Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

SocDem leadership

Options

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 27,675 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    It will be interesting to see what they do.

    A merger back into Labour was not possible under the leadership of Murphy and Shortall, and while Kelly was leader of Labour not a possibility either.

    However, say Cairns and Bacik might view things differently. LSD party maybe?



  • Registered Users Posts: 12,382 ✭✭✭✭Calahonda52


    LSD party maybe... indeed

    Lysergic acid diethylamide


    “I can’t pay my staff or mortgage with instagram likes”.



  • Registered Users Posts: 277 ✭✭scrumqueen


    The POINT of the SDs is that they arent Labour, and for a good deal of people that actually means something.

    Cairns is popular and incredibly capable, and I hope her recent harassment she has experienced doesn't stop her from running. Gannon is also a strong contender. I do hope though that the party moves away from this joint leadership nonsense.



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,782 ✭✭✭✭Danzy


    It would be tolerable if they merged into the SDLP.



  • Registered Users Posts: 14,889 ✭✭✭✭loyatemu


    I do hope though that the party moves away from this joint leadership nonsense.

    surely they will, a party that can't even decide who their leader is doesn't exactly inspire confidence.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 7,076 ✭✭✭Brussels Sprout



    Yup, that would be nice. Create another truly all-Ireland party and tidy things up on the left.

    Shame that the SDLP have already thrown their lot in with FF for some reason.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,928 ✭✭✭Bishop of hope


    Not unbelievable that such a jump coymuld be made by an SD TD, wasn't Stephen Donnelly in the SDs, enough said



  • Registered Users Posts: 68,545 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    The SDLP-FF relationship is over; it never passed a party conference either so was really only a proposal.

    SDLPs sister party is Labour, most senior SDLP members are Labour members; it wouldn't be fully reciprocated but there are still some senior Labour members also in the SDLP. A three way merger may be possible, but SD-SDLP won't happen.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,423 ✭✭✭AlanG


    The challenge for the SD and labour to a degree is that they should be attractive to middle income workers but they are viewed as pandering to social media when it comes to border security and welfare for the free forever home brigade. This approach may insulate them for abuse on twitter but it pushes their natural base to FF and FG as they really don't want to be funding these policies with no limits. Meanwhile SF already have the market sown up among those who believe in the money tree.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,076 ✭✭✭Brussels Sprout



    There's an awful lot of projection going on here.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 16,329 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    Yeah poster wants SDs to adopt policies that would position them to the right of FF and FG. How would that work out for a party called the Social Democrats?



  • Registered Users Posts: 24,202 ✭✭✭✭Sleepy


    Bacik is Labour's biggest electoral problem imo. You can't win a significant part of the electorate when you hate half the population on the basis of their gender.



  • Registered Users Posts: 27,675 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Oh I agree, remember her from student politics, back then she was divisive too.



  • Registered Users Posts: 24,202 ✭✭✭✭Sleepy


    Divisive is a nice way to put it. She deliberately and knowingly mis-represented her electorate.



  • Registered Users Posts: 14,889 ✭✭✭✭loyatemu


    she's an improvement on Kelly who came across badly in pretty much every appearance he made (and by most account is a d*ck). Most people aren't that aware of her past as a student leader and senator. She's unlikely to provide much of a boost for Labour though.

    Anyway, SDs have decided that leadership elections are for other parties and Cairns has got the job by default unniversal acclaim.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,076 ✭✭✭Brussels Sprout



    In fairness - they've only got 4 eligible TDs so the fact that there's going to be no leadership election is more a matter of practicalities than some kind of democratic deficit. When you only have a handful of TDs then you're probably all going to have a good sense of who the natural leader is and cohesion is going to be more important than it would eb for larger parties. Labour faced the same issue themselves last time around and dealt with it the same way.



  • Registered Users Posts: 68,545 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    I actually know of someone who left Labour and joined the Soc Dems specifically and solely because of Howlin being appointed without a leadership election; claiming that there should always be an election for such a role. I wonder if they're going to move on again now!



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,076 ✭✭✭Brussels Sprout



    If they don't jump ship again then you'll know for sure that they just didn't like Brendan Howling but wanted to sound like they were leaving for more high minded reasons.



  • Registered Users Posts: 68,545 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    I think they wanted Alan Kelly; but didn't come back when they had the chance to have Alan Kelly.



Advertisement