Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Backdating Legislation

  • 14-11-2022 8:25pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,789 ✭✭✭✭


    Back in 2015 Minister for Justice Frances Fitzgerald made a statement that she was going to put a cap on semi-auto centrefire rifles and revoke any licences lawfully issued after 18th September 2015. She never followed through with this legislation. Therefore people applied and were granted licences for these rifles since 18th September 2015 up until the present date.

    Now, in the Criminal Justice (Miscellaneous Provisions) Bill 2022 that is currently before the Dail, there's the below Section that, if enacted, will take back all semi-auto centrefire licences lawfully issued since 18th September 2015.

    Anybody any idea what legislation allows a law to be backdated over 7 years based on a statement by the Minister?



Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,827 ✭✭✭✭28064212


    Under what legislation would such a law be prevented?

    Boardsie Enhancement Suite - a browser extension to make using Boards on desktop a better experience (includes full-width display, keyboard shortcuts, dark mode, and more). Now available through your browser's extension store.

    Firefox: https://addons.mozilla.org/addon/boardsie-enhancement-suite/

    Chrome/Edge/Opera: https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/boardsie-enhancement-suit/bbgnmnfagihoohjkofdnofcfmkpdmmce



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,789 ✭✭✭✭BattleCorp


    I don't know if any legislation exists that would either allow or prevent the Minister from backdating the ban over 7 years. That's why I'm on here asking the question.

    And just to be clear, the Minister isn't banning these guns, she's allowing those who had these guns before 18th September 2015 to keep them but revoking lawfully issued licences after that date.

    Here's my situation.

    I have one of these guns. I applied for it after 18th September 2015 and was issued the licence. At the time I applied there was no legislation in place banning these guns. There was a statement by the Minister saying that she would revoke any licences issued after that date but she didn't implement the ban. So, at the time I applied, they were totally legal and I was granted a licence. Now, the Criminal Justice (Miscellaneous Provisions) Bill 2022, if passed in its current form, will revoke my licence.

    I'm simply asking the question if anybody here knows what legislation allows the Minister to backdate the revocation of licences to 2015.

    For example, I'm pretty sure a Minister couldn't revoke all driving licences that were issued since 18th September 2015.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,827 ✭✭✭✭28064212



    For example, I'm pretty sure a Minister couldn't revoke all driving licences that were issued since 18th September 2015.

    I'm pretty sure they can. Legally anyway, whatever about the electoral impact.

    What they can't do is enact legislation that would declare past acts to be criminal. From the Constitution:

    15.5.1° The Oireachtas shall not declare acts to be infringements of the law which were not so at the date of their commission

    I don't see how section 3DA would violate that, no act from the past will have been criminalised.

    Boardsie Enhancement Suite - a browser extension to make using Boards on desktop a better experience (includes full-width display, keyboard shortcuts, dark mode, and more). Now available through your browser's extension store.

    Firefox: https://addons.mozilla.org/addon/boardsie-enhancement-suite/

    Chrome/Edge/Opera: https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/boardsie-enhancement-suit/bbgnmnfagihoohjkofdnofcfmkpdmmce



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,716 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus


    Bunreacht na hÉireann, Art 15.2.1: "The sole and exclusive power of making laws for the State is hereby vested in the Oireachtas". That's certainly wide enough to authorise the Oireachtas to enact laws cancelling licences that were previously issued.

    The only restriction on the retrospective effect of laws is, as 28064212 points out, that the Oireachtas cannot retrospectively criminalise an act — can't declare an act to be a crime which, at the time it was done, was not a crime. But this law doesn't violate that rule.

    In fact, this law isn't retrospective at all; it only revokes licences with prospective effect. Licences will be revoked three months after the amendment takes effect, but they will be perfectly valid up to that point. They won't be retrospectively invalidated.

    Post edited by Peregrinus on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 243 ✭✭chunkylover4


    Also for taxation but agree with everything here.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,716 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus


    Retrospective taxation is possible and is in fact common - e.g. the Minister announces on budget day that certain tax changes will be legislated with effect from budget day, and the Oireachtas later enacts legislation imposing those changes with effect from budget day.

    In theory there's no constitutional barrier to an even greater degree of retrospectivity - e.g. the Oireachtas could pass an act in 2022 imposing an extra 1% tax on all income earned in 2021. It's political, not legal, constraints that stop it from doing so.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,450 ✭✭✭✭Marcusm


    I’d argue that it is rare that there is true retrospection in taxation. Budget measures intended to take effect from that day such as excise duty changes etc are generally formalised by means of a financial resolution that might. Other measures a taking early effect, such as anti-avoidance measure, generally only take effect from announcement albeit that enabling legislation is only passed in the Finance Act. That’s not a true measure of retrospection as adequate notice is given.


    if, for example, an announcement was made which took effect before the announcement (not to mind enactment) then I would see that as retrospective legislation.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,716 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus


    I think it is retrospection - the legislation, when passed, has effect from a date earlier than the date on which it was passed. The ministerial announcement effectively represents the limit of retrospection that is politically acceptable in normal circumstances, but it doesn't change the fact that it is retrospection.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 243 ✭✭chunkylover4


    It technically is. My point was that there is in effect (in my view but arguable) a defacto prohibition on retrospective taxation save where the state can justify a severe public importance (bankruptcy of the state) or where it is in effect an administrative step as described above for the budget. I do see an article about taxing PUP payments as retrospective but that may just be political noise, I haven't read into properly.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,501 ✭✭✭✭coylemj


    That's not exactly true. Budget measures that take effect from budget day are typically related to excise (fuel, booze and cigarettes) and they have to be passed that same evening by a vote of the Dáil, in order that the various measures take effect from midnight. It typically doesn't get much coverage in the press but it happens late in the evening of every budget day, after all of the opposition speeches.



  • Advertisement
Advertisement