Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Is it time to join Nato

Options
15556586061152

Comments

  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 24,094 Mod ✭✭✭✭robinph


    Yep, and being a member of NATO won't make any difference either. It won't do anything to improve the chances of survival, just means Ireland is more likely to be a target... Very far down the list of targets admitedly but join NATO and Dublin would be added to the list of NATO capitals to be hit.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,839 ✭✭✭Polar101


    If there's Russian aggression against Ireland, it's unlikely to be in the form of "invasion ships on the horizon". It's going to be sabotage/cyber attacks against key infrastructure. Ireland doesn't need a massive conscript army to stop that.



  • Registered Users Posts: 29 Narango



    I tend to agree with this. Ireland must think very carefully about abandoning neutrality, taking current world events as a wake-up call. Ireland must look dispassionately at the current world order and not be dictated to by decisions made in the past.

    If joining NATO is too much for most Irish people, Ireland must beef up spending significantly on its armed forces, to make any potential invasion at least difficult for the aggressors. Eventually, some logistical help will arrive from European and American allies. But, they will not intervene militarily; as we have seen in Ukraine as Ireland is not aligned with NATO and there is no effective European Defence Force.

    Ireland is a relatively prosperous nation in Europe now. Finland, with similar population and smaller GDP and which has been neutral until recently, has a standing army of 20,000 and a reserve force of 900,000. Ireland has 10,000 and no heavy equipment currently.

    https://www.google.com/search?q=ireland+gdp&rlz=1C1SQJL_enSA873SA873&oq=IOreland+GDP&aqs=chrome.1.69i57j0i13l9.5895j0j15&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8

    The Russian fleet was off the Cork coast in February 2022. What were they doing there? Ireland does not have any military surveillance capability  to potentially check what they were doing.

    https://www.americamagazine.org/politics-society/2022/02/22/russia-ireland-navy-242435

    In 1904, the Russian fleet sailed 18,000 miles from the Baltic to try and take  a warm water port from Japan. They failed. However, if there is one thing that is certain is that Putin only respects strength and exploits what he considers to be weakness for his own ends and is prepared to be ruthless about it.

    https://www.google.com/search?q=russian+fleet+sails+18%2C000+miles+to+japan&rlz=1C1SQJL_enSA873SA873&sxsrf=APq-WBvKDWnZPJGk0Xq7pbJZTxipMPJJfQ%3A1651075251902&ei=s2hpYv_bNuqiqtsPqpqe6A0&ved=0ahUKEwi_gYzPzrT3AhVqkWoFHSqNB90Q4dUDCA4&uact=5&oq=russian+fleet+sails+18%2C000+miles+to+japan&gs_lcp=Cgdnd3Mtd2l6EAM6BwgAEEcQsANKBAhBGABKBAhGGABQgQlYgQlghgxoAXABeACAAbICiAGyApIBAzMtMZgBAKABAcgBCMABAQ&sclient=gws-wiz

    Alarmist!  I can hear you say, and I sincerely hope you are right. But, why would you  leave your front door open for a thief?

     



  • Registered Users Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    But we need to massive investment in our cyber security capabilities along with military capabilities



  • Posts: 0 ✭✭✭ Ramona Wide Kale


    again thats behaving like a sheep. We should be allied with our EU neighbours. How can we expect them to save us in a war but not the other way around. Anyway if there was a nuclear war, no one would survive, neutral or not. Except maybe some remote place like new zealand



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 26,640 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Ireland is a relatively prosperous nation in Europe now. Finland, with similar population and smaller GDP and which has been neutral until recently, has a standing army of 20,000 and a reserve force of 900,000. Ireland has 10,000 and no heavy equipment currently.

    Finland has an 800km border with Russia...


    In 1904, the Russian fleet sailed 18,000 miles from the Baltic to try and take a warm water port from Japan. They failed. However, if there is one thing that is certain is that Putin only respects strength and exploits what he considers to be weakness for his own ends and is prepared to be ruthless about it.

    The Russian Baltic fleet sailed 18,000 miles because their Pacific fleet had already been destroyed in order to continue a war against an aggressor they were involved in a land battle with over Korea and China.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,839 ✭✭✭Polar101


    That would be useful, hard to disagree with that.



  • Registered Users Posts: 9,381 ✭✭✭Yurt2


    And our intelligence capability. I'm not talking about a rake of low-rent James Bonds running around the world making trouble - but similar sized countries to us in the Nordics, or New Zealand or Holland have formalised intelligence gathering and analysis capacity that far outstrips Ireland.



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,680 ✭✭✭eire4


    Certainly there is no question IMHO we need to significantly up our defense spending and thus our military capability. In the early 80's we were at 1.5% of gdp in terms of defense spending today we are at 0.3%. We need to gradually work our way back up to that 1.5% number. Some say well why spend the money we are not under a real threat. Plus we have NATO countries around us. Firstly for me that mindset is utterly selfish. So other countries spend money on defense but we don't bother to do our part in making sure all of Europe is secure. We are part of the EU and that is our future we should be pulling our weight in all matters. That may in numerical numbers be small but we still should be doing it and not being selfish. Secondly I would remind others that we were the victim of a severe cyper attack by the Russians not so long ago that caused us a lot of damage in terms of money and the disruption it caused so the idea that we are safe and nobody will attack us ever is clearly fanciful sadly in todays world with bellicose authoritarian dictatorships like Russia around.



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,680 ✭✭✭eire4


    I would see cyber security spending as being part of increased military spending and definitely something we need to be doing as we all saw from the Russians cyber attack on our health service.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 6,680 ✭✭✭eire4


    Sure there is no shortage of talkative Irish lads and lassies to go wiggle out info I would think. But seriously your absolutely correct and again this could all be part of our increased defense spending.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,293 ✭✭✭Deusexmachina


    A good article from the Irish times which accurately assesses the current deadlock. https://www.irishtimes.com/news/world/europe/peace-in-ukraine-what-will-it-take-and-how-can-it-happen-1.4865193



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,839 ✭✭✭Polar101


    Article in today's IT. The headline is a bit rubbish, since that wasn't actually said.

    There's two interesting points:

    As one senior official puts it: “Please explain to me why Ireland is celebrating a centenary of its independence from the UK, yet, to defend that sovereignty, relies almost entirely on the UK?”

    “The key question for Ireland is this: will membership of the EU provide enough security for you in decades to come?” he asks. “If the answer is yes, you don’t have to change anything. If you think there is any chance that you will need a stronger and more robust military capability support for your sovereignty, go for Nato.”



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,358 ✭✭✭BluePlanet


    Hey maybe if we did increase military spending like that Finnish guy wants, we can then seriously sabre rattle the unionists in the north when SF get into power. So there are upsides.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,392 ✭✭✭nigeldaniel


    It would not be necessary to spend megabucks [10 Billion plus] on hardware for the army. A well-managed high-end drone squadron and IT infrastructure along with air radar would be a start. The navy needs a frigate and some cruiser vessels. The first step would be to sort out the pay grades. The Rangers need their own aircraft for transport. A 10-year plan perhaps?

    Dan.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,410 ✭✭✭old_aussie




  • Registered Users Posts: 665 ✭✭✭goldenmick



    Russian TV is just a complete joke. All bluster and swagger and fruitcakes, and if you pay any heed to that nonsense then you're as likely to believe there are leprechauns at the bottom of your garden. There's no such thing as a "radioactive tsunami", and a discussion on this has been had on the Russia thread if you want more information on it.

    Whilst having a few of your own nuclear warheads may act as a deterrent to others, the reality is that if someone really wants to invade you then they will. And if someone really wants to nuke you then they will. There's nothing Ireland could do about it.

    I wouldn't read too much into it. Ireland is not going to be attacked and it's not going to be nuked.



  • Registered Users Posts: 29 Narango


     

    To clarify my earlier post.

    Ireland must improve its military capability given the current world order since 24th February 2022

    Like most people I remember where I was when I heard about the 9/11 attacks. I could not believe what was happening. It was a game-changer for international affairs. Similarly, the Russian invasion of Ukraine is a game-changer for the world order and a wake-up call for everyone.

    I mentioned Finland as the Finnish have been historically neutral, like Ireland. In the last few weeks, they have made the difficult decision to join NATO. They have similar population and GDP to Ireland. Any argument that Ireland cannot afford a significantly bigger military is no longer applicable. This may have been an argument in earlier decades. It is true that the Finnish have a large land border with Russia. The Finnish , also, have a history with Russia and fought bravely in the 1930’s to fend off a full invasion. But they still lost territory to Russia. Ireland is an island, however, and could be attacked from the sea.

    It is the responsibility of any government to put in place procedures to protect its people. Ireland must assess the current world order, as it is, and it must upgrade its military accordingly. This is regardless of neutrality and regardless of whether that involves joining NATO or not. For many Irish people a move to join NATO would be distasteful. However, Ireland joining NATO must be debated.

    I mentioned the Russian fleet that travelled 18,000 miles to try to secure a warm water port from Japan in 1904 . The fact is that a warm water port has always been a significant strategic benefit to Russia, hence their attempt to take Mariupol in Ukraine and form a land corridor to Transnistria in Moldova, controlling the Sea of Azov. We still do not know what the Russians were doing off the coast of Cork in February 2022.

    https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/russia/warm-water-port.htm

    America currently holds Guantanamo Bay on the island of Cuba for its fleet. There is nothing that the Cubans can do about this. At the current time Russia could invade Southwest Ireland and colonize the area for their fleet. They could also go through the country up to the border like a knife through butter.

    This would give Russia an easy victory after the embarrassment of the sinking of the “Moscow” and the mauling they have taken in Ukraine


    This would also give Russia a strategic position to control the North Atlantic, The Baltic and the Mediterranean against NATO from a warm water port in the Southwest of Ireland. The USA, the UK, France, and the EU would make significant speeches and noises but would do nothing.

    Putin does not care how many of his military gets killed. He will cover it up back home. He would care even less about Irish neutrality or how many innocent Irish people would get killed and maimed along the way. This has already been demonstrated in Ukraine, Chechnya and Syria.

    The strategic significance of a similar scenario was discussed between Churchill, Roosevelt, and De Valera during the Second World War for the Allies. A United Ireland was discussed with De Valera as payment. But he declined.

    https://www.irishtimes.com/news/britain-offered-unity-if-ireland-entered-war-1.281078

    There is nothing Ireland could do were this to happen at the current time. Ireland does not have the strength, currently, to even discourage such an attack. This is with all due respect to the Irish soldiers who have an exemplary record serving in the British Army, the US army and, latterly the UN since 1960. There is not enough of them, and they do not have the right equipment.

    Irish politicians must also be careful in their speeches. Many of them are making bold speeches against Russia with nothing to back it up.

    A frightening and alarmist scenario? In January 2022 I would have agreed. Now I am not so sure. “Group-think” got Europe into the position where they are so dependent on Russia for oil and gas, when everyone has known for years what kind of a tyrant Putin is.

    Right now Russia has its hands full in Ukraine and I fear for the people of Moldova. We must significantly improve our military capability in any case, whether Ireland remains neutral or not. We must start this now!



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 26,640 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Russia need a warm water port connected by rail infrastructure to the rest of the country. A warm water port in Ireland is utterly and completely useless to them.

    Also the Russians have quite clearly demonstrated they have no capability to control anything. The idea they would "control" the Atlantic from Ireland is beyond fanciful.

    The strategic significance of a similar scenario was discussed between Churchill, Roosevelt, and De Valera during the Second World War for the Allies. A United Ireland was discussed with De Valera as payment. But he declined.

    There is also a reason none of the allies or Germans actually invaded Ireland despite having plans around it.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 24,094 Mod ✭✭✭✭robinph


    America currently holds Guantanamo Bay on the island of Cuba for its fleet. There is nothing that the Cubans can do about this. At the current time Russia could invade Southwest Ireland and colonize the area for their fleet. They could also go through the country up to the border like a knife through butter.


    The difference being that Cuba is near the USA and is surrounded by other countries which are friendly to the USA, or at least not hostile or of any significance militarily. Not a lot Russia can do about it from the far side of the planet.

    But Ireland is surrounded by countries hostile to Russia, isn't easily accessible directly from Russia and would be easy for the USA to get forces across the Atlantic to help Ireland out even if the rest of NATO sat by for some unknown reason.

    USSR did try to get forces across the Atlantic to arm Cuba before when they were far more powerful and competent than Putins Russia is now, and they failed. No reason to think they could carry out a more substantial mission against a hostile Ireland and surrounded by NATO nations who wouldn't let it happen, for exactly the same reasons that stationing nuclear weapons in Cuba wasn't allowed to happen.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 14,406 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    Well Finland is already preparing an application which is going to be done within days.

    A huge move, unthinkable even 6 months ago. Given that Finland was neutral throughout the cold war.

    And of course the Russians respond with threats.

    I guess the Finns are warmongers, say the Putin bots that want to 'whatabout' this topic.



  • Registered Users Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    We need a whole new restructuring of the defense forces first and foremost ,we recently bought 2 new patrol vessels (2nd hand) that will need to be crewed ,the Navy are struggling to crew what few vessels we have let alone frigates and cruisers.

    We need advanced radars for air and shipping, we need medium lift helicopters , possibly gunship type or at least helicopters armed something with more than a FN mag for defense ,

    While we now have 2-3 pc12 ISR aircraft they don't exactly have advanced avionics such as Long range sensors/radars for tracking aircraft and ships ,

    It's looking like they are replacing the camouflage currently used by the army for something most nato countries use multicam .

    It's not going to cost 10 billion ,it's going to cost multiples of that based off spending 2-3 billion per year every year going forward



  • Registered Users Posts: 29 Narango


    Further to my earlier posts, concerning Ireland’s lack of defence,

    The 24th of February 2022 was a game changer for the world order. The big issue was that the invasion of Ukraine did not make sense. It has brought the world back to the 1930’s. Russia lost all leverage and credibility on the diplomatic world stage at that time. Sanctions, isolation, and Western support for Ukraine has made things, and will continue to make things, quite desperate for Russia. Now Russian actions are quite unpredictable. The Russian generals and admirals are in fear of a purge by Putin, like Stalin conducted before in the 1930’s. They are not unlikely to grasp at anything for any sort of victory and this situation  is extremely dangerous. They may well be looking for an easy victory, with impunity, to strike back at NATO for their  logistical support given to Ukraine.

    https://www.history.com/topics/russia/great-purge

    https://www.theweek.co.uk/news/world-news/956656/russian-generals-turning-on-one-another-avoid-purge


    Another look at the NATO map of Europe is necessary. Russia has its hands full now and getting mauled by the Ukrainians. Sweden and Finland are about to join NATO and go blue. Switzerland is landlocked inside NATO countries and safe. Russia may invade the former Yugoslavian counties, formerly under Soviet control. But Ireland is a safer bet. Ireland has no defence whatsoever. An easy victory.

    Russia has a huge Navy, the third largest after the US and China.

    https://www.edudwar.com/top-10-strongest-navies-in-the-world/

    The US does not have access to the whole island of Cuba, only Guantanamo Bay. They have been there since 1898. Cuba is a non-aligned ally of Russia. Ireland is a non-aligned ally of the USA. Joe Biden, President of USA, claims Irish heritage!

    If Russia invades Ireland, then nobody would intervene, just like Ukraine. We are on our own. The difference between now and WW2 is the existence of devastating nuclear weapons. It is worth looking at Mark Felton’s six-minute video on Russia’s Satan 2 missile.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CjrPS8Lzs2g

    NATO will not come to Ireland’s aid, directly, because of this, just like Ukraine. Ireland is not in NATO.

    So, Ireland is on its own. It has no defence. Finland spends 1.5% of GDP on its military, Ireland currently spends 0.29%. This is incredible. Being on its own, Ireland should spend significantly more on defence, as a deterrent. This is regardless of considerations to join NATO. Joining NATO is a separate discussion. Far more important is that Ireland should be able to defend itself in any case. Currently Ireland cannot!

    Ireland has battled for nine hundred years, against its near neighbour, for independence. Why would Ireland risk throwing that independence away now by putting up no defence? Neutrality should not mean weakness!

    Ireland is “blinkered” into thinking that our near neighbour is the only potential enemy. This is outdated “group-think” mentality.

    Irish Politicians like Claire Daly MEP and Mick Wallace MEP would probably not agree with this scenario. Claire Daly MEP misguidedly believes that it is possible to negotiate with Putin. “It’s peace, and peace isn’t delivered by the barrel of a gun. It’s delivered by diplomacy. By dialogue.” Claire Says. Such dialogue with Putin, and people like him unfortunately,  can only happen from a position of strength.

    https://www.thejournal.ie/clare-daly-sanctions-russia-european-parliament-5731540-Apr2022/

    If the Russians get into Ireland, it will be impossible to get them out like the US in Cuba, unless they want to leave. They will cause carnage and misery and wanton destruction, just like they are doing in Ukraine. I do not even want to think about such a thing in Ireland. We must mitigate against it.

    What I have outlined is a potential scenario. It is possible to criticize it certainly. But, the Irish military Defence Chief, Lieutenant General Seán Clancy, and his staff, should be modelling such scenarios all the time and producing contingency plans on how to deal with them. Then General Clancy should be knocking on the defence minister Simon Coveney’s door demanding more assets to defend the country. Then the Taoiseach’s door.

    Why is he not doing this?

    What were the Russian Navy doing off the West coast of Ireland in February 2022?



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 24,094 Mod ✭✭✭✭robinph


    That's all great analysis, but what does Russia do with Ireland once they have it? Would be blockaded by USA and UK at an absolute minimum. No easy way to get supplies in and whatever their next target is is coloured blue on that map so why wouldn't NATO intervene?

    There is nothing of use to Russia in taking Ireland. Just a massive headache in supplying it and for no useful purpose.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 24,094 Mod ✭✭✭✭robinph


    Equally verging on impossible for Russia to take the former Yugoslav republics as they have no route to get to them without going via NATO controlled land, sea or air. Mildly more justification for them to do so if they come up with some lies about liberating former satellite states of USSR, but that's stretching things quite a bit even for Putin.

    A small scale attack on those states, or Ireland, by a small force just to cause some disruption is entirely possible. But still fairly pointless at doing anything other than ensuring more states turn blue on that map.



  • Registered Users Posts: 95 ✭✭GalwayMark


    One error you made

    Yugoslavia was independant of the USSR after Stalin fell out with Tito.



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 16,321 Mod ✭✭✭✭Manic Moran


    In the event of a hypothetical resurgent Russia in about ten years (assuming it fixes its military), the idea of Ireland being invaded as a jumping off point to the UK or France is a bit… unlikely. As is, frankly, the idea that other nations will have nothing better to do with their forces than liberate Ireland.

    The only logical way Ireland might be invaded by Russia is as part of a much larger conflict. It can be an economy of force operation. If they are sitting on Shannon airport or Cork harbor, they are in a position to interdict supplies or transport aircraft coming from North America to aid the fight doubtless going on at the same time in Eastern Europe. Should the US or Uk decide to divert forces to destroy that capability, then they will probably be diverting more force than the Russians would have on Ireland, in order to ensure success. That is force which cannot be used concurrently on the main/important part of the battlefield, Eastern Europe.

    Hypotheticals aside, it is a bit unlikely. However, if Ireland’s best interest is promoted by a peaceful Europe with prosperous trading partners, is it not in Ireland’s interest to aid in the preservation of that peace and the freedom of its trading partners? The same can be said for other countries not under immediate threat of invasions like Iceland or Canada which have chosen to provide such aid.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 24,094 Mod ✭✭✭✭robinph


    Other than putting up some extra monitoring stations in Ireland and officially using Shannon for refueling NATO flights, what would Ireland be providing that they don't already? There isn't going to be masses of extra manpower, or military hardware from Ireland joining.

    The point at which Ireland gets attacked the war with NATO is already well underway so membership is pointless at that time. Joining beforehand just makes Ireland a weak target and legitimate point to attack NATO if someone doesn't want to directly hit the USA.


    Would have been very useful for Ireland to join NATO in the beginning as they would have likely got a bunch of money from US hardware being stationed there and monitoring stations. Less useful to NATO now, other than just showing that it's a preferable option to Russia.

    Yes, spend more money, but things like coast guard and search and rescue. Don't join NATO and spend money on expensive planes and armaments though as it won't be enough to make a difference, and just puts a target on your back.



  • Registered Users Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    @robindch Yes, spend more money, but things like coast guard and search and rescue. Don't join NATO and spend money on expensive planes and armaments though as it won't be enough to make a difference, and just puts a target on your back..


    But if you don't invest in defense sitting with your head in the sand makes you an even bigger target because your weak and cowardly .

    Spend money on the coast guard yeah , but first and foremost we need to invest in the defense and increase capabilities across the board for all of the defense forces Air , Ground ,Naval , Intelligence .

    No point waiting until another flag gets raised over buildings and then crying if only we did this and did that we wouldn't be in this position



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 726 ✭✭✭Mach Two


    What would happen if one NATO country invaded another NATO country.



Advertisement