Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Is Ireland's fake tan use problematic?

Options
1810121314

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 2,851 ✭✭✭CrabRevolution


    If anyone thinks that all other circumstances being the same (unknown author, no past work etc.) they'd have published an article titled "It's a veritable fact that immigration adds to housing demand" or "The travelling community need to acknowledge that respect goes two ways", you're comically deluded or (more likely) lying.

    The authors of the article picked their subject carefully because an article from a member of a "minority" calling Irish people racist was likely to bypass all editorial scrutiny and be immediately published.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Nobody here is an editor.

    The fact it was written by AI or human is not the point. They chose to publish the woke identity politics race baiting.

    Put it this way. If someone used AI to write something criticising non whites for cultural appropriation you can bet they would not have published it.

    Their woke ideology got in the way of editorial professionalism. Or they had none to begin with.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 49,443 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    yeah, it'd be standard practice to pay their contributors, i'd have thought.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,914 ✭✭✭skimpydoo


    The sub editor who agreed to this being published should be sacked. As a journalist I can't believe the so called paper of note published this clickbait AI bullshit.This is a sad time for the media.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 49,443 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    just got this in the mail:



    Good morning, *****

    If a good newspaper is a nation talking to itself, the Opinion section is where much of that talking happens. It is an open, pluralistic space that hosts everyone from public figures and commentators to specialist analysts and ordinary readers with something to say. The aim each day is to come up with a blend of thought-provoking columns that inform, stimulate and lend a fresh perspective on a current issue.

    For us at The Irish Times, it is an important means of making good on our founding principles. Those principles describe a view of the world that is open-minded, tolerant, curious, respectful of divergent views and always attentive to the needs of minorities.

    We work hard at this. As in any 24/7 news operation, some days we do better than others. But last Thursday we got it badly wrong. That day, we published online an opinion column under the headline ‘Irish women’s obsession with fake tan is problematic’, written by someone purporting to be a young immigrant woman in Ireland. It made an argument that has been aired in other countries but related it to the Irish context.

    Over the course of several days, the author engaged with the relevant editorial desk - taking suggestions for edits on board, offering personal anecdotes and supplying links to relevant research. All of this was taken in good faith, and the article was published online on Thursday morning.

    Less than 24 hours after publication on our digital platforms, The Irish Times became aware that the column may not have been genuine. That prompted us to remove it from the site and to initiate a review, which is ongoing. It now appears that the article and the accompanying byline photo may have been produced, at least in part, using generative AI technology. It was a hoax; the person we were corresponding with was not who they claimed to be. We had fallen victim to a deliberate and coordinated deception.

    We don’t take this lightly. It was a breach of the trust between The Irish Times and its readers, and we are genuinely sorry. The incident has highlighted a gap in our pre-publication procedures. We need to make them more robust - and we will. It has also underlined one of the challenges raised by generative AI for news organisations. We, like others, will learn and adapt.

    In the meantime, The Irish Times will continue to make space for new writers, not least those from under-represented communities, and to offer you, our readers, the high-quality journalism you expect.

    Ruadhán Mac Cormaic

    Editor



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 906 ✭✭✭Everlong1


    Nice of them to end with the pledge to ensure they continue to feature writers from "under - represented communities." Does that mean we might start to see an occasional piece from a white heterosexual?



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 49,443 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    there are i think 6 opinion pieces in yesterday's paper. have a guess how many are non-white?

    i'm not going to speculate about their sexuality (but would be confident in my guess about breda o'brien).



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,130 ✭✭✭lmao10


    Tell us why this is happening. The big conspiracy theory and who is behind it.....



  • Registered Users Posts: 12,535 ✭✭✭✭Varik


    See the Indo listed the words they used to generate the image.

    “overweight, blue hair, smug expression”



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 595 ✭✭✭cheese sandwich


    No acknowledgement that the article was divisive clickbait that had no place in a supposed newspaper of record. The only problem the editor sees with it is that the IT was hoaxed. So the root cause that led to this debacle is not addressed and likely to reoccur



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    If they were hoaxed or not is irrelevant. They chose to publish this racist tripe and now they are too cowardly to own it. They’re literally trying to blame the alt right for what happened.



  • Registered Users Posts: 913 ✭✭✭thegame983


    From now on we will ensure that the race baiting clowns who write for us are verified.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,857 ✭✭✭growleaves


    Yes and I think Mac Cormaic and friends may not even find it all that easy to dig up (real) activists with an ethnic grudge to stir the pot.

    The Mayor of Detroit - a city with a 78% black population - is a white Irish-American guy named Mike Duggan. Its easy to forget that ordinary non-whites like white people just fine for the most part.

    Usually the "I hate white males" stuff comes from white Irish feminist women and ball-less wonder male leftists.



  • Registered Users Posts: 923 ✭✭✭Burt Renaults


    As a white heterosexual (and a male one too... these days, you can get arrested for that, these days), I can't honestly say I've ever felt that my demographic is under-represented in the opinion pages of the Irish Times. Off the top of my head, Michael McDowell, Fintan O'Toole, Diarmaid Ferriter, Cliff Taylor, Newton Emerson... I mean, I could go on...



  • Registered Users Posts: 277 ✭✭Guildenstern


    There was enough evidence in recent years that the IT was going down the rabbit hole of wokedom at an uncontrollable rate. This apology seems to be buttoning down on that.

    Let them to it. Anyone with half a braincell cannot and should not take them seriously.

    It's a free country. If someone is happy to continue subscribing to this nonsense, let them to it.

    Do they regularly publish subscriber numbers? Would be interesting to see before and after numbers after this week.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Everyone of those a self hating lefty. They don’t represent their demographics, they don’t even represent themselves. They just say what they think is required from them the absolute cowards



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,342 ✭✭✭AyeGer


    If fake tan is not bad for you how could it be problematic op?



  • Registered Users Posts: 923 ✭✭✭Burt Renaults


    If I was Michael McDowell, I'd hate myself too. But I wouldn't call him a lefty. Although I do think that the vast majority of opinion columnists could easily have their articles written by an AI algorithm and nobody would notice.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,857 ✭✭✭growleaves



    They are sowing ethnic divisions. Its hard to underestimate just how destructive and ill-intentioned it is.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,946 ✭✭✭0ph0rce0


    10 pages on fake tan bullshit 😂 I hope Russia just nukes the world soon.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 49,443 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    michael mcdowell a self hating lefty?

    we're not in kansas anymore...



  • Registered Users Posts: 277 ✭✭Guildenstern


    It also feeds into the Irish psyche of just following trends, in this case US identity politics. The IT must have both The New York Times and The Guardian on speed dial.

    It's also a particular backlash to the strict conservative priest ridden times. We shall be uber social liberal, and nothing shall stop us.

    They'll end up turning this into a rant about how we need to be careful about the rise of the far right. Words such as 'controversial' 'disturbing' 'concerning' will get plenty airing.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,130 ✭✭✭lmao10


    I'm just shocked that the conspiracy theorists in the thread can't tell us what is actually going on....

    There seems to be some conspiracy they keep alluding to but seem scared to say anything about it.



  • Registered Users Posts: 322 ✭✭pjcb




  • Registered Users Posts: 13,460 ✭✭✭✭fits


    Jaysus. Once again on boards I feel like I’ve gone down the rabbit hole. This thread is weird.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    What conspiracy do you think anyone actually mentioned? I didn’t see anything like what you imagined.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,130 ✭✭✭lmao10


    I think there is definitely some reason behind what people are posting but they seem terrified to spell it out unfortunately.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,410 ✭✭✭jmcc


    Typically. Not sure if they'd get the same rate as a freelancer or working journalist writing for print and onliine as it was an online-only article.

    Regards...jmcc



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 7,410 ✭✭✭jmcc


    Unfortunately for the IT, it wasn't a subby but rather the opinion section editor and she is newly appointed.

    Regards...jmcc



Advertisement