Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Please note that it is not permitted to have referral links posted in your signature. Keep these links contained in the appropriate forum. Thank you.

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2055940817/signature-rules

NCT and exhaust emissions on a 1992 car

Options
  • 10-01-2005 12:37pm
    #1
    Registered Users Posts: 365 ✭✭


    Guys,

    My car is due for its test in 2 weeks and a few people have told me that 1992 and older cars are not tested for emissions.. Is this true?

    Looking back on my previous 2 NCT tests I see on the report that beside the high idle section it has N/A in all areas.

    Emissions were measured on low idle however.

    Cheers
    Jayo


Comments

  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 39,727 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    Pre-1992 cars *are* tested for emissions. However, they don't need a catalytic converter.
    IIRC emissions are now checked under both high and low idle but I may be wrong - it may be model dependant.


  • Registered Users Posts: 365 ✭✭jayo99


    k thats really what I wanted to know..
    I have the cat out of my car and am wondering whether to put it back in or not for the test.


  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 39,727 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    If your car was designed with a cat (in terms of your fuel injection software) then it may be beneficial to stick the cat back on.


  • Registered Users Posts: 365 ✭✭jayo99


    It was.. but last year my cat blew and took out my back box also..
    So I have been running it without a cat for a while to see if I had my running problems sorted.
    Just wondered if I had to go to the bother of re-fitting it...
    Think I'll risk it and fit it if it fails on emissions ;-)


  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 39,727 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    bring it to a reliable pre-test centre then and get the emissions checked or alternatively just bring it to the test and see what they have to say (presumably this is the cheaper option!).
    What type of car is it? My cat went a few weeks ago and with various discounts I still had to fork out €1100 :(


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 6,031 ✭✭✭lomb


    funny thing is i passed a 98 corolla the other day and that car was driven on 3 cylinders and one plug defective for 500-1000 miles. i thought surely the cat was gone with the unburnt fuel going into it. but no! it passed emissions with flying colours. mayb u dont need a cat to pass it?


  • Registered Users Posts: 365 ✭✭jayo99


    sounds like u had a lucky escape lomb..

    My coolant temp sensor was the cause of the problems for me.. It went and so the ECU thought the car was cold all the time dumping more fuel into the exhaust, thus blowing the cat which broke up into pieces which ended up in the back box.. New cat & box from Toyota €1500 thx much !

    All for a dumbass coolant temp sensor !


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,031 ✭✭✭lomb


    what year is she, u can get a cheap cat in traynors. i reakon i was lucky by the way. how did u know the cat broke up?

    oh i reakon my cat is gone. how could it b rite after 3weeks of running on 3cylinders. but it passed emissions.my advice is put a brand new air filter in like i did and send it through sure it wont cost much if she fails apart from cat. i reakon ud pick up a cat for 100 in traynors in the north. they have daily deliveries.


  • Registered Users Posts: 365 ✭✭jayo99


    to get a cat from a mate and I spotted someone a while ago selling 2 on this board for my car.

    I knew it broke up coz the car stopped on the motorway and when I got under the cat was glowing bright orange (no messin).

    When I disassembled it the cat was blown right thru and its contents could be heard when I shook the back box :-(


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,031 ✭✭✭lomb


    did it drive ok then? on the motorway?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 365 ✭✭jayo99


    well it drove like a lead ballon.. had to drive the whole way home on the hard shoulder.. gradually would cut out after every 5 miles.. had to leave sit and cool down and then tacke another 5.. not v good for engine ..


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,031 ✭✭✭lomb


    wel my cat must be gone and it passed with a wide margin so stick it thru. let us know how u get on.


  • Registered Users Posts: 365 ✭✭jayo99


    test is on the 18th so we'll see how it goes.


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,031 ✭✭✭lomb


    good luck with it looking forward to results with interest


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 88,978 ✭✭✭✭mike65


    Just checked my last NCT test sheet and it shows CO levels must be below 3.5volume% and Hydro Carbons 750ppm. Both at tickover speed.

    Mike.


  • Registered Users Posts: 365 ✭✭jayo99


    Well guys..

    My car sailed thru the NCT. I notice that on the test results form they don't even list emissions at high idle, so the car must be exept from that test.

    At low idle it performed well - CO levels were .38% volume and Hydro Carbons 126ppm

    Nice :-)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 973 ✭✭✭Gmodified


    I have taken cat out of 89&92 CRX and cars had no problems with passing NCT

    emission was very low and Cat was probably dead anyway


  • Registered Users Posts: 365 ✭✭jayo99


    heheh as it happens my other car (garaged) is a CRX.. 1988 model ..
    Car is a rocket!


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,031 ✭✭✭lomb


    so a cat is a waste of time basically they allow 200ppm on high idle anyway on a modern car. my opinion is it restricts the exaust and should be removed if it self destructs (which can happen due to failed o2/lambda sensor spark plug, coolant temp sensor, maf sensor), this is why u can buy universal cats for 70 euro that dont restrict the gases much.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,038 ✭✭✭stratos


    Would it be worth running some engine treatments to your petrol a few days before the test I wonder? I know our work mechanic recomends it, but I never tried it. I have also seen ads for a product called cataclean, Seems to do remarkable things. Has anyone any experience of it?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 6,031 ✭✭✭lomb


    dont put the stuff anywhere near the motor. there is some info i was reading about a guy nearly wreaking his v8 out of his s500 due to adding teflon lubricants.it eventually gums up passages and can damage fine lubrication points that lubricate the cam bearings. also it can/will clog ur oil filter resulting in the bypass valve activating. there only snake oil salesmen that is the consenses


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 439 ✭✭litirspam


    Can anyone tell me if the car jack in Aldi is worth getting please?


  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 39,727 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    @ litirspam - read the posting guidelines.
    @ lomb - are you referring to oil treatments? These can and sometimes do work but not usually advisable if the engine has not been rigorously maintained. As for fuel treatments (which is what stratos was asking) - some work, some don't. Many folk recommend redline products


  • Registered Users Posts: 365 ✭✭jayo99


    car jack in aldi.. urmmm .. its cheap but not great.. I have one and my car rolled forward whilst jacking it and it bent the side bars of the jack which prevented it from lowering fully


Advertisement