Jesus - Not the only gay in the Village

damien

http://www.rainbownetwork.com/News/detail.asp?iData=22449&iCat=29&iChannel=2&nChannel=News

(Los Angeles, California) As Christians celebrated the birth of Jesus few of them will have been told anything about the sexuality of Jesus, yet a growing group of Biblical scholars believe that Christ may have had at least one sexual relationship with another male.

Noted Methodist theologian Rev. Theodore Jennings Jr. and Dr Morton Smith, a world renowned Bible scholar, say there is irrefutable evidence that Jesus was at least bisexual. Dr Rollan McCleary of the University of Queensland, in Australia, says he has discovered through his research that three of the disciples were gay.

Prof. Smith points to a fragment of manuscript he found at the Mar Saba monastery near Jerusalem in 1958, which he says alludes to Jesus having a homosexual relationship with a youth he raised from the dead. The fragment shows that the full text of St. Mark, Chapter 10 (between verses 34 and 35 in the standard version of the Bible) includes the following passage:

"And the youth, looking upon him (Jesus), loved him and beseeched that he might remain with him. And going out of the tomb, they went into the house of the youth, for he was rich. And after six days, Jesus instructed him and, at evening, the youth came to him wearing a linen cloth over his naked body. And he remained with him that night, for Jesus taught him the mystery of the Kingdom of God".


Rev. Jennings, a professor at the United Church of Christ's Chicago Theological Seminary, points to the Gospel of St. John. In his book "The Man Jesus Loved: Homoerotic Narratives From the New Testament," Jennings writes that the reference in St John about "the disciple Jesus loved" was actually a reference to Jesus' gay boyfriend.

Jennings also claims the centurion's servant who was healed by Jesus actually was the centurion's gay boyfriend and that Jesus did not denounce their relationship.

Dr McCleary spent three years researching “gay spirituality”. His book, "Signs for a Messiah" says that Jesus and at least three of his disciples were gay, and Christianity in general is built on “gay principles”.

McCleary says that Christianity needs to recognize its homosexual roots and abandon the practice of alienating gays and spreading homophobia.

British gay rights advocate Peter Tatchell says even though the information about Jesus' sexuality remains scant, "there is certainly no evidence for the Church's presumption that he was heterosexual. Nothing in the Bible points to him having desires or relationships with women. The possibility of a gay Christ cannot be ruled out."

"Since there is no proof of the heterosexuality of Jesus, the theological basis of Church homophobia is all the more shaky and indefensible," Tatchell said.

"Large chunks of Jesus' life are missing from the Biblical accounts. This has fuelled speculation that the early Church sanitized the gospels, removing references to Christ's sexuality that were not in accord with the heterosexual morality that it wanted to promote", said Tatchell.

The Vatican has denounced the research by Jennings, Smith and McCleary as "heretical". It has also been denounced by Southern Baptists and evangelical Anglicans.

When recently asked if his research might be tainted because he is gay, McCleary said: "You could see that either way. You could also say that heterosexual people have their eyes wide shut on the matter, that they don't want to see that Jesus would have been of gay disposition.

"You maybe have to be gay to read the signals and to see things and research things which other people wouldn't," he added.

HerrLipp

Ooh, I had a thing for the apostle Philip, is he gay? Was Jesus a top or a bottom?

And he remained with him that night, for Jesus taught him the mystery of the Kingdom of God".

"You can get in through me, ie: the backdoor". Well I think that proves he was a bottom.

FX Meister

Complete bollocks I'd say, Haven't you read the DaVinci code by Dan Brown

damien

http://www.forteprenestino.net/iniziative/olson/ultima_cena.jpg

Nice new version of the last supper.

segadreamcast

"Haven't you read the DaVinci code by Dan Brown"

Both articles (DaVinci Code/this) are merely speculation... I'm not sure where you obtain the authority to dismiss one in favour of the other...?

Obviously this theory is very unlikely - nevertheless, how can you disregard it entirely due to another *theory* put forward in Dan Brown's book?

FX Meister

Mere theory? I have it in a hard back book, it is the truth.

Boston

FX Meister wrote:

Mere theory? I have it in a hard back book, it is the truth.

Truth is relative, and just because something is in a book, doesn't make it anymore true then it would be, had it been presented through another media.

ixoy

Boston wrote:

Truth is relative, and just because something is in a book, doesn't make it anymore true then it would be, had it been presented through another media.

Eh I'm assuming FX Meister is being extremely tongue-in-cheek after the manner in which so many people assume all Dan Brown's writings are, for want of a better term, gospel. I think we all know that just because it's written in a book doesn't make it true.

damien

FX Meister wrote:

Mere theory? I have it in a hard back book, it is the truth.

fx, at least one person gets the humour.

Stark

I think we all know that just because it's written in a book doesn't make it true.

Except if it's written in the Bible

BuffyBot

Gotta respect ad-words:

God loves you
How to know that God loves you

Jesus Institute
Curious about Jesus words and life? Free online educational resource.

Proof. He hangs around here..he must be gay

Boston

damien.m wrote:

fx, at least one person gets the humour.

I get stuff, I'm cool... hey stop laughing...

Stark

What? Humour got misinterpreted on a web forum? Now there's a first