Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

"128K" does this mean bits or bytes

Options
  • 25-02-2005 1:31pm
    #1
    Registered Users Posts: 577 ✭✭✭


    Ok thanks in advance for any info on this:

    Firstly:

    I am trying to argue a point that when we were offered a broadband uncontended "128K" ( this was the exact text used ) line that I assumed that it would be:

    128 kilobytes

    not

    128 kilobits ( 16 kilobytes )

    Secondly:

    What is Broadband?

    Surely it is more that 128 kilobits which = 16KB which is like an isdn connection???

    Give me some Ammo or Do I have a Leg to stand on ???


Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 3,330 ✭✭✭radiospan


    I don't think there's an exact definition for the minimum speed required to be offered before you can call it Broadband, but I think an ISP in the UK were told that they couldn't call their 256Kbit product "broadband".

    So going by that, I'd call broadband anything that offers a 512KBit download speed.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,317 ✭✭✭Chalk


    bb with 128kb contended or uncontended offers a max of 16kB upload.
    128kb download is not bb

    note the use of small 'b' and large 'B' to denote bits and bytes respectively


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,317 ✭✭✭Chalk


    the k refers to 1000, whether bits, bytes or metres


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,314 ✭✭✭Talliesin


    Chalk wrote:
    note the use of small 'b' and large 'B' to denote bits and bytes respectively
    Alas, many people aren't as consistent in this as yourself.

    There's also inconsistency in how kilo is used.

    Generally networking is discussed in terms of bits, with kilo meaning 1,000 and memory and file size in terms of bytes with kilo meaning 1,024. This makes sense when you think about what networking people are concerned with (moving bits from A to B, and dealing with physical constraints in the medium used) and what programmers are concerned with when writing a program to deal with a file (dealing with bytes using technology for which multiples of 2 are often more convenient than other numbers).
    Hence 128kb is equivalent to 15.625kB.

    Byte doesn't even consistently mean 8 bits, though it does with just about every modern machine (this is why ISO and IETF documents use the term "octet" to mean blocks of 8 bits).


  • Registered Users Posts: 577 ✭✭✭Velcrow


    So when they said 128K

    Was I right to assume Kilobytes?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,317 ✭✭✭Chalk


    in regards to interent services available today youd be wrong.
    most isps worldwide advertise the speeds in kilobits to give it more oomph,
    since everyon knows dialup as 56k,
    bb is not synchronous, ie the speed up is not the same as the speed down
    standard offerening here , today, is 512kb/128kb or , roughly 60kB down 15kB up


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,067 ✭✭✭tomk


    If you were offered a 1Mb BB service, it could conceivably have been described as 128KB i.e.

    128 x 8 = 1024

    However, as mentioned above, ISPs tend to use the higher number i.e. the bit count, as opposed to the byte count.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 345 ✭✭padraigf


    128kb on an internet service means 128 kilobits. Meaning a 16kiloByte speed. (Good luck getting 16kiloBytes out of it though, expect more like 12-13kB).

    As far as I know, a lowercase b stands for bits, whereas an uppercase B stands for bytes. Wouldn't trust that though, since most places seem to use them interchangeably even though they arent the same thing.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 19,080 ✭✭✭✭Random


    bits bits bits.
    It's all kilobits they use. Kb. :)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,718 ✭✭✭SkepticOne


    plazzTT wrote:
    I don't think there's an exact definition for the minimum speed required to be offered before you can call it Broadband, but I think an ISP in the UK were told that they couldn't call their 256Kbit product "broadband".

    So going by that, I'd call broadband anything that offers a 512KBit download speed.
    But this 512KBit would be referring to the maximum link speed of the service. If an ISP quotes the 'uncontended' speed this means what the user should expect if all the other users are maxing out the connection. For example Eircom's lower end 512k product has an 'uncontended' speed of 10 kbit/sec (much lower than dialup). If everyone was to start downloading at the same time this is the speed you would get since the 512k is contended at a ratio of 48:1. 512/48=10. This is unlikely particularly on a capped service like Eircom's and this is why they can get away with such a high contention ratio.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 577 ✭✭✭Velcrow


    Thanks everyone - yeah - only in ireland is bb sold as 16KB ( 128 Kb ) - just came back from france and they were offering 1MB ( 8Mb ) bb for 19.99 a month..... :(


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,538 ✭✭✭PiE


    Uncontended 128k would be a leased line, which would be considered broadband (in Ireland anyway), non?


  • Registered Users Posts: 18,484 ✭✭✭✭Stephen


    Velcrow - who are you getting 128kb broadband from? Sounds seriously low. All the eircom radsl resellers do 512k.

    Unless, of course, you're talking about the upload speed, where 128kbit is the standard speed offered by Irish dsl ISPs.


  • Registered Users Posts: 577 ✭✭✭Velcrow


    PiE wrote:
    Uncontended 128k would be a leased line, which would be considered broadband (in Ireland anyway), non?

    Correct it is a leased line we are getting 128kb ( 16KB ) - ( Smart ) for 50 ex vat a month - are there better offers out there?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,718 ✭✭✭SkepticOne


    Velcrow wrote:
    Correct it is a leased line we are getting 128kb ( 16KB ) - ( Smart ) for 50 ex vat a month - are there better offers out there?
    Do you need uncontended bandwidth? There are much faster contended services from Eircom, Esat, Leap, UTV and a host of others for less money.


  • Registered Users Posts: 9 nolaen


    Network traffic is not measured in bits, bytes or thousands of. The 'B' stands for bauds. Likewise kb is kilo - bauds


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,007 ✭✭✭Moriarty


    Uhm, no it's not.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,419 ✭✭✭nadir


    I have a 128 KB line (or 1 Mega bit) with IBB, that's broadband

    anything lower is not BB imho

    I know dsl around here runs at half that, but I just like to think of broadband as 1 Meg or better, and no caps obviously.


  • Registered Users Posts: 197 ✭✭iano


    Please guys, stop the confusion.

    In networking, speeds are measured in multiples of bits/sec, i.e. Kbps,Mbps,Gbps (or Kbit/s, Mbit/s, Gbit/s).

    In computer storage, file and disk sizes are measured in multiples of bytes, i.e MB, GB, TB.

    My comment on the original question:
    If its a 128Kbps line, it is the equivalent of 2 ISDN channels and is pretty poor throughput in this day and age. SMART's own recently announced Consumer product offers a 2Mbps/128Kbps service for 29 euro ex vat.
    A lot depends on your location and proximity to an enabled exchange/pop.

    As for "what is broadband?", that's a whole other story!
    The OECD definition of broadband is at least 256 kbps downstream and at least 64 kbps upstream.
    Ofcom, the UK regulator, states "'broadband' is used to refer to higher bandwidth, always-on services, offering data rates of 128 kbps and above."
    Comreg simply states that "You can use a broadband connection to access Internet at speeds that are significantly quicker than dial-up connections. Most broadband offers provide download speeds of 512kbps or higher."
    You pays your money and you takes your choice! :(


  • Registered Users Posts: 15,815 ✭✭✭✭po0k


    A sensible definition of "broadband" (in the context of internet connections) is 1.5Mbps-down, 600Kbps-up.

    Regarding the 1000Vs1024 debate.
    If you don't adhere to this then you are wrong.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 6,007 ✭✭✭Moriarty


    .. off to Nets/Comms we go.


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 91,878 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    Remember it's marketing so they will quote the best looking figure

    look at the fuss over HDD's where 1GB = 1,000,000,000 bytes (about 5% less than you'd expect)

    take for example 128,000 bits per second signaling rate

    that's including overheads like CRC's and stop/start bits and hardware routing information and Ack's
    of what is left you have to wrap your packets with IP addresses and other junk
    You could esily loose 10% on both steps..
    (or look at the OSI 7 layer model - overheads at each level)

    So getting 100Kbits data transfer on 128Kb line could mean you have no cause for compaint !


Advertisement