Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Is getting married still worth it nowadays?

2»

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 95 ✭✭watchclocker


    Jesus thats terrible I'm sorry for your loss and for your fight :(



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,713 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus


    We don't really have "civil marriage" in this country; just marriage. We have civil weddings and we have religious weddings and we have humanist weddings, but they all lead to the same marriage.

    But, yeah, there is nothing about a civil wedding that can guarantee the couple involved are, or will be, exclusiv, or conjugal. For that matter, there is nothing about a religious wedding or a humanist wedding to guarantee that either.

    But the legal, social, adminsitrative etc status of marriage is designed to support a relationship that is exclusive and conjugal and, regardless of what kind of ceremony a couple chooses to inaugurate the status for themselves, it will involve making public, solemn, witnessed commitments that involve exclusivity and conjugality.

    There's nothing to stop a couple who don't intend to be exclusive, or don't intend to be conjugal, from marrying. (Or, a couple may marry intending that but later decide it's not what they want.) Either way, they may find that the status they are taking on is not the best fit with the relationship they have, or want to have. And, of course, they may recognise that and still choose to take on the status; the legal incidents of marriage may not suit them perfectly, but still suit them better than not being married at all.

    Nobody should marry without having given the question a good deal of thought. And, for a couple who don't intend exclusivity or conjugality or whose relationship doesn't fit the template in some other significant way have some extra things to think about. I wouldn't say they shouldn't marry, but they certainly shouldn't marry without thinking about those things.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 296 ✭✭89897


    If you're considering marriage and dont see it as worth the hassle as divorces are expensive then you shouldnt be getting married and definitely shouldnt be committing to anyone. Where homeownership and kids are involved a breakup is just as messy as a divorce in terms of finances etc.



  • Registered Users Posts: 164 ✭✭Wezz


    That's what I was thinking. We'll both be putting a lot of money into a house so it makes sense to protect that investment as much as we can.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,821 ✭✭✭✭yourdeadwright


    Its a personal thing if you ask me, There is no right or wrong answer, Circumstance differ from couple to couple,

    I'm glad i got married & would never regret it ,



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,571 ✭✭✭yagan


    Then there's also automatic power of attorney if one of you becomes very ill.

    This could become very tricky in an unmarried situation where well meaning family can make an already difficult situation more complicated with legal challenges etc...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 208 ✭✭Kathnora


    Aside from the financial and legal benefits I see marriage as a public statement of life long (hopefully!) commitment to each other. There's just an added security to it I think especially when there are children involved. It seals the relationship, puts it on a more permanent footing and sends out the message that this relationship is for life (hopefully, of course!)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 54 ✭✭Feline Groovy


    Unless she's a piece of sh1t mother to the kids.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,428 ✭✭✭Aisling(",)


    I'm in a similar boat.8 years together and we bought our house 3.5 years ago.

    For inheritance purposes you and your partner are considered strangers for tax purposes and if one of you die the other is liable to capital acquisitions tax(CAT) at 33% on everything over €16,250. There is an exemption for your home though called the dwelling house exemption. If you have resided in the property for 3 years before you inherit and plan on staying in it for 6 more years you can inherit it tax free. There's a few other conditions like you can't own another property etc. We always joked that after 3 years one of us would have a suspicious accident.

    You can name her as your next of kin in your will but she would still taxed on any benefit she receives over the €16,250.

    We're not planning on having kids but we do plan on getting married at some point. If one of us found out we were sick it'd be the first (non medical treatment) thing we'd do to make sure the other is looked after. just in case and that we'd be the person able to make medical decisions if needed.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 54 ✭✭Feline Groovy


    Surely not being tethered together in the eyes of the law makes ending the union easier? Divorce can be a crazily drawn out process.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,571 ✭✭✭yagan


    If you don't believe in investing in a lifelong commitment then legal marriage won't matter to you.

    It is possible to secure a divorce at minimal expense, but it requires both parties cooperating.

    I've even known a couple who had a divorce party together!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 411 ✭✭SodiumCooled


    Marriage from a legal perspective is very much worth it, there are significant tax benefits and importantly more rights for a father in the unfortunate event of a break up.

    Big church weddings with 300 guests followed by an expensive hotel wedding are not worth it though and it can be done in a much smaller civil ceremony (or none at all just the couple filling the forms).



  • Registered Users Posts: 164 ✭✭Wezz


    That's really helpful thank you. I didn't realise you could avoid the tax if you have lived in the house 3 years or more, good to know that is in there. I'd still be inclined to get married though just for the peace of mind of not having to worry about one of us dying within those three years. And then there is the next of kin stuff, my partner is a doctor and she's told me stories of patients not having their wishes respected and their partners not being able have a say in their care. Stuff like that does make me think about how we take our relationships for granted and don't consider the legal and financial implications if the worst happens.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,559 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    Was responding so a poster saying unmarried couples should be given the same entitlements as married couples. In which case it would need the same procedures for splitting assets and parental responsibility as a normal divorce.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,564 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    Sexist drivel.

    And does that mean that adoptive mothers are second class mothers?

    Scrap the cap!



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,564 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    There's nothing whatsoever about a religious marriage that guarantees they are, or will remain so, either.

    Scrap the cap!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,946 ✭✭✭✭_Kaiser_


    So much wrong and nonsensical about this - not least the last 4 words. Can we not say MAN anymore?

    Being a woman and carrying a child doesn't mean that you'll automatically be a good mother, or a good partner, nor does it mean that you should be "rewarded" with all the assets by default in the event of a relationship breakdown.



Advertisement