Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

So "X" - nothing to see here. Elon's in control - Part XXX

1150151153155156212

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,217 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 353 ✭✭McHardcore


    "Thousands of scientists are cutting back on Twitter, seeding angst and uncertainty

    A Nature survey reveals scientists’ reasons for leaving the social-media platform now known as X, and what they are doing to build and maintain a sense of community."

    https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-02554-0





  • I'd say what you'll end up with is fragmentation. I don't think you'll ever see a single space like Twitter was again.

    Twitter really just became something else when Musk took over and I think the X rebrand is really the final nail in the coffin for whatever Twitter was.

    While Twitter in its original form had problems, it was also genuinely useful for decimating information, interacting in niche areas like science, tech, and so on. What it is nowadays is really just a toxic mess and it's no longer useful for those kinds of users.

    Mastodon's improving, particularly with the growth of decent apps like Ivory and Ice Cubes on iOS and Melodeon, Fedilab, etc on Android. Ivory is visually and functionally one of the best iOS social apps I've ever used. It wipes the floor with X and Threads in terms of how it works and looks

    There's still a problem communicating what Mastodon actually is though. It's just a protocol. The actual services are the likes of Mastodon.ie which is really well run to be fair to them. The problem though is that anyone can spin up a server, it just gets defederated if it's badly managed. However, it's a protocol just like the WWW or email or whatever and that does create some issues with how it works and how it's discussed.

    The dark horse is Bluesky. It's building quite rapidly (I have an account) and for example much of Irish core old Twitter is already on it. They're working by giving existing users an invite code every couple of weeks, and you can bring more people on board and the logic is it will be populated by people who are essentially in the networks of other solid posters, so the standards are kept up. When they throw the doors open widely is anyone's guess and it's still technically in beta mode, so nobody knows.

    Functionally it's not great tbh. I think it's getting more tech press than it deserves. It's basically just a 'me too.' The app is very basic and doesn't even support video or gifs yet and the hash tagging system is a complete mystery to me. You can search fairly effectively and you can even design your own algorithms or subscribe to different ones, which gives you a lot more control over it.

    In theory Mastodon and Bluesky can be bridged, but whether that happens is also anyone's guess.

    However, it's the same guy who founded Twitter and it could just be tech bros talk about tech bros, so it gets more coverage than Mastodon despite being an inferior setup.

    Threads is Meta so ... beware!



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    I don't see Mastadon managing to break the mainstream, ever. Ultimately I suspect it'll stay in existence by all accounts yet be the Opera / Duck Duck Go of social media: chipping away as the niche alternative only a very specific subset of people will use, while the rest stick with ...

    Ha. Oh shít.

    I was gonna say "stick with X" as a placeholder to mean whatever mainstream social media rises to the top but ... Yeah. Can't use that linguistic convenience anymore lol.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 353 ✭✭McHardcore


    FFS. Just when you were thinking that he hadn’t done something stupid for a while he comes out with this.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,670 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr


    Absolutely mental, I bet he will still have it though.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,195 ✭✭✭nachouser


    Sure, scammers won't buy blue ticks if people can just block them.

    Another great example of Musk making twitter work to suit him instead of users.

    Undoubtedly, this will result in a very public f*ck-up involving a high profile user and it'll be quietly rolled back.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,534 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko



    Blocking is only used by sad woke lib groomers. it makes no sense.


    https://x.com/kenklippenstein/status/1692587854281486599?s=46&t=3l1OhjvjsuAh4w9RMjlH8g

    We must all be too dumb to understand the genius level business strategy behind providing ads for non paying customers.



    https://x.com/mashable/status/1692590025865662953?s=46&t=3l1OhjvjsuAh4w9RMjlH8g

    Post edited by AndrewJRenko on


  • Registered Users Posts: 158 ✭✭Kevrano




  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    But, but ... why? What possible benefit is this going to bring to users?

    Presumably all those blocks previously applied will be unset, so a lot of innocent accounts are gonna get immediately slammed by trolls and shítheads suddenly able to abuse people again.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 11,156 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    Musk is an incredibly blinkered person who presumes his feeling and those in his bubble are what the rest of the users also want.

    He hates how many people have blocked him and those dumb enough to pay for the check mark.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,534 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    A bit harsh. He’s going to put things to a vote before making any decisions, surely.




  • Registered Users Posts: 11,156 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    Turns out the block button is required by both Apple and Android Stores as part of their terms of service so he won't be removing it.

    Looks like another embarrassing climbdown for him...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,657 ✭✭✭Doctor Jimbob


    Wouldn’t be like him to talk nonsense without checking his facts first.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,670 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,223 ✭✭✭Tow


    An Post did that when they said they would no longer forward post for free when some crossed out an old address and wrote the new one on the envelope.

    It turned out that it is written into the law that they are required to do so.

    When is the money (including lost growth) Michael Noonan took in the Pension Levy going to be paid back?



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    Meanwhile, somewhere deep in Musk's inner subconscious...




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 611 ✭✭✭maik3n


    I imagine Elon and his fanbois would posit that by using the block feature, you are restricting someone's freedom of speech.

    And he is a free speech warrior so.......



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,195 ✭✭✭nachouser


    It'll be fun if there are community correct notes on him yet again.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,195 ✭✭✭nachouser




  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    Someone should tell him Twitter's riddled with bots, he might get a refund for that 44 billion 🤭



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 353 ✭✭McHardcore


    You know, it could be a reason as stupid as not wanting people blocking him. When the twitter algorithm got released we found out that it artificially boosted Musk's tweets by a factor of 1,000, while hiding important news stories like the Ukraine invasion. He was the only user I had blocked. Im sure many, many others had him blocked too.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,606 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    That doesn't mean the individual users have to have the ability toblock other uses from seeing them, but that they can report abuse, and a mod or some other system can block abusers

    Of course, that would mean Twitter would be taking on the burden of moderation and are now responsible for taking swift action to respond reports of abuse and harassment. I can see courts ruling that Twitter need to either restore the block function or spend a lot more money on top down content moderation.

    If the block button was changed to just stop people from replying but no longer prevented the from reading the tweets then Maybe Musk might have a leg to stand on, but he's basically unleashed the dregs of psychos and stalkers and bot armies loose to kill off whatever was left of Twitter as a useful platform



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,606 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    That doesn't mean the individual users have to have the ability toblock other uses from seeing them, but that they can report abuse, and a mod or some other system can block abusers

    Of course, that would mean Twitter would be taking on the burden of moderation and are now responsible for taking swift action to respond reports of abuse and harassment. I can see courts ruling that Twitter need to either restore the block function or spend a lot more money on top down content moderation.

    If the block button was changed to just stop people from replying but no longer prevented the from reading the tweets then Maybe Musk might have a leg to stand on, but he's basically unleashed the dregs of psychos and stalkers and bot armies loose to kill off whatever was left of Twitter as a useful platform



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,670 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,071 ✭✭✭Christy42


    Blocking hurts blue tick users. His taking over was with promises to make all voices as prominent as each other (for a fee). However anyone willing to pay for that likely has nothing good to say and as they were the ones getting boosted they were getting blocked before people even read their posts.


    A lot of his supporters are those who feel like no one is listening and his taking over was seen as a way to force people to listen to them. Blocking hurts that as people really, really don't want to listen to them (generally with good reason).





  • I'm not surprised. It's absolutely crawling with bots. When I was still active on Twitter / X, anytime I logged in I seemed to have an extra 8 followers, all of which were those weird accounts that initially look normal something like "Jenny" and then when you click on Jenny's profile it's either cryptocurrency garbage posts or she has a link to some weird xxx site

    I was blocking about 8 to 10 accounts per day. I think I'd blocked something like 1000 accounts since Musk took over. I used to never get spam accounts like that at all. It just became utterly tediuous. I tried locking my account down for a few days to see what would happen, and it didn't help. I just then got the same number of follower requests every day.

    I found Twitter just became unusable due to bots. I don't know if I'd one bot infested follower who was responsible for bringing all this on or something, but it was just overwhelming and I gave up and deleted my account.

    It's a pity in a way as I'd a nice core group of sensible followers from the early days of Twitter, but that's increasingly duplicated over on mastodon.ie and on Bluesky, which I am still highly sceptical of and putting minimal effort into using.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,534 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    Someone needs to explain GDPR to Space Karen





  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 60,937 ✭✭✭✭Agent Coulson


    Yeah I can see millions of people volunteering to give their information to Mossad just so they can be on second rate version of Twitter.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    100% guarantee this wasn't run past legal - if they still have a department worth a damn - and given the dozen other "new features" quickly reverted, I'd not hold my breath this will see the light of day. Am also curious if this is ALL users or just Blue members, special personalities or what.

    Not even GDPR presents problems; California has its own equivalent privacy law that's itself quite strict and a potential landmine.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 611 ✭✭✭maik3n


    Has there been any reason mooted previously as to why he wants to introduce this verification thing (besides data farming) ?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,223 ✭✭✭Tow


    When is the money (including lost growth) Michael Noonan took in the Pension Levy going to be paid back?



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    I'm gonna speculate it's an attempt to reduce the ongoing problem of bots - prove you're a human twice over. It's absolutely gonna lose real members while killing off bots - assuming it doesn't get slapped down by the EU et al. Musk has been sulky with Brussels before but he needs the market.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,195 ✭✭✭nachouser


    The old holding up a newspaper with todays date on it and saying "Honestly, I'm fine. Please do what they say."

    (I'm assuming that headline is a parody)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 60,937 ✭✭✭✭Agent Coulson


    They are building something better than the block button lol and safety is the number 1 priority double lol lol




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,501 ✭✭✭Harika


    New game at twitter, good cop bad cop between Linda and musk. Both saying contradictory things to shape it as it fits



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,322 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    I'd say it's more a case of Musk announces something on a whim, then Linda starts she's getting a lot of notifications on her phone, realises Musk has just announced something without discussing it with her or anyone else, and she has to try find a way to a) make some sort of version of it work and b) make it more palatable to the userbase.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,511 ✭✭✭ForestFire


    Musk doent like being blocked by half of "his" community" and will force his way and views back onto all users.


    The new blocking system probably requires some reason for blocking, or you cannot block companies (Including Elon as Mr. Twitter), Gold ticks or whatever they are now!!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,212 ✭✭✭Cordell


    Space Karen contracted a third party that complies with GDPR:


    Why do you assume it won't be in compliance? Just because they are an Israeli company?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 60,937 ✭✭✭✭Agent Coulson


    Though the ID thing might actually get rid of the padeos who like to share abusive images of children to you know "protect them".



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,501 ✭✭✭Harika




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 60,937 ✭✭✭✭Agent Coulson


    i am seeing a lot of users concerned about removing blocks. We can make mutes stronger, like not allow people you mute to reply or quote you. We can also transfer you block list to mute list.


    Anyone with any intent can find out what you post by simply creating another account or logging out.


    So leave it as is then and let users block whoever they want as many times as they like.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,322 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    Nowhere does he say they've been working on it for a while, just putting forward alternative suggestions about what they will be able to do.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,071 ✭✭✭Christy42


    So what problem is getting solved by removing blocks?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,195 ✭✭✭nachouser


    When you think about it, "mute" is a pretty **** term to throw about.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,534 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    There’s a big difference between saying that you comply with GDPR and actually complying with GDPR. What happens when an Israeli Court orders the company to handover the data to local police or Mossad ?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,200 ✭✭✭McFly85


    I wouldn’t have any issue with the company regarding data(as it seems they use Azure for hosting which has its own processes in place for data standards).

    But asking for ID verification in this way is typically only done when it’s a regulatory requirement - like opening a revolut account. I absolutely don’t think it’s worth handing over a copy of my ID because Musk can’t do his own work with bots.

    I suspect there’d be a relatively significant fall off of users if that’s brought in too. Musk hasn’t engendered trust with the way he’s operated the company so will people really want to start giving more personal detail to X?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,187 ✭✭✭✭pjohnson


    Someone who was defending sharing child abuse tryna take some kind of high ground is amusing.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,187 ✭✭✭✭pjohnson


    I'd imagine the last thing Musk wants is an actual stop to bots. They are key to keeping Twitters activity going nowadays, and in the majority most bots fawn over him anyway.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,534 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    Id say the same about any non EU company. He can we be sure that local laws are GDPR compliant, and will remain compliant?



Advertisement