Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

So today there is now officially over 8 billion people alive on our little blue planet

Options
2»

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 10,386 ✭✭✭✭tom1ie


    Well I have seen it written and heard it spoke that in underdeveloped countries, children are seen as an economic benefit where’s in developed countries they are seen as an economic cost due to expensive childcare and education etc.

    So when a country becomes developed and expensive to bring up kids- people have less kids.



  • Registered Users Posts: 398 ✭✭jimmybobbyschweiz


    Too many very old and sick people are being kept alive and draining resources from younger people. It isn't a big problem with a high birth rate so much as it is a problem to have burdensome demographics like the very elderly and the sick. A difficult discussion for sure but unfortunately it is important in the context of sustainability.



  • Registered Users Posts: 12,984 ✭✭✭✭bnt


    There is this idea called the Demographic Transition Model that describes how populations evolve over time. It describes how population growth has slowed or stalled in some countries / regions and not in others. Overall population forecasts use this model, but that requires certain assumptions about the adoption of birth control in particular. In some parts of the world adoption rates are low for reasons relating to culture, intelligence, religion, etc.

    From out there on the moon, international politics look so petty. You want to grab a politician by the scruff of the neck and drag him a quarter of a million miles out and say, ‘Look at that, you son of a bitch’.

    — Edgar Mitchell, Apollo 14 Astronaut



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,738 ✭✭✭donaghs


    You're forgetting about culture. Child mortality rates have been hugely improved in the third world.

    Ireland's birth rates only really started to drop steeply when we shed our strict allegiance to the Catholic Church.

    But who's going to tackle the cultural issues?


    Also, anyone who says the world is still "underpopulated", surely this basic graph shows how extraordinary population growth in the 20th and 21st century has been?




  • Registered Users Posts: 10,386 ✭✭✭✭tom1ie


    So if child mortality rates have dropped in the third world- are we seeing less births due to more children surviving or are we seeing an increase in third world population due to improvements in infant mortality?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 50 ✭✭japprentice


    We need to import another 2 million at least to get our population up to standard.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,738 ✭✭✭donaghs


    You could just check yourself! But yes, the improvements in child mortality rates have slowed population growth in some countries. Other countries, mostly in Africa, continue to have the highest birth rates in the world despite this. And also despite improvements in living standards generally, e.g. Angola in the top 3 birth rate in the world, despite going from one of the poorest countries in Africa to (nominally) in the top 10 GDP.



  • Registered Users Posts: 10,386 ✭✭✭✭tom1ie


    So yeah- the human population is still growing but at a much slower rate.

    By 2080 we will have plateaued.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,738 ✭✭✭donaghs


    How many more billions will we add before it plateaus in 2080? (when most of us will be dead)



  • Registered Users Posts: 10,386 ✭✭✭✭tom1ie


    Another 2bill. Due to plateau at 10 and then as economy’s mature and birth rates fall it’s not bound the realms of possibility that population levels fall.

    I plan on being around in 2080 thanks 😉



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 27,564 ✭✭✭✭steddyeddy


    It's worth saying that all of those 8 billion aren't equal in terms of impact. Those in developed countries place more burden on the earth in terms of energy, food consumption and space than those in developing countries.

    Unfortunately those of the more right wing disposition misunderstand this fact.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,618 ✭✭✭thinkabouit


    One of The biggest problem facing the planet is desertification of land & losing our top soil.

    Every year millions of acres are being burnt, eroded or turned to desert.

    wd don’t have to few humans, we have too few animals to keep the grasslands healthy

    nobody, is talking about it



  • Registered Users Posts: 50 ✭✭japprentice


    We can import cattle also.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,738 ✭✭✭donaghs


    That’s a politically correct justification for overpopulation. Migrations trends will mean many of those will end up in cities living as modern consumers. And what about the effects of overpopulation in underdeveloped rurul areas? Deforestation for firewood and agriculture, animals driven towards extinction etc etc.

    we need to get past ideology and accept that we can still have kids at replacement rate but we need to stop growing the world population.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,101 ✭✭✭Mr. teddywinkles


    Deleted



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,794 ✭✭✭Greyfox


    Have you heard about the housing crisis or will these 2 million people be happy to live in tents?



  • Registered Users Posts: 50 ✭✭japprentice


    There is no housing crisis, there is not even 10,000 homeless. Eu lowest. We need to build up or cities.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,794 ✭✭✭Greyfox


    People who say there is no housing crisis are the worst people in Ireland. If theirs no crisis why is it almost impossible to find somewhere decent to rent in Ireland? We have ran out of places to house Ukrainians and students have put off college places as they can't find accommodation. Yes we need to build up, loads of building required but we need to create more homes before we can let more people into the country.



  • Registered Users Posts: 50 ✭✭japprentice


    We have loads of hotel rooms. Tourism can be put on hold for 5 years no problem.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,101 ✭✭✭Mr. teddywinkles


    Why do have to do what other countries in the eu is doing the whole time. Look at the germans with there problems with energy at the moment. Now the knock on effect here. Dont get this mantra the whole time. Mainland europe is far from perfect.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,101 ✭✭✭Mr. teddywinkles


    To hell with peoples jobs and businesses that depend on it. This has to be a wind up



  • Registered Users Posts: 50 ✭✭japprentice


    A payment scheme like covid payment would be setup.



  • Registered Users Posts: 50 ✭✭japprentice


    40% and more of rooms are taken in tourist spots so the country cannot function as a tourism industry.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,794 ✭✭✭Greyfox


    And what about all the money lost due to no tourism industry? Do we just raise taxes even more on working people?



  • Registered Users Posts: 50 ✭✭japprentice


    Provide supports. At the moment parts of Clare have over 50% of rooms permanently taken.

    Season 2023 with 50% rooms out of stock will be a poor season.

    Two things that can be done is free up stock or close the tourism industry and give supports.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,794 ✭✭✭Greyfox


    Closing tourism and giving supports is just wasting more money



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Exactly, we can sit back without worry. We can let homeless numbers build up. If they reach the tens of thousands only then should we sit up and take notice. These problems only affect a small number at the margins anyway.


    Shutting down tourim for a few years or indefinitely, would be a major boost to our efforts to cut emissions. Instead of people continuously flying in and out we have a one way flow inwards. Massive reduction.

    We definitely need to build up. We can fit many more people and want to get many more people into public transport. Our living footprints are too large and downsizing from a typical 3 bed semi or a horrendous one off abomination to apartment living wholesale in a gradual shift will be superior too. We can trade back gardens for community gardens in the name of progress and improve of standards of living massively while saving the planet.

    Bring on the millions and greater diversity. Ignore the racist naysayers.


    The next steps the state should be taking are to compulsory purchase holiday homes for refugees. It could be done under the banner of taking on air bnb and how it would be relieving the so called housing crisis



  • Registered Users Posts: 20,430 ✭✭✭✭kneemos


    There are cities in the UK with populations as big or bigger than Ireland consisting almost entirely of semi D's. Space isn't an issue.

    Compulsory purchasing is mainly for essential infrastructure,not sure any Government could arbitrarily decide to purchase properties. Anyway holiday homes would be in the wrong place,better off building where the facilities are.



Advertisement