Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Legal Question

  • 10-02-2023 1:12pm
    #1
    Registered Users Posts: 30


    Question regarding the status of adverse Possession. If a building is standing and half used. The question is the area in question apears to have no planning permission. If a adverse possession document was submitted along with other documents that this land is in limbo in who owns the land. With those documents submitted would we be right to say we have a right to stay there? W e are Irish and have recently become homeless and are very stuck we work but cannot afford the crazy rents and hotel hopping isnt something I want for my kids. Any help would be greatly appreciated



Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,537 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    To avail of adverse possession you must have taken control of land for a fixed period. It arises after you have stayed there for the fixed period (12 years i believe). it doesn't give you a right to stay there before that period is up. You say the building is half used. If there are other people in the building then adverse possession doesnt apply. you must take exclusive use of the building.



  • Registered Users Posts: 30 SFG


    The building is two seperate buildings. The building that is being used is the ground floor of one of the buildings. The other building is completly empty with appartments on the top floor that have never been used from when things went tits up in 2007/8. Having looming at the land registry there is no permission for those appartments andas far as I can tell the deeds have not been submitted unless they are help privately



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,537 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    the permission is irrelevant. you would be squatting. adverse possession is years down the road.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,689 ✭✭✭ittakestwo


    You dont look at land registry for a planning permission. You go to the county council website of where it is located. They will tell who the applicant at the time was. Also the land might be registered in the registery of deeds not the land registry. You dont submit title deeds with a planning application but there is a question on the planning form of your interest in the land (Freehold, leasehold etc.)


    I know this is Ireland but i doubt someone built a block of apartments without planning permission.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 78,495 ✭✭✭✭Victor


    Note that a vacant building will be unlikely to have water, electricity or other connections, creating obvious issues. Utilities may be reluctant to make connections without proper paperwork, that you might not be able to provide.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,689 ✭✭✭ittakestwo


    I have heard of cases where neighbours claim AP over part of thier neighbours garden etc or farmers who claim AP over part of a neighbouring farm.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,281 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump


    AP is not easy to establish.

    If I read it correctly, the OP is planning to squat somewhere and thinks they can then claim it?

    In general, you would have to establish that you excluded the legal title holder from the property for the relevant period. If the owner gives you permission, then you cannot claim it.

    I think that there was a case where someone else was squatting and just before the 12 years were up, the owner sent them a licence allowing them to use it, which wiped out their potential claim.

    There are also cases where land which was left vacant due to a long term plan, but was used in the interim for the prescribed time, but was found not to have established adverse possession due to the squatting not affecting the long term plan.

    Also another case, which I think is on the PRAI website, about a man who owned a field, and he used to stop his jeep at the gateway once per year and look in, and that was deemed to be a sufficient assertion of ownership to defeat an adverse possession claim by a squatter.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,689 ✭✭✭ittakestwo


    Did not go to court as was agreed with title holder that they had got rights from squatting and was transferred for nominal fee.

    Alot of AP claims are between neighbours where one has moved the boundary. I have never herd a defence to this being you cant get AP as you haven’t taken control of all my property on that folio.



Advertisement