Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

So "X" - nothing to see here. Elon's in control - Part XXX

199100102104105212

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,535 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    Who’s going to tell him?

    https://mastodon.social/@elonjet



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 353 ✭✭McHardcore


    Ah now. He banned our favourite Irish journalist Donnie O Sullivan 😭


    WTF. All Donnie did do was link to the statement from the LAPD that said Elons stalker story was bullshit.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,671 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr


    He put up a poll asking when the elon jet account should be unbanned

    Didn't like how the original poll was going apparently so has changed it because it had "too many options".





  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,748 ✭✭✭Real Donald Trump




  • Registered Users Posts: 5,399 ✭✭✭Cody montana


    I’d love to see the free speech advocates defend this!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,188 ✭✭✭✭pjohnson


    Only the most gullible ever believed "Free Speech" guff.

    But the "most gullible" just so happens to overlap perfectly with "Musk cheerleaders".



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,188 ✭✭✭✭pjohnson


    Amazed his bots didnt get him his wishes immediately like his other polls have.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 353 ✭✭McHardcore


    He is being a complete space-Karen right now.





  • They don’t mean actual freedom of speech in any kind of philosophical sense, rather it’s just some notion that everyone has to be forced to uncritically listen to their insane ranting at clouds and bonkers conspiracy theories and/or that they should be able to hurl abuse and insults without feedback or consequences.



  • Registered Users Posts: 160 ✭✭ChickenDish


    I'm sorry Musk hasnt realized anything, certainly not the dangers of "free speech", He is a narcissist throwing a very public tantrum by banning anyone who dare question or call him on his BS. The irony is all his fanboys will tell you he is an even bigger champion of free speech by stopping free speech.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,643 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    Jesus, even for Space Karen standards this is some hissy fit.

    You just know he hasn't left the office in weeks, probably píssing into the sink he brought with him and washing himself with the píss.

    Wouldn't surprise me if he pulled the plug on the whole cess pit and fúcked off like the petulant cockwomble he is.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    The Free Speech mantra has always been a total facade for the reality: Musk was píssing off the "right" kind of people that some here, or in other environs, really hated. "The libs", basically, or anybody with a scintilla of public compassion towards those on the fringes; that, hey, maybe being an outrageous díckhead to others isn't a virtue or should be allowed on public fora. Beyond issues of government censorship, I've not seen a single recent argument towards Free Speech Absolutism that hasn't ultimately boiled down to "I wanna be a huge ásshole to [insert social grouping here] without being judged by others as an ásshole"

    Elon Musk is an ásshole. A rich ásshole, and we know that's alluring to some. It's funny 'cos he's running Twitter exactly in the manner some here accuse Boards mods/admins of doing. A little Hitler banning and juking the system just to wield petty, insecure power against those he doesn't like, or those who question his bona-fides.

    Post edited by pixelburp on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,657 ✭✭✭Doctor Jimbob


    It’s hilarious to me that the dimwits who support this clown go around calling others easily offended snowflakes. What an utterly embarrassing thin skinned cretin of a man.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,535 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    They should get this free speech advocate involved in the discussion




  • Registered Users Posts: 827 ✭✭✭farmingquestion


    Lol Donie is suspended! haha

    Ah don't worry about it, he'll unsuspend them in a week at most.

    The circlejerk over that Donie lad was cringe just because he's Irish who made it onto CNN. Just shows the inferiority complex this country has.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,635 ✭✭✭✭hotmail.com


    No doubt about it. This time the do gooders are going to leave twitter in their droves.

    Oh wait...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,188 ✭✭✭✭pjohnson


    Musky is too busy banning any non Muskharďs to give them a chance.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,624 ✭✭✭lawrencesummers


    Maybe someone can clarify this.


    Sharing the location of musks jet is seen as bad because your sharing real time information about his location, and sharing realtime information about someones location is not good.

    How is it then that posters are allowed to post videos of people at matches, playing sports, doing all sorts of things. When harry kane missed a penalty and people posted that information to twitter it gives harry kanes location in real time.


    What am i missing here? Other than the muskegotrip



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    You're not missing anything. It's purely an ego trip and reactionary impulse. As you say, the change in the Terms of Service hold no water when stacked up against the myriad of real-world examples like sports matches. A billionaire got insecure & píssy 'cos someone was sharing public information on Twitter - information protected by the 1st Amendment no less in the US - and so Billy Big Balls had him banned, the ToS changd. That's about the size of it and the rest is dissembling by the Sunk Cost crowd.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 7,237 ✭✭✭mcmoustache


    It just demonstrates that those going on about free speech and its importance aren't to be taken at face value. It's never about free speech as a principle, it's about being able to be a cnut without consequences. Saying "I'm pro free speech" sounds less objectional that saying "I should be allowed to threaten that n*gger with a noose and a burning cross". When anyone claims to be pro free speech, they're usually hiding what this free speech is to be used for and with a good reason.

    For example, I believe that people should be allowed to criticise the state, government agencies, elected officials etc without being sanctioned by the state. In other words, I believe in freedom of speech and when pressed, I'm happy to explain why this freedom is important. When you ask some right-wing reactionary about why this freedom is important, especially in a thread about why their favourite shítehawk got banned off some private platform, they'll claim to be lofty philosophers who love freedom of speech for its own sake. They won't want to admit what they want to do with this freedom. It's no different to the historical revisionists who claim that the American civil war was about States' rights and not slavery - sure it was about the rights of states but it was specifically about the rights of states to practice slavery. Freedom of speech is the same - when someone claims to be pro free speech, it's quite meaningless without including what that freedom is for.

    Unfortunately, when you just want to be a cnut, you'll want to hide that so claiming to be in favour of free speech without going any further in terms of what that free speech entails will give the illusion of a sensible position without giving away the underlying cnutiness that you want to hide.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,538 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    Missing nothing. It was an ill-conceived change made in a fit of pique.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,535 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    "It's never about free speech as a principle, it's about being able to be a cnut without consequences. "

    This should be put up on billboards.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,934 ✭✭✭Wolf359f


    Reading the comments is entertaining, people don't realize that to do business in the EU, one has to abide by EU laws and regulations.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    If Brexit has shown anything, it's that there's a resting, critical lack of understanding of what the EU actually is and how it works. Can't say it's surprising that it's mostly US/UK voices that shout the loudest and most ignorantly WRT the bloc's rulesets.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,101 ✭✭✭✭Snake Plisken


    Very true can't be doing that to the media arm of the government now can we


    Also delighted Donnie got banned, an embarrassment to the country just hope he doesn't get kicked out and end up on RTE



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    If journalists started flying around in private jets, they're probably being paid too much.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,217 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe



    Here's a thread with a list of journalists and pundits who have just been suspended/banned by Elon's tantrum Twitter




  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    Also, if journalists' locations were being tracked real-time, then of course it'd be a case for the FBI 'cos there'd be some kind of illegal phone hacking going on - so yes of course law enforcement would be involved. As opposed to what Musk is whinging talking about, which is people using publicly available data, surfaced by a myriad of already-existent tools & protected by the 1st Amendment.

    The two scenarios aren't even comparable, except in the mind of Musk's idiot siege mentality and those willing to go to bat for someone píssy 'cos his private jet's public location was being shared.

    Snort.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,246 ✭✭✭✭Dyr


    Remember the mantras of the last 5 years, girls and boys, all together now:


    A company can decide who gets to use their product, if you dont like it build your own 😂



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,538 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    We know. People are just pointing out your beloved Musks hypocrisy.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 50,293 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder




  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 16,252 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    Absolutely - He can do whatever he wants with it; and he is, even if what he wants is apparently "burn it to the ground and leave mountains of debt".

    However he is very very loudly saying one thing and then when it comes to anyone that says anything about him he is doing something very very different.

    It's the knee jerk bouncing from guard-rail to guard rail that is keeping everyone interested.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,635 ✭✭✭✭hotmail.com


    Nobody cares about American journalists.

    Americans and free speech. Their media is the worst in the Western World.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,538 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    he is a thin-skinned narcissist. The crossover between Trump fans and Musk fans really stands out.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,141 ✭✭✭spakman




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,320 ✭✭✭✭VinLieger




  • Registered Users Posts: 5,399 ✭✭✭Cody montana


    Not when you’re championing free speech and then banning people for free speech.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,246 ✭✭✭✭Dyr


    But Twitter has always championed free speech while banning people for speech it doesnt like

    Just ask Jack Dorsey.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,399 ✭✭✭Cody montana


    .deleted



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,785 ✭✭✭mohawk


    I never got the love for Musk over the years. I worked with lads before that thought he was a genius.

    I think many extremely wealthy people are surrounded by so many people whose job it is to attend to every whim and as a result they never hear the word no or get called out on their BS. It has to affect the mind and ego. He appears extremely thin-skinned.

    I am increasingly starting to think Twitter isn’t a good place to have important discussions about our society and so maybe not a terrible thing if it either fails or loses most users. It’s probably too late to undo the damage of the echo chamber effect that blights much of social media. Twitter has always banned people whose views they don’t like. It’s just now a different set of people are getting the boot.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,529 ✭✭✭✭kowloon


    He's free to ban people as he sees fit, and people are free to call him out for being a ****, which is exactly what is happening. If he bans enough people and drives others to spend less/no time on his platform he's only opening up opportunities for competing social media companies.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,200 ✭✭✭McFly85



    Who had Jack Dorsey personally banned because he didn’t like them?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,246 ✭✭✭✭Dyr


    Who said Jack Dorsey personally banned someone that he didnt like?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,200 ✭✭✭McFly85


    Okay then, so there were accounts Twitter as a company simply didn’t like that were banned? Who were they?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 60,937 ✭✭✭✭Agent Coulson


    Watching an interview with the kid who built the Elon plane tracking bot and he was showing the DM's he had gotten off Musk offering him $5k to close down the bot account and stop tracking his plane.

    The kid countered with $50k and a Tesla and Musk never replied.

    Might have saved himself $44B if he had just paid the kid $50k and a Tesla instead of buying Twiiter and then banning the account.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    The Musk supporters are something else on this thread.


    Lads. You're never going to be as rich as .1% of him. You're never going to meet him. He truly couldn't give a sh*te about any of ye.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,246 ✭✭✭✭Dyr


    Are you already wrlggling to redefine parameters? It's now accounts that Twitter "simply didnt like that were banned" 😂



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,071 ✭✭✭Christy42


    That was the point from the start. Musk's ego couldn't handle negative posts and they got banned. As you say he is free to do so and people here are free to point out his previous statements about bringing free speech to the world of twitter was a load of lies.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,538 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    Musk is now banning accounts of people that he doesn't like or that offend him. Unless jack was doing the same thing then there is no comparison.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 50,293 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    and this is from a free speech absolutist. who has a very henry ford approach to free speech.



Advertisement