Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Ukraine (Mod Note & Threadbanned Users in OP)

Options
15960626465315

Comments

  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 26,667 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    I mean, we could use the example in front of us. If Poland unilaterally engaged with the Ukraine conflict then whether NATO would get involved becomes very tricky. Obviously if Russian engages with Polish forces on Ukrainian soil then the answer would almost definitely be no. If Russia then engages on Polish soil it becomes more complicated.

    The idea of the article is to defend against (basically Soviet) aggression though. "starting" a conflict than claiming defence when hit back is a much more complicated scenario. For what its worth the article itself is below and absolutely doesn't cover this scenario with complete clarity. So then it becomes a political question - but it would not be a default reaction.


    "“The Parties agree that an armed attack against one or more of them in Europe or North America shall be considered an attack against them all and consequently they agree that, if such an armed attack occurs, each of them, in exercise of the right of individual or collective self-defence recognized by Article 51 of the Charter of the United Nations, will assist the Party or Parties so attacked by taking forthwith, individually and in concert with the other Parties, such action as it deems necessary, including the use of armed force, to restore and maintain the security of the North Atlantic area."



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,333 ✭✭✭topmanamillion


    You cannot bet on that. The Germans in particular have a well known history of being the aggressor which still influence their political and military decisions today.

    An attack on a baltic country is as likely to lead to the Germans and French doubling down on their own defenses as run to the defence of another European country. The US (by far the largest military budget in the world) are vital to NATO functioning properly. The fact their "obligation" under article 5 is entirely at the mercy of the US president of the day is surely a weakness in NATO.

    The fact Trump spoke about NATO with distain and talked about pulling the US out of shows just how fragile the whole thing is. If Ukraine had happened during his presidency a couple of years ago this could all be much grimmer.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,303 ✭✭✭liamtech


    I think you and i are preaching from the same prayer book, but we are on different pages? I suspect we agree so i want to clarify my position.

    Obviously emotions are high and this is a terrible situation, and the obvious question is being asked time and time again. Why cant the west/Nato/The US get involved

    The debate on what would happen if one NATO member acted unilaterally is interesting, and i tend to stand by my stance that it would inevitably involve NATO - That said, if the fighting remained outside NATO territory - That is an interesting question - Russia's reaction would determine what could/should happen. If they consider it a NATO involvement, then there would technically be no triggering of A5 - it would simply be NATO V Russia - if they didnt, who knows - its grey but almost certainly it would lead to an escalation - there is ambiguity for sure

    The fact is - we both know that under no circumstance will a Nato member state intervene in this conflict - It is simply too risky. The above hypothetical's are interesting thought experiments - but that is all they are. My posts were to try and make clear that sadly, the West/NATO will undoubtedly remain as it is. and will not intervene. Clandestine assistance is possible but we arent there yet

    Sic semper tyrannis - thus always to Tyrants



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,826 ✭✭✭✭Danzy


    The French army is world class, and lots of experience, in a European context, just behind the English army.


    The German army was considered excellent 30 years ago, now it is run down and barely able to function as an army in barracks, never mind as a combat force.


    It's not able to fully participate in excersises due to lack of equipment, breakdowns, infrastructure ie bridges not able to have tanks drive over etc etc.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    No normal president would pull out though.

    The reason Trump wanted to pull out is the same reason he called Putin's invasion "genius" and is the same reason why Trump never criticised Putin.

    I mean, that reason is unknown, but it does exist...



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 5,281 ✭✭✭The Golden Miller


    I don't believe this is something Russia want to do, or like doing, but the West has forced their hand, and Ukraine are the unfortunate pawns in the middle



  • Registered Users Posts: 29,422 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    Russia wanted a vassal Ukraine not a pro Western Ukraine. The Ukranian people in the Maidan revolution chose a Western course. Putin thought he could get Ukraine through bribes, stooges, corruption etc without firing a shot. So no they didnt want to invade, and then they thought they could stage a coup.

    Putin basicaly said Ukraine isnt a country, it is a Russian province. That is a pawn alright. Say like Belarus.

    By contrast the EU wants to see a free and strong Ukraine as a valued member. Say like Poland.

    The West forced their hand because every country given the free choice does not choose Russia.

    Spot the difference?

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,281 ✭✭✭The Golden Miller


    The West has been creeping closer to Russia's door for a long time now, as Russia said ok and watched, arming NATO countries. They want to back Russia into a corner and land on their doorstep, showing them up as weak if the don't respond.

    If they don't respond, it's an acknowledgement America can do as they please around the world, with that buffer of Russia gone. If they do respond they're the bad guys. This is a situation that has been building for years and the West forced it.

    Ukraine are the unfortunate pawns in the middle, but Russia have to do this, and they don't want to, but no choice left



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,281 ✭✭✭The Golden Miller


    I genuinely believe Russia hate doing this



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,303 ✭✭✭liamtech


    Would you care to explain that rather odd opinion?

    -How has the Ukraine been used as a Pawn

    -Given that this took months to plan, and arguably began in 2014, how do you not 'believe this is something Russia want to do'

    -How exactly has 'the West has forced their hand' - assuming 'their' is Russia/Putin

    -How do you feel posting in favor of a large militarily powerful dictatorship, invading a small neighboring state - and calling their Jewish President a 'Nazi'

    -Do you genuinely believe that you can convince people of any of the above (assuming you reply and address the questions)

    -Do you genuinely believe your main thesis (that Russia has had 'her hand forced' and that in effect the West is to blame for this Russian Invasion)

    Sic semper tyrannis - thus always to Tyrants



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]




  • Registered Users Posts: 29,422 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    Rubbish. If NATO hadnt expanded to protect the former Soviet bloc countries they would already be subject to the oppression of Putins new Russian empire.

    NATO isnt going to invade Russia. It has zero interest. Russia is a huge country. There is no corner to back it into. It doesnt need a buffer it has 6000 nukes.

    Read your master Putins speech from last week and his plan for Ukraine. This is nothing to do with NATO it is about Ukraine is Russian vassal or free. That is just a pretext for propagandists to regurgitate. And look there you are.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,281 ✭✭✭The Golden Miller


    I'm serious, there is so much intertwinment there, why would they want to hurt Ukraine or their people?



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,281 ✭✭✭The Golden Miller


    Yes I do believe it. I'll respond tomorrow properly as I'm on the phone right now



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,303 ✭✭✭liamtech


    Because Vladimir Putin wants to reconstitute a New Russian Empire - this has to be trolling at this stage -

    Sic semper tyrannis - thus always to Tyrants



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,324 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    The only thing Russia might hate is how much of a balls they have made of everything. Both the invasion and of the ability to control the narrative. Putin presumed the West was riven by disunity and cultural disharmony that nobody would care: instead it has been a rallying cry showing Brexit was far from the thin end of the wedge many predicted within the EU. And while it remains a matter of numbers, the military advance has been beset by ineptitude, bad logistics and a completely underestimated opponent.

    They had no cause, no justification to invade; they might have got away with sticking to those separatist regions - but Putin for greedy and power hungry



  • Registered Users Posts: 16,133 ✭✭✭✭iamwhoiam


    Not as much as the women carrying their children for miles to safety

    Not as much as Ukrainian men putting children on trains not knowing if they will ever see them again

    Not as much a people having to leave everything they own behind

    Not as much as people leaving their sick and elderly behind because they cant travel .

    Not as much as waking up to bombs hitting your home , the hospital or the school

    Not as much as people crossing into a strange country and completely reliant on strangers to help them

    Not as much as nurses having to carry children with cancer into basements and parents knowing they cant get the chemo they need

    Not as much as the huge numbers of volunteers trying to feed and keep thousands warm .


    So dont write that shoite .



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,044 ✭✭✭patnor1011


    If only 10% of your crystal ball "out of storage" number will be used it will be end of the world anyway. You forget that world is littered with nuclear powerplants and spent fuel storage sites. In case of attack most of them will start to go in meltdown as stopping nuclear powerplant is quite complicated process.

    Most of the people calling for or speculating about "limited" nuclear attack should stop playing video games. There is no reload after failed mission in the real life.



  • Registered Users Posts: 25,741 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    So how will an EU army run by both those countries be better ?



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,826 ✭✭✭✭Danzy


    The French have a serious army, the Germans had, one paid the other stopped. If the will is there..



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 15,976 ✭✭✭✭AMKC
    Ms


    I have to say I don't care what people think of Joe Biden I think he is one cool dude and he was looking great today with his sunclasses on out in the sun. I think the presidency is good for him and he looks healthier than he has ever been.

    Live long and Prosper

    Peace and long life.



  • Registered Users Posts: 24,008 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    Biden was always cool. How can a man who collects Corvettes be anything but cool. And he has a cool wife and a cool family.

    But, he is now too old to withstand the relentless pressures of the biggest combined crises at home and abroad in the last 100 years.



  • Registered Users Posts: 90 ✭✭Saladin Ane


    Is that a parship-sized one you just rolled?😁



  • Registered Users Posts: 15,976 ✭✭✭✭AMKC
    Ms




  • Registered Users Posts: 15,976 ✭✭✭✭AMKC
    Ms


    Why did they stop? Was it because after unification that need for the army was not there anymore and that the west were not fully funding it now? They had to pay for it out of there own pocket and they had far more pressing issues to solve like reuniting and rebuilding the East of there country with the West. Was that it?

    Live long and Prosper

    Peace and long life.



  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 91,331 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    FYI Rossiya24 still on satellite. Hotbird 13E 11034 V 27500 3/4 QPSK DVB-S


    It's very yellow. Tourist scenes on loop and I'd swear he said "Ruski Diaspora"


    oops..



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,826 ✭✭✭✭Danzy


    America paid for it, Germany stopped paying for a lot of things in the 90s. It's Why Much of its vital infrastructure is falling apart, why its internet provision shocks people from the 3rd world, why a fax is essential in a German office.


    They ultimately are short changing themselves.



  • Registered Users Posts: 15,976 ✭✭✭✭AMKC
    Ms


    So they are just like the Americans now then lol. They hate paying for infrastructure or anything they have to fund in there own country lol.

    Americans of course of no problem spending billions in other countries lol.

    Live long and Prosper

    Peace and long life.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 6,425 ✭✭✭SafeSurfer


    You think Covid and Ukraine are the biggest combined crisis since 1922?

    Multo autem ad rem magis pertinet quallis tibi vide aris quam allis



Advertisement