Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Ownership of houses in the event of marriage

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,502 ✭✭✭XsApollo


    if the houses are in sole names and marry after purchasing, then I think either can start to sell their house without needing the others signature and sell if the other person doesn’t have an issue.

    the other person also has the right to not agree and go to court to stop the other person selling and have the court decide wether they have an interest in the house or not.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,674 ✭✭✭✭Calahonda52


    Re the second point, if there has been no contribution, financial or otherwise to A's house then I wouldn't expect the court to entertain it.

    “I can’t pay my staff or mortgage with instagram likes”.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,372 ✭✭✭phormium


    I'm not a solicitor but my take on that is that the house that becomes the family home after the marriage cannot be sold without the consent of the spouse, other house I imagine can be. That's not to say that a judge would necessarily give all the proceeds of the sale to the owning spouse, that's a whole other story but the 50/50 split some people imagine to be law is not the case either.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,502 ✭✭✭XsApollo


    you can expect what you like, the key word being expect. Still doesn’t stop the other person exercising that right for a court to decide.

    also if any kids pop out in the future then, that complicates matters drastically.

    also depending on how long A has been co habiting with B regardless if they are married or wether or not they are logged with revenue as such, A might have a right to some share in that house also, or at least get a judge to decide if they do.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,142 ✭✭✭✭Mrs OBumble


    Marriage is irrelevant: If they've been living together for five years, (less if they have kids) the house they're living in is a family home, so subject to certain constraints.

    There's no way to register cohabitation with Revenue: it's proved with address documentation.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,387 ✭✭✭Padre_Pio


    While A and B may be living in As house, with A paying a mortgage, B may be contributing to bills and upkeep.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,674 ✭✭✭✭Calahonda52


    Thanks.

    A and B are currently living in B's house and A has now bought his own.

    There is no issue with B's house and A contributing to bills etc: I aprrcite it may give A some "call" but thats not the question.

    The question is does B get a stake in A's house on marriage, the answer seems to be no

    “I can’t pay my staff or mortgage with instagram likes”.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,808 ✭✭✭✭Water John


    A's house seems to be a property investment and is not the couples residence.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,674 ✭✭✭✭Calahonda52


    Correct, Thank WJ, hope you are keeping well, alway appreciate your contributions😀

    “I can’t pay my staff or mortgage with instagram likes”.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,541 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump


    FHPA will kick in for the family home. Not an investment property though



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,502 ✭✭✭XsApollo


    B might have a claim or they might not.

    getting married opens up a whole can of worms.

    if they married and were married for 30 years, then it’s quite possible B might get awarded some of the assets.

    as for the question, does B have a stake in the house, not automatically they don’t, but after being married and if the marriage goes south then B can certainly go to court and try to claim a stake in the house, then a judge will decide if B has a stake or not.

    also the question will only need to be answered if the marriage fails?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,674 ✭✭✭✭Calahonda52


    if the marriage fails?

    indeed, or even occurs in the first place!😀

    Anyway case closed, they have enough to go on

    Thanks to all

    “I can’t pay my staff or mortgage with instagram likes”.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,804 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus


    If A and B never live in A's house, it's not a family home, and A will not need B's consent to mortgage, sell, or otherwise deal with the house.

    If the marriage breaks down, all of A's assets (and all of B's assets) are in the mix as far as financial and property orders are concerned. So, while marriage doesn't alter A's interest in A's house, marriage (or relationship) breakdown could do so.



Advertisement