Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

First glance @ PS3 Chip

Options
  • 29-11-2004 8:40pm
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 833 ✭✭✭


    Linkage

    Sounds fairly powerful, but im holding all judgements until I see it in action for myself.


Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 3,892 ✭✭✭madrab


    i agree



    we all remember the hype over the "emotion" chip


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Computer Games Moderators Posts: 51,393 CMod ✭✭✭✭Retr0gamer


    i won't believe a word of it. I still remember Sony saying that the PS1 would have graphics better than the special effects in Jurassic Park and also the plain silly PS2 emotion engine comments.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,892 ✭✭✭madrab


    i agree



    we all remember the hype over the "emotion" chip


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,892 ✭✭✭madrab


    not sure why that came up twice......maybe the emotion engine is not happy with my comment


  • Hosted Moderators Posts: 18,115 ✭✭✭✭ShiverinEskimo


    for those of us not in the know (xbox man) what the hell was the emotion chip?


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 292 ✭✭Thrasher


    The Emotion Engine (TM) is part of the CPU of the Playstation2. According to Sony Marketing, this thing apparently was to add all sorts of new fandangled capabilities to gaming that were not possible with Intel, AMD or Mac CPUs.

    Apparently, the players thoughts would be transmitted via the controller into the PS2 CPU Emotion Engine where characters would feel with the player and perform all sorts of great things - well beyond the AI or scripting of the game itself....... :p:confused::p


  • Registered Users Posts: 10,581 ✭✭✭✭Dont be at yourself


    Remember those tech demoes for the PS2, featuring these "real-time" characters ball room dancing etc while the demonstrator manipulated the camera with the analogue sticks? Guffaw.

    Don't believe the hype.


  • Registered Users Posts: 10,148 ✭✭✭✭Raskolnikov


    Yep, that article reeks of steaming bull****. 16 giga FLOPS (Floating point operations per second) sounds fantastic but you need to bear in mind that the xBox is supposedly capable on 80 giga FLOPS (that's not a fair comparison of course) already. Not to mention, the xBox2 will allegedly contain multiple CPU's and supposedly will deal with the issue of memory bandwidth that currently plauges graphics chips.


  • Hosted Moderators Posts: 18,115 ✭✭✭✭ShiverinEskimo


    Already sort of commited myself to buying xbox2. I like the sort of games in attracts...and i guess its as close to pc gaming as your going to get with a console costing the price of a decent pc's gfx card...


  • Registered Users Posts: 451 ✭✭Bodan


    Im still undecided weather or not to get a xbox .Im very happy with my ps2 and now just after reading a few reviews of the ps3 , i think i just might hang on . It sounds awesome


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 17,441 ✭✭✭✭jesus_thats_gre


    The 16 GFlops was referring to a rack of the processors. not a single 1 I think..


  • Registered Users Posts: 15,815 ✭✭✭✭po0k


    It's just a smp chip.

    Afaik it's pretty much a 3-core PPC 970fx, or related to it.

    Should be a nice enough number cruncher, but they'll have some loss to cover on the hardware if they want to reach a sellable price-point, what with the shortages associated with 90nm fabs recently.

    And the PS2 was a horrible architecture.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,951 ✭✭✭L5


    Lets hope it can do Toy Story 2 quality graphics just the like ps2 was claimed to be capable of !


  • Registered Users Posts: 10,304 ✭✭✭✭koneko


    Sony have a tendency (as others have said) of making up complete BS. I'll believe it when I see it.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,682 ✭✭✭LookingFor


    The figure quoted for that one rack workstation is 16 Teraflops, not 16 Gigaflops (a teraflop = a gigaflop x 1000).

    They're not saying PS3 will reach that performance (it won't).

    Also, you all need to look back on those PS2 demos and announced specs. They were accurate. A lot of people let their imaginations run wild, probably because they didn't actually understand what any of the specs meant. Seriously, though, I think the original Sony PS2 presentation did end up being accurate (and I'll argue this point in more detail if anyone wants me to).


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Computer Games Moderators Posts: 51,393 CMod ✭✭✭✭Retr0gamer


    LookingFor wrote:
    A lot of people let their imaginations run wild, probably because they didn't actually understand what any of the specs meant. Seriously, though, I think the original Sony PS2 presentation did end up being accurate (and I'll argue this point in more detail if anyone wants me to).

    Emotion Engine (snigger :D )


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,698 ✭✭✭garthv


    The three firms claim that the Cell chip will be up to 10 times more powerful than existing processors.
    then why the hell would they put it in a console....
    I cant belive its not out till 2006,someone told me that it was going to be next year....i think


  • Registered Users Posts: 23,216 ✭✭✭✭monkeyfudge


    The emotion chip in my PS2 must be broken... it simply doesn't love me anymore...

    Will they have to stop the PS3 from falling into Bin Laden's hands? He could use it to destroy us all... Remember the stories that if you linked 3 PS2's together you could use them as a missile guidance system?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,239 ✭✭✭Gilgamesh


    was wondering myself, 16 TeraFLOPS sounds more likely, my PC at home allready has 4.7 TeraFLOPS.
    But from my understanding, the PS3 is going to contain 16 of these processors, not just a single one.
    the performance could be awesome, but also looking at the 2006 release, it could be outdated.
    Sony, and Toshiba (and another company I always forget) are going to be implementing this chip into just about any piece of hardware that can benefit from it, e.g. HiFi systems, for more higher performance environment processing, TVs will have them in, and finally, Toshi and Sony are going to try and create a true multimedia device.
    A TV which has enough power to run games, without having another box sitting next to it.
    could be cool in some ways.


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,718 ✭✭✭Matt Simis


    Gilgamesh wrote:
    was wondering myself, 16 TeraFLOPS sounds more likely, my PC at home allready has 4.7 TeraFLOPS.
    But from my understanding, the PS3 is going to contain 16 of these processors, not just a single one.
    the performance could be awesome, but also looking at the 2006 release, it could be outdated.
    Sony, and Toshiba (and another company I always forget) are going to be .


    That would be that "IBM" crowd I believe...


    Matt


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,682 ✭✭✭LookingFor


    Gilgamesh wrote:
    was wondering myself, 16 TeraFLOPS sounds more likely, my PC at home allready has 4.7 TeraFLOPS.

    Your PC at home certainly isn't 4.7 Teraflops. 4.7 Gigaflops, you mean?

    We'll be lucky if PS3 gets to 1 Teraflop..that would be insane performance. My guess is it'll come in at approx. 500GFlops.

    The PS2's CPU was very powerful for floating point performance, more powerful than desktop CPUS of the time. If you bought enough of them and distributed processing over them, you could easily guide a few missiles with them ;)


Advertisement