Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Public Pay Talks - see mod warning post 4293

16768707273235

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,107 ✭✭✭salonfire


    Oh so now the narrative has changed. It's not that they can't buy a house, it's because it's only an "average" house.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,435 ✭✭✭Scoundrel


    Idiotic comments aside what is your solution? What is your alternative?



  • Registered Users Posts: 854 ✭✭✭crinkley


    The narrative didn’t change it was just pointed out to you how ridiculous it is to say that if two civil servants above a certain grade pooled their money they could buy a house in say Longford, doesn’t really help when the majority of departments and buildings are in dublin



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,190 ✭✭✭✭o1s1n
    Master of the Universe


    You selective omitted the 'nowhere near where they work' part.

    Post edited by o1s1n on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,107 ✭✭✭salonfire


    That's why there should be a Dublin weighting. Why do you think unions don't push for this for their Dublin employees?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,107 ✭✭✭salonfire


    I already said there should be a Dublin weighting. Aside from Dublin, there's no reason why non Dublin based employees should live far from where they work.

    Every city, town and village has three bed semis.



  • Registered Users Posts: 854 ✭✭✭crinkley


    I’ve always said there should be a dublin weighting, and I say it again as someone who doesn’t live in Dublin. One union rep told me because there would be no appetite amongst members to have a dual system, but if new entrants could be screwed over to protect those already in the service I dunno why members, especially those living and working in dublin, aren’t pushing for this, it’s not novel it happens in the UK.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,462 ✭✭✭fliball123


    Do enlighten me I said the borrowing of this money has gone up by 7 times am I wrong in that ? Is that not what the article states?



  • Registered Users Posts: 414 ✭✭jaykay2


    You could buy a fabulous house in Longford for the price discussed above.

    The real issue is that the civil service should be trying to move departments out of Dublin again. Lets not call is decentralisation though this time as it has a lot of toxicity attached to it.

    No reason for putting all these departments in Dublin where people can't afford to live.



  • Registered Users Posts: 854 ✭✭✭crinkley


    Personally I don’t think moving offices out of dublin will help. Many people for various reasons won’t want to move. Hybrid working should be fully embraced and hubs established around the country with the use of these being allowed to count towards your office days with an anchor day once a fortnight or month depending on business needs. This may encourage more people to move out without the need and hassle of relocating large sections of departments

    moving offices out of dublin doesn’t address the need to provide public services for dublin - which are greatly needed such as nursing, teachers etc so this is where I think an additional allowance or something should be paid for those working and living in the capital



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 18 Strider84


    A lot of our debt was refinanced and locked in at lower interest rates for the long term when borrowing was cheap. The increase in interest rates will only apply to the portion of the debt that has to be refinanced.

    The cost of our borrowing won't increase drastically overnight.



  • Registered Users Posts: 414 ✭✭jaykay2


    Of course working from home etc should be rolled out and made available to everyone, but at the same time, people can't have it every way. If you want to live in Dublin, you are going to have to pay Dublin prices for accommodation / mortgages. That is the premium people have to pay if they want to live there.

    Regarding public services availability in Dublin, obviously any that are needed to be physically in Dublin would need to stay there, but the vast majority of offices / departments could be moved to places where people could more easily afford housing or could get much more substantial home for their money. People wanting to stay in Dublin and keep all the jobs in Dublin are the reason accommodation /housing is so expensive.

    For the towns that got departments due to decentralisation, it has been a great move for people from the area and for people who have to waste significantly less time commuting.



  • Registered Users Posts: 10 Greenlamp21


    It wont work. Should there also be a 2nd weighting for Cork, then Galway and so on

    The UK system is different because its London, Dublin is not in any way comparable to London



  • Registered Users Posts: 854 ✭✭✭crinkley


    No I wouldn’t propose more than one weighting system. I too won’t think it will work because others would complain too much but it’s just personally what I would do. Cork and Galway aren’t experiencing the same problems with retaining vital staff



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,255 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    Actually most CS jobs are outside of Dublin, and have been for a long time now.

    But given that pretty much everything which can practicably be decentralised already has been, we have to offer T&Cs that will attract and retain talented staff especially graduates.

    Also you can't decentralise the gardai, nurses, ambulance drivers, teachers... we will always need large numbers of public servants to work in Dublin and the other cities, and people need to be able to afford to live near where they work. The idea of commuting crazy distances is over, it's no longer affordable, nobody wants the terrible effects it has on their family life, and we have to get our national transport emissions down. People who work remotely and are rarely in the office can afford to live further away, but WFH is just not an option for huge numbers of public sector jobs.

    Scrap the cap!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,255 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    Clearly you haven't read Nineteen Eighty-Four.

    The idiotic comment was the one I was replying to. Victory, my arse.

    The alternative is to stop signing up to pay deals which erode our T&Cs and leave us worse off. Every "deal" in the last 15 years has left us worse off.

    Scrap the cap!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,255 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    Dublin is where the government is. The head offices of departments are always going to have to be in Dublin. (Yes FF idiotically tried to move some HQs away, this was really an attempt to sideline certain departments and of course they saw right through it - like most things about that vote-buying plan, it was totally unworkable). Most civil servants already work outside of Dublin and have done since the 90s wave of decentralisations.

    Scrap the cap!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,107 ✭✭✭salonfire


    Why won't it work? There is already allowances for working on the Islands and medical staff used to be given allowances for working in regional hospitals. It won't work because the unions don't want it to work. They want Dublin rates of pay across the entire country.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,435 ✭✭✭Scoundrel


    So your solution is no pay deals no increases nothing as usual. How would you suggest PS workers achieve pay rises that are satisfactory to you without signing up for pay deals? How does this latest deal erode our T&C's exactly in recent times the unions have achieved pay restoration and the reduction of hours from 37 to 35 how would you have achieved this?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,107 ✭✭✭salonfire


    You could buy a fabulous house in the vast, vast majority of the country at that price.

    Even in Dublin, a 2-bed apartment is within that price range.

    House prices are just another piece of the unions lies and propaganda. They are as bent as a two bob note, full of double speak.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 357 ✭✭LegallyAbroad


    It's also where the judiciary, legislature, and diplomatic corps are so certain central departments will always need to be there.



  • Registered Users Posts: 357 ✭✭LegallyAbroad


    What weighting would you give to Dublin staff?



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,435 ✭✭✭Scoundrel


    Ah I've heard it all now the nationwide housing crisis is just a trade union lie! Your commitment to being a bootlicker for your betters really knows no bounds.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,107 ✭✭✭salonfire


    Are you suggesting the nationwide house sales survey is incorrect? Have you got figures to contradict the figures I gave?


    I hope basic data analysis is not part of your role.



  • Registered Users Posts: 122 ✭✭Alonzo Mosley



    I know it's slightly off topic but there is a remote working tax benefit available for employees, and there is another scheme which see employers give a €3.20 daily remote working allowance to employees working at home, which is free of tax, PRSI and USC. Only 10% of employers and I'm presuming 0% in the public service are paying this.

    I don't want to cause a Private sector can't afford this blah blah' v Public sector debate, I am just pointing out both sectors should pay this if affordable. Look at all the money that was saved/unused by Civil Service Departments during lockdown. Savings on heat,light,allowances, foreign travel etc. Why cant' these savings be passed to both Public and Private Sector workers instead of making us all submit a claim through Revenue for pittance??



  • Registered Users Posts: 82 ✭✭08122019


    In addition to lying about the housing prices I heard the unions are responsible for increasing the fuel and energy prices and are going to return them to regular levels once the pay increases go through.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,269 ✭✭✭Quitelife


    With yearly Increments and this 6.5% many public servents will get a 12/13% over 2 years.

    Thats not a bad deal to be fair , its only those on top of their scales will only get the 6.5% , most of those people are on 60/70/80K



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,462 ✭✭✭fliball123


    if we have to borrow more it will also be at the new higher rate. Also at rollover time our debt will become more expensive to service.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,435 ✭✭✭Scoundrel


    Give it over ya melt you're the one claiming that the housing crisis is union propaganda.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,705 ✭✭✭✭kippy


    Completely factually incorrect on a number of points but sure lets not let actual facts get in the way of the standard public service bashing that goes on.



Advertisement