Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Divorcing PPR and child maintenance

12346»

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,259 ✭✭✭realdanbreen




  • Registered Users Posts: 475 ✭✭delusiondestroyer


    Best of luck Op,

    I hope you become less agreeable and disregard this "go along with it" horseshit mantra on here twill be the ruining of you and condemn you to a life of misery and your kids wont be better for it.

    There is no worse fate than being a modern day slave for your ex-wife because that's who you'll be working for if you nod along with the courts in this country.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 301 ✭✭89897


    Listen to yourself!! Theres hysterics and then theres hysterics. You're making things up.

    1) Homeless; Hes not homeless. Its not ideal but hes not homeless.

    2) Wages reduced to 1.5k for the next 20 yrs minimum reduced further if his ex has her way: Hes said himself 8-10 years.

    3) No prospect of getting a home or even renting on that money and due to paying her mortgage. Ill address that below.

    4) At her mercy for when and if she allows him to see the kids. Thats never been in question, he has the kids, he has said its amicable and he sees a way forward.

    As for the removed from reality comment, again, listen to yourself. The biggest issue in this country is the housing crisis and the rapid increase in the cost of living. Someone making 3.5k shouldn't be in a situation where he cant look after his family and house himself and move forward with his life. Shes cost the marriage for sure but she hasn't caused every single issue in this country.

    You clearly dont read things and have gone on this rant, that has given the OP absolutely nothing of substance, advised him horribly and made up your own version of events when OP has said the opposite. Much like you have here; ive said the system needs an overhaul but you taking that as me pretending the status quo is better.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,259 ✭✭✭realdanbreen


    Sweet Jesus! I find it mind boggling how guys who have just come out of a divorce dive right back in and find themselves a " partner/ soulmate" or worse still a new wife! No wonder the crowd who really coin it in these situations, the solicitors, rub their hands in glee!



  • Registered Users Posts: 475 ✭✭delusiondestroyer


    Fair question how does OP the kids are his and she hasnt cheated before? it seems to be asked multiple times in this thread now seeing as you think shes some form of good character explain that to us.

    As the saying goes Once and cheat always a cheat.

    He is essentially homeless he is sleeping on his parents couch.

    Wages reduced to 1.5k for 10 years so still not exactly selling it to me

    He earns enough to afford a house in this country infact he already has one but the system is in the process of stealing it from him. He could actually afford another one if he had his full wage but thats being stolen from him aswell by the system and for what ? no fault of his own but a cheating wife.

    Where is the fairness in that? she didnt give a **** about the kids when she cheated, she didnt care how it impacted em.

    And the biggest sign of all the says to me she is of despicable character is even after all his paying and the horrendous situation he is in rather than be remorseful she is looking for and ill qoute op "much more money" what sort of a demented person does that to someone and then believes they are entitled to there money.

    The only one in hysterics here is you, it must pain you to know that some of us would rather burn our money than give it to a corrupt system.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,259 ✭✭✭realdanbreen


    Sounds like you had a bit of a bad experience yourself! You stopped just short of having her committed to an asylum!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 301 ✭✭89897


    Again, listen to yourself. You are again making stuff up and jumping to conclusions. You're now going into hes having his stuff stolen from him and modern day slavery to his ex. Man you're gone down a rabbit hole and along with that giving downright dangerous advice.

    Theres no world in which this is easy for the OP but you're throwing gas on the fire for no return whatsoever but to give your own bitterness a voice.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,259 ✭✭✭realdanbreen


    Certainly mandatory for anyone thinking of getting divorced!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 52,600 ✭✭✭✭tayto lover


    I really don't believe that men get fair treatment in Family Law courts. I hear many stories about it. As I said earlier I knew someone who went through the process and he didn't believe he got fair play at all. His wife also refused to attend mediation beforehand. She seemingly took the advice of Womans Aid. Her best friend who fell out with her over it told him that Womans Aid told her to put him out of the home, keep him out and take him for everything she could. Seems very unfair too as it was her fault the marriage broke up.



  • Registered Users Posts: 475 ✭✭delusiondestroyer


    I know of a man that killed himself over the state sponsored destruction of his life by his ex-wife who cheated, took him for everything denied him seeing his kids, moved the guy she cheated with into the family home he paid for.

    That's the law doing that, that's what is done in these courts all of this was done in the guise of what's best for the kids.

    Disgusting despicable people and system.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,871 ✭✭✭DeanAustin


    Read the first and last page so not sure what's been covered in between. Sounds like you're being rode a little bit OP. Don't just agree to whatever she wants and don't rely on your solicitor to get the best for you. You need to challenge some of this stuff - solicitors just want the divorce to be done and to get paid. They don't give much of a f**k beyond that. I had this and my ex is doing well enough out of me but had I agreed to what she wanted, I'd be living under a bridge somewhere.


    Here's my advice. No one gets everything they want out of this. She'll think she should be getting more, you think you should be paying less. You have to understand what it is you need to be happy in life and make sure you've enough out of the settlement to pay for that. Sure, I'd like more money, particularly the money I'm paying her, but I'm lucky enough right now that I can afford to do the things I really want to do.


    Good luck with it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,543 ✭✭✭A2LUE42


    Having seen people on both sides of these disputes. Men do not get fair treatment in the Family Law Courts. But, if either party wants to ignore what is best for the children, there is very little the courts can do about it. The slow procedures ensure that a divorce and subsequent court orders carry very little weight when either partner doesn't care about the children and they are used as pawns in a game that nobody can win.

    Two simple examples,

    1. The number of fathers who don't see their kids at Christmas, despite having written agreements and have to wait until the new year when the courts reopen to be able to do anything about it, which is a bit late at that stage.

    2. The number of Mothers and kids abandoned with little or no financial support.

    Some people are a$$holes, irrespective of gender, and if they are willing to make their kids suffer, sometimes in the misguided belief that it is all the other persons fault, there isn't a lot that can be done to mitigate it.

    OP, There is no simple or easy fix here from a financial or logistical point of view. Get good legal representation(also costly) and try and get a separation agreement agreed upon and signed off, as a basis for a divorce, as soon as possible.

    Once everything is agreed, there shouldn't be anything left to fight about, so ye should be able to focus on getting on with your separate, but intertwined lives.

    Unfortunately, sometimes people love the drama aspect of it and will continue to create conflict at every opportunity, hopefully that is something you won't have to deal with. Best wishes and take care of yourself and your kids.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,582 ✭✭✭Ezeoul


    That is what I said. That her OPFP is taxable. (Also provided a screenshot above). And sorry, you're wrong again. It is not dependant on waiting for a settlement next year.

    The OPs ex wife would already have had to submit all the current financial details to social welfare in order to claim a one parent family payment, including the OPs details and proof of any "efforts made" to secure maintenance. They are especially vigilant in the case of separating couples. On awarding the claim SW automatically advise Revenue of the amount being paid for tax purposes and her tax credits are amended.

    Also maintenance paid by the liable relative (the technical term used by social welfare, or if you prefer, the maintenance debtor as used by the Courts) is not tax deductible.

    Post edited by Ezeoul on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,582 ✭✭✭Ezeoul


    This is out and out untrue. The OP is paying €1500 - €1750 a month, inclusive of the mortgage payment, out of an income of €3500.

    If you think a household with four kids living in it can be run for a total of €1750 a month inclusive of the full mortgage, utilities, food, etc etc without touching the mother's income then you are seriously underestimating the cost of living.

    He is not "paying for everything" and he is not being left penniless. And for the record, I also said earlier in the thread that I believe this be addressed in the divorce.

    A big issue for the OP will be that the mortgage is in his name only.

    Post edited by Ezeoul on


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,632 ✭✭✭the.red.baron


    its obvious he is paying to much. Lads keep up



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,632 ✭✭✭the.red.baron


    you have any experience yourself there?

    your roadmap is bankrupting himself, genius, making his kids homeless

    brilliant

    the courts would tear him a new one for doing that for obvious reason



  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 51,688 Mod ✭✭✭✭Stheno


    Closed for review



  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 51,688 Mod ✭✭✭✭Stheno


    Mod - reopening thread. Still reviewing. Posters are reminded of the charter. No personal abuse please



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,582 ✭✭✭Ezeoul


    @Bass Reeves I think you are referring to court ordered spousal maintenance, not child maintenance. The OP is not paying spousal maintenance, he is paying the mortgage loan on the house (which legally is his sole debt as it is in his name only) and then contributing towards child related costs. Child maintenance is never tax-deductible.

    His soon-to-be-ex-wife has her own income from working and partial social welfare so the chance of any spousal maintenance being awarded in the divorce is very unlikely.

    Post edited by Ezeoul on


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,582 ✭✭✭Ezeoul


    @Hammerhead1 can I ask you a question?

    You don't have to answer, but you were obviously in a relationship with this woman for a long time, long enough to marry her and have four children.

    Why, once you married, did you not include her on the mortgage? Or sell and buy something together. Was she at least named on the mortgage protection policy?

    Post edited by Ezeoul on


Advertisement