Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Calf to beef thread

18910111214»

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,480 ✭✭✭funkey_monkey


    I might be thinking of a mectin based pour - on instead of levafas. Sorry if I have muddied things!

    Yes, best the the resident vet @greysidesspeaks up and clarifies for everyone.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,422 ✭✭✭tractorporn


    What he said.

    It was the vet that recommended tramasole as they had had a mectin pour on bout 8 weeks ago



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,314 ✭✭✭weatherbyfoxer


    The mectin based products are the ones that cause the problem with a large burden of lungworm..levamisole and albenzole type products are safer for treating lungworm. Injectable and pour on ivermectin produce over use is a massive problem in this country..Haven't used a a ivermectin type product in 5 year on cattle here and dung samples are showing great results from levamisole and albenzole type doses



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,314 ✭✭✭weatherbyfoxer


    First few heifers nearly ready for the factory all late February 23 born and weight an avrage of 488kg 1 month ago..on 4kg of meal since weighing.what do people think of them for fat cover?..was planning on killing them all in 2 weeks



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,433 ✭✭✭Anto_Meath


    I was reading on Argiland the minister for agriculture is undecided on how to give the €40 for dairy beef calves. Maybe €20 for the breeder of the calf like this year and €20 for the farmer who rears the calf like last year. In reality is the €20 for the breeder of the calf any incentive to the dairy farmer?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,885 ✭✭✭mr.stonewall


    I think the €40 should go to the rearer. I the past I would have been leaning towards the breeder and rearer.

    A carefully designed scheme, which focuses on carcass weight confirmation index, genotyped with a CBV. Calves with valves which are below a certain tolerance from with the dam or sire would not be eligible. The reasoning for this is very simply to encourage breeding a better calf, with better beef potential from both the dam and sire. This would remove eligibility for calves in the following scenarios,

    Farmer using a very easy calving bull with poor carcass weight and poor confirmation, especially with heifers

    Farmer with a high% jex crossbred herd, expecting serious money by horsing in BB straws. Remember Aidan Brennan from the FJ this spring and is CBV comments

    Not paying this on FR bull calves. Or just pay it on a low total % of calves purchased. This tightens the market for FR Bulls and forces more sexed semen

    The focus on better calves has to be simple both sire and dam. Calf to beef farmers have to be asking for more data on the calves they are taking. If they are to claim this money they have to be rearing or requesting a genetically superior calf to qualify for this. Basically the top 50% of calves born should qualify. This adds a premium to these and moves the dial

    If dairy farmers are realising that the direction in this way with getting calves moved and the day of the boat is disappearing, better consideration will be given breeding choices both towards replacement and terminal



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,875 ✭✭✭ginger22


    On the one hand the Government want to reduce livestock numbers and on the other they want to keep the calves in the country.

    You couldn't make it up.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,272 ✭✭✭morphy87


    What would most people give there dairy beef Calfs for the winter, nuts or ration? What percentage nut or ration would you give? I’ll be throwing this on top of silage, they are currently getting a nut



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,080 ✭✭✭nhg


    We feed nuts from when they come onto the farm at about 4-5 weeks of age until housed in late November (weather dependent), once in the slatted shed they only get silage, good grass when out & no nuts again until about 8 weeks before finishing….



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,272 ✭✭✭morphy87


    What weights did your cattle average this year at sale, or did you do an total average?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,314 ✭✭✭weatherbyfoxer




  • Registered Users Posts: 2,399 ✭✭✭Dunedin


    I give a little over 2lb of an 18% nut from Grennans to all weanlings. They really lick the troughs clean and they shine off it. And early May cut silage off reseeded ground. Average weight gain over last 2 winters was .625kg a day. I cut back to 1lb about 6 weeks before they go out and to zero 4 weeks before turnout.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,272 ✭✭✭morphy87


    If they were 250kgs and silage was average,but I’m hoping to have top quality silage for the weanlings



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,272 ✭✭✭morphy87


    Did you ever test the silage that you feed them? Do you creep feed them on the cows?



Advertisement