Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Cold Case Review of Sophie Tuscan du Plantier murder to proceed. **Threadbans in OP**

Options
1248249250251252254»

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 3,727 ✭✭✭chooseusername


    Typical Mirror reporting, Bailey's article was in the Daily Star on Wed 26th. Irish Times and Independent and Daily Telegraph had it on the 25'th. Post mortem was on the 24'th.

    These are facts Tommy, don't bother asking for links etc. do your own research.



  • Registered Users Posts: 177 ✭✭jesuisjuste


    If you want to argue about the obvious fact that almost everyone in proximity to the case was at home in bed in west cork with their close family members as their alibi, that's fine.

    Bailey had a confirmed alibi too…. until he didn't, and that is about the only tangible thing that people are willing to stand behind other than hearsay and fires without smoke.

    Who else's alibi would hold up to the same scrutiny.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,100 ✭✭✭drury..


    Bailey changed his story and so did Jules

    All highly sus.

    He had arrived back to Jules bedroom the morning of the murder and would have had a busy day that day, but he misremembered he had been gone for the nite

    Jules also misremembered

    Been discussed to death



  • Registered Users Posts: 177 ✭✭jesuisjuste




  • Registered Users Posts: 30,380 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    Who else would have changed story if the Guards had presented a fake witness like Marie Farrell?

    Who else would have had their claimed alibi fall apart if the Guards had properly dug into it?

    What was Marie Farrell's alibi?

    What was her husband's?

    What was the alibi of the 'man' Farrell was with?

    That's on a level of 'sus' leagues above Bailey.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,100 ✭✭✭drury..




  • Registered Users Posts: 1,100 ✭✭✭drury..


    You're talking rambling nonsense

    Farrell's husband and ANother man are leagues above Bailey in the suspicion stakes ?



  • Registered Users Posts: 30,380 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    Rambling nonsense? Read some of your posts back to yourself.

    The whole situation with the Guards and the Farrells and this 'phantom' in the car is multiple times more suspicious than anything to do with Ian Bailey.

    You seem very focused on claimed alibis.

    So what was Marie Farrells and do you believe it?

    Whats the alibi for the rest of the night for the man MF claimed to be with for a period of it?

    What is her husbands for the time MF claims to have been out and about?

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users Posts: 177 ✭✭jesuisjuste


    @drury.. are you interested in justice? This usually involves the pursuit of people who are unknown? There are at least 3 people who have a higher amount of suspicion than Bailey, and it could be the same person in fact.

    1. The unknown male DNA that was discovered on the boot of Sophie. This was not compared against the 50 persons of interest. Why is that, and who are they? They can re-test all the rest of the blood DNA with modern technology too.
    2. The person who left the Doc Marten boot print. How many of the 50 people owned Doc Martens. No doubt a number of them, plus persons unknown. Bailey wasn't one of them.
    3. Tire tracks from the skid marks, they are visible on the ground. Were they compared against the 50 persons of interest? They didn't match Bailey/Jules car.

    Then you may get to mystery men, of which Marie Farrell's driver is one, and a bunch of others etc.

    It could all be inconsequential, and Bailey could be the perpetrator, but you will always have reasonable doubt before the above are answered. If you don't believe those questions should be answered, or dismiss them with speculation, then you are not interested in justice. Are you an anti-justice warrior?



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,100 ✭✭✭drury..


    Can you outline your reasons for claiming MFs husband and lover are multiple times more suspicious than bailey

    Aside from the fact that you're querying their alibis for the night

    Otherwise it's just wild speculation and should be stated as such with a disclaimer

    BTW . I don't know what all these persons alibis are and haven't claimed to



  • Advertisement
Advertisement