Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Dept of Finance Security Shelter cost €1,429,000

2»

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,603 ✭✭✭MrMusician18


    Is a portacabin appropriate in that location, or a cheap breezeblock box?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,460 ✭✭✭Tork


    I hope they are, and that we see more evidence of the OPW's mismanagement of our money. Anybody who has ever had dealings with the OPW or has seen the wastefulness and inefficient work practices knows exactly what I'm talking about. The only way the OPW can ever be taken to task in any meaningful way is if journalists unearth more stories and expose them to the light.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,627 ✭✭✭Cluedo Monopoly


    Excuses. The Tanaiste is also shocked it seems.

    Tánaiste Micheál Martin has branded the €1.4m spend on a security hut at the Department of Finance as “ridiculous” and demanded a “fundamental review” of the cost.

    Speaking in New York today, Mr Martin said he “was shocked to hear that figure this morning”.

    "It's ridiculous. There's no need for that level of expenditure. I think we need a fundamental review now of what's happening there, and full transparency in front of the Oireachtas of the actual breakdown of costs, that does seem shocking, in terms of what is there that it would cost that amount of money."

    What are they doing in the Hyacinth House?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,627 ✭✭✭Cluedo Monopoly


    It was Green Party TD Steven Matthews that probed the OPW on the cost of a new security hut today in the committee. He must have been tipped off.

    What are they doing in the Hyacinth House?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,797 ✭✭✭✭kippy


    And rightly so - that is essentially the work of the good journalist, however how much will/does the average citizen get exercised by these types of articles? Indeed, as stated already we have had multiples of the figures thrown doing the toilet in the recent past (RTE, Childrents Hospital etc) and nothing really changes.

    Now, if I were a journalist, I would be questioning why the OPW introduced this specific project into the public realm today………is this a smokescreen to deflect from the bike shelter (there may be a number of reasons people would want people to look elsewhere…….)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,627 ✭✭✭Cluedo Monopoly


    A Green TD (Matthews) asked a question about it and the OPW had the figures available.

    What are they doing in the Hyacinth House?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,797 ✭✭✭✭kippy


    Ah thanks, I wasn't fully aware of the context.

    Nothing to see here - move on to the higher spend issue.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,460 ✭✭✭Tork


    Reports of overspending on bike and security shelters resonate more with the public. It's easier for the OPW to obfuscate when it comes to more complex projects, whereas it's harder to hide when it comes to these simpler structures.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,349 ✭✭✭thebourke


    It really wants you to pay taxes in this country when you see the waste by the public sector ….i reckon its billions we are wasting every year



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,463 ✭✭✭✭BorneTobyWilde




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,339 ✭✭✭Markus Antonius


    All the green-blooded bleeding hearts coming out to defend Eamon Ryan (who pushed for the bike shed) saying he wasn't responsible for its construction. And now it comes out that the minister responsible for expenditure at Leinster House is none other than GREEN minister (and wife of GREEN minister for tourism Catherine Martin) Francis Duffy!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 52,404 ✭✭✭✭tayto lover


    I wonder who got a nice new extension to their own house around the same time?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,422 ✭✭✭SuperBowserWorld


    Bloody hell, that's just one department's security shelter.

    The place can probably be hacked remotely. This is just more lipstick on a pig.

    Leprechaun economics for the sheeple.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,422 ✭✭✭SuperBowserWorld


    Construction costs have gone crazy because our permanent government continuously fans the flames of the Irish one trick property pony. I bet you are happily milking the property market. 😁



  • Registered Users Posts: 340 ✭✭Grassy Knoll


    you are absolutely correct 1.5 m is a lot of money but the cost is symptomatic of how out of control construction has become generally. However a large part of the cost of that project is actually in the ground…. There is a hydraulic barrier that is mounted in the road the vehicles pass through , I presume top of the range security does not come cheap. My sense is when the cost breakdown is published, while still very high, will be seen a different light.


    The bike shed is in any person’s language hard to justify, but it seems the political system are partially complicit in this given the siting etc



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,462 ✭✭✭✭kneemos


    When was it built and are we talking about current construction costs?



  • Subscribers Posts: 41,863 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    Well, it's completed, so we're not taking about current construction costs.



  • Registered Users Posts: 340 ✭✭Grassy Knoll


    opened before the summer. Yes, mad money but all construction now is mad money. Public contracts are generally a higher spec ( we can discuss whether that is good or bad) plus other payment practices prevalent in parts of the private sector don’t go on.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,793 ✭✭✭beachhead


    Not too prudent when trying to bury this story.Well done to the digging reporter.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,042 ✭✭✭✭NIMAN


    I don't see why there are calls for an inquiry.

    What will it achieve? It'll cost money itself and in the end noone will be held responsible. It will be rinse and repeat until the next public waste of money.

    The current government is playing into SF hands perfectly. If the election is to be in November, all these scandals came at a very bad time for them.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,462 ✭✭✭✭kneemos


    Accountability for public money and make sure nothing underhand or incompetent is going on.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,127 ✭✭✭thatsdaft


    I got slammed for pointing finger at the Greens

    And here we are



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,627 ✭✭✭Cluedo Monopoly


    Where is Patrick O'Donavan? He is the Minister with responsibility for the OPW. He should be front and centre on this.

    What are they doing in the Hyacinth House?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,042 ✭✭✭✭NIMAN


    We need to see detailed breakdowns of where exactly every cent went.

    If we had proper investigative journos in this country, they have perfect subject matter here. Find out how much every item cost, and if that's the same cost it would be if supplied to me or you. If it's being inflated because it's a government project, then name and shame the companies involved. In fact, all the companies involved should be named anyway, and how much of the €1.4m or €338k they got for each of these scandalous builds.

    Are we the only country where this sort of extravagant spending would happen? I wonder are our other EU neighbours governments plagues by such scandals as well? I somehow don't see this sort of waste being acceptable in Germany, Sweden, Netherlands. But then again, maybe it happens the world over?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,968 ✭✭✭Andrea B.


    Stolen from a comment somewhere on twitter regarding next election.

    A poster referenced printing up a leaflet with images, costs (including all the zeros) of the NCH, bike shed and security office and leaving them in a holder outside front door, so as to exchange with politicians when they come canvassing.

    Edit. Yeah, I know, why bother. Water off ducks back.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 27,325 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Of course we aren't the only country where it happens. Irish exceptionalism is so tedious.

    This is a far less clear-cut case than the bike shelter. The number sounds large but we have absolutely no idea how much it should have cost.



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,667 ✭✭✭thecretinhop


    I have dealt with many public sector bodies in my time. It used be outright corruption brown envelopes etc.

    Now it's a project that should cost maybe 10k but the tender that get it is for 400000. They then div up the money themselves and get an intern to design the website for like 1k.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,857 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    Out in the far reaches of west Limerick. Can only be contacted by post and takes about 5 days for a letter to reach him…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,742 ✭✭✭Floppybits


    The security hut should have cost the €330K that was used to build the bike shed.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,857 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    If the election is to be in November, all these scandals came at a very bad time for them.

    The scandals might well determine the timing of the election, if the next opinion poll records any sort of dip for FFG…



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,139 ✭✭✭Augme


    Theres a scandal every month for FG though. The next one could be worse.and I've no doubt there are stories being deliberately held until an election is called.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 765 ✭✭✭techman1


    Whoever signed off on this should be fired as well as the person who signed off on the bike shelter

    I bet they working from home aswell like most of public sector, probably had to wait for them.to be in on Wednesday for it to be signed off



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 765 ✭✭✭techman1


    Of course we aren't the only country where it happens. Irish exceptionalism is so tedious.

    This is a far less clear-cut case than the bike shelter. The number sounds large but we have absolutely no idea how much it should have cost.

    No but the other countries aren't our European peers but dodgy dictatorships in Africa and Latin America where the elites spend so much of their resources on themselves. Because the country is awash with corporate tax money the public sector can get away with so much waste and incompetence because there is money for alot of other stuff anyway. They are squandering money rather than allocating it to proper infrastructure like they do in the rest of Europe.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,627 ✭✭✭Cluedo Monopoly


    Security hut costing €1.4m shows lack of respect for taxpayers, TD says.

    Security hut costing €1.4m shows lack of respect for taxpayers, TD says (breakingnews.ie)

    John McGuinness, the chair of the Oireachtas Finance Committee, said the system has failed people and no responsibility is taken when something goes wrong.

    Speaking on RTÉ radio’s Today with Claire Byrne show, the Fianna Fáil TD said there needed to be political leadership in each department and responsibility should be taken by public servants about spending.

    Mr McGuinness said one way to do that was to increase the powers of the Comptroller General and Oireachtas committees, such as the Public Accounts Committee.

    The Comptroller General should audit all public spending, otherwise “we will have error after error”, Mr McGuinness said.

    He said there would have to be an examination about why the OPW decided to deliver the bike shed project at a cost of €350,000 and “why no one said stop?”

    The €1.4 million cost of the security hut at Leinster House should also be questioned, he said.

    “I have no doubt that there are security issues and the need for security technology and so on, in that hut. But you would question the €1.4 million spend and whether it was value for money or not.

    “I believe that the systems behind the delivery of these projects have failed the people, have failed the country and the different departments that spent that money. I have no doubt that you could have done the job much cheaper, much more efficiently and still dealt with the problems that you had in the first place.”

    He added: “There seems to be no respect for taxpayers’ money. And there seems to be no responsibility taken when something goes wrong and that we can't allow that to continue.”

    …………

    FG don't do reform so the likes of the Comptroller General and SIPO will never get extra powers. Not while the trough is full of MNC tax.

    What are they doing in the Hyacinth House?



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 27,325 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Again, this is hysterical garbage. Our "European peers" waste money on bad projects and inefficient infrastructure. The Germans being a particularly good example of this with Brandenburg Airport being a scandal multiple times as bad as the NCH and their rail system being an utter joke. Or a Spanish regional authority buying trains that didn't fit the rail tunnels.

    None of this excuses any potential or proven overspend in the Irish public sector. But exclaiming how it could only happen in Ireland makes you look very silly.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,462 ✭✭✭✭kneemos


    The HS2 project in England has turned into a white elephant. Kinda ironic given their historical knack of building rail lines all over the world.



  • Registered Users Posts: 625 ✭✭✭Baba Yaga


    im not worried about how the German,French,Spainish,Italian,english goverments pish away their taxpayers money,im concerned about how our goverment is pishing away OUR tax money…


    "They gave me an impossible task,one which they said I wouldnt return from...."

    ps wheres my free,fancy rte flip-flops...?

    pps wheres my wheres my rte macaroons,kevin?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,462 ✭✭✭✭kneemos


    Not really a Government issue. The OPW are given a budget. The Civil Service you need to be annoyed at.



  • Registered Users Posts: 625 ✭✭✭Baba Yaga



    "They gave me an impossible task,one which they said I wouldnt return from...."

    ps wheres my free,fancy rte flip-flops...?

    pps wheres my wheres my rte macaroons,kevin?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 625 ✭✭✭Baba Yaga


    i gave an example of the gate house on the place i work in (i do security) it came in at €146,000 with all modcons and fully equipped,there is no way costs have gone up that much in 2 years…those barriers you mention are about €6,000 each ,allowing that those are super heavy duty,you need 3 to 4 to cover a normal entrance,they are powered by an electric pump for the hydraulics to raise them,if we had those put in,bomb proofed the hut here we are still only at about €250,000…about a hundred grand short of a bike shed and about a million and a quarter short of the leinster house "hut"


    "They gave me an impossible task,one which they said I wouldnt return from...."

    ps wheres my free,fancy rte flip-flops...?

    pps wheres my wheres my rte macaroons,kevin?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,235 ✭✭✭LambshankRedemption


    I was involved in a design of a similar building a number of years ago. I don't remember the final cost, but I think it was around the 120k mark.

    It didn't have the ornate swirl at the top which does not appear to have any practical purpose though.

    The costs for some things like this can be eye watering because they have to conform to certain requirements. For example, I assume the glass is bullet proof, which makes sense.

    That said, 1.4M is someone taking the piss.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,235 ✭✭✭LambshankRedemption


    Thats the thing though. I wouldn't be surprised if the initial quote was around the 330k mark and someone said "You mean its going to cost the same as the bike shed? Clearly you have not done due diligence on this, come back when you have a more grown up figure".



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,456 ✭✭✭✭ednwireland




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,235 ✭✭✭LambshankRedemption


    I was thinking the same thing. I very nearly included that clip.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,462 ✭✭✭✭kneemos




  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 27,325 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    You can't put a flat roof portacabin esque structure outside such an historic building. It needs to have some architectural merit.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,797 ✭✭✭✭kippy


    Agreed, this is a bit less clear cut than the bike shelter but the same logical reasoning can be applied.

    The bike shelter, even with groundworks etc shouldn't have come near a spend of 40-50k and even that is exceptional. I am allowing for a lot of overheads there.

    We may not know the specifics of the security shelter of have anything to compare it to but you can bet your bottom dollar it could have been done significantly cheaper, like the bike shelter.

    As others have said the figures involved, the decision making process and the companies and individuals that the money ended up with needs to be published but they/it won't



Advertisement