Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Public Pay Talks - see mod warning post 4293

15681011235

Comments

  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 39,652 Mod ✭✭✭✭Gumbo


    Construction. Particularly the supervision, inspection of statutory regulations etc



  • Registered Users Posts: 156 ✭✭mtb_sends


    @Gumbo With respect to the construction sector, are you expecting that growth to be short-lived with spiralling costs etc.



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 39,652 Mod ✭✭✭✭Gumbo


    The quotes im seeing nowadays for small domestic extensions are crazy!

    My builder friends can’t even stomach it as the trades are hammering him with their costs along with material increases it’s just madness.

    Gone are the days of €2k a square meter, it’s €4k now in Dublin!



  • Registered Users Posts: 156 ✭✭mtb_sends


    @Gumbo I've heard of some hardware suppliers chasing up their quotes because the work is starting to slow down. Something they haven't had to do the last couple of years.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,379 ✭✭✭AyeGer


    Increments aren’t pay rises they are increments. Nobody signed up to the job for the bottom of the pay scale. They signed up for the eventual top of their incremental scale. Some roles are at the top of their scale after 7 years.

    It’s all written in to the contract. It’s already outlined what they can expect to be paid once experienced in the job and at the top of their scale (the true value of their experience).



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 156 ✭✭mtb_sends


    Can anyone tell me, were all public sector organisations governed by the Haddington road agreement in terms of working hours or was it only certain organisations?



  • Registered Users Posts: 259 ✭✭exitstageleft


    Gotta think that they'll offer another 1% to get the unions back to the table. So 3.5% this year.

    I guess the timelines of the increases are important too though. 2.5% back dated to the start of May might look more appealing!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 170 ✭✭Shuffl_in


    At the National Economic Dialogue yesterday Leo stated he wasn't involved in talks but suggested:

    1. A larger percentage increase on income earned before a certain threshold than income above it.

    2. Tax reform to protect middle-income earners from losing half their pay increase to tax, USC and PRSI.

    3. Commitments on the ‘Social Wage,’ as trade unions describe it, to ensure that the money we do earn goes further.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,268 ✭✭✭lightspeed


    I am perhaps biased but would agree with starting salaries being increased to higher percentage not so much to match inflation but to at least match market rates in private sector.

    I'm starting in HEO role soon in Department of Finance. So I'm starting at €50,848. For this I'm leaving a job where I'm on 53k per annum with up to 10% bonus. However my current job does not have a pension.

    Without any promotion to AP or higher I think I worked out it will take about 12 years to get same net pay, albeit difference isn't really as large considering the pension contributions included in public service job.

    Nonetheless, with management experience going into the role assuming there not a larger recession, I could walk into a job on private sector on 65 to 70k with pension and healthcare. I'm even getting emails from companies looking to interview me for such jobs now without management experience.

    I'm making the move for the experience it will provide and possible promotion opportunities along with greater sense of job security particularly should a recession occur. However, its delusional for anyone to think current salary grades are competitive as they are compared to private market. They are perhaps for lower grades but not for skilled workforce coming from finance, IT etc.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,543 ✭✭✭jaffa20


    https://www.rte.ie/news/ireland/2022/0621/1306024-public-pay-talks/

    "We think that it was a very good offer and that it was a fair offer and also that it would have brought some extra benefits for lower paid public sector workers,"

    Wonder what Minister means by the above? I guess 2.5%, with a minimum increase flat rate amount to lower paid? Hopefully that's the case.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    5% more over two years, followed, in the same article by:

    'Difficult period' ahead, warns Ryan

    Meanwhile, the Minister for the Environment has warned of a "difficult period" this autumn and winter as households struggle with the cost of energy.

    Yeah, no kidding there is a difficult period ahead.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,209 ✭✭✭PopTarts


    The 2.5% next year is probably a bit insulting given that as part of the Building Momentum Agreement they gave 2% this year (and that was before all this inflation).

    They’ll have to go with 3-3.5% at the very least next year. Best to extend only to end of next year too.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,325 ✭✭✭cuttingtimber22


    What is the value of job security going into a recession? If a recession happens - many households with private sector workers will be out of work.

    If there are unsustainable pay increases then services will have to be cut and the playbook from 2010 will be rolled out and there will be pay cuts.

    Everyone is facing higher costs and unfortunately most of us have to suck it up without getting pay increases and without that job security.

    For those with a short memory or not around then…

    Papers show 2008 pay deal agreed despite warnings on economy


    if a global recession hits, I forecast (as does the fiscal advisory council) that corporation tax revenues and income tax revenues will take a massive hit (income tax by 20% and CT by 40%), which will then hit the consumption taxes. we will be back to spending beyond our means and the public sector pay bill will need to reduce in size - this can be through numbers and pay cuts - the latter will be more likely if public sector unions hold the Govt. over a barrel in these talks.

    All in - be careful what you wish for.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,861 ✭✭✭SouthWesterly


    ,Senior staff are to get 10% as part of restoration on 1 July. Something is seriously wrong with union negotiations when the far get fatter and the rest of us look forward to 1%

    Hopefully these talks will be better weighted.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    its almost as if:


    - public sector pay isnt the only component in government expenditure and the workers in that sector need to argue for their terms and conditions to improve in inflationary times like everyone else regardless of whether some people think we have an onus to work for minimum wage across all grades and skillsets

    - 2012 didn't happen (short memories indeed, a funny short memory that only remembers our pay increases and not subsequent ten year cuts- would you ever go swing ffs)

    go analyse 2012-today vs general pay rises and inflation or do you only have one trick in one direction?


    blatant



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,325 ✭✭✭cuttingtimber22


    Yes. Pay restoration going back to 2008. Lower paid got their restoration first which is what the unions negotiated.

    FEMPI was constitutionally difficult - that difficulty provides safeguards for lower paid workers.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,427 ✭✭✭✭lawred2


    Heard it all before from Leo. A poor record on delivering on his words though.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,325 ✭✭✭cuttingtimber22


    Actually I was a public servant then and I do remember the pay rises through partnership including the 2008 deal (which was madness), benchmarking (remember that), and also suffered the significant pay cuts.

    Pushing for high pay rises now and threatening industrial action will mean that politicians will be mandated by the rest of the country to punish public servants. And yes there is a big value to defined benefit pensions and job security.

    Modest pay rises yes but big pay rises will be more trouble in the long run.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,044 ✭✭✭ParkRunner


    Looks like they’re going back in for further negotiations anyway. Probably needs to be wrapped up in the next 2-3 weeks before the summer economic statement https://www.rte.ie/news/ireland/2022/0622/1306224-pay-cost/



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 170 ✭✭Shuffl_in


    Leo must be taking tips from the anti public sector brigade in this thread:

    "The current agreement gives them an increase of between 2% and 3% a year this year plus increments if they get an increment."



    RTE news : Govt intends to make further pay talks offer - Tánaiste

    http://www.rte.ie/news/ireland/2022/0622/1306224-pay-cost/



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Yet no one batts an eyelid at Tesco, Bank of ireland, other private sector workers mentioned in the thread, getting 10% payrises and backdated to 2021, while they're at it.

    Sick and tired of not been appreciated for the work we do, and being told we're screwing the country up if we look for payrises that aren't immediately swallowed up.

    Especially after the last two years.

    If I could retire today, I'd go gladly, and only for my income continuance plan, I'd cancel my union subscription (after 30+ years of membership).

    I'm feeling really **** salty today, about all this.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    right i accept that, but i dont think i can agree with you on what we mean by "big" payrises.


    if these are multi year deals in times of big inflation- a govt can always hold the threat of big recession over us but the fact is that terms and conditions in the public sector have been under attack for over a decade and public servants have to deal with govt as employers sometimes, not as participants in the running of the state.


    and furthermore, that employee/employer relationship is not similar to a mutual endeavour to maximise profits because that is not the business of govt.


    "a bad job in good times, a good job in bad times" but that is less and less true and its now more of a case of "a bad but safe job in bad times, a bad job and dont dare expect any better in good times"


    these are negotiations for pay increases on the foot of a decade long wait for pay restoration in an understaffed service for that whole time. public servants are rightly sick of being told to put the country first as a way of fingerwagging at us when we go to the table because successive governments have gone to that well too many times.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,258 ✭✭✭combat14


    they are far from "big pay rises" inflation is running at 8.5+%



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,460 ✭✭✭fliball123


    Did BOI, Tesco make a profit this over the last year, how much were either company borrowing?



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    is govt a profit making enterprise or are its aims and goals constituted around an entirely different modus operandi?

    is this something a child needs explained to them more than once?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,460 ✭✭✭fliball123


    The fact is both companies are making a profit so it is right to give the workers who are doing the job a pay increase and as a country we had to borrow this year what was it 4 billion what are we over 250 billion in debt but yeah while there is a glut of uncertainty and as interest rates rise the expense to service our debts as a country are going to balloon and a hell of a lot more pressing (housing, infrastructure) issues that need financing there should be zero pay rises going on until the likes Brexit, Ukraine and covid have gone away for good as if we do hit a recession and there is a waivering from our cropo tax take there will be a need to make pay cuts again. Just as an aside what happened to the USC being temporary where is my pay restoration (answers on the back of a post card on that one). We may not be a profit making enterprise but we sure as phuck have to pay ours debts and the can kicking of rolling over our debt for the last 12/13 years will squarely kick us in the ass in the next decade with rates going through the roof



  • Registered Users Posts: 498 ✭✭DubLad69


    The goal of those employees is to help Tesco, BOI etc make a profit. They are meeting their goals, so perfect.


    The goals of the PS are different.


    The goal of a nurse is to care for patients? Do you think Nurses are not adequately caring for patients?


    The goal of a teacher is to educate? Do you think our children are not receiving an adequate level of education?


    The goal of a fireman is to put out fires. Of the council worker to clean the streets. Etc etc.


    If we don't increase the pay for a public servant, the good ones will simply leave and the quality of those services will decline. Those in the public service don't care about public finances, because it is not their job to worry about the money, their job is to make our country a better place to live.


    In their view, the government are nothing more than an employer. The fact that their employer is also responsible for managing public finances, for managing homelessness or the challenges in Ukraine is irrelevant.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,460 ✭✭✭fliball123


    Surely affordability has to have some sway with regards to payrises, we cannot just keep kicking the debt and deficit can down the road and expect to have no impact, what we pay out in expenditure in this country is criminal with respect to the actual return we as a population see in return. We are already one of the most progressive with regards to income tax paying, we are heavily reliant on corpo taxes and the shortfall has to be borrowed I mean we are not even running a surplus at the moment and we have essentially full employment and if we have a similar drop in corpo taxation like we did with stamp duty back before 08 or the private sector gets decimated again then ps pay will have to cut again as there is no doubt the IMF are looking at us as they are the rest of the countries who were branded as the PIIGS with regards to our borrowing and our expenditure as the next recession is looming and it is coming. As I said wages in the PS are high in a lot of areas, jobs are guaranteed and with the pensions on offer (that are not there for the private sector) its already a massive burden on the future purse strings. Pay rises here will also add to this future burden. We also need more money for infrastructure, housing and a lot of other areas so do we just keep borrowing till we fall off the cliff and if our interest rates go back (already 2 rate hikes scheduled this year) to anywhere near where back in the 80s as in double digit (already over 5% in the U.S). All of a sudden our debt will be unsustainable and with all of that going on its depressing to see one group of ps employees on one side of the table (government) and one set on the other arguing how much more is to be paid with absolutely no thoughts on the knock on effects, its effectively ff/fg seeing the Sinn Fein written on the wall and trying to buy the ps vote just Bertie did per 08.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,253 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko




Advertisement