Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

2024 World Championships

Options
145791039

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 731 ✭✭✭drury..


    The people advocating the move need to make the case, not me . Managed to elicit the arguments eventually after all the cliches.

    Anyway to summarise:

    Cramped arena (true)

    Outdated facilities (if true)

    Seating capacity (true)

    Money presumably, according to hearn



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,460 ✭✭✭Arthur Daley


    Even this cramped arena arguement has a fair touch of the Diana Ross about it. I can imagine saying some of this stuff to men like Ray Reardon or Doug Mountjoy. Miners.



  • Registered Users Posts: 723 ✭✭✭JIdontknow


    Robert Milkins seems to have his emotions well in control in his match!



  • Registered Users Posts: 20,196 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    Well, the man in charge wants to move it, so it's very much on those who want it to stay, to make the case.

    Do you think you could make the case for it staying* or is it too difficult?

    *without clichés, but I don't need to tell you that.



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,399 ✭✭✭✭ArmaniJeanss


    Just to put some 'rough bones' on the money aspect.

    Based on an average price of £50 a ticket, a potential extra 1500 people per session and 47 total sessions over the 17 days.

    That's £3.5M a year which a bigger arena brings in. I've been conservative with £50 there. Cheapest first round prices are £44 afaik, so the average is probably closer to £65. The total potential then is an extra £4.5M a year.

    So to take the midpoint, there's £4M being thrown away by the venue size. That's not all profit obviously, the extra people brings extra costs at every level, though also opens extra revenue streams.

    Personally I don't think Saudi or China are serious alternatives - I think they are being used as convenient Swords of Damocles to wield in the direction of Sheffield. An alternative venue in the UK is far more realistic. It'd be sad to see it go, but I think we'd get over it if the right venue was found.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 20,196 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    I wondered about that. Hearn said he wanted the crucible to he rebuilt to show they're serious about wanting to keep the snooker. Obviously that isn't realistic as the economics in post-industrial cities in the North of England wouldn't allow it. And if they even did a major refurbishment and extension, it would likely be out of action for a world championship or two.

    So we're talking about where it moves to rather than whether it moves. A bigger venue in the UK is a much better option than Saudi. China would be inconvenient for us but probably makes sense too. I presume their market is much bigger than the European market combined, by virtue of its massive population.

    I hope it can stay in the UK. I was at a qualification round in Barnsley a few years ago by sheer accident as I was there for work and saw a load of Chinese lads at breakfast in dickie bows. The Marshall arena is huge and there are dozens of similar huge arenas around the UK - in better locations than Barnsley.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 8,927 Mod ✭✭✭✭mewso


    If they move it to a venue in a country with enough fans of the sport to actually fill said venue then fair enough. Sadly that would qualify the likes of China which to my mind is just one step below Saudi Arabia in how egregious it would be. Saudi would have empty venues and the cash would be the only motivator. My ideal scenario if it has to move is for it to stay in Sheffield in a newly built venue (or existing if there is anything there bigger than the Crucible) but this is the UK and the idea that a northern city in England would be able to find the money for that seems unlikely. At the very least keep it in the north if possible. Would be sad to see the likes of London getting it.



  • Registered Users Posts: 14,894 ✭✭✭✭loyatemu


    From Hearn's perspective it's

    Money

    Money

    Money

    Money

    Whatever about moving it to China where the sport is fairly popular; there isn't one Saudi professional player and there is no interest in the sport there.



  • Registered Users Posts: 731 ✭✭✭drury..


    I don't see SI winning now from 5-2



  • Registered Users Posts: 196 ✭✭Spiderpig92




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 731 ✭✭✭drury..


    My bad forgot that

    Still though I don't think he's the comeback type , a little fragile mentally

    I would like to be proven wrong



  • Registered Users Posts: 196 ✭✭Spiderpig92


    I don't think so - he was 9-7 and 0-69 down in the Qualifiers needing a snooker and has lived to tell the tale….



  • Registered Users Posts: 731 ✭✭✭drury..




  • Registered Users Posts: 20,196 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    When it cones to replacing the white ball, I always wonder why the ref doesn't gave an ipad to see the images that we see. The one where the before image is laid on the live feed so they can do it themselves. Relying on a second ref to direct them blind seems very old fashioned and not very efficient.

    Is there a good reason they don't find a better way or just reluctant to modernise?



  • Registered Users Posts: 731 ✭✭✭drury..


    It makes the game look silly the methods they're using to replace balls atm

    A bit left a bit right

    Surely the tech is there to assist in this

    You wouldn't believe the tech in some of the manufacturing processes these days .



  • Registered Users Posts: 731 ✭✭✭drury..


    You think 90s Hendry would clean up?

    I must check, but usually when you go back snooker , darts etc the standard is noticeably lower

    Remember that jimmy white was at the same level as Hendry in their world finals except for temperament

    Do you think 90s jimmy white "would run through this field without blinking " ?



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,393 ✭✭✭AllForIt


    There was a tournament in China a few weeks back and they were using a better system. From what I vaguely remember it involved a circle graphic of where the ball should go overlaid on the live image of the table. Seemed a bit more advanced at least.



  • Registered Users Posts: 196 ✭✭Spiderpig92


    To be fair - the closest Jimmy got Hendry was playing with a broken arm. Hendry was in a league of his own back then.



  • Registered Users Posts: 731 ✭✭✭drury..


    Not the way I remember it

    Jimmy had the better of him in some finals and temperant let him down

    I thought he was his equal in the playing department in world finals i remember



  • Registered Users Posts: 731 ✭✭✭drury..


    Ya they're in the stone age with the method used currently

    No surprise the Chinese have stepped it up



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 5,328 ✭✭✭The Golden Miller


    Standard is relative. Bring that Hendry up to the standards and improvements of the modern game, and he'd be better again.

    Unless that is, you believe in some sort of fallacy that todays players are inherently more talented all of a sudden?



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,328 ✭✭✭The Golden Miller


    Fine, "top tier". Yes Higgins would be regarded as a top tier player, and I even said was years past his best. Again, it just further backs up how poor the field it. Ryan Day is still knocking about ffs.

    Of course they're all top players, but this just isnt a generation of particularly great top players



  • Registered Users Posts: 731 ✭✭✭drury..


    You're saying something different now , bringing Hendry up to new standards and improvements

    You stated the 90s Hendry would clean up which is the point I argued

    Your last point is nonsense

    Standards evolve and improve across the board in sports



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,328 ✭✭✭The Golden Miller


    It's implied surely? I'd hardly argue Borg would be successful in tennis today, is he was plucked straight from the past. The assumption is, when all else is eqaul, yes Hendry would run through the field without blinking.

    Standards evolve and improve yes. Williams makes more centuries now than he did in his prime. Did he become more talaneted all of a sudden? Standards may have improved somewhat for a variety of reasons, but the talent is badly lacking in this field



  • Registered Users Posts: 731 ✭✭✭drury..


    It would be interesting to hear if there's a consensus that 90s Hendry "would run through this field without blinking " as Golden Miller states ?

    Happy to accept the consensus view



  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 11,394 Mod ✭✭✭✭Say Your Number


    He wouldn't go through Trump that easily the way he's playing.



  • Registered Users Posts: 731 ✭✭✭drury..


    Trump would beat him



  • Registered Users Posts: 731 ✭✭✭drury..


    O'Sullivan at his best right now would surely beat 90s Hendry

    I don't see how that can be in dispute



  • Registered Users Posts: 731 ✭✭✭drury..


    I've underestimated him. Forgot his run last year



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 17,212 ✭✭✭✭sligeach


    Yes, he would. I wouldn't say without blinking, but I've often thought before he'd have walked some of these WC tournaments. The COVID year with no spectators was shocking.

    You've the same old faces year in year out because a lot of youngsters would rather play other sports. And those who do play, don't have the same commitment to practise it would seem. Some, like a few of the Chinese players would rather cheat on betting than put the graft in.



Advertisement