Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Government's secret plan to block repayment of illegal nursing home charges

Options
2456718

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 4,685 ✭✭✭SleetAndSnow


    Nothing in the morning papers, the journal posted an article at 12am basically and it's pushed down now, independent nothing, the Irish times similar to the journal. Interesting. David Cullinane was on newstalk at 7am alright I believe



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,862 ✭✭✭10000maniacs


    We were living beyond our means and simply couldn't afford it. If there is stuff we can't afford, we shouldn't be doing it.

    We were a country in receivership in 2010. As a country, we needed to smell the coffee.We didn't have a pot to pi$$ in.



  • Moderators, Education Moderators Posts: 2,606 Mod ✭✭✭✭horgan_p


    This predates 2010 by some fair amount.


    And just because you're broke doesnt give you the right to rob or withold payment to someone you essentially overcharged.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,893 ✭✭✭deirdremf


    I'm not sure if this is a písstake or not, it would be hard to fit more cliches into the same space!



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,862 ✭✭✭10000maniacs


    Where would you have got the money in 2010? Ask the IMF?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 7,640 ✭✭✭Floppybits


    Is this post for real or is this going to be response of the government zealots to excuse this? Do you think this only started in the 2010? This was going on for years before 2010.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,893 ✭✭✭deirdremf


    And not just any households, many of them would be FF households, who were used to being looked after by FF. Wouldn't it be a shame if they stopped voting for FF?



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,640 ✭✭✭Floppybits


    Leo Varadkar is on the Pat Kenny show this morning, I wonder will Pat bring this up or will it just be a party political broadcast for FG?



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,893 ✭✭✭deirdremf


    Unless the law said otherwise, then this was illegal. Everyone involved must be shítting themselves, not just the pols.

    Post edited by deirdremf on


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,640 ✭✭✭Floppybits


    Oh I agree 100%. Anyone involved in this including those in the Public Services should all be accountable. Time for those in the Civil and Public Services to be more accountable and have the heads on the chopping block. If they want the pay then there are conditions that should come with that and one on those should be accountability. It seems like those operating in the HSE are a law onto themselves.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,290 ✭✭✭howiya


    While I take your point this is exactly what was suggested by Fine Gael when they were in opposition in 2010.

    'Fine Gael believes the law should be clear and that the State agencies should implement the law as it is, rather than as they would wish it to be… if resources to meet statutory duties are not available, the legislation should be amended to reflect practice.'

    This would seem to me to be a reasonable way out.

    However as yesterday's article stated.. "Eight months later, now on the other side of the fence in government, Mr Reilly got his answer - and quickly changed his tune."



  • Registered Users Posts: 15,953 ✭✭✭✭Spanish Eyes


    As a person whose parent (now deceased) was unfortunately in NH care for many years I am appalled by this. To clarify, parent paid for the care from their own independent means, didn't qualify for Fair Deal yada yada, so I have no immediate skin in the game.

    Does anyone remember the scheme a number of years ago to make refunds of NH fees under certain circumstances? I seem to recall that there was something like that around twelve or so years ago? Maybe that is the scheme being referred to. I know from a previous life that many refunds were made, but is it the case that it was only those savvy enough to apply actually got the refunds or what?

    Goes to show that unless elderly unwell have advocates, it seems they are fair game for exploitation and that does not just include NH fees either.



  • Registered Users Posts: 10,664 ✭✭✭✭maccored


    is this story even on RTE's site? doesnt come up in a search



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,292 ✭✭✭keeponhurling


    Yes, that's a fair point.

    I can actually understand why the government might have thought this policy a good or "pragmatic" idea. I'd have a small bit of sympathy.

    But ultimately, it is illegal. And to make it worse it seems that the policy (at least indirectly) targeted the worse off, who cannot afford legal fees to take on the State. They are presumably the ones who needed the refund the most.



  • Registered Users Posts: 43,028 ✭✭✭✭SEPT 23 1989


    Leo sounded very nervous when this topic arose with Pat this morning



  • Registered Users Posts: 14,903 ✭✭✭✭elperello


    David Cullinane was on just now with Claire Byrne.

    Basically saying the government have questions to answer and we need more information.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,640 ✭✭✭Floppybits


    Thought it was a very soft interview and Pat let him waffle away.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,359 ✭✭✭MrMusician18


    The charges were illegal but the strategy for managing claims was not.

    It's a tried and tested method of legal strategy when a big dog with lots of resources but a losing argument goes up against an ordinary individual.

    It was immoral and not behaviour becoming of an institution that is meant to have people's interests at heart.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,129 ✭✭✭dashoonage


    Nothing to see here...move along...



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 4,862 ✭✭✭10000maniacs


    I speculate that the thought process in 2010 was, this is €12 Billion. Its a lot of money. We are going to hammer the people with mortgages that they cannot afford into the ground over the next few years. The IMF is forcing us to do it (hammer middle earners into the ground with stealth taxes). Lets ease their burden a bit by not taking another €12 Billion away from them and give it to people who to all intents and purposes have had their mortgages paid off years ago and done well out of the property market up to that point.

    A bit cynical if this is indeed what happened, but necessary at the same time. The last thing the middle earners needed at the time was another €12 Billion hole in our deficit.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,893 ✭✭✭deirdremf


    Given the little information available at present, it behoves us all to be extremely cautious in what we say and in how we discuss this matter, particularly in view of the fact that full information is not in the public domain.

    That said, the information available points to a group of first-line pols and civil servants having been involved in kicking some of the most vulnerable people in the state for the past decade, and perhaps for several decades.

    IMO this is potentially the largest story in our state's history, and - legal strategy or not - could destroy both of our remaining legacy political parties.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,862 ✭✭✭10000maniacs


    I am just speculating what maybe the thought process was at the time in Government. Maybe there was more going on or less going on. I don't know as I was not in Government. I had a mortgage though at the time and I was feeling the pinch. I didn't even know this was going on until today.

    But you have to look at the situation through 2010 eyes.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,893 ✭✭✭deirdremf


    But you have to look at the situation through 2010 eyes.

    Indeed, the eyes that paid all the banks' debts, including the unsecured ones.



  • Registered Users Posts: 246 ✭✭purplefields


    Remember at the next election when you are about to tick your usual FFG box that a spoiled vote is the best way to vote.



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,674 ✭✭✭Allinall




  • Registered Users Posts: 246 ✭✭purplefields


    Incorrect.

    I'm guessing you are one of those FFG voters that ruin it for everyone.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,862 ✭✭✭10000maniacs


    Yes, and the middle earning taxpayer was the least to blame for that situation. Yet everyone expects everything to fall on them.

    Mica, The property collapse, The housing crisis, the nursing home crisis, Army deafness. Etc



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,118 ✭✭✭StrawbsM


    Could someone explain what the nursing homes/HSE were doing? And are they still doing it?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,012 ✭✭✭eggy81


    Where are the cavalry? What’s going on. Not a single post. Unbelievable.



Advertisement