Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Frasier sequel ordered to series **Spoilers**

123468

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,630 ✭✭✭squonk


    yeah episode 3 was a step in the right direction and a good improvement. The show is starting to get into its stride now and sidelining the younger characters who are kind of one dimensional anyway was a good choice. I definitely got a few good laughs from it. I do think the show within a show was a a very welcome development and I think that’s how the show should have gone. I’m happy for now though to see what they can make out of this. I guess too there’s nothing to stop him going back to a radio show in Boston as a fallback but what I saw in episode 3 was pretty good.

    Post edited by squonk on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,100 ✭✭✭LambshankRedemption


    Captain, the Universal Translator seems to be malfunctioning.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Regional Midwest Moderators Posts: 24,004 Mod ✭✭✭✭Clareman


    It's gone a bit too sit-comey for me, is that a word? I mean a bunch of Harvard students taking a class just to see some celebrity, it's f**king Harvard, I can't imagine numbers matter much there, also, I can't imagine they'd like to have some TV Doctor attached to their school.

    That aside, I'd like to see the side characters given a chance, few scenes in the fire house and other bars wouldn't go astray but less of the ham.



  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 15,745 Mod ✭✭✭✭Tabnabs


    .....



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    Noppppppe. No chance I'm bothering with this.

    Hadn't yet given this a whirl, as I do have Paramount+ but I managed 1:20 minutes before I couldn't take the canned laugher any longer. WHile the cadence of the dialogue - line, pause, line - would drive me bananas; just reminded me of a now very old skit on the SImpsons




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 4,570 ✭✭✭JeffKenna


    Seem to be going a bit against opinion here but I thought episode 2 and 3 were quite ok. Dare I say, I even enjoyed them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,142 ✭✭✭ilovesmybrick


    Yeah, I'd agre with you Jeff, is it great, no, and it is a bit dated, but for a few episodes where they're establishing all new characters alongside a character that has been around for 40 years it's pretty reasonable. Though hopefully they tone down some of the characters, notably Niles son. I'll continue with it for a bit anyway, somewhat nice to have a straight 30 minute sitcom that needs very little effort!



  • Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 11,829 Mod ✭✭✭✭icdg


    Not to put too fine a point on it, but it is a sitcom! Can a sitcom be too sitcomy?

    According to the producers, the laughter isn’t canned, it was filmed before a live studio audience just like the original series was. (Nor has the laugh track ever completely gone away, the BBC still uses it to an extent, particular on some longer running shows). Donald Clarke had a good article about it in the Irish Times earlier this week (leaky paywall).




  • Registered Users Posts: 12,683 ✭✭✭✭TheValeyard


    So, I've watched all three

    One -not good to be honest

    Two - less bad

    Three - was okay

    I'm liking Fraiser as it's Fraiser, nothing has changed there really, except he's super-super rich.

    Nicolas (Alan) is very good. Bit much on the whole functional alcoholic though.

    But mini Niles is just, I don't know what it is, just not........good.

    Same with Fraisers son and his friend with the baby. It just doesnt work well for some reason. Maybe it's the forced laughter in the scenes with them.

    All eyes on Kursk. Slava Ukraini.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,598 ✭✭✭✭fritzelly


    Well episode 4 is supposed to be the turning point, so will see in a few days - any new show (it's been 20 years!) needs to find its footing so giving it some grace. Each episode has gotten better so I have hope

    Still missing the old characters, they were just as much the show as Frasier.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,598 ✭✭✭✭fritzelly


    Yeah I think that episode worked, felt more like the original - got more chuckles out of me anyway



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,100 ✭✭✭LambshankRedemption


    The David character needs to be forgotten about. Don't write him out just forget him.


    Just watched eps 3 and 4. My opinion is the same. Its becoming 2 and a half men. Which is ironic because the actor who played Freddie in the original went on to be in 2 and a half men.

    Post edited by LambshankRedemption on


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 39,451 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,100 ✭✭✭LambshankRedemption




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,100 ✭✭✭LambshankRedemption


    I don't know if anyone spotted it, the bar Eve works in is called Mahoney's. The actor playing Martin Crane in the original was John Mahoney. Presumeably a reference to him.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,459 ✭✭✭✭Mushy




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,146 ✭✭✭piplip87


    Watched the fourth episode just there. It's growing on me. The younger cast members are starting to come into themselves a bit more. Still has a long way to go.



  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 15,745 Mod ✭✭✭✭Tabnabs


    From people who have been in the audience it does apparently start to find its feet in from the 4th episode onwards.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,138 ✭✭✭Sparko


    Trevor Einhorn, the original Freddie, wasn't in Two and A Half Men.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 39,451 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    Episode 4 was ok. Some development on Freedie & Frasier's relationship but there's still the impression that the whole show is unnecessary. It's not really doing anything new or original.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,825 ✭✭✭crushproof


    Went through the first 4 episodes this week, very forgettable stereotypical canned laughter American sitcom. So disappointed despite getting a couple of laughs in the 3rd and 4th episodes. However the characters are just so weak, especially the nephew that brings absolutely nothing to the show.


    Watched a couple of old episodes today and the difference! Stellar comedy and the line delivery is perfection. Such a shame this reboot might stain the legacy of a great show.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,360 ✭✭✭.red.


    I liked the "Moose" reference too in episode 4. That was Eddie's real name, probably my favourite character from the original. One of his pups, Enzo came in later on when poor Moose/Eddie was slowing down.

    Post edited by .red. on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,317 ✭✭✭santana75


    Yeah I had the same experience in watching the new show and then going back to watch episodes from season 1 of the original..........the gulf in class in apparent straight away. Not sure what exactly it is, could be better writing, better acting, or something else. Its not nostalgia though, or looking back through rose tinted glasses, its just plainly obvious that the original frasier was far better straight off the bat when comparing the first 4 eipisodes of that show with the first 4 of this one.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,040 ✭✭✭onrail


    I'm starting to really think production is where a lot of the fault lies with this.

    Some of the gags would probably be much funnier if delivered in the setting and tone of the old Frasier.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,630 ✭✭✭squonk


    I don’t know about episode 4 being the return to quality people were saying. I don’t see it. episode 3 was much better IMHO. I will say I suppose the show is a bit more grounded after that episode but, really, it felt very poor and could have been an episode in any throw away sitcom only there were a few Frasierisms thrown in. David needs to go. Full stop. I said it before, there’s literally very little to laugh at a man with seemingly special needs. The firehouse didn’t do it for me either. A Boston firehouse crewed by 4 fire fighters? Yeah right. I bought the radio station in the original being stsffed by a skeleton crew because that seems normal for radio. I don’t know. It’s just not great and I was hoping for more after hearing about episode 4 being the turning point.

    Post edited by squonk on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,598 ✭✭✭✭fritzelly


    After watching this Frasier Pills: Season 6 - YouTube its made me realise all the more how this show needs Niles, such a perfect comedy duo



  • Moderators, Regional Abroad Moderators Posts: 2,281 Mod ✭✭✭✭Nigel Fairservice


    I'm enjoying it enough to keep going with it for now. The first thing I noticed was the canned laughter. I don't mind it. I haven't watched anything with canned laughter in years. It made me feel a bit nostalgic for some of the great 90s shows.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,734 ✭✭✭larchielads


    The quiz episode, a buck fifty for a brandy!!! Where were these bars when i was in boston???



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,533 ✭✭✭RocketRaccoon


    I'm fairly sure it was $152 with a tip because he took away a note when she was being smart and said 151.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,598 ✭✭✭✭fritzelly




Advertisement