Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

2023 RWC Buildup, Squads, Fixtures 'etc'

11819212324185

Comments

  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I chuckled that we're talking about a game involving France and it's the other team that we don't know if they'll show up or not!

    I think NZ are going to rattle France badly early on and their composure is going to wane. The last 20 minutes in Dublin during the six nations they couldn't get themselves back into the game, I think the All Blacks are going to put a few late tries on them for a score line that 'looks worse than it is' scenario.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,080 ✭✭✭ElisaAtWar


    Good post. So here's, I believe, an interesting point. Let's say France and New Zealand do beat lumps out of each other. And let's say Ireland and South Africa beat lumps out of each other. In both cases I believe this is highly likely. With the difference being that France and New Zealand have much more recovery time available to them before the quarter finals. So if you just play it through game by game Ireland is at a distinct disadvantage entering the quarter final stage ( on the assumption they make the quarter finals). Keep in mind after the SA bruiser they take on Scotland to earn that position.

    Which then leads to a suggestion. You play the competition qualifying rules for the quarter finals rather than the teams in front of you. And if you were to do that you would rest your primary team against SA and go full out from there on in. Be it France or New Zealand in the quarter finals it simply isn't going to be easy. But if you play the competition sensibly you have a fresh team against Scotland and as fresh a team as possible for the potential quarter final.

    So you potentially throw a game in the knowledge it should see you go further in the competition. I know this is a bit radical but at the same time does it not make sense



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,897 ✭✭✭TheRona


    You could look at the pool draw any way you'd like. Ireland get the chance to bring Johnny up to peak match sharpness before the SA game, and they do have 2 weeks to recover for the Scotland match, so it's not all bad for them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,757 ✭✭✭✭AdamD


    I swear anyone suggesting we throw the SA game must have skipped maths class in school. We can beat Scotland and still not qualify



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 16,313 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    Valid points , but the risk of "putting all your eggs in one basket" is simply too great.

    One badly timed tackle and you are playing half the game with 14 men for example.

    Think you have to play each game to win and manage the resources accordingly.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    On a purely logic basis this makes some sense - but when you add in the variables that exist in sport the risk factor of throwing a game rapidly outweigh any potential benefit.

    And I don't like the idea of running from a fixture. Best way to win the World Cup is to beat everyone and whilst we have both a bad draw and an unfortunate run of games, I think the week before the Scotland game is enough for the squad to freshen up and we don't know yet whether the Scotland game will be an all out war or if we'll strangle them out of the game as usual.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,897 ✭✭✭TheRona


    NZ team named

    Injuries mean first choice missing at Prop, Lock, Blindside Flanker and 2nd 5/8.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,080 ✭✭✭ElisaAtWar


    Is your factual statement true Venjur. The risk factors outweigh the benefits. On basis do you form that opinion. You suggest we should go all out on what statistics.

    I just mumbled an idea but I would be interested in what statistical basis it is incorrect which is what you suggest.

    Note I am not trying to get at you here, but you made a statement and I just wish to understand the basis of that statement

    Post edited by Boards.ie: Mike on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,897 ✭✭✭TheRona


    The first statistic I would use is that no team has ever thrown a match and won the World Cup.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,808 ✭✭✭irelandrover


    Because if we lose to South Africa then we have to beat Scotland. Which gives zero wiggle room in the case of cards, injuries, or anything else that could possibly happen.

    I really can't believe people are actually seriously suggesting that we throw a game in the world cup.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I mean, we can win 3 and lose 1 and not qualify so for that reason alone it isn't worth the risk.

    We might much prefer to face one of France or New Zealand (more than the other) depending on how they go in the pools. Throwing a game takes away any influence we have on that.

    I'd rather go into the final game with a loss still being enough to top the pool. Take the pressure off us and heap it all onto Scotland.

    But as I said, it's the intangibles that exist within competitive sports that would stop you from considering this.

    You don't throw a game in the biggest tournament in the sport, it's cynical and says something about your self belief.

    Ireland need to back themselves to win this outright.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,605 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    I do wonder if SA might go with a weaker team against us if it let them face NZ in the 1/4. Would be a very Rassie move



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,897 ✭✭✭TheRona




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,503 ✭✭✭swiwi_


    Which teams turns up. Game of two halves. Team with most points wins.



  • Registered Users Posts: 548 ✭✭✭MaddChris


    ...



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 16,313 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    Well - To be fair we've seen two very different NZ teams in recent weeks.

    The dominant one that played in the Rugby Championship and beat SA and the cowed one that turned out in Twickenham the other week.

    If the NZ pack are as flat as they were then , the French even without Baille and Willemse up front will do serious damage.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,503 ✭✭✭swiwi_


    Yeah I was just pulling your leg. Im totally relaxed about this RWC as anything other than NZ not winning would be a surprise.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,765 ✭✭✭Shehal


    Anyone thinking we should throw the SA game are either slow or were home schooled. Stop trying to over think the situation, we are the best side in the world so no we wont be throwing any game.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,605 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    Don't think DDA has been particularly good, Esterhuizen looked better to me



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 704 ✭✭✭Ben Bailey




  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 16,313 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    Agreed - Think he's been underwhelming for a while now , including a lot of his time with Munster.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,080 ✭✭✭ElisaAtWar


    I believe that point has been made a few times without any solid basis to date. The argument for this is more players likely to be available towards the end of the competition. So far the argument against is, for example 'we are the best team in the world '.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,080 ✭✭✭ElisaAtWar


    Anyway Venjur, we will agree to disagree and I believe what you say will be the reality. It doesn't mean I agree with it but I know what you say is more likely. It doesn't mean it's the right choice, I just can't see Ireland doing anything else. And yet my personal opinion is it's absolutely the wrong choice if we wish to win this competition. Anyway it will all come to pass and we can then look back in hindsight



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,757 ✭✭✭✭AdamD


    If we sent our seconds out to play South Africa we'll get pumped for 30-40 points. That puts us in a situation where we'd get knocked out if Scotland beat South Africa unless we somehow make up that points difference. Nobody with half a brain would think that's a good idea



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,080 ✭✭✭ElisaAtWar


    Hmm, we would already know the potential points difference risk going into the game. So it is not as you make it out at all my friend



  • Advertisement
  • Subscribers Posts: 41,915 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    Points difference is not the first factor which determines who goes through in a tie. Points gained by those tied teams in their inter-games is more important.

    Therefore a trouncing against SA could very easily mean that a win against Scotland doesn't put is through, should Scotland get a LBP against us.

    It would be insanity to deliberately put ourselves into that position



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 39,066 ✭✭✭✭PTH2009


    Anyone happen to have a spare wall chart they could possibly mail ?

    I can donate €5 to a charity of there choice ?

    PM if any available



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,241 ✭✭✭Sanjuro


    The coaching team are going to put out the strongest team they can, with some minor tweaks for every game. Forget this 3 and 4d chess stuff. Nothing we've seen in any Six Nations under Farrell suggests that he's going to gamble on anything but a win.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,478 ✭✭✭✭dastardly00




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 4,518 ✭✭✭Paul Smeenus


    This. I had the Fijians to beat the Welsh, but it was based in no small part on how savvy and sensible Muntz is. I don't know enough about his back-up - does anyone familiar with him think they can still do it?

    Post edited by Boards.ie: Mike on


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,518 ✭✭✭Paul Smeenus


    Also - watched this earlier. I thought it was very interesting, specifically because of Ben Darwin, from Gain Line analytics. He's fascinating in his talk about what he defines as the primary reason for success, ahead of individual skill - cohesion. He thinks we'll win it, and that Scotland will be second in our group ahead of SA, because if things start going wrong for the Africans, he thinks they'll crumble.


    In amongst a load of Kiwi cheerleaders (who are, to be fair, watchably self-aware and tongue in cheek), he makes for an interesting listen.


    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dH7WGZNQ31Q



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,605 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    Good watch, he makes some salient points. If Sexton and JGP stay healthy, I think we win it



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    One more sleep

    One more sleep

    One more sleep



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,757 ✭✭✭✭AdamD


    That's a bit of a weird point considering largely the same group of players lost their opening game in the last world cup and went on to win it..



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,518 ✭✭✭Paul Smeenus


    He just thinks they're currently overconfident. I'm summarising.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,765 ✭✭✭Shehal


    But if that's the case why don't SA go 2nd string against us, they are an inferior side so need more of an advantage than us, and let us worry about winning all our matches.


    In real world the only country talking about throwing a game to "help our chances" its us, and the reason for that is because it's a really dumb idea.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,765 ✭✭✭Shehal


    They were more consistent going into the last RWC, nowadays they are very up and down at times. I mean lets be honest, the only reason the media and fans are wetting themselves about SA atm is because they won....ONE...GAME...



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Yeah but they're always good in world cups. You can't ignore that they switch it on at the right time every cycle and they get better as the tournament progresses. In as much as people are factoring in our inability to breach the quarter final barrier - they are also factoring in South Africa's track record at the tournament and ability to repeatedly win the thing.

    I'd be hoping for Ireland / Scotland to emerge from the pool as I think if SA make a final they'll be awful tough to beat. They have enough stock of forwards to just brute force their way through games and as the tournament progresses and fatigue kicks in they can keep churning out victories.

    I think we can out box them in the pool, contain their game with an incredibly hard working and accurate defence and then just pick off our chances when they come along. It's unlikely we make a final without losing some continuity so our defence will somewhat deteriorate and if it's not as on top as I'd expect it will be in a few weeks then were in trouble. If we can't contain them as effectively in the final they'll run over us and I'd rather play any other team (including France) than South Africa should we get that far.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,044 ✭✭✭Yeah_Right


    I wish I had your confidence. I think we're going to get rolled in the opener. Look alright in the rest of the pool and lose the QF.

    Post edited by Boards.ie: Mike on


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,044 ✭✭✭Yeah_Right


    I'm curious about the comment that more players would be available later in the tournament if Ireland threw the game against SA. Do you have some numbers that show more players get injured or red carded against SA than against other teams?



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Nope. You don't need to worry at all, I have you making the final but losing to Ireland.

    Whereupon I will be tea bagging you rent free in your head for all eternity.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,897 ✭✭✭TheRona


    When did France last beat NZ when NZ wore black? I know NZ were in their alternate strip in 2021 when they lost, and also in 07 when Barnes decided it was American Football.

    Edit: It was Carisbrook 2009.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,877 ✭✭✭ionadnapokot


    French troubles....still confident that they will beat NZ even without Baiile, Danty & Willemse.

    And Jalibert's rapid rise was over 5 years ago! He made his debut v Ireland in 6N DG goal game.


    Interestingly only 1 of the 7 guardians writers think Ireland will make the final. 2 dont think they get out of the group!

    6 of them have SA in the final. I think they have put way too much premium on that Oil Cup game in Twickenham

    https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2023/sep/07/rugby-world-cup-2023-guardian-writers-predictions

    This will age badly when Ireland beat SA in 2 weeks and hopefully very badly come the end of Oct.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 27,465 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    This might age poorly but those are dreadful predictions.



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 11,436 Mod ✭✭✭✭Hermy


    AB You’d have to think South Africa are bound to take at least one of the two qualifying spots in Pool B

    Rassie is arrogant but I don't think even he expects SA to take more than one of the two qualifying spots!

    Genealogy Forum Mod



  • Registered Users Posts: 175 ✭✭noc1980


    There's nothing crazy or stupid about predicting a SA or France or NZ win. Yeah it's irritating how nobody's giving us a shot but you have to look at it from the outside. We're in the toughest pool with the toughest possible QF and we've never won a knockout game. We're not going to be respected at the RWC until we make an impact at it. Pundits know that we've got a top team capable of winning it and if we get past the QF most of them will have us as favourites but it shouldn't be surprising to us that they remain doubtful over our belief come crunch time.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 12,248 Mod ✭✭✭✭Cookiemunster


    For me, two of them predicting that Ireland won't get out of the pool is what's a bit mad about those predictions.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,799 ✭✭✭✭Pudsy33


    I particularly enjoyed the Georgia to escape the pool prediction. The type of madness I can get behind.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,877 ✭✭✭ionadnapokot


    Its not so much that they aren't picking Ireland, I find it amazing that so many of them think SA will get past NZ (or France) in the 1/4 finals & beat France in a final. It's not happening.

    This SA are not near as good a side that won the WC 4 years ago. Lotta miles on the clock and are missing key players.



Advertisement