!

    Urgency is lost on this state no wonder the plan is nearly a year late




  • Registered Users Posts: 3,877 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    She was supposed to be out the door in early December but they have got her to stay until March. Callans Kicks had a funny take on it last night



  • Advertisement
Advertisement