Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Irish White Privilege......Yeah

11011121315

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,829 ✭✭✭ArthurDayne


    I'm a zealot? How so? What zealous things have I said and do you have any particular substantive response to them, aside from just calling me stuff?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,536 ✭✭✭Silentcorner


    Count the amount of times you have mentioned privilege in one sentence….and you are proposing that all kids should be made aware of their privilege based on divisive factors like race, sexuality, gender, no doubt you believe that straight white males are the most privileged of all kids and should be reminded of this as much as possible.

    You haven't considered what impact this will have on a classroom of kids who normally divide themselves up along lines of common interests like football, comics, games, dolls…you know kids stuff!!

    Like I said, you are a zealot and you shouldn't be allowed near kids.

    Post edited by Silentcorner on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,829 ✭✭✭ArthurDayne


    Ah, so I'm the zealot even though you're now descending all the way down to the "you shouldn't be allowed near kids" stuff. Great.

    Not only that, you seem to just be shoving opinions into my mouth that I neither hold nor have expressed. I don't think white straight males are the most privileged of all kids — some of the most underprivileged kids in Ireland are white males, regardless of orientation. They may benefit from certain privilege from being male, white, straight etc, but they also lack privilege in lots of different ways, not least by virtue of the much tougher socioeconomic conditions they face. Indeed, in my view, socioeconomic privilege is probably the most significant one in the country.

    And you know, for someone who seems to portray themselves as a champion of not dividing people etc, your posts seem to do nothing but summarily dismiss my views and declare me someone who shouldn't be allowed near kids. So maybe you should take a look in the mirror when it comes to divisiveness and try to actually engage respectfully when debating others — ya know — the way we try to promote healthy debate in schools (or does that scare you too?).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,536 ✭✭✭Silentcorner


    There you go again. I believe kids should be left alone, to be kids. I've no tolerance for people who want to impose their ideology on young minds. You can call me divisive, but it is you that is pushing an ideology on children. Parents are more than capable of navigating the nuances of life with their kids.

    The definition of a zealot is - "a person who has very strong opinions about something, and tries to make other people have them too"

    So ya, you are a zealot.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,011 ✭✭✭Backstreet Moyes




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,218 ✭✭✭nachouser


    It's about someone claiming that privilege is going to be taught in schools based on the word appearing once in an appendix to a document. That's all I'm pointing out. I'll continue to do so. It's a thread based on a lie.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,448 ✭✭✭suvigirl


    Such a strange thread. Were people not told when they were kids that there were a lot of people in the world that were not as fortunate as they were?

    that was completely normal for me, and all my contemporaries. I most certainly was not a privileged person in Ireland, I grew up below ' working class ' but I was always taught by parents, grandparents, teachers and anyone else in authority, that I was privileged, compared to some.

    And I was. As are all the children growing up in Ireland today, extremely privileged. We were taught that we were lucky, nothing wrong with teaching kids today that they are lucky.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 50,357 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    that's the weird thing, if i'm to believe many people on this thread (who i suspect are mostly white), society would treat them the same as a black person? i suspect for many people, trying to explain how society treats them is like trying to explain water to a fish.

    i had a chuckle when someone (i think helen mcentee) was quoted after the riots in dublin, 'ireland is not a racist country'.

    presuming it was she; she'd not be the first person i'd think of asking as to whether ireland is racist.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,536 ✭✭✭Silentcorner


    Would you look at this….

    We are a long way from what you are describing, we were all told we were more fortunate than others in far away countries…

    What didn't happen was that the class would be divided up in and told of their different privileges within that classroom…along the lines of skin colour, gender or sexuality.

    You are forgetting, many Irish workers have been exposed to "Training" of this nature, so a lot of people know exactly what is being suggested here. I love the way the zealots act like it is all so harmless and virtuous. But I bet you wouldn't put it to the parents to vote on.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,448 ✭✭✭suvigirl


    Of course the class was divided up! Some people were much more privileged then others, and they were told.

    That is just normal common sense, we in Ireland, are much more privileged then lots of other nationalities. I can't see what could possibly be wrong by telling kids that!



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,536 ✭✭✭Silentcorner


    So tell us about your classroom where the kids were divided up along the lines of their gender, skin colour and sexuality?



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,314 ✭✭✭bloopy


    Are there classes being divided up according to privilege?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 137 ✭✭susan678


    What difference does it make how many times it appears the point is it is in the document and that is very disturbing.

    This thread is not based on a lie.

    The document is for public consumption God knows what these loons will do in private with our children.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,314 ✭✭✭bloopy


    Are there school classes being divided up according to percieved privilege?

    If so, where is this happening.



  • Registered Users Posts: 369 ✭✭sekiro


    Haha. Sorry I don't share the same beliefs as you.

    And it is just a belief system after all. Some people just seem very determined to push their beliefs on others.

    If I see two people heading down the street towards me, a man walking along and a woman in a wheelchair, any judgement I make on their so-called "privilege" is based on personal belief and assumption rather than any factual basis.

    It's based entirely on belief and, as we already know about strongly held beliefs, some people obviously can't take it when their beliefs are challenged.

    Its very similar to the way that people argue the existence of God. Some religious people will argue basically that something cannot come from nothing as if their argument for God is simply "something must have created all this" and not a pretty extensive set of specific beliefs about God and Jesus and sin and the age of the planet and so on.

    So here you might find people who obviously do buy into the belief system of white privilege and male privilege and thin privilege etc trying to act like "well you enjoyed your coffee this morning while some people have no coffee at all so you see privilege exists!"

    I stand by my position.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,829 ✭✭✭ArthurDayne


    OK but would you not then be able to supplement the belief on more solid ground by actually communicating with the disabled person and the disabled community more widely to understand what they see as the particular barriers they face on account of their disability? That way you can assess it on a broader understanding right?

    Sure — I hop on the train sometimes and it strikes me that there are no lifts at some of the stations. I think at Ashtown for example where there is a level crossing, a person unable to use the stairs to cross the flyover footbridge would have to wait for the level crossing to open before they can actually cross to the other platform and would then potentially miss their train. So it strikes me in that situation that there is an existence of privilege for able bodied people. OK, that's just my "belief" but if thinking about privilege helps to make you conscious of it, then surely that assists with society's appreciation for what things could be done to alleviate the situation to some extent. And you can always just actually engage with disabled people to supplement that.

    For whatever reason, even this positive outcome from how acknowledging privilege can be beneficial doesn't seem to be acknowledged here. It's all just shot down immediately as some nefarious, dogmatic, religious, zealous plot, with very little attempt being made to actually find the middle ground. And the example I'm using is a much more tangible, easily demonstrable one. I accept that there are less tangible and less easily demonstrated ones, but supplementing the "belief" can come from actually communicating with others and assessing what they have to say.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,693 ✭✭✭volchitsa


    This is a false equivalence though. The title of the thread is not "is society perfectly equal?". Clearly it's not, and in the case of disabled people, it's not a matter of other commuters becoming conscious of things like the lack of lifts - because frankly that "consciousness" doesn't actually help disabled people one bit unless practical steps are taken - and those practical steps are easy to identify.

    What would make a difference is society deciding to spend the extra money needed to provide access to all. Of course that would mean increasing taxes or else spending less in other areas, and it's an unending process because there will always be extra needs that the latest improvements aren't fulfilling - for instance, what about the mentally handicapped who might need help with signs being read out to them? Or the deaf/blind etc etc? Where does society decide to stop spending?

    But the thread title is not about that sort of extra spending, which wouldn't help in the case of "white privilege". There's no identifiable issue to "fix" like putting in new lifts. Because "white privilege" is the claim that people are being deliberately excluded from society, not from a lack of public spending but purely because of their skin colour. A claim of systemic racism in Irish society that has only been able to be made by conflating anecdotes of individual racists (mostly vague and/or hypothetical) with the notion that the whole society is organised in such a way as to keep black people down. Which to be frank is complete nonsense. But also - and this is why it needs to be opposed - deeply harmful to creating a cohesive society in schools and the workplace.

    Reem Alsalem UNSR Violence Against Women and Girls: "Very concerned about statements by the IOC at Paris2024 (M)ultiple international treaties and national constitutions specifically refer to women & their fundamental rights, so the world (understands) what women -and men- are. (H)ow can one assess fairness and justice if we do not know who we are being fair and just to?"



  • Registered Users Posts: 373 ✭✭Gentlemanne


    I agree with you that some people cannot take it when their beliefs are challenged. Sometimes it's easier to be an ostrich with your head in the sand, and attempt to justify to yourself why something is bullshit because you don't seem to understand it.

    Not even sure what your point is about your own snap judgment about the circumstances of a disabled person you happen to come across? Just because you don't have perfect information about someone doesn't mean there isn't extremely obvious advantages (privilege?) to being able-bodied over having a disability.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,829 ✭✭✭ArthurDayne


    The consciousness does help though — I mean that's the very base foundation on which stuff like disabled access is built, right? But where the consciousness also comes to the fore is how people interact with and understand disabled people who they may encounter. Look at Jack Grealish at the FA Cup final at the weekend, taking the time to chat to the child who I understand is blind. What's great about that is, for the other kids there, it's a lot just to see the big stars — but him taking the time to actually chat to her meant that she got to experience a moment that took into account her particular sensory barrier.

    It's things like that where I feel that understanding privilege can help — being conscious of the lived experience of another person, the barriers or negative experiences they might face that you and others don't, and this can also help you think critically about their perspective in life. Note how in this example it should be obvious that nobody is asserting that sighted people should feel guilty or attacked because they aren't blind.

    Also, I'm not arguing that Irish society is systemically racist. In fact, I don't think Ireland is systemically racist. I also don't think that white privilege means, as you put it, the "deliberate exclusion" of non-whites, it's simply a reference to some negative experiences a non-white person might person might encounter that a white person might not.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,846 ✭✭✭shootermacg


    Idiots applying privilege to colour is racism in it's purest form. Like even an absolute fool would first consider wealth as being the fundamental privilege no?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,413 ✭✭✭Potatoeman


    This stuff is really just a replacement of religion, original sin is white privilege under a different name. It conveniently ignores wealth which is a far bigger advantage. Wander around the Middle East or Africa alone as a white person and see where that privilege gets you. It’s amazing how the left have gone to other end of the spectrum on this stuff.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,829 ✭✭✭ArthurDayne


    Is anyone here denying that wealth / class is the fundamental privilege (though I would probably add health / able-bodiedness alongside)? The very point being made repeatedly here is that privilege applies to many different c circumstances. The acknowledgement of white privilege is not to say that a white person is privileged full stop. It is obviously and demonstrably the case that many white Irish people have a serious lack of privilege, not least among them a lack of wealth.

    The distinction however is that people tend be pretty aware of wealth / class status as a source of privilege — because it's always been the case and its outcomes tend to be more obvious and understood. Acknowledging other forms of privilege that relate to newer developments in Irish society (like ethnic diversity, increasing openness toward gay people etc) are a little more novel to us, and it seems to be that people take the discussion on underlying biases that haven't been traditionally challenged as being a bit of a personal attack.

    And don't get me wrong, a lot of people who advocate better recognition of privilege often do so in a heavy-handed, aggressive and needlessly attacking way. I think by and large, outside smaller groups of activists, commentators and the Twitterati, people are capable of seeing the middle ground.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,829 ✭✭✭ArthurDayne


    Well I don't think it ignores wealth at all but let's consider your view on the "shame" point. As you say, wealth confers certain advantages on people. On a relative basis, you are wealthy versus others and others are wealthy versus you. Those in particular who are born into a relatively wealthy position might have certain opportunities to secure comfort, invest to increase passive income, have family properties handed to them for free, pursue their passions and interests with less concern for financial risk. People with less money on the other hand face more financial barriers in life.

    Does acknowledging this make you feel "ashamed"? Do you think acknowledging this is invariably an attack of the relatively well off or an attempt to divide people between rich and poor forevermore? I



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,413 ✭✭✭Potatoeman


    Money is an advantage, I don’t see why anyone should feel guilty about it. A rich black person would have more privilege than a poor white person, are we all going to have to make a list to figure where we are on the oppression chart? Is being white in a majority white country even a privilege? Do diversity incentives then make being a minority an advantage?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,240 ✭✭✭Cordell


    attempt to divide people between rich and poor forevermore?

    I think rich and poor division is a diversion. The best good start in life an average young person can have is a healthy family environment with both parents as role models.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,432 ✭✭✭mikethecop


    so where is this privilege and how do i get some coz i could really do with it ???



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 486 ✭✭thereiver


    Most people in ireland are white this includes migrants and people from the eu who come here to work.

    ireland is not america ,it does not have a history of slavery or racist treatment of black people or other minoritys. theres a large white working class population are they really priveliged or better off than other people who happen to be of other races .Middle class people and upper class people tend to have advantages in terms of income acess to education and the network effect ,eg middle class people tend to give jobs to people from certain area,s and people who speak with non working class accents.

    i think gen z whichever racial group they belong to, are more concerned with the housing crisis trying to find a place to rent at a reasonable price or the looming threat of climate change ,than the problem of racism towards certain minority groups.

    i think since the 80s ireland has been regarded as a modern western country ,our economy has been improving since the 90s especially since we became the eu base for various companys like google intel and facebook



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,829 ✭✭✭ArthurDayne


    Exactly — the acknowledgment of advantage does not have to mean guilt. It doesn't mean you've done anything wrong, it doesn't mean you haven't achieved anything in life of your own doing, and it doesn't mean that you aren't disadvantaged in other ways or versus other people. Privilege does not need to equate to guilt.

    I also don't think it's about oppression either. It can be, but I don't believe Ireland specifically to be an oppressive society. I also think that white privilege in the Irish context is very much not the same as what is meant in the American context — it is far, far less of an issue here than what it has been in the States and (in my opinion) manifests itself in subtler, less frequent and less socially profound ways. But it's still present and I think being conscious of the more sober and reasonable perspectives of it, instead of just summarily dismissing it based on the more intense perspectives some people push, is beneficial. Some of the comments you see for example in videos of Rhadisat Adeleke, born in Dublin, on YouTube — "she isn't Irish and took a place off an Irish woman" etc — is just a taste of some of the social bias that is out there, and that's obviously on the nastier more obvious end of things.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,829 ✭✭✭ArthurDayne


    Well I don't agree with the diversion bit but I do agree — if that's what you're saying— that being born into a stable family environment is definitely a huge privilege in life and definitely one of the most consequential. I was lucky enough to have that and, now that I have a partner who didn't have that, I do see the privilege I enjoyed in that regard.

    And personally, growing to understand that privilege has helped me a bit in the stop-and-think process before giving a bit of advice that might be laden with bias I previously wouldn't have been conscious of.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,322 ✭✭✭Mr. teddywinkles


    Well people who suggest it in the first place are probably from a wealthy background which is funny in itself. Think everyone else with same coloured skin is the same.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,829 ✭✭✭ArthurDayne


    Well, I'd probably see it as a healthier state of mind for relatively wealthy people to acknowledge privilege than to believe that they are wealthy because they are simply more naturally superior to poor people or have some unwritten entitlement to be better off than others. It's better than thinking poor people are poor because they are simply lazy and unindustrious.

    It doesn't mean that wealthy people can't be proud of their achievements — and success in life comes from taking whatever opportunities you can — but acknowledging that you had certain privilege along way might go some way to giving you a healthier perspective as to why some kids don't just waltz as easily into stellar careers as others. That's just my two cents anyway.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,011 ✭✭✭Backstreet Moyes


    I am instantly wary of people who try to push views on young kids.

    What I find then is many of them actually don't have any kids themselves.

    Imagine white Johnny going home and starving and getting beat up by alco parents.

    Then we have black Jason who has a loving family who holiday two times a year.

    Then you are telling Johnny that he is privileged.

    Unless these ideas are forced upon kids, they just tend to get on with life like kids do.

    The people trying to force these things on kids are the ones trying to push division between kids.

    Jason just wants to get on with life and has other problems and Johnny is just trying to make it by.

    So it's best to just leave kids be kids and to focus on your own life and not interfere with other people's kids lives.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,240 ✭✭✭Cordell


    The diversion bit comes from the fact that what we both agree on is now something that's not to be said, because a healthy functional two parents family somehow became a conservative right wing ideal.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,693 ✭✭✭volchitsa


    So should young people in school be taught that if they have two parents they are privileged and if they have only one they are underprivileged?
    What active steps should be taken by the school to even this privilege up? Or is it just about making one group of kids feel bad about themselves without anyone being able to do much about it? Unlike disability access to train stations.

    Reem Alsalem UNSR Violence Against Women and Girls: "Very concerned about statements by the IOC at Paris2024 (M)ultiple international treaties and national constitutions specifically refer to women & their fundamental rights, so the world (understands) what women -and men- are. (H)ow can one assess fairness and justice if we do not know who we are being fair and just to?"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,185 ✭✭✭patnor1011


    Perhaps they feel ashamed by that and they are trying to shift the blame.

    Seriously, white privilege drivel is just attempt at wealth redistribution. They think that having the same starting point gives everyone equal chances but it is not the case and it never was. There are people who are driven to get or achieve more and there are people who do not care or bother. That is why socialism failed and fail every time when implemented.

    Even here, there are numerous non white people who were driven to achieve success and got good jobs, nice houses and worked their a$$ off to get where they are. And there are others who still sit in DP centers because they wait for the house they feel they should be getting.

    White privilege my a$$.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,448 ✭✭✭suvigirl


    I am instantly wary of people who try to push views on young kids.

    What I find then is many of them actually don't have any kids themselves.

    Yes, only parents should have the right to push views on their children.

    Children learn about the world from many different places, ridiculous to suggest otherwise



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,818 ✭✭✭Sunny Disposition


    White privilege is a ridiculous concept in Ireland, where Travellers have been among the most disadvantaged for more than a century.

    Privilege in itself is a dangerous notion, there's every chance it will be used as an excuse if kids are told they are disadvantaged and that's just inevitable.

    I went to London as a young fella, half educated, but I was a millionaire within ten years. Black guys I know did the same. Other Irish guys drank themselves stupid and whinged about the English, the Government at home, but didn't take the huge opportunities London had to offer.

    No doubt there are privileged white people, but there are also privileged black people and underprivileged white people. Anyone with a screed of commonsense knows this to be the case.

    Teaching kids that privilege is inevitable is hugely dangerous and far more likely to reinforce systemic issues around prejudice than disrupt them.

    It's an unpalatable truth, but true nevertheless.

    Virtue signalling is causing an awful lot of issues in Ireland nowadays.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,693 ✭✭✭volchitsa


    Of course, but the OP is about attempts to teach children a specific set of beliefs, as part of what they have to learn to succeed in school. That makes it obligatory, not just a personal choice. And parents may disagree with some of those beliefs for valid reasons, not because they are racist.

    So who decides what children should be officially taught? It would not be acceptable to teach muslim children the catholic catechism, nor to have fasting during ramadan enforced on all children in a school. "White privilege" in Ireland is just another belief: even posters defending it have agreed that other factors such as wealth and a stable family background are far more significant in practical terms than skin colour, in Ireland.

    So why would teachers be instructed to teach children that they benefit (or lose out) from something as random as their skin colour, if their parents don't want that taught to them in school? And that may not just be white parents who don't it taught to their kids: black parents who want their children to feel comfortable with their white friends may not want them to be taught to see themselves as victims either.

    Reem Alsalem UNSR Violence Against Women and Girls: "Very concerned about statements by the IOC at Paris2024 (M)ultiple international treaties and national constitutions specifically refer to women & their fundamental rights, so the world (understands) what women -and men- are. (H)ow can one assess fairness and justice if we do not know who we are being fair and just to?"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,011 ✭✭✭Backstreet Moyes


    I mean I thought it was pretty obvious with the word push, given the context of the thread.

    I never said kids should only learn from their parents, maybe read it again as your post is ridiculous.

    Interesting how you think people beside parents should 'push' views on children.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,846 ✭✭✭shootermacg


    There's a greater chance of a parent acting in their own child's interest than some random committee.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,829 ✭✭✭ArthurDayne


    Well, firstly I don't think I ever said there's a need to "even things up". Even taking the simpler example of disability access, nobody is actually saying that things need to be evened out — i.e. stairs haven't been cancelled.

    Secondly, I don't think the conversation has to be that one person is entirely privileged and another is entirely underprivileged. I also don't think that society is incapable of emotional intelligence when it comes to this. Problems in the home are obviously emotionally charged situations. I don't think any conversation on privilege needs to be held in the absence of cop-on, and if it's better to avoid talking about certain things in certain contexts then fine.

    I also think the way we discuss these things obviously should vary greatly dependant on age. Older students in the mid to later teens, in my opinion, should be encouraged to think critically about society. Things like privilege form part of that because it's a topic that invites you to engage critically with the lived experience of others versus your own. This doesn't mean always taking big measures, but simply encouraging a better understanding of why some peoples' experience and perspective of life is different.

    And look, maybe there's a better word for all this than "privilege", because the word seems to really set people off on a parade of assumptions about what is meant by it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,693 ✭✭✭volchitsa


    Then I think you need to start your own thread, because what you're saying has almost nothing to do with the OP.

    The question was whether schools should, as has been suggested, teach children that white children in Ireland are the beneficiairies of unfair advantages due to race and sex. I think that's an unhealthy approach to take for a number of reasons. That doesn't mean I think there's no racism or sexism in Ireland. I just think it's pointless and unnecessarily divisive to "teach" it as fact in Ireland. Because we don't have a history of deliberate racism as the US does. And that really is the question here.

    Reem Alsalem UNSR Violence Against Women and Girls: "Very concerned about statements by the IOC at Paris2024 (M)ultiple international treaties and national constitutions specifically refer to women & their fundamental rights, so the world (understands) what women -and men- are. (H)ow can one assess fairness and justice if we do not know who we are being fair and just to?"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,240 ✭✭✭Cordell


    maybe there's a better word for all this than "privilege"

    No, not when you're trying to shift the narrative. It's basically like saying that someone in a wheelchair is not disabled, but everyone else is overabled - hence you (you meaning state or society) shift the burden to people who don't owe anyone anything for being normal and average.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,829 ✭✭✭ArthurDayne


    My position on it would be that I don't mind privilege being taught or at least discussed in schools so long as the understanding of it is broad and it's not pushed in absolutist form (such as white privilege being pushed as meaning white people are invariably privileged in all ways). The discussion on privilege is, in my opinion, perfectly healthy if it is also acknowledged that everyone — even white straight men like me — both have privilege and lack privilege in certain regards.

    And I don't necessarily agree that we don't have historic problems. We have never been immune to sexism and problems regarding the wellbeing and safety of women — and similarly with the societal treatment of and issues faced by gay people. Yes, we don't have a longstanding domestic history of racism by virtue of the fact that the island has been overwhelmingly white — but shifting racial demographics mean that we should not be complacent to the potential growing prominence of the issue.

    Look, it's not that I'm deeply passionate about privilege being a feature of discussion in schools. If it wasn't, I wouldn't particularly care. But I guess I just don't think its the wildly radical thing it's made out to be and it can be a beneficial thing to consider.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,693 ✭✭✭volchitsa


    But the suggestion is that it should be taught as a fact, not as something to be discussed.

    From the OP: The National Council for Curriculum & Assessment (NCCA) released a new draft for the secondary SPHE curriculum that wants “white privilege,” “male privilege,” & gender ideology taught to Irish kids. In the draft curriculum it urges children to recognize their “privileged status” as a “white, male or Irish person,”  

    That's a terrible thing to teach children IMO. Not that different from back in my time where we were encouraged to pity the little black babies in Africa: it was no doubt well-meaning, but in practice it was deeply racist. Lots of black people in Africa were better educated than many Irish people, but you wouldn't have known that from the way they were portrayed in Irish schools.

    And at least that was done in order to get money to feed people who were actually hungry, and who weren't in our classrooms: this proposed curriculum will do nothing except teach children to see each other as either victim or oppressor. It's a terrible way to go about encouraging friendship among children of different origins. It will do the exact opposite.

    Reem Alsalem UNSR Violence Against Women and Girls: "Very concerned about statements by the IOC at Paris2024 (M)ultiple international treaties and national constitutions specifically refer to women & their fundamental rights, so the world (understands) what women -and men- are. (H)ow can one assess fairness and justice if we do not know who we are being fair and just to?"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,829 ✭✭✭ArthurDayne


    Now that you mention it, I just looked at the draft curriculum (not sure if this features in the final one) and the only reference to privilege is in this one passage:

    "Allyship involves recognising and using one's privileged status (for example as white or male or Irish person) to support individuals from minority identity groups. "

    Is this all it says? That doesn't strike me as being particularly heavy — plus it appears to be for Senior Cycle which is the 15-18 year old group. Am I missing something and this applies to the younger cohort too?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,186 ✭✭✭✭jmayo


    I am not allowed discuss …



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,186 ✭✭✭✭jmayo


    Why the fook is there any mention of white and male privilege at all ?

    Aren't we supposed to be saying everyone is equal rather than this shyte of telling some they are inferior or superior to others.

    It is this modern tripe of giving excuses to people why they fail or even why they shouldn't bother trying in the first place.

    We have done this shyte for generations with travellers and now it is going to be used for immigrants of certain backgrounds.

    I can see it in years to come.

    Ah shure the state gave you education, housing and healthcare, but it is all the fault of the natives why you didn't use that education, why you live in a ghetto with huge crime and you can't get a job.

    I am not allowed discuss …



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,710 ✭✭✭jackboy


    Being white or male in a country like Ireland gives close to zero advantage, so for a start it is a false statement. Traits such as intelligence or attractiveness give far far more advantages than race or gender.

    We need to be honest, calling whites and males privileged is about bashing those groups, nothing more.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,457 ✭✭✭SharkMX


    My whole generation seem to have spent their lives being molly coddled and have grown up to blame someone or something else for ALL of their failures. With the result that the most of us now expect someone else to do everything for us to help us get on in life and then theres always someone to find to blame for our own failure to launch.



Advertisement