Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Colombia legalises abortion up to 24 weeks!

168101112

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,935 ✭✭✭✭EmmetSpiceland


    The majority of people in this country certainly can.

    “It matters not what someone is born, but what they grow to be” - A. Dumbledore

    “It is not blood that makes you Irish but a willingness to be part of the Irish nation” - Thomas Davis



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 68,173 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    I see all the head the balls here showing deep concern for the preservation of potential children in Colombia, but nary a word about the fact that once born, the child is nearly 500% more likely to die before their 5th birthday than an Irish child.

    Where your concern for the actual, living children in Colombia?

    The same forced-birth crowd who claim to be all about "de little baybees", go very fckn quiet when the child is born. When the mother asks for help, she's called a slut and a scrounger and told she shouldn't have gotten pregnant in the first place.

    Gowls, the lot of them.



  • Posts: 10,222 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Nice of you to prove that the pro-life brigade aren't the only ones to use hyperbolic and emotive language



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,853 ✭✭✭robbiezero




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 914 ✭✭✭nolivesmatter


    As is the normal on boards.ie the thread discussion has evolved over time to become more about abortion in general. This just looks like a massive effort from you to deflect attention away from the topic of abortion and to thwart any attempt of a discussion. If we all did what you clearly tried to do there then no discussion on boards.ie would ever gain any traction.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,963 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail



    Can anyone justify a medical reason for abortion? 

    anybody who has bothered to educate themselves on the subject will be able to do that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 68,173 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    It's a waste of time discussing abortion on boards.

    People who oppose the legal availability of abortion lack nuance and refuse to consider the social, practical and logical bases of it. They have painted themselves into an ideological corner that only works if they oppose abortion at any level. If they accept any part of the rationale for the availability of abortion, their house of cards starts to come down. So instead they just shut their ears and stick with it.

    I'm merely pointing out the hypocrisy here that we have a thread full of the usual suspects who'll generally bang on about people on social welfare, about immigrants and anchor babies and about crime, yet suddenly when it comes to abortion they're mother **** teresa and they're all about saving lives. All the while wilfully ignorant of the relationship legal abortion has in addressing all of their favourite topics.



  • Posts: 10,222 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Are you suggesting that its hypocritical to be against illegal immigrants, people who exploit our generous social welfare system and criminals while also being against late term abortion?

    Because that's a huge leap and smacks of just a cheap attempt to smear people who don't hold the same views as you as some sort of bigots.

    I don't think you are correct about the painting themselves into a corner idea either. The same could be levelled at the other side. If you accept that abortion shouldn't be available past a certain stage before birth, then it begs the question of why you think that.

    There have been reasoned and honest replies on here from both sides which I wouldn't necessarily agree with but I am not so blinkered to think that there isn't some validity to their opinion.

    To completely disregard anything that the opposite side says and class any discussion as a waste of time is pretty much textbook shutting your ears and sticking with your own opinion.

    You are pretty much holding up a mirror to your own attitude to the debate and you don't like what you see.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,963 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


     If you accept that abortion shouldn't be available past a certain stage before birth, then it begs the question of why you think that.


    I've already explained my reasoning for thinking that so I'm not sure what question it begs?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 593 ✭✭✭CrookedJack


    This is readily available information - a simple google will tell you this. Of course there are many medical conditions where abortion is the correct approach - for example anencephaly where 50% of those afflicted will die during birth and the the others will last only a few hours. Other genetic conditions and chromosomal abnormalities have similar outcomes.

    Most of these would be diagnosed and dealt with long before 24 months.

    Since everyone (at least those being intellectually honest) is saying that abortion at 24 weeks is incredibly rare and invariably for medical reason, why don't you tell us the non-medical reasons you think someone would wait until 24 weeks to get an abortion?



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 10,222 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I did phrase that poorly and was not referencing you.

    What I meant was that the poster who I quoted saying "If they accept any part of the rationale for the availability of abortion, their house of cards starts to come down." is not true. It would be akin to saying that if you accept any part of the rationale for the availability of abortion to be withdrawn, their house of cards start to come down.

    It's not true and people on both sides are able to hold either opinion and have valid reasons for holding them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,473 ✭✭✭✭GreeBo


    Why is the woman's life more important than the child's?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 914 ✭✭✭nolivesmatter



    Even if you were right, that all of these people who take issue with abortion (and obviously not all of them take the same position, nuance was you say) were all hypocrites, that's not an valid argument in the context of a discussion about the ethics of abortion itself. But as you've admitted yourself you think it's a waste of time discussing it so I don't know why you're even here.

    On a side note, there's so much going in the world we're all guilty of some kind of hypocrisy. Sounds like you have a very high opinion of yourself if you don't think you are as well.



  • Posts: 19,178 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    My life is certainly more important than an unborn, to me and to my family, friends and those who rely on me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,906 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr


    Because the woman is already alive and sentient, there may be other children in the family already who need the mother alive, there are many reasons why the mother is more important in this scenario.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 106 ✭✭Yoozername.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,770 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    Aborted, not killed. Murder is killing. Abortion is not murder. HTH



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 914 ✭✭✭nolivesmatter


    Can you elaborate a little on that. Why in your opinion is it not killed? Putting aside any ethics one way or the other for a moment, the fetus does die. It is killed by the abortion process.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 106 ✭✭Yoozername.


    Adolf Hitler didn’t consider some people to be “people” either, so it wouldn’t have been considered murder.

    Shift the goalposts all you want, abortion is the premeditated killing of a human life.

    Why is it considered more egregious for a pregnant woman to be murdered? Because there is a human life growing inside of her.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,906 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr


    A zygote Is a parasite and removed in the same way a cancer tumour is destroyed, it cannot grow without its host to feed on.


    Now this is the part where the pearl clutching gets really intense, a zygote is a clump of cells the same as a cancerous tumour, if either if those puts the host (mother) at risk then they should be removed at the first opportunity and no amount of screaming "ButITsABaBY will change my mind on that.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 914 ✭✭✭nolivesmatter


    I'll try not to clutch my pearls too hard. But even granting all of that, the cancer cells can be killed.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,906 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr


    Yes, they are killed/aborted from the body. As I said I see both as the same.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 106 ✭✭Yoozername.


    Comparing a unborn baby to cancer. The mind boggles.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,412 ✭✭✭Jequ0n


    It’s not a full human until it is born. I don’t see why this is so confusing.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,133 ✭✭✭Idle Passerby


    A dead woman cant carry a pregnancy to term. Is that not blatently obvious? What good would avoiding abortion do in that instance when the feotus will die with her anyway?



  • Posts: 2,264 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    F*cks sake lads, have you all not had this conversation multiple times before? Just cos some "new" account decides to post something "edgy", you don't have to bite. Let it wither on the vine, with 0 replies. That's about all it deserves.



  • Posts: 10,222 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Oof. No pearl clutching on my part, but it is a little off to use that analogy.



  • Posts: 10,222 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I disagree. Do you think a baby at 8 and a half months isn't a human?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,324 ✭✭✭Ubbquittious


    I don't see a massive difference between cutting up a foetus inside the womb the day before it's born or immediately after it's born. After two days the effect is the same.


    "Life starts at conception"

    "Up to 3/6/9 months is ok"

    Or any other arbitrary cut off point is just something silly humans use to justify their actions to their peers and society in the face of whatever adversary is around at the time.


    100s of years from now the human population could slide into heavy decline and once again there will be calls to ban abortion and contraception. Society is constantly rewriting it's rules based on what is happening at the time



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,580 ✭✭✭✭Riesen_Meal


    Or just move it out of here to current affairs...


    Same people with the same investment in spouting the same nonsense about countries they most likely will never even get a chance to visit...


    Edit : I did use pearl clutchers also 😂



Advertisement