Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Ukraine (Mod Note & Threadbanned Users in OP)

Options
1220221223225226315

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 4,885 ✭✭✭fly_agaric


    I would turn that around, and say China should be a little bit more wary of provoking the US (and the EU) right now.

    On the EU side of it, I just feel the Chinese relations with the EU and most European countries who oppose this invasion must be almost irretrievably damaged by the sneaking regarder stance they took on the war. The die is (probably) cast there.

    Unless something else surprising or unexpected happens (on China's end), I kind of think we'll see this play out in a slow and steady worsening of China-EU relations over the coming years, as the economic ties that have been built up since China joined WTO are picked apart and unplugged.

    Also think you are wrong about (military) support of Ukraine. I think if they still want to fight on + try to push Russia further back towards pre war lines and force a peace on much better terms, it could continue to increase till they are pretty much fielding a large NATO-standard army (and perhaps airforce) against Russia, and we'll see how Russia's military copes with containing that + avoiding the fate of being run out of Ukraine on a rail.

    edit: in final paragraph I'm assuming Russia continues with what it is doing now (seems to be trying to take over most of the country and ruin the parts they cannot take over), and there's no honest effort made by Putin to negotiate a peace.



  • Registered Users Posts: 12,812 ✭✭✭✭bear1


    Belarus are allowing Russians to use their country to bomb a sovereign state.

    Yes i would consider them an active combatant.

    Not sure what your point is with that?

    As for the first part of your post, yes that is how it is being done. To the point Poland is literally becoming Europe's most powerful army, something that would have been laughed at not that long ago.

    But that comes at a cost, how that cost is absorbed is going to get harder and harder. Again, I'm not advocating we stop sanctions but there needs to be some sort of other play here that doesn't drag us all bankrupt.

    And we aren't in a war economy state of mind, like in ww2 when the Americans were pumping out mind boggling numbers of tanks and ships.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,546 ✭✭✭amandstu


    Point about Belarus is what do we do to counteract its actions in favour of Putin?


    On the other point ,who is suggesting that all measures should not be employed?


    Military means seem to be the most necessary and urgent but what "other sort of play" do you have specifically in mind (one that doesn't reward aggression and unprovoked invasion of a neighbouring country )?

    Strengthening the alliances against dictatorships would be a consideration of mine but that is not done in a fortnight and we are on the back foot on that regards anyway(reports that Russia may have precipitated the collapse of the Italian parliament)



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,440 ✭✭✭McGiver


    Regarding sanctions.

    Good paper on it from Yale:

    Looking ahead, there is no path out of economic oblivion for Russia as long as the allied countries remain unified in maintaining and increasing sanctions pressure against Russia, and The Kyiv School of Economics and McFaul-Yermak Working Group have led the way in proposing additional sanctions measures.


    Defeatist headlines arguing that Russia’s economy has bounced back are simply not factual - the facts are that, by any metric and on any level, the Russian economy is reeling, and now is not the time to step on the brakes.

    Whereas Russian bots/trolls/agents and all sorts of Alt-right or alt-left players leveraging or helping Russian propaganda efforts are telling that sanctions don't work and that we should "talk to Russia to get peace" (Orbán is one of such)...



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,523 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    Belarus are a tricky one in that their dictator is acting against the wishes of their population in letting the country be used as a launch pad. Lukashenko lost that election a couple of years ago - it's essentially a Putin puppet regime, something along the lines of Vichy France in WW2.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,546 ✭✭✭amandstu


    Seems to me that the Russian economy may be a big loser just from the transition to clean energy resulting from the climate emergency


    Nobody has the option of opting out and Russia's economy may be high and dry in the medium term ,war or no war if they do not get with the program.


    Ironically the basket case of Europe.


    Now ,I realize this could well not play out that way at all but even this war is a bit player in the coming Climate Action scenarios.


    (They are even losing their "nuclear privileges" as their bluff has by now been called to a degree and the new kids on the block are just as scary imo)



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,523 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    I was reading a separate Twitter thread a couple of days ago from an analyst / academic saying the Russians are lying on an industrial scale about what is really happening to their economy - every set of figures they release is bogus and misinformation and designed to mislead.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,970 ✭✭✭Christy42


    Yeah I wouldn't consider Belarus a sovereign country. It is under Russian rule in all but name.



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,523 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    Indeed, and its important to remember that many Belarussian people are probably dead set against the war. They have no issue with Ukraine or Ukrainian people at all - this is all Putin's doing.



  • Registered Users Posts: 29,451 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    Which is the future Russia intends for Ukraine and was the purpose of their invasion.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,546 ✭✭✭amandstu


    Will be nice to see that domino fall if that plays out.Make that very nice.


    Again what can we do to help their population if there is an uprising?

    Will it still be all on Ukraine's shoulders?



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,523 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    The exiled opposition leader Tikhanovskaya is playing a very strategic waiting game. She knows that it would be very difficult to bring down a Putin puppet regime by force (not without a huge amount of bloodshed and Putin could well send the Russian army in). She's probably waiting for Russia to become weaker or destabilised at some point and that could be the time to mount an uprising - probably a sensible strategy overall.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,546 ✭✭✭amandstu


    Well timing is everything

    Too soon and a defeat would be guaranteed even if only for the medium term.


    Also too soon might be a signal of disregard for the population?

    Post edited by amandstu on


  • Registered Users Posts: 18,523 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    Exactly - an uprising at the moment would be too risky and Putin could respond by sending the Russian army in and killing thousands of civilians (claiming that they are all "Nazis" and a threat to Russia etc). The waiting game is more sensible. It's frustrating for the Belarussians of course but they will just have to bide their time.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,326 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    Had missed this but Kyiv are buying 100 howitzers from Germany (for the small price of €1.7 billion, oof).

    Wonder how long they'll take to be delivered, and if Ukraine will have the support to upskill on their use. Interesting decision to purchase such heavy hitting weapons; hopefully they're mobile enough to avoid counter batteries and airstrikes. 9 are already in service since June.




  • Registered Users Posts: 8,460 ✭✭✭Markcheese


    That'll be years before they're all delivered , hopefully all over by then ... But Ukraine still has a peace to " win" or protect as well as this war ..

    Slava ukraini 🇺🇦



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,440 ✭✭✭McGiver


    Mounting evidence that Russia simply murdered the Azovstal POWs.

    Graves in satelite pictures before/after. Damage seen not consistent with HIMARS.


    Russia is simply lying as always and is a terrorist state. The EU and the US, plus global allies must double down on the sanctions. Something has to be done.

    Note: Gazprom Bank which is used to charge EU gas deliveries and to pay Russian mercenaries (they're mostly not a regular army now) is not sanctioned!



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,173 ✭✭✭realdanbreen


    And yet we get sabina Higgins urging Ukraine to cut a deal with the monstrous Russian state. And don't tell me that she didn't give Michael d a sneak preview of the letter.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,393 ✭✭✭nigeldaniel


    I don't honestly think champaign posh socialists are going to bother Ukraine or indeed President Volodymyr Zelensky. He is more concerned with those people with authority and clout. Ireland and the Aras naaa. I doubt it [the story about that letter] gets any attention outside the Irish Times.

    This is more of a concern to Ukraine.


    Dan.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,546 ✭✭✭amandstu




  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]




    Does Amnesty International lying too ? I just can't understand,why you didn't believe it when war started ?

    So what Amnesty International report mean ? That Russian Propaganda was telling Truth ? When British and Irish propaganda was telling lies ?

    So let's look what BBC and other will telling about it but something tells me that they will avoid speak about Amnesty International Report!

    So what about Tweets been reposted here ? Does they was lies too ? And I been banned here because was calling Lies the Lies name ? And I been banned for telling Truth? So what about it Now Folks and Mods ?

    Post edited by [Deleted User] on


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Good to see for the moment. Amnesty international are standing by their report despite all of the criticism from Ukraine and their supporters.

    Just because Ukraine has been attacked, doesn't give them the right to do anything that they want and they can hardly criticise Russia committing war crimes when they themselves are also committing war crimes of their own.



  • Registered Users Posts: 29,451 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    Did you read the report?

    Compare what Russia is accused of v Ukraine.

    You have no moral compass if you think they are equivalent in kind.

    "Many of the Russian strikes that Amnesty International documented in recent months were carried out with inherently indiscriminate weapons, including internationally banned cluster munitions, or with other explosive weapons with wide area effects. Others used guided weapons with varying levels of accuracy; in some cases, the weapons were precise enough to target specific objects.

    The Ukrainian military’s practice of locating military objectives within populated areas does not in any way justify indiscriminate Russian attacks.

    Not every Russian attack documented by Amnesty International followed this pattern, however. In certain other locations in which Amnesty International concluded that Russia had committed war crimes, including in some areas of the city of Kharkiv, the organization did not find evidence of Ukrainian forces located in the civilian areas unlawfully targeted by the Russian military."

    Russia hits these kinds of targets regardless of whether military is there or not

    https://www.npr.org/2022/03/01/1083686606/ukraine-russia-civilian-casualties-syria?t=1659736366439

    "Investigators for the United Nations would later conclude that Russia was responsible for multiple war crimes during the 11-month campaign in Idlib. In one attack, more than 43 civilians were killed when Russian aircraft launched a series of airstrikes on a market. Civilians and other rescuers soon rushed to the scene, but within minutes they were met by a "double-tap" airstrike on the same area, killing scores more. About a month later, a separate airstrike hit a compound for displaced civilians, killing at least 20 people, including six children."

    Russia shoots at convoy evacuating citizens.

    https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/ukraine-seven-civilians-dead-after-russia-fired-evacuation-convoy-2022-03-12/

    How can Ukraine protect its citizens except with its military?

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]



    How can Ukraine protect its citizens except with its military?

    Using Ukrainian citizens,woman, children as live shields as Amnesty International says it's right thing to do ? Put tanks on hospitals and playschool yards is right thing to do you gonna say ? And blame Russia forces after ?

    The things what Ukrainian army do is terrorist tactics widely used in North Africa, you know that ?



  • Registered Users Posts: 29,451 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    No terrorist tactics is indiscriminate attacks on civilian targets. Which Russia is documented as doing in multiple recent conflicts with or without military presence.

    It is executing civilians in occupied settlements like Bucha.

    Where does amnesty say they are using them as shields? Ukraines military is their shield from Russian occupation atrocity and Bucha writ large.

    Russia attacks civilians with or without military presence in multiple recent conflicts. How does Amnesty suggest Ukraine protects such civilians in market places?

    Russia shoots at civilian evacuation convoys. So how does Amnesty suggest civilians are safely evacuated?

    Russua shoots unarmed civilians in Bucha. Thats what happens if ukraine military not there. How does Amnesty sugest Ukraine prevent such war crimes?

    Russia attacked civilian Refuge Mariupol theatre. How does Amnesty suggest Ukraine could have protected them?

    Amnesty is living in a fantasy land where both sides are gentlemen.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Amnesty International living in a fantasy land ? Well,if you think so ,so read this report again if you didn't read it





  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,326 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    Right there in the third bullet point:

    Such violations in no way justify Russia’s indiscriminate attacks, which have killed and injured countless civilians

    Even amnesty acknowledges this scenario doesn't excuse Russia's response; while if the war is on the streets and at the city gates, where else does one stage one's armed forces? Only a moral absolutionist would try to draw equivalence between the imperfect defence against a foreign invader rather than question the morals of said invader. Though hard to respect a user's bona fides when named for the Soviet Revolution. Kinda tips the hat towards deep bias.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    The Ukrainian army must simple take them tanks and artillery and go outside hospitals and schools ,go to the fields and fight like a warriors not like terrorists hiding behind woman and children backs putting them lifes at risk ! Other words Ukrainian army must stop use Ukrainian citizens as live shields ! And when those woman and children get killed the Ukrainian president Zelenskij blaming Russian army !

    Will we call a heroes terrorists which keep hostages in school ? No ! So why we call Ukrainian army heroes which keep hostages in whole village ?



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,484 ✭✭✭Fighting Tao


    I suspect that you want the Ukrainian army to surrender to the invaders rather than defend their country and people. Russia should withdraw to their own borders to save lives of innocent Ukrainians (both civilian and military). If they hadn’t started the war people wouldn’t be dying and Amnesty wouldn’t be writing a report on it.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    No ! I want Ukrainian army stop using woman and children as live shields!



Advertisement