Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

So "X" - nothing to see here. Elon's in control - Part XXX

1162163165167168212

Comments



  • Bluesky is a lot less impressive than the hype around it. It has created a need to get an invite code which is creating a mystique but the reality of it is very much like earlier versions of Mastodon. I can’t seem to find topics. They don’t use # tags and claim that they’ve something better, which I can’t seem to figure out and they don’t even have 2FA. The mastodon apps like Ivory and Ice Cubes on iOS are also massively superior to the Bluesky app that’s currently available.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,037 ✭✭✭✭Stark


    Interesting that they just didn't use Mastodon as the foundation for their service in a similar way to how Google Talk used Jabber/XMPP.

    Post edited by Boards.ie: Mike on




  • Theoretically there's no reason why they can't just bridge the two at some point.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,501 ✭✭✭Harika


    EU is behind it, if Elon only provides lip service it will be expensive soon



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,320 ✭✭✭✭VinLieger


    My issue is with who said it, Linda Yaccarino is usually who he uses as cover to try give things an image of legitimacy while really everything is still fucked. Also Elon still doesn't understand or maybe care about how much a pain the EU can be, he hasn't actually had a proper run in with them yet, so I reckon he's lied thinking the EU cant actually do anything to him.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,501 ✭✭✭Harika


    Those unelected EU bureaucrats won't be happy with Linda saying that all is fine now. It will be monitored.

    Will be interesting if Elon throw's Linda in front of the bus or fires her in name of free speech.

    I was also thinking that X claimed that the issue resolved by redistribution of workforce. You wonder how the remaining staff liked that. You are a senior developer and are made to review snuff stuff.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,501 ✭✭✭Harika




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,671 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr


    Anyone else having this issue?





  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 60,940 ✭✭✭✭Agent Coulson


    The free speech and let people decide for themselves about misinformation supporters have been quiet in the last few days when videos of innocent men, women and children being murdered and bombed are being openly shared.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,661 ✭✭✭✭For Forks Sake


    Yep. Elmos broken something. Again. Or inadvertently invented time travel



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,260 ✭✭✭Buford T Justice




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,320 ✭✭✭✭VinLieger


    Suddenly getting daily spam from crypto bots for the last week



  • Registered Users Posts: 39 samvimes




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,322 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    Funnily enough most of the spam ads from cryptobots showing up in my timeline are all using Musk's image and name in their tweets to make it look like it's endorsed by Musk.

    Well done on all your genius spambot prevention measures, Elon! Working like a charm!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,320 ✭✭✭✭VinLieger


    Ohh yeah all using the X profile pic and trying to make themselves look like elon



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,027 ✭✭✭Ashbourne hoop


    Same. Blocked about 30 of them in the past week.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,607 ✭✭✭eightieschewbaccy


    Finally shutdown my Twitter a few weeks back and really not seeing myself turning back at this stage. Years of tweets etc but it was not feeling the same any more. Even half the accounts I followed were pretty dead.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,320 ✭✭✭✭VinLieger


    He's charging people to simply post now..... He still doesn't understand the platform and why it's popular



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    Maybe it is as was suggested months ago: the intent is to sabotage the business, drive down the price and get out with his shirt intact. Make it an enticing "fixer upper" for new investors. Cos either that, or he's a bit of an idiot who doesn't know what to do with Twitter.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,322 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    It's all about addressing the bots that nobody cares about and that will still easily bypass these weakass paywalls. Definitely not an attempt to try claw back any money at all to offset the huge losses, and to get people into their payment system so when Musk finally does launch more of his payment all-in-one version of 'X', some people will already be in the system so start using it.

    No, it's definitely just about the bots. Those damn bots.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,023 ✭✭✭Mike3549


    Wait.... So he pays 40B, sabotages business and sells for peanuts as fixer upper? That would make him even bigger idiot.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    For context for those not seeing the headlines. Not exactly breaking the bank though as anyone with a Netflix account knows, the boiling frog effect quickly appears with these services' "cheap" subscription models:

    THE SOCIAL MEDIA site X, formerly known as Twitter, has announced that it has begun charging new users in New Zealand and the Philippines to use basic features like posting messages.

    X, owned since last year by billionaire Elon Musk, said in a statement that its new subscription method should “bolster” existing efforts to reduce spam and “manipulation of our platform and bot activity.”

    Under the trial, new web users in the Philippines and New Zealand will have to pay X around $0.75 and $0.85, respectively, every year, in order to access basic functionality like posting on the site.

    Those who decline to pay the nominal fee will only have access to a “read only” version of the platform, limiting them to reading posts, watching videos and following accounts, the company said.

    “This will evaluate a potentially powerful measure to help us combat bots and spammers on X, while balancing platform accessibility with the small fee amount,” it added.

    Existing users in these countries are not affected.




  • Registered Users Posts: 1,027 ✭✭✭Ashbourne hoop


    Once the subscription model takes hold, even if it's 85c, I'm out. It's not the money, but no way would I trust Twitter with my bank details.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,322 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    Thankfully for me, it'll make no difference to how I use the site. I stopped posting years ago (and barely posted before that anyway) and I don't bother retweeting or liking tweets or anything. I only use it for following accounts and reading the timeline (of accounts I follow, not the curated For You tab they keep trying to push).



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,027 ✭✭✭Ashbourne hoop


    The "for you" tab is the biggest contradiction ever. I wonder do people who follow the likes of Darren Grimes, Piers Morgan, John McGuirk etc get a "for you" tab of Colm O'Gorman etc...

    I liked twitter, it's the one Social Media app I use, but it's gone to hell since Space Karen took over.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,607 ✭✭✭eightieschewbaccy


    Yep, the number of active tweeters are drastically lower in general so even making money back this way feels unlikely. There's 370 million active users and imagine those that frequently tweet is a fraction of that. So the profit numbers on this are overall hilariously small.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,322 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    Contrarians drive engagement (positive but mostly negative). Engagement results in views/clicks. Therefore the For You tab pushes that stuff more to get people to engage with it and drive engagement further.

    It doesn't actually care what you might like, as everyone has that mostly sussed anyway and follows the accounts they like. It's just all about those clicks. And paying people for their engagement serves nothing but encourage more people to be contrarians as doing so becomes profitable for them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,071 ✭✭✭Christy42


    The charging is obviously a test to see if they can without risking too much of the user base. The ideal would be to have a big uptake, expand it worldwide and up the price.


    The price is nominal but also don't get the same as you would from a Netflix subscription. This is just charging people to create the content they need to get people coming back.


    Fundamentally Musk is a salesman with a product he has no idea how to sell so he is just trying whatever he can. If it does get rolled out the most likely to pay are those who agree with Musk's politics further driving it down the road of the echo chamber his supporters gave out about. Course this would be the right type of echo chamber for them.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    It's also possible this is all part of the grander, Everything App plan; tying these "trivial" subscription fees into X Pay or whatever it'll be called, the hope to capture an automatic market for Musk's slow merge & attempt to create a Western version of WeChat.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 16,252 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    But no one wants an "everything" app.

    If they did it would already exist in some form or other.

    WeChat doesn't count as it solely exists in a vacuum created by the Chinese government.

    WeChats utter non-existence outside of China tells you all you need to know about the actual market for an "everything" app.

    Musk thinks it's a great idea and is going to do it no matter what , just like he always wanted a company called X so no matter how utterly brain-dead it was to flush years and years of brand recognition for Twitter , he went ahead and did it anyway.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 158 ✭✭Kevrano


    I deleted my Twitter account earlier in the year. For months afterwards, I still had a sense of FOMO and tried to view tweets to see what was going on.

    I've stopped caring now. I just follow this thread to see what happens with his next big revenue raising scheme. The man has nobody who will say No to him.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,023 ✭✭✭Mike3549


    I might defend musk in this case, I don't like him in fairness.

    Just because we don't need it now, it doesn't mean it won't work in the future.

    Couple of examples: Nokia smartphones/tablets, 00s, we weren't ready at the time.

    Selfie stick created in the 80/90s. It's was in the book of useless inventions.

    Everybody laughed at the robot vacuum cleaner at first, not anymore.

    But yeah, twitter/x is going to dogs





  • I think this notion that he actually has a strategy is giving him far too much credit.

    As for an everything app? I would point out that Twitter / X can’t even do one thing well, yet it wants to be an “everything app”.

    Seems the speculation that he’ll just walk away from the EU market is being taken seriously by the media now too. https://www.businessinsider.com/elon-musk-considering-taking-twitter-x-out-of-europe-dsa-2023-10



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 866 ✭✭✭timetogo1


    What's the betting it's something he's saying now and will back away from in the next month or two.

    Post edited by Boards.ie: Mike on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,200 ✭✭✭McFly85


    Even if an everything app was viable in a western market(but really, it isn’t - people are very happy to have their everything app essentially be their phone, and SSO integration means even the benefit of having only one account for everything is limited), Musk is not the person to be able to deliver it.

    I don’t know if he’s prepared for the amount of regulatory oversight that comes with an app that you can do everything in, even in the US.

    We’ve already seen him throw his toys out of the pram with the relatively light touch regulation in the EU, when the fed and ECB get involved he’ll really start feeling it.

    Hes a man who likes to throw our big ideas and have his engineers worry about implementation, and ordering large changes as he thinks of them. Thats already at odds with Twitter as an advertising platform, it’s certainly going to be much more at odds when people’s money is involved.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,322 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    With Musk, it'll always come down to if the fines for breaking rules is less than the profit from doing so, he'll do it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,200 ✭✭✭McFly85


    Agreed, but unless X starts making serious profit, it will almost always be the case that he’ll have to back down.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    Go on Musk: do it. Kill Twitter in a stroke. I'd bust a blood vessel from the laughter as their traffic cratered and the company truly went into freefall. Just goes to show that above all else, Musk is just another petulant billionaire who wants to ignore the kind of governmental oversight that's trying to protect us - not stymy "innovation" as pleaded by the corporations.

    The irony is that the culture and economy that people like Musk want - freewheeling capitalism - is never gonna let an Everything App take root 'cos the nature of capitalism demands competition (even if modern corporate culture is trying to homogenise that); and if you don't have an authoritarian government cosplaying as an open capitalist society, one that can enforce an Everything App, then it ain't gonna happen. And that's leaving aside the reality that there are already very solid, very successful corporations who fulfill each pillar within this fantasy Everything App.

    Post edited by Boards.ie: Mike on




  • They seem to have implemented an EU illegal content reporting button, which requires you to fill in your full real name, email address and make a statement saying basically that you believe you’re making a true statement and you also have to pick which country you think the content is illegal in and why.

    Obvious that they don’t want to deal with reports.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,200 ✭✭✭McFly85


    So end users are supposed to understand EU regulation?

    Even if this was being fed into an algorithm to better understand how to prevent similar posts from being allowed in future, it will create more noise than anything else.

    Imagine deciding that the person who implements a social media site this poorly is the guy you want responsible for your money.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    That's a really low effort attempt to circumvent the EU regulation, by the looks of things; I can't imagine Brussels is gonna be happy with that?

    Post edited by Boards.ie: Mike on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,322 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    That's the hilarious thing. If he'd announced as soon as he bought Twitter that he wanted to turn it into his everything/payment app thing, a lot of people might have thought it was a strong idea that could work.

    Instead, he tried to get out of buying the site altogether, was forced to take it at an absurdly high price, completely mismanages the site for about a year, saddles it with a huge amount of debt, and then throws in "I want people to link their banking accounts and use my site for payments etc"

    It's the equivalent of claiming the window on your truck is so strong it won't break if you throw a metal ball at it, then throwing a metal ball at it and it cracking, and then just shrugging your shoulders.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,200 ✭✭✭McFly85


    Having had to deal with regulators myself, I really doubt “we have asked our customers to let us know when we don’t comply with regulations” is an acceptable process!





  • It also very clearly is aimed at discouraging reports and won’t allow reporting with just your user name. It wants real names and emails before it will even allow you to flag illegal content beyond a rather narrow range of options that Twitter itself has.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    Plus: wouldn't asking for a real name and email itself also open a can of GDPR worms that'd only increase Musk's problems?

    Post edited by Boards.ie: Mike on




  • Not to mention that you could fill in anyone’s name as it doesn’t check …



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,602 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    The idea of an "everything" app is a very scary one TBH. Especially one that's under the control of someone like Elon Musk.

    Post edited by Boards.ie: Mike on




  • Thankfully it's extremely unlikely, given market forces.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,349 ✭✭✭✭super_furry


    "Elon Musk, owner of social media platform X, is considering removing the service formerly called Twitter from Europe in response to a new internet platform regulation in the region, news site Insider reported on Wednesday."


    At this stage, nothing of value would be lost. He's killed the site as anything other than a crypto-scam spam farm and a troll party. The Gaza/Israel crisis shows just how useless it is at presenting any kind on trustworthy information now.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,200 ✭✭✭McFly85


    Complete bluster.

    X needs the EU far more than the EU needs X.

    Removing the platform from the EU would lose tens of millions of users and a significant amount of advertising revenue, and would open the door to another competitor to swoop in and start competing with his platform pretty quickly.



Advertisement