Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Public Pay Talks - see mod warning post 4293

1112113115117118235

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,293 ✭✭✭Ezeoul


    The "boom" totally bypassed civil and public servants.

    I take it you're referring to the farce that was the benchmarking awards, which didn't happen until the early 2000s - years after the Celtic Tiger had been roaring for everyone else - and was meant to bring the much lower C&PS pay rates up closer to the much higher rates being paid in the private sector for equivalent roles. Awards that again were drip fed in slowly over years, and then very swiftly removed by FEMPI, once the bottom fell out. As well as more pain on top.

    Giving something with one hand, then taking it away with the other, then giving it back, once again drip fed over more than a decade, were not pay increases.

    It was pay restoration to where they should have been all along.

    Post edited by Ezeoul on


  • Registered Users Posts: 87 ✭✭readoutloud


    Deleted



  • Registered Users Posts: 87 ✭✭readoutloud


    Deleted



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,755 ✭✭✭lbunnae




  • Registered Users Posts: 1,755 ✭✭✭lbunnae




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,293 ✭✭✭Ezeoul


    Well, maybe I'm a dreamer, but it's like I once said to a PO back when I was a very junior CA and a 2% pay increase was being discussed.

    "2% of what you earn is a good increase. 2% of what I earn is **** all".

    As far as I'm concerned, the same applies today.

    Someone on €70k getting a 7% increase equating to almost €5k pa (gross) might think it's a good offer (or even a "great!" offer) and happily vote it in.

    However, someone on €28K getting a 7% increase equating to less than €2k pa (gross) is getting fcuked over.

    I won't vote to accept a deal for 7% over 2 years.

    Post edited by Ezeoul on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,963 ✭✭✭bren2001


    Inflation was higher then the rate increase from the last agreement. Inflation would outstrip a 7% rise over the next two years.

    10% is probably unlikely but perfectly reasonable.



  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 14,121 Mod ✭✭✭✭pc7


    I really feel they need to look at the lower grades this time, it is getting impossible to recruit and retain staff.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,755 ✭✭✭lbunnae


    I dont disagree here. But id wager there isnt a lot of lower grades posting on boards with the age demogrpahic



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,038 ✭✭✭Daith


    Where would a CO even get the time to post on Boards!


    But yes, something better for lower grades would be good



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,755 ✭✭✭lbunnae




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,251 ✭✭✭Grueller




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,293 ✭✭✭Ezeoul


    You say you don't disagree, but you have been vocal that you would vote to accept such a deal again anyway!

    This is were we will always differ.

    Post edited by Ezeoul on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,679 ✭✭✭Gusser09


    Not a chance of 10 percent obviously. It'll be between 6 and 8 I'm guessing. I'd also think most people will accept this deal.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,038 ✭✭✭Daith


    Yeah, a "big" increase at the start like 4 with two others around 2 or something over two years?



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Are we all saying that we're happy taking a pay cut so?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,679 ✭✭✭Gusser09


    No I'd be happy with 20 percent. I doubt that'll happen though so I'd take 8 percent.

    Not a chance I'm standing on a picket line. No **** way. Not after the debacle last time.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,038 ✭✭✭Daith


    I think the bigger question is, are you saying you'd quit your job and go to the private sector? That's what the State is betting when they negotiate.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,755 ✭✭✭lbunnae


    Oh yeah i mean ill vote for 10 across the board. We wont get 10 like.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,755 ✭✭✭lbunnae


    I see the local authroties are threatening strikes , maybe that will speed up the talks.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Parts of TUSLA and HSE are already beginning industrial action for conditions changes.

    Union seems to be getting angsty



  • Registered Users Posts: 87 ✭✭readoutloud


    Irish inflation:

    2021 ~ 2.5%

    2022 ~ 8%

    2023 ~ 6%

    (100 * 1.025 * 1.08 * 1.06 = 117.5%)

    Between Jan 2021 and Dec 2023 inflation will have been 17.5%. That's a significant reduction of public servants' actual purchasing power.

    And this will be further compounded by continued high rates of inflation next year.

    What were the pay increases across the same time period?

    I don't think a double digit pay increase this time round is an unreasonable ask.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Jaysus, hope that the Government negotiation team are clones of you



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,255 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    But that completely ignores the problem of not being able to recruit competent staff. It's been hopeless in IT for a long time but it's everywhere now.

    Scrap the cap!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 725 ✭✭✭ethical


    People dreaming again! No way on earth the Gov.will listen to a double digit pay increase.Remember we are Public Servants for a reason!!! Best we can hope for is 3% in year 1 and perhaps 1.5% in year 2 and same in year 3...that's if its a 3 yr agreement which I doubt it will be.Giving a 'big' 3% in yr 1 will be the best that can be hoped for. Remember the rate of inflation is coming down and by year 2 or yr 3 of a new agreement we could be down to the EU hoped for 2% inflation rate and the yr 2 and yr 3 wage % increase will look OK when compared with the then inflation rate.

    Really what the Gov. should be doing is getting all suppliers in for a chat and threatening 'fines' if the supply of goods and services does not show a downward curve over a certain few months. Of course the Gov. will say they cannot interfere in this.Remember they sort of brought energy suppliers in and sort of told them to bring prices down...and of course, they sort of told the banks to give better saving rate....so its all just sort of........

    If we didn't have the extortion we could survive with low enough wage increases. Yes, we missed out big time over the years from 2010 'til the present with FEMPI ,etc ,yes, we are an easy target and will remain so.Industrial unrest will not heal matters. Unions are TFU (totally fcuking useless!) when it comes to pay negotiations nowadays!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,038 ✭✭✭Daith


    Pay rises for existing staff and recruiting new staff are different things though.

    As I mentioned before, they could change the starting entry point on the scale rather than actual rises. Or look at a Dublin bonus but, well, that will cause ructions as already discussed.

    But they know the vast majority of public servants will grumble but won't leave.

    They're doing three streams for IT specialists at the moment. Now, I personally think HEO doesn't really mean IT specialist, but I'd be really curious as to what level of applications they're getting



  • Registered Users Posts: 87 ✭✭readoutloud


    This post shows a misunderstanding of inflation.

    If, as the poster says, the was a paltry pay increase of 3% next year, and 1.5% the two following years, that means that even were inflation to drop to 2% in Years 2 and 3, public servants would be losing purchasing power each year (by ~1% the first year and 0.5% the next two years). This seems fairly unacceptable.

    Even if inflation does drop to 2% over the next few years (a big if) that does not mean prices for the "supply of goods and services" revert to their previous levels. Instead, prices remain where they are - which almost 20% higher than they were 3 years ago.

    For prices to actually drop back to 2019 levels, we would have to see high deflation. This is unlikely to happen, especially given that significant deflation has only occured about 3 times in the history of the state.

    Short of a major economic crash (and likely even then) prices are staying up. Wages must rise accordingly if we want a skilled, fully-functioning public sector.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,293 ✭✭✭Ezeoul


    The State already knows they don't have to offer more than 6% or 7%, because they know people won't quit, and too many are willing to just accept whatever lowball first offer is made, and go quietly on their way for another couple of years.

    Why would they offer more?

    The outcome is pre-determined and its so predictable.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,679 ✭✭✭Gusser09




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,293 ✭✭✭Ezeoul


    Me personally, yes I would, even though I wouldn't enjoy it. Because I think until it actually comes to that, all C&PS will ever get is the crumbs of the table.

    It would be short term pain for long term gain. I've been on strike before, as I know you have.

    But there is little threat of it happening now with the current membership, and the Government are well aware of that.



Advertisement