Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Should Zoos be banned?

  • 17-06-2022 08:47AM
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,076 ✭✭✭✭


    Was just listening to this debate on radio. I was in a zoo lately, nice day out but it feels a bit wrong, some of the animals like the chimps have a nice size area to wander around and privacy but some of the others like the snow leopard, red panda, wolves, penguins have tiny enclosures with no privacy from the public, this much result in utter boredom and cause certain disorders with the animals.



«1

Comments

  • Posts: 7,681 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Zoos have come a long way since the polar bears pacing back and forward.

    They are invaluable for breeding programs of endangered species.

    The alternative for many animals is Extinction



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 53,181 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,312 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    No



  • Subscribers Posts: 43,412 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    they do much more good than harm



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,089 ✭✭✭✭whisky_galore


    No.

    Stick multiple conviction offenders in them. Bring back human zoos.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,770 ✭✭✭✭Muahahaha


    I think they have positives, like where else are children going to see that amount of animals, not like everyone can just fly to Africa. So they are good from an educational perspective.

    But on the flip side no one is going to convince me that keeping an animal like giraffes or leopards in an enclosure when they roam for a hundred miles in the wild is good for them. They can come up with all the marketing spin they want and call the enclosure the African Plains but at the end of the day it is just a few lousy acres and the animals are bored. The only argument against it is that the animals are captive several generations so wouldnt survive in the wild anyway. But at some point their forebearers were taken from the wild and put in encloseures that are tiny compared to their natural roaming range in the wild.

    On conservation Im dubious of some of their claims. Some zoos do good conservation work on animals in danger of extinction. But others are basically breeding programs for profit under the guise of conservation. In Sydney a couple of years ago a company set up a brand new zoo opened city despite it already having one (Taronga). People were asking why even more animals should be locked up and why another zoo was needed when the city already had one operating for over 100 years.

    The basic answer was profit, there was money to be made for the operator, the city could sustain two zoos. A lot of people in Sydney werent happy about it but it went ahead anyway. Then Dublin Zoo showed up in the story, it came out that they were selling this new zoo in Sydney an elephant. Other zoos worldwide were also selling them animals to stock the new zoo up and all of this under the guise of 'conservation'. The end result was that the elephant had to endure 6 weeks in a tight cage on a ship from Dublin to Australia bouncing around in the oceans. Bear in mind this is a skittish land animal whose feet are extremely sensitive. To me that is unnecessary cruelty to an elephant and I lost all respect for Dublin Zoo after they put that elephant through such a traumatic process all so they could make a few quid and then claim its 'conservation'.

    So while I dont think zoos should be banned I think we should be more questioning of them and their practices. They sell the woolly conservation idea but ultimately they are there to make a profit and if that means putting animals through unnecessary stress and trauma then they will do it. Ive no beef with proper conservation programs but in general they are done in the wild well away from the paying eyes zoos depend on.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 414 ✭✭dorothylives


    It never feels right to see animals in cages. I know that zoos are getting less flack for moving towards breeding programmes for endangered animals, but even so, it just doesn't sit right with me. Saving endangered animals, yes, but putting other animals in enclosures to be stared at by people is just wrong imho. Circuses with animals have almost died out, thankfully, as people realised keeping animals in circuses was cruel and wrong. Maybe in time people will feel the same about zoos.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,442 ✭✭✭CPTM


    I think mankind's perception of freedom is way off the mark. So many think animals are happier in the wild than in a zoo and it's madness. Practically none of us would want to be living in the wild and for good reason. It's hard to imagine what it's like to have a pack of your young, falling asleep knowing that somewhere in the vicinity there is another animal waiting to come and eat them. That's aside from infection, disease, drought, hunger.

    If you had any animal in the wild with everything they need beside them including water, food, protection, none of them would roam much further than the confines they have in the zoo. Mistreatment of animals or putting them in horribly small cages etc is obviously wrong but as far as I know that is already banned. A lot of zoos nowadays are paradise in comparison to the realities of the wild that people easily forget.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,707 ✭✭✭Bobblehats


    I think they should too many animals; in close proxinity. Going stir crazy trapped in their own little own little enclaves, it’s a recipe for disaster whatever about all gods creatures it’s inhumane.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,076 ✭✭✭✭pgj2015


    So wolves would stay in an area the size of quarter of an acre in the wild?

    A hippo in a little pool?



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 53,181 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    we have two house cats. they don't leave the house, so i'd regard it as somewhat hypocritical if i was to criticise a zoo from doing similar.

    and what would be more than somewhat hypocritical (were i to criticise zoos) is that we bought eggs in the supermarket yesterday.

    in short, what i'm saying is that being critical of zoos for keeping animals in captivity, should basically lead to an argument in favour of veganism.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,517 ✭✭✭✭Thelonious Monk


    They're horrible and I couldn't visit one but in the bigger picture they're not doing much harm I suppose. What should be banned are things like plastic grass, huge pointless manicured lawns outside houses, roundup, and all the other things we are doing in the war on nature. The insect apocalypse is here.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,707 ✭✭✭Bobblehats


    Well then how does your garden grow?

    Don’t be expectin the council to step in fella ..



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,517 ✭✭✭✭Thelonious Monk




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,439 ✭✭✭corner of hells


    Do you know how many species of bees there are in Ireland ? There's 101 types.

    I like the little feckers.


    I also think we should turn Roscommon or Leitrim into giant zoos , just fence them off and let the animals be.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,058 ✭✭✭homer911


    You should visit Fota Park, not your typical zoo at all



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,058 ✭✭✭homer911


    I visited London Zoo once and the part I liked the best was the insect house - minimal space needed



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,056 ✭✭✭✭cj maxx


    A great listen, ( is it OK to say Thanks you mad Bastard(er) 😀



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,941 ✭✭✭gameoverdude


    I think dublin zoo has made great strides over the decades (apart from those poxy penguins).

    Berlin zoo was depressing.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,707 ✭✭✭Bobblehats


    Made great strides soiled. If you do bring em to the pets corner, make sure you’re carrying an extra pair



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,941 ✭✭✭gameoverdude




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,770 ✭✭✭✭Muahahaha


    I think you are anthropomorphising there, you cant proscribe human wants, needs and dislikes on to animals as they have different instincts and drivers to us. For sure they live longer in captivity but it doesnt mean that if they had a choice they would choose a zoo, it is effectively a prison for animals where they cant live their life to the fullest as nature intended.

    A cheetah that is born to run at up to 120kph but cannot becasue its in a fenced enclosure of a few hundred square meters is just going to be bored and unfulfilled. Depression in animals in zoos is a real thing, chimpanzees act differently in captivity to those in the wild becasue not being able to go where they want to drives them around the bend. Being thrown together with chimps who are not blood relations also goes completely against how they live in the wild as part of a huge family and hierarchical structure. Its the complete opposite of how the chimps instincts would have them live if they had the choice, it goes against their very nature.



  • Posts: 157 ✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Yes Ban them.

    This banning everything is great. What will the do gooders do when all the fun is gone!!

    Ban culture ireland 2022 isnt it great!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,442 ✭✭✭CPTM


    Do you think a cheetah in the wild who is fed, protected and given mating partners by someone would leave the area? Go off for a 120kph jog to see some scenary or have a few nights in the middle of nowhere? I can't see it happening. The only time animals exercise these kinds of things is to find food or water or to protect their own.

    Animals can definitely get depressed in zoos. I'm not saying zoos are like a paradise for them, but in comparison to the realities of the wild it's a better option. And before anyone starts talking about crap zoos or monkeys chained to walls, clearly I'm talking about decent zoos run by animal lovers. Do you know most animals in the wild have a fairly horrific death, by pain, thirst or hunger because they're too injured or sick to hunt or protect themselves? I'm just saying most people have a lovely view of what it's like to live in the wild. There is a reason why humans stopped doing it as soon as they could.



  • Posts: 157 ✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Are you a zoologist? Can you quantify this as fact?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,442 ✭✭✭CPTM


    You don't have to be a mathematician to say that 2 + 2 is 4. This is an internet forum we're on, not some animal convention for professionals.

    If you were an elephant, would you rather take your chances on the African plains, with poachers, animals hunting you while you sleep, illnesses,droughts, and no food.. Or would you go to the zoo? To me it's obvious. Zoo everyday of the week.

    Obvious best option is the one we have as humans. But imo, Dublin Zoo beats the realities of the wild by far.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,770 ✭✭✭✭Muahahaha


    yeah I agree the cheetah would likely not roam if all its needs are met. But thats besides the point, evolution has evolved them into what they are today which is the fasted prey animal in the world. Them not being able to run goes against their most basic instincts and evolution itself. It cant be reversed by a stay in a zoo, even their offspring will have the same instincts as thats how evolution works, their basic instincts are passed through the generations.

    And yeah of course all animals in the wild suffer horrific deaths, often as a meal for another animal. Thats not to take away though from all the years they have had following their basic instincts as nature intended.

    I get your point about a zoo giving them shelter and 3 meals a day but that in itself goes against their natural instincts to hunt just as evolution has designed them to. A human in a prison gets shelter and 3 meals a day but not many would actually choose it despite some of their basic needs being met.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,028 ✭✭✭✭Strumms


    I’m inclined to agree, improving them might be an option, but no.. “ we don’t like it, ban it “.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,955 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    No.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,442 ✭✭✭CPTM


    I would choose prison over living unassisted in the wild mountains with animals wanting to eat me all day long and me having to hunt for myself. Wouldn't you? I suppose I just think that the likes of David Attenborough and the BBC did a great job at making the animal kingdom look like this lovely place that Elton John could sing about all day. When the reality is that in order for anything to live, something must die, and that's aside from all the other trials and tribulations which exist like illnesses etc that I already mentioned.

    Not saying that zoos are the best thing in the world but I do think they're a better option than a lot of people think, and freedom is not all its hyped up to be.

    Ill take the point made on instincts which have evolved to this point. But I'd argue that they'd soon melt away if they had a friendly zookeeper looking after them and their family day and night. But that's just an opinion.



Advertisement