Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Hamas strike on Israel - Threadbans in op - mod warning in OP updated 19/10/23

Options
19039049069089091266

Comments

  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 20,407 Mod ✭✭✭✭Weepsie


    This one ticks all the bingo cards and basically oversimlifies the fact that a zionist movement supported by colonial rulers who were themselves vehemently anti muslim at the end of the `19th and start of 20th century, enabled the situation to arise in which people could simply be removed at the stroke of a pen This combined with a collective shrug and a collective guilt over ignoring what was happening in central europe between 1930-1945 lead to the creation of a de facto ethno state out of nowhere, leading to the instant creation of 100,000s of refugees who were forced to leave their homes and since then many more have been illegally displaced


    But yes, it's simply anti **** semtiism. Stop it. It's not. It's antiimperialism. Anti just wanting to stop having the boot come down on you by some emboldened power because they have bigger guns



  • Registered Users Posts: 51,921 ✭✭✭✭tayto lover




  • Registered Users Posts: 7,512 ✭✭✭volchitsa


    If there is a right of return, then all the Arab states who expelled Jews will have to either take them back or reimburse them (depending on the terms of the agreement for Palestinians) - right?

    And presumably the European states that allowed Jews to be murdered, thus forcing them to leave for Israel, will also be on the hook for something too?



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,826 ✭✭✭SeanW


    The problem with all of this is that for Israel to actually be guilty of "colonialism" (in terms of its formation and for example 1967 borders) is that by definition, a colony must have a Metropole-Colony relationship, a homeland with which settlers in the colony identify. Israel has no such relationship with anywhere else in the world. At most, the term colonialism might apply to Israeli settlements in the West Bank, but to assert this you must accept that Israel within the 67 borders is a legitimate State of Israel.

    Trying to undermine Israel now isn't "antiimperialism" it's anti-Semitism. It openly threatens the 7+ million Jews (nearly half of all Jews in the world) who call Israel their home who share a common identity, language, ethnicity and culture.

    As to the refugees, there were more Jewish refugees who fled the rest of the Middle East than there were Arabs who fled Israel/Palestine between '47 and '67. 900,000 Jews in all left the rest of the Middle East of which 600,000 went TO Israel, vs. 700,000 Arabs who left. The "refugees" argument of Israel's haters is BS.



  • Registered Users Posts: 19,612 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump



    Let them go back and live on any land in Arab states they can show was taken from them or their families. Not sure why you'd be making that conditional.

    Germany already paid reparations to Israel - who accepted on behalf of Jewish victims - (and other Jewish representative organisations) decades ago. That was settled and agreed. You can't have continuous and repeated reparations for the same thing over and over again.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 7,512 ✭✭✭volchitsa


    You must have missed the Jewish fighting the British in the British Mandate - it was more a case of the British gave up fighting them, rather than actively supporting them. Does the name "King David Hotel" not ring a bell with you?

    Chamberlain's 1939 White Paper tried to limit Jewish immigration to 75,000 for five years - and said that further immigration would then be determined by the Arab majority. (That failed only because they couldn't stop all the other European nations from allowing/inciting Jews to leave for Palestine.)

    They also restricted Jews from buying Arab land in all but 5% of the Mandate.

    Basically, you may as well say the British "supported" the Indians at the point at which they gave up fighting them to keep India British.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,512 ✭✭✭volchitsa


    Germany paid for trying to exterminate them, for killing 6 million of them. How much did the Soviet Union/Russia, or the various Baltic states, or Ukraine, or Poland, Hungary, Czechia etc ever pay for all the Jews who were expropriated from those states? Zero?

    What about Turkey? North Africa? Millions of Jews were expelled from those countries too. Again, I'm not aware of them ever getting a penny - are you?

    So no, they haven't had more than a tiny share of the reparations they should be due if you're wanting to see the Palestinians recompensed for their losses - most of whom, by the way, can't show any evidence of their ownership because they were illiterate, and kept no documents.

    I mean, I'm sure you wouldn't be applying a double standard here, and would expect the Palestinians to provide the same level of evidence of ownership - right?



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,192 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    Powerful.

    told my Jewish friend I was going to visit Bethlehem and Jericho. Was told "don't, the Arabs will kill you".

    I only told one person (close Jewish friend) that a gave a lift to a Palestinian bloke each evening. She was horrified. He was well over 60.

    I heard today that the lead judge in the ICJ to hear the upcoming genocide case is a holocaust survivor.

    Also heard Blinken state that the case is "meritless".



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,192 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    Thats an interesting article - many sentiments in there that I agree with.

    The final paragraph is particularly powerful.



  • Registered Users Posts: 19,612 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump



    Irrelevant. If the British government settled and paid reparations to Ireland to cover all past wrongs in 1922, I couldn't go back now to them and demand more reparations now. Nor could I go and demand that Scotland pay reparations, or India, or Australia, or Wales, or Guernsey or anywhere else.


    It's all about the money and compo for some!



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 7,512 ✭✭✭volchitsa


    The Germans are not responsible for paying for losses caused to Jews in the Soviet Union. That just makes no sense. So if people are still entitled to reparations for losses 80 years later - or to recover their lands (as long as they have evidence, you say) then the Jews in those countries are also part of that.

    As for your strange point about Scotland etc - the British government are responsible for Scotland. So of course reparations from the British would cover Scotland. But not if you were an Italian peasant who'd been expropriated in the Val d'Aoste - you'd have to see the French or Swiss government for that. Like a Jew in Belarus wouldn't get reparations from Germany for the loss of his home.

    And of course, Palestinians who can't prove their ownership of land in Palestine have no more rights than Jews who can't prove they owned a house and business in, say, Vilnius. Right?



  • Registered Users Posts: 812 ✭✭✭Hey boy




  • Registered Users Posts: 19,612 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump



    When you accept a settlement, or a representative body accepts a settlement on your behalf, that is the end of it. My grandfather had some land taken by CPO to build a road. He didn't want to sell it but they took it and compensated him. My father wasn't subsequently entitled to go and claim more compensation or take back that land. I'm not entitled to more compensation for it. None of my descendants will be entitled in perpetuity to claim for it.

    You need to get over the obsession with entitlement to money money money for the same thing repeated over and over again.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,512 ✭✭✭volchitsa


    LOL. Considering the nonsense you came up with to completely misunderstand what I said over on the thread about Iran this is hilarious. I don't know if it was deliberate because you're so desperate to disagree with anything I post, or whether you really could have misunderstood to that extent. Though it's possible, going by the level of your discussion on here.

    (That thread is now closed so I couldn't reply there)



  • Registered Users Posts: 19,612 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump



    That's a weird response. Perhaps try reading what you quote before quoting it next time.



  • Registered Users Posts: 19,612 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump



    Well you are lucky then that you couldn't respond. Because you'd end up being embarrassed, although fortunately for yourself you probably wouldn't realise it.

    Along with drinking the zionist kool-aid about Palestinians being savage inhumans, you also appear to have done the same in relation to their propaganda about Iran. It's pure ignorance.

    Any Iranian I met was a nice person. And extremely well educated. Both male and female.



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,826 ✭✭✭SeanW


    Really? How so? As to why I post in defence of Israel, it's because I foresee the possibility of history repeating itself in a really nasty and unpleasant way.



  • Registered Users Posts: 812 ✭✭✭Hey boy


    B. If within Israel that isn’t realistic whether fair or unfair, right or wrong. Jews lost their homes as well. We need to move on.

    Re: SA and Arab States. My simple view is that people who chip in with criticisms and issues should be willing to help. Ideally Iran and Qatar would pay everything given Israel was attacked but highly unlikely plus I think there would be enough goodwill internationally to chip in. In fairness to Israel I would imagine they would contribute if a peaceful solution was possible.



  • Registered Users Posts: 19,612 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump



    Even more nasty and unpleasant than they are doing right now to the Palestinians? I don't think Israels actions can really get any more nasty or unpleasant to be fair. Perhaps increase in scale, but not in character


    Like yourself, I have no doubt that they will repeat it once they are let. They have form and they do appear to have a particular lust for murdering.



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,826 ✭✭✭SeanW


    Well Israel are surrounded by people want all of them dead so ... yes. And others who seek to undermine them in any way possible, who might be very helpful (a.k.a. useful idiots) to the first group.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 19,612 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump



    Completely mental on both points.


    Imagine a condition of me pointing out that my neighbour was doing something illegal was that I had to pay to rectify it. Nuts. .................. I complain that my neighbour is pumping industrial chemical waste directly from his factory into the local river ......... and as a result, I have to pay to clean it up 😂



  • Registered Users Posts: 19,612 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump



    At some stage SeanW, they should take a step back and think "I wonder if the reason all these people hate me is because of something I do rather than just arbitrary bad luck".



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,192 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    Where is the accusation in the post that Israel was guilty of colonialism?

    Or did you see the word "colony", the lightbulb went off and we get yet another post on metro- bloody- pole?



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,192 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    Hope not...

    Its either simple preparations owing to an abundance of caution or it could be a bit of politicking.



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,826 ✭✭✭SeanW


    Considering that they've been under attack constantly since 1947, I suspect that the problem is elsewhere.



  • Registered Users Posts: 19,612 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump



    It's always someone else's fault SeanW. Woe is me.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,192 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    If it does, I'm guessing many would say that Israel brought it upon itself.

    Even the US said in October that the conflict would be a tactical success for Israel but a strategic failure. Israel making sure that history does repeat itself.



  • Registered Users Posts: 812 ✭✭✭Hey boy


    Lots of countries have paid aid to other countries in all sorts of circumstances which they were not responsible for. I think if a peaceful solution was possible there would be tremendous goodwill internationally.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,192 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    SA, as a signatory to the convention, have a legal obligation to prevent genocide by reporting it to the ICJ.

    If SA didn't do it, I'd imagine others would have. As I said before, possibly other countries supported them in the background - we may never know.

    But in fairness, they were complying with their legal obligations - which Israel is also obligated to do.

    I'd be pushing other countries to chip in before SA - I'd certainly rummage through UNGA and UNSC voting lists...



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 8,826 ✭✭✭SeanW


    So it's the Jews fault that they've been attacked constantly and that all the Islamic fundamentalists want them all dead. Gotcha.



Advertisement