Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Public Pay Talks - see mod warning post 4293

1136137139141142235

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 98 ✭✭spark_tank


    That's one thing I do agree with you on, certainly over the last few years anyway. Negotiations all seems like a show and it feels very unlikely that the government could have given us any less.

    Lets hope the Unions do a better job of serving their members this time around.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,963 ✭✭✭bren2001


    Nobody wants to be on a picket.

    I am happy to strike unless I see my pay restored (or the intention to restore by structuring a deal to facilitate that).

    It won't be an all out strike if the Unions cannot settle on a deal. It will be one day strikes, work to rule etc.



  • Registered Users Posts: 98 ✭✭spark_tank


    Nobody wants but it seems the majority are willing to go down that road if a fair deal isn't received. Its what a few poor pay agreements will do.



    A survey by Fórsa, has revealed very strong support for unions to pursue inflation-matching pay increases, including in the next round of public service pay talks.

    The survey, which drew completed responses from more than 20,000 of the union’s members nationwide, was commissioned by Fórsa and conducted by Amárach research in the second half of April.

    More than 80% of respondents said it was ‘very important’ that that pay negotiations secure increases that match inflation, and this response was especially high (90%) among younger workers.

    The survey found a clear majority of respondents are in favour of Fórsa organising a ballot for industrial action if negotiated increases are below the rate of inflation, with only 5% opposed, while the remainder said they would consider their support for an industrial action ballot when details of any pay offer are known.

    The union said that if such a ballot became necessary support would be likely to increase, and noted a higher level of support for an industrial action ballot among younger Fórsa members.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,755 ✭✭✭lbunnae


    Slim minority my arse!! That deal would be voted in with ease again.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,255 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    Work to rule. No need for a picket and you still get paid...

    Scrap the cap!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,288 ✭✭✭Ezeoul


    Dont forget they did try to get away with less last time.

    The first offer was 5% and it caused the talks to break down in June 2022.

    Eventually they increased the offer to 6.5% in September, with the first 3% backdated.

    They would absolutely try to get away with less, if they could.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,755 ✭✭✭lbunnae


    Good news , talks starting by end of the week. And It article mentions pursuit of a short term 1 year deal.



  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 14,121 Mod ✭✭✭✭pc7


    It would be great to get it sorted and some payment early in the new year, will it likely be March now?



  • Registered Users Posts: 98 ✭✭spark_tank


    There are obviously negotiation tactics involved. If the government feel that they want to offer 4.5% in 2024 then they're not going to bring that straight to the table.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,923 ✭✭✭Sultan of Bling


    Doesn't have to be a picket, could be a work to rule.

    No requirement for the nuclear option............yet.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,705 ✭✭✭✭kippy


    I know the science on this but in reality is that what each individual is actually doing?

    Not everyone is effected by inflation in the same way. Its simply daft to suggest that everyone is X percent poorer because the headline rate of inflation is X percent.

    The logic required to suggest that accepting a payrise makes your poorer than before you had the pay rise is absolutely astounding.


    The reality is that very few members of unions have the stomach for long term strike action and the unions themselves cannot afford it - most people are realistic.

    Suggestions like above that there should be 15% increases across the board over a calendar year are pure insane - you could not go out on strike with that aim - you'd still be on strike or worse still.


    To be honest I have heard so little from any union on the specifics of these particular talks, I'd find it difficult to know what the position they are taking on talks are.

    Post edited by kippy on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,705 ✭✭✭✭kippy


    I didn't speak to one person in the real world who regreted voting for the deal - yeah they were slighted peeved that it wasn't more but sure isn't that always the case.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,262 ✭✭✭combat14


    Pay increases worth 12.7% for 2023 - 2026 agreed for mechanical workers on top of 2.8% increase which took effect in January 2023 i.e. 15.5% over 3 years or an average of 5.15% a year

    https://www.rte.ie/news/business/2023/1121/1417766-mechanical-workers-pay-deal/



  • Registered Users Posts: 105 ✭✭EduKate


    Nobody suggested everybody is affected the same way by inflation. It's a straw man argument.

    Overall, voting for a pay deal that doesn't match inflation is a vote to make yourself poorer because your purchasing power has declined. That isn't "astounding logic", it's sound logic.

    A majority of union members have demonstrated they're quite happy to vote for a real-term pay decrease.

    Accepting that without even trying to fight it is a terrible strategy imo. If the government knows union members will vote for anything without putting up a fight, the logical thing for them to do is offer less and less each time, with public sector workers falling further and further behind in real terms.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,755 ✭✭✭lbunnae


    Really not sure , but it is a one year deal maybe the bulk could come fast ish



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,255 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    To say that inflation doesn't affect everyone equally is a bit ridiculous when the largest increases have been in electricity and food. Maybe if you live off-grid on an organic vegetable patch...

    Scrap the cap!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,705 ✭✭✭✭kippy


    It's astounding logic to suggest that accepting an increase in take home pay is a pay cut or indeed making yourself poorer, particularly on an individualised basis which is what people vote on....which is why the statement that inflation doesn't hit everyone equally isn't a straw man argument. Quite the opposite.

    90 percent of union members voted based on their individual circumstances not on the broad brush strokes of commentary that yourself and others seem to think are gospel.

    As for the negotiating hand of the government of the day, once you cannot attract or retain people into the sector for one reason or another terms and conditions have to be made better. The state simply cannot function otherwise.

    The social and employment landscape has changed drastically from forty years ago. People have many many more options on careers and employability which changes entirely the landscape on attraction and retention of staff.

    Post edited by kippy on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,705 ✭✭✭✭kippy


    I spend less on food and use less units of electricity now than 3-4 years ago spending slightly more on electric but not the percentage rates discussed here.

    When I vote for pay deals I do take on the me fein attitude as everyone else does. The suggestion that I am voting for a paycut for myself is moronic.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,262 ✭✭✭combat14


    If your raise this year was less than 7.1%, it didn't keep up with inflation — and you effectively got a pay cut


    e.g.

    nominal "pay rise": 5%

    inflation at for example: 7%

    real terms "pay rise": -2%



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,705 ✭✭✭✭kippy


    Look at the logic above and have a think about it for a minute



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,379 ✭✭✭AyeGer


    The way inflation has been going we’d need 5 or 6% increase asap followed by a few 2 or 3% increases over the next 2 or 3 years. About 12% over 3 years.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,505 ✭✭✭✭Calahonda52


    Re this vitriol.

    Also, private sector works are going to lie and spin things to guilt and making public servants look greedy. It is essential they are ignored as well. This isn't a popularity contest we are entering.

    I did a presentation to 300 relatively junior PS workers a few years back and one of the questions I asked was: who pays your wages?

    Answer: Government.

    And where does Gov get the mula?

    No idea.

    Was a revelation to think that the private sector, in all its guises, is the main contributor.

    Re this

    making public servants look greedy.

    We are long past that.

    Now its just a question of scale

    Re guilt

    Not even in the PS lexicon

    “I can’t pay my staff or mortgage with instagram likes”.



  • Registered Users Posts: 105 ✭✭EduKate


    Not sure if you're being disingenuous or genuinely don't understand how inflation works.

    There's little point engaging in either scenario.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,705 ✭✭✭✭kippy


    On a purely personal basis inflation hasn't affected me from an overall disposable income perspective - which ultimately is what I care about.

    The last pay agreement increased my disposable income the next one will as well. If I think I can do better elsewhere then that's up to me.

    If enough staff in the PS and CS think they can do better elsewhere thats a major issue for the state.

    I think thats as clear as the nose on your face - its a pity it has to be pointed out in such obvious terms.

    It's pretty obvious that a large percentage of the union members think/thought the same.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,288 ✭✭✭Ezeoul


    The social and employment landscape has changed drastically from forty years ago.

    It certainly has. And not always for the better.

    There was much less of this "mé féin" attitude which, imo, is nothing to either brag about, or be proud off.

    And which ultimately, weakens all.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,705 ✭✭✭✭kippy



    You are suggesting the fact that we have more employment and employment opportunities in this country than EVER before is a bad thing? That opportunity is a bad thing? That we are not beholden to a very narrow number of careers and employers is a bad thing?

    There's as much mé féin attitude now as then - and suggesting otherwise is pure nonsense.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,352 ✭✭✭naughto


    Any 1 that got the last pay increase how much did ye get?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,288 ✭✭✭Ezeoul


    I think you know very well I was not talking about "employment and employment opportunities" in general. Don't be disingenous.

    As far as I'm concerned, if someone's attitude is "I'm a mé féiner" then they do not belong in a union where they would actually use their vote without consideration for the impact on their lower paid colleagues and the private sector would probably suit them better too. So they should own it, and stay out of unions.

    In my day, being called a "mé féiner" was considered an insult,

    mé féiner (plural mé féiners)

    1. (Irelandderogatory) Someone who acts from self-interest, rather than the common good or the national interest. 

    But if its now being worn as some kind of badge of honour then things have definitely changed. And yes, in my opinion, definitely not for the better.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,705 ✭✭✭✭kippy


    Look, everyone in union is ultimately a me feiner....looking out for themselves, if they think union membership will further their own interests they will stay in it. Dont go telling me the are in the union so that the poorest in Irish society benefit.......or any other group for that matter.

    I ain 'wearing' it as any badge, just pointing out a very clear fact that differs from the narrative of some here.



Advertisement