Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

HHG2G is crap ... Time to PANIC

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,488 ✭✭✭Goodshape


    Just reading over some of the stuff they left out. Tragic.
    # The Guide entry on alcohol or any mention of a Pan-Galactic Gargle Blaster
    # The description of the Vogon ships hanging in the air "in exactly the same way that bricks don't"
    # The second part of the Guide entry on Babel fish, about proving the non-existence of God
    # Most of the Vogon poetry scene
    # Most of the 'space is big' Guide entry including "a long way down the road to the chemist's" and the bit about Bethselamin
    # The Guide entry on 'Stress and nervous tension'
    and so on...

    arseblankets anyway. earlier reviews suggested good things.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20,346 ✭✭✭✭KdjaCL


    la la la la la im not listening la la la la


    kdjac


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,324 ✭✭✭OfflerCrocGod


    GOD NO!!!!!!!!!

    :mad: :mad:

    /Offler breaks down and cries :(


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,921 ✭✭✭✭Pigman II


    Wicknight wrote:
    Saw this on Slashdot. Adam's biographer has seen the Hitch Hikers movie and says it is "Phantom Menace" bad

    Ah well, at least he doesn't rate it 'Attack of the Clones' bad. That would be a pity.

    Besides the trailer makes it look crap anyway, like a more expensive/less interesting version of the TV show from 1982.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 31,967 ✭✭✭✭Sarky


    That was a depressing read. Sounds like the creators completely missed the point. Time to spend the price of the film ticket on the DVD of the TV series, then... :(


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,958 ✭✭✭✭RuggieBear


    bastids


  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 17,994 Mod ✭✭✭✭ixoy


    Ah well, is anyone really surprised? TBH, the trailer didn't impress me that much anyway. Shame but I expected as much.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 88,972 ✭✭✭✭mike65


    Most of Arthur's conversation with Slartibartfast

    Sorry to include a spoiler but really, thats one the great chats in history.

    "Did you ever go to a place ... I think it was called Norway?...that was
    one of mine. Won an award you know. Lovely crinkly edges"

    Looking through that list I weep but in a small way cos I frankly expected no better from Hollywood.
    The Hitchhiker's movie is, in summary, a train-wreck of a film. The plot is strung together randomly without cause and effect or motivation.

    So that just about wraps it up for HHGTTG...with any luck the Beeb will be inspired to re-run the Tv series.

    Mike.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 17,208 ✭✭✭✭aidan_walsh


    /me anticipates the "H2G2 RoXXoRz, fcuk da cirtics" thread...


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 31,967 ✭✭✭✭Sarky


    If that review could turn me, I doubt such a thread will appear.

    Aside: Depressing as the review was, did anyone else find it highly entertaining anyway?


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 92,550 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    mike65 wrote:
    Sorry to include a spoiler but really, thats one the great chats in history.
    You must come with me, great things are afoot, you must come now or you will be late.
    Having first heard in on the radio, I was plesently suprised by how good the TV series was considering the state of special effects and liked the graphics from the book, that review was scary..

    I loved the little bits at the end of the radio shows..
    If you would like a copy of the book, ’The Hitch-Hiker’s Guide to the Galaxy’, please write to Megadodo Publications, Megadodo House, Ursa Minor. Enclosing three pounds, ninety-five for the book
    plus five-hundred-and-ninety-seven-million, eight-hundred-and-twelve-thousand, four-hundred-and-six pounds, seven-p, postage and packing.
    http://www.clivebanks.co.uk
    Graced with a wonderful cast, brilliant scripts, and filled to bursting with special effects, the show is best known - and rightly so - for its amazing computer graphics, used to represent the entries of the Book. Which is quite remarkable, considering that they weren’t computer generated at all, but were actually made by animating reversed-out line drawings on acetate, using lighting gels for the colours.
    You learn something new..


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,258 ✭✭✭✭Rabies


    I never read the book before and only heard about it on boards about a year or two ago. Know sweet fvck all about the plot. Prob go and see it because I don't know what to expect.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 44,036 ✭✭✭✭Basq


    Awful, awful news!! :(

    But in a way.. i can't say i'm suprised! Don't get me wrong... i was really looking forward to it. But as i said here a while back, it was probably not a suitable first film for a first time film director.

    Still... terrible news! But i'm gonna ignore the review and still stay stoked about it!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 31,967 ✭✭✭✭Sarky


    About a month and a half ago, myself and some friends were involved in the radio play for NUI Galway's college station. The memories came flooding back. Such perfect lines, that script was pure gold. How could they cut the Arthur/Prosser bit? How? And leave out Marvin's best lines? :cry:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 818 ✭✭✭Cormic


    "Bandwidth Limit Exceeded" from the planetmagrathea site

    I hate that message :(


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,488 ✭✭✭Goodshape


    Hold the phone - Empire review gives 4/5.

    Also a more favorable review from a /. reader here

    Going to have to remain optimistic about this one then.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,842 ✭✭✭steveland?


    Well the film always had very big shoes to fill but I shall reserve judgement till I'v e seen the yoke.

    Which by the way I still can't wait for...


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,554 ✭✭✭herobear


    is there a boxset of the books available ?? me want

    never read it before either


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,488 ✭✭✭Goodshape


    There's loads of versions of the books available - one at a time paperbacks, all inclusive bumper editions, box-sets, etcetera.

    You'll find it in any half-decent bookshop. Can't recommend them enough.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,554 ✭✭✭herobear


    boxsets on play.com ?? im lazy


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,488 ✭✭✭Goodshape


    How lazy can you be?
    Play.com has a search feature. Try that.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,480 ✭✭✭projectmayhem


    herobear wrote:
    boxsets on play.com ?? im lazy
    surely you're not so lazy as to "click" a button or two


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,862 ✭✭✭mycroft


    surely you're not so lazy as to "click" a button or two

    Thats damn lazy.

    Oh c'mon people, care to tell me how you'd film the vogon poetry? It's funny because of the description (One reviewer escaped by eating his own arm) the actual poetry isn't and couldn't be as bad as how it's set up to be in the book.

    As for the rest of the spoilers;

    The god bit was going to go always. It's like people demanding a "preacher" film, never going to happen people.

    As for the rest of it. The guide was great on description. Really evocative turns of phrase. You can't film a turn of phrase.

    You're going to lose some stuff from the books and radio play. It's just going to happen. Accept it and try to move on and see the film on it's own merits*




    *I reserve the right to change my mind about this if they lose the bit about
    "I won awards for Norway"


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,488 ✭✭✭Goodshape


    I understand they have lost that bit. But anyway, watch the old BBC TV series for how to film a turn of phrase. You use naration and guide animations - it worked beautifully. Best thing about the old show.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,862 ✭✭✭mycroft


    Goodshape wrote:
    I understand they have lost that bit. But anyway, watch the old BBC TV series for how to film a turn of phrase. You use naration and guide animations - it worked beautifully. Best thing about the old show.

    And the worst being Zaphod's paper maiché second head.


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 92,550 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    mycroft wrote:
    Oh c'mon people, care to tell me how you'd film the vogon poetry? It's funny because of the description (One reviewer escaped by eating his own arm) the actual poetry isn't and couldn't be as bad as how it's set up to be in the book.
    They managed it in the TV series ...
    Oh freddled gruntbuggly thy micturations are to me
    As plurdled gabbleblotchits on a lurgid bee.
    Groop I implore thee my foonting turlingdromes.
    And hooptiously drangle me with crinkly bindlewurdles,
    Or I will rend thee in the gobberwarts with my blurglecruncheon,
    see if I don't!

    See Also:
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/cult/hitchhikers/vogonpoetry/lettergen.shtml


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,862 ✭✭✭mycroft


    They managed it in the TV series ...

    See Also:
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/cult/hitchhikers/vogonpoetry/lettergen.shtml


    See I didn't think the TV series was that funny........


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 92,550 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    mycroft wrote:
    See I didn't think the TV series was that funny........
    It wasn't as funny as the radio series, and as you say the second head was a disaster, but the rest wasn't that bad considering the budget and technology they had to work with.

    The film just doesn't sound as good as the TV series, despite having more people and money throw at it. It's like they had too many resources so they didn't have to think around constraints.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,457 ✭✭✭Cactus Col


    might be possible that some reviewers didn't like the film because they're favourite bits were left out, which doesn't mean the film isn't good ... in any case I'll make my own mind up when I see it.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 436 ✭✭sleepwalker


    just another case of an adaptation being slated by the fanboys, most reviews that i have seen seem to be positive

    read the book good read but i dont think id be arsed seeing the film


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 29,130 ✭✭✭✭Karl Hungus


    Jesus christ lads, have a bit of cop-on!

    This is coming from Douglas Adams' Biographer ffs, you'd be hard pressed to find a more biased opinion there. Has Christopher Tolkien's repeated slatings of the Lord of the Rings films tought you nothing here?

    Just see the ****ing film, and make your opinions then.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20,346 ✭✭✭✭KdjaCL


    Just seen Tv spot on UK Gold or one of them UK channels, looks even better :)


    kdjac


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,035 ✭✭✭✭Stark


    Jesus christ lads, have a bit of cop-on!

    This is coming from Douglas Adams' Biographer ffs, you'd be hard pressed to find a more biased opinion there. Has Christopher Tolkien's repeated slatings of the Lord of the Rings films tought you nothing here?

    Just see the ****ing film, and make your opinions then.

    Well said.

    I'm still looking forward to the film and I'll make my judgement after I've seen it. I've still hopes for it, the casting is spot on for one imo.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,276 ✭✭✭Memnoch


    Not to upset anyone, but I wasn't really that impressed with the books myself.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,958 ✭✭✭✭RuggieBear


    Memnoch wrote:
    Not to upset anyone, but I wasn't really that impressed with the books myself.

    stone him....

    :D


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 448 ✭✭Agent Orange


    If years of reading SFX magazine have taught me anything, it's that MJ Simpson has absolutely terrible taste.

    Wait until the reviews by 'proper' reviewers come out before drawing any conclusions.


  • Moderators, Arts Moderators, Regional Abroad Moderators Posts: 11,078 Mod ✭✭✭✭Fysh


    Jesus christ lads, have a bit of cop-on!

    This is coming from Douglas Adams' Biographer ffs, you'd be hard pressed to find a more biased opinion there. Has Christopher Tolkien's repeated slatings of the Lord of the Rings films tought you nothing here?

    Just see the ****ing film, and make your opinions then.

    See, I'd disagree. I'd argue that, as someone who has a fairly strong interest in the material, he'll be quite well placed to tell me (although maybe not everyone else) if I'm going to like it. As a fan of the original material, I've seen more cases of horrible adaptations than I have good ones. (For example, most reviews for Constantine ranged between mediocre and reasonably good, but I found it to be easily the worst film I've seen in the last year or so - both as a film in its own right, and as an adaptation of the comic).

    I'm all for adaptations changing some aspects of the original material - I understand why it's necessary not just from the perspective of making the transition between media, but also to avoid alienating the audience. But if you start hacking out what made the original good in the first place (in the case of Constantine, for example, it was the character of John Constantine and how he interacts with those around him. In the case of H2G2, it was the jokes.) then what you're ending up with is something effectively original, with a known name attached to try and get it to sell. And, judging by the longer review, that's what seems to have happened. One of the most memorable exchanges (the one about getting the plans) seems to have had all its humour trimmed out, apparently in the interests of shortening it. It is this, combined with the speedy progress the film has made after Adams kicked the bucket (compared to the 20-odd years of feet-dragging prior), that makes me think this just isn't going to satisfy me as a fan of the books.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 545 ✭✭✭OY


    ixoy wrote:
    Ah well, is anyone really surprised? TBH, the trailer didn't impress me that much anyway. Shame but I expected as much.

    I agree with this. On other threads i have said that i am nervous about this movie. So i will not be suprised when it is bad.
    But i also agree that i will wait and see it myself and see what it is like. :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,982 ✭✭✭ObeyGiant


    It'll be a cold day in hell before I start paying attention to the opinions of fanboys.


Advertisement