Inconsistencies in the Irish criminal court? Any thoughts on this as a member of the public?

Sugar_Rush · 18-03-2023 10:42pm

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/comment/120372637#Comment_120372637

Well, Nolan is obviously a product of Irish culture for one, and secondly it doesn't really stop at Nolan.

I think Irish culture has this weak sense of pity for degeneracy, and therefore we're more inclined to place good faith where it has no business being placed.

Where as an individual who's hard working, reliable, good citizen, our same justice system will throw the book at them (apparently they don't inspire that same sense of pity).

This is a cultural issue and I've noticed it in law enforcement as well as spineless weak people like Nolan.

......

There's a reality that in instances like this, ESPECIALLY with degeneracy, the saying "one must be cruel to be kind" most definitely applies.

Degenerates always have a sob story, always an out-clause for their vile and obscene behaviour, some obscure justification for it.

As a culture, we're not particularly good at seeing past that.

Not addressing it as good logic and rationale dictates it should be addressed is in some ways, actually enabling it. And it's amongst our leading national issues at present, only due to get worse as population increases and continues to ethnically diversify.

16-04-2023 2:58pm

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/comment/120350097#Comment_120350097

Why would the courts business want to reform? Would upset the money train you outlined, the Government being one of the main beneficiary's.

Op's Inconsistencys probably stem from every courthouse being a separately registered, for profit business. Also that your solicitor and barrister and everyone else in the court's first oath is to the BAR, not to you or those they represent. Win or loose your just a cash cow. It's all just commercial business.

May also have something do with the fact that the Courts of Justice Act 1924, on which Ireland's justice system is founded on was never commenced (signed into law) so courts/judges were never given jurisdiction. This means every court ruling for the last 99 years (including a few death sentence's) has been by essentially fraudulent kangaroo court's without lawful jurisdiction who have been allowed to believe they're a law unto themselves.

Why this happened is mostly speculation now but can't have been by accident, But still, although none deny it, few want to talk about it or change it. Sure our courts (without jurisdiction) are grand, we're a great wee country.