Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Time for a zero refugee policy? - *Read OP for mod warnings - updated 11/5/24*

15725735755775781019

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 311 ✭✭engineerws


    I'm not condoning the policy suggested on this thread but nevertheless find this remarkable given the narrative being pushed around obligations and laws, as if both were immutable.

    It turns out government can draft new legislation. Who would have guessed?



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,206 ✭✭✭riddles


    Start with a strong message at the local and EU elections delivering a wipe out to the Greens FFFG showing the electorate is looking for tangible action on clear plans to help reshape our society into some kind of functioning model where a basic social contract will again be a reasonable aspiration as opposed to pipe dream.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,816 ✭✭✭ArthurDayne


    Because she, like any other politician, is subject to the democratic process. You asked what it would take to remove her — people can remove her by not voting for her or not voting for her party.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,266 ✭✭✭combat14


    its laughing talking about bringing (x20+ times) family members over when we cant give the free homes and hotel treatment to the crowd that are there already



  • Registered Users Posts: 146 ✭✭Will0483


    We haven't a snowballs chance in hell of improving anything in Africa. Even food aid is looted by the strong and sold to the weak for profit. Any cash investments are stolen by the connected African elites or their families.

    The aid industry is an abject failure. The people there need to demand an end to corruption and sort out their own countries without any interference from the west.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,333 ✭✭✭twinytwo


    Another fantastic observation - so you are happy for a minister to remain in their position regardless of how hopeless they may be and we should just suck it up and wait for an election?



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,382 ✭✭✭tom23


    Can actually never see Helen loosing her seat unless she decides not to run. From the area and I can tell you she has a core support that will vote for her regardless.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,699 ✭✭✭Gusser09


    I'd fully support a hard just to deal with refugees. The brits are a stain on irish humanity amd continue to **** on us.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,816 ✭✭✭ArthurDayne


    Well, no. But you are asking what it would take to remove her, and suggesting that she is too stupid to resign, so if the people want to remove her by not voting for her or her party, they can. I'm not sure what you're objecting to here.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,226 ✭✭✭StrawbsM


    Will Rwanda also be listed as a safe country?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,501 ✭✭✭✭whisky_galore


    Rwanda looks about as safe as here.



  • Registered Users Posts: 146 ✭✭Will0483


    Go live outside the peripherique (ring road around central Paris) for a few months like I did. Then, you'll see how well the 2nd and third generation Algerians and Sudanese have integrated. When France beat Morocco in the world cup, the youth went mad burning cars and French flags.

    They're also hugely over-represented in the courts and unemployment.

    People need to wake up to reality and stop spouting simplistic platitudes about immigrants "becoming Irish" when the vast majority have absolutely no interest in doing so and their children's children won't either.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,962 ✭✭✭MegamanBoo


    One name you never hear mentioned of course is Putin.

    I believe he's actually quite popular amongst the far-right, Le Pen, Orban, etc all admirers.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,757 ✭✭✭DeadHand


    Are they though?

    British society has been deeply troubled and destabilised by mass immigration and illegal immigration.

    The current government there were elected on a mandate to confront the problem.

    They have.

    It is not their fault nor their business that we in Ireland refuse to take our border or our security seriously.

    It is not their fault or their business that our government has encouraged, incentivised and participated in a process of mass, unregulated immigration. So much money is being passed into private hands by this madness that I think it is fair to call it people trafficking.

    They are at least trying to safeguard their country while we flail around and attack everything but the problem at source.

    No one is to blame for the current crisis, or the far, far worse crises to come, but the leadership in Ireland.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,451 ✭✭✭✭ednwireland


    plenty of ngos on the radio yesterday debunking the 80 % from uk. it's all people here whose circumstances have changed.

    tthen channel 4 interview I'm dublin, yeh came from England.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,138 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    Good discussion about all this on the Pat Kenny show just now. One interviewee pointed out 'you can't return people to a country that doesn't want them' i.e. Ireland will have to find other ways of managing the people crossing the border issue.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,310 ✭✭✭bloopy


    Why is there such a determination to debunk the Northern Ireland route?

    Surely it makes the most sense to use that route.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,382 ✭✭✭tom23


    I missed it… i take it that interviewee was an NGO representative? Who was offering the opposing view? Not wanting them and having an international legal obligation to take them back are two different things.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,586 ✭✭✭baldbear


    Heard that and sounds right even though people won't want to hear it. People will continue to arrive via the North if they want. They can't be stopped.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,333 ✭✭✭twinytwo


    Who has the ability to appoint and remove ministers? - not the electorate.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 588 ✭✭✭ECookie13


    I can only assume it's just a widespread attempt by certain crowds to debunk any negative immigration news and information, as this is the most amount of negative news that refugee immigration has received here that I can remember.

    All the websites where the pro-immigration free-for-all crowd congregates, which are getting less and less these days of course, have been on the warpath the last few days posting about how all these figures about NI are being used by conservatives, "far-right" etc. to push their "narrative". That this is all exaggerated and false news. Sometimes you wonder if it's satire on their end.

    It's likely all just an attempt at damage control for their warped ideals, and with the NGOs, to save their backsides and attempt to keep the gravy train going.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 901 ✭✭✭JPCN1


    put a couple of huge IPA centers in her end of the constituency and she won’t be returned as a councillor. But she’s happy to visit that upon others. We’ll get the same guff she gave about not being able to take a Ukrainian refugee… happy to leave them in rural Kerry, Clare, Donegal.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,850 ✭✭✭aidanodr


    So to confirm .. yes this is all about France v UK .. we walked into being the useful used pawn in this

    He (Sunak) tells @peston he won’t consider taking returns from any EU countries, unless France did likewise from UK.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,816 ✭✭✭ArthurDayne


    Has solid proof on this been established as of yet though? From what I have read, the high figure being cited of IPAs using the NI route appears to be based on an inference that people who apply for asylum anywhere else than an airport or port must have come across the land border. Inference is not fact, especially when there are reasonably rational reasons why a person might see a benefit at applying at the IPO rather than immediately upon arrival into the State at the airport (ie, fear of being denied entry etc).

    It stands to reason that the ease of crossing the border would present a good opportunity for people who have made it to the North and want to apply for asylum in the south. But it would be good to know more solidly how much of that 80% is just a big assumption and how much can actually be verified. Has anything been put forward to that effect?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,758 ✭✭✭brickster69


    AS mumbers increasing in South Belfast the last few weeks.

    "if you get on the wrong train, get off at the nearest station, the longer it takes you to get off, the more expensive the return trip will be."



  • Registered Users Posts: 990 ✭✭✭Fred Cryton


    Don't we have a problem where asylum seekers are essentially "untouchable" and above the law unless they commit a crime serious enough to put them in jail?

    Like on Mount Street - we provided them with alternative accomodation with sanitary facilities, and then like soft parents we allow them to go right back to Mount street. And now, Simon Harris talks about a "consensual" approach. Why is it consensual, are we literally unable to just give these people orders or instructions while they reside in our country illegally?!? But the Guards plenty able to shout orders at irish people protesting.

    We need to wipe the floor with the established parties at the coming election. They need record low votes and record high for alternatives. Only way to get a semblance of change in tact.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,850 ✭✭✭aidanodr


    One of the replies to Gavan O Reilly tweet above is interesting:

    this really shouldn’t be rocket science

    their refusal to accept returns breaches the letter/spirit of the CTA which disrupts the Windsor Framework which thereby puts their Brexit CTA back on the table; we should be lobbying Brussels now for trade sanctions

    I think this is the road that Michael martin is travelling and not that useless legislation change McEntee is wasting her time with



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,310 ✭✭✭bloopy


    But I don't understand why they are so hell bent on disproving the Northern route.

    This whole thing has exploded now and is nothing but negative.

    WheWhether they are coming in through the airports or coming in through the north does not change the fact that the country has had enough one way or the other.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,993 ✭✭✭Tenzor07


    For the migrants camping out at Mount St. committing an offence to get charged and brought to a nice warm bed with wash facilities and 3 meals at day in Mountjoy prison must seem very tempting given the conditions outside the IPAS centre.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,816 ✭✭✭ArthurDayne


    Say what you want about the plurality of media — I'm all for media platforms with different views — but I genuinely pity anyone who laps up what Beattie says there as being fact. Not least the idea that somehow the Irish government is to blame for not agreeing to border infrastructure which, even at that, was not infrastructure that was ever proposed as being one aimed at tracking or monitoring the flow of people — only goods. It's just an unbelievable re-writing of history.



Advertisement