Rate my pings....

RicardoSmith

08/05/2005
11:32

Pinging www.boards.ie [82.195.136.36] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 82.195.136.36: bytes=32 time=200ms TTL=46
Reply from 82.195.136.36: bytes=32 time=162ms TTL=46
Reply from 82.195.136.36: bytes=32 time=256ms TTL=46
Reply from 82.195.136.36: bytes=32 time=309ms TTL=46

Ping statistics for 82.195.136.36:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 162ms, Maximum = 309ms, Average = 231ms

SoBe

:eek: omg they look like the ones i had from my old isp

Ciaran500

I'd give it a 2/10

Chalk

what point does pinging boards have?
isnt the server fairly stretched anyway so any ping you get is gonna be exaggerated by the fact that it isnt able to respond super fast?


Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600]
(C) Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp.

ping www.boards.ie

Pinging www.boards.ie [82.195.136.36] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 82.195.136.36: bytes=32 time=54ms TTL=59
Reply from 82.195.136.36: bytes=32 time=115ms TTL=59
Reply from 82.195.136.36: bytes=32 time=143ms TTL=59
Reply from 82.195.136.36: bytes=32 time=21ms TTL=59

Ping statistics for 82.195.136.36:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 21ms, Maximum = 143ms, Average = 83ms

pages still open as fast as i can read em,
and no camped snipers have hit me yet
those pings are actually better than yours :P
but they go up and down regularly

Pinging www.jolt.co.uk [82.133.85.65] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 82.133.85.65: bytes=32 time=34ms TTL=59
Reply from 82.133.85.65: bytes=32 time=31ms TTL=59
Reply from 82.133.85.65: bytes=32 time=33ms TTL=59
Reply from 82.133.85.65: bytes=32 time=34ms TTL=59

Ping statistics for 82.133.85.65:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 31ms, Maximum = 34ms, Average = 33ms


My pings are lovely!

RicardoSmith

Chalk wrote:

what point does pinging boards have?
isnt the server fairly stretched anyway so any ping you get is gonna be exaggerated by the fact that it isnt able to respond super fast?
...

The response times of my connection are dire. Its NTL starter. However streaming media or gaming is amost impossible with bad pings.

Pinging www.jolt.co.uk [82.133.85.65] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 82.133.85.65: bytes=32 time=56ms TTL=50
Reply from 82.133.85.65: bytes=32 time=77ms TTL=50
Reply from 82.133.85.65: bytes=32 time=23ms TTL=50
Reply from 82.133.85.65: bytes=32 time=58ms TTL=50

Ping statistics for 82.133.85.65:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 23ms, Maximum = 77ms, Average = 53ms

eircom's good for some things!

Pinging www.boards.ie [82.195.136.36] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 82.195.136.36: bytes=32 time=24ms TTL=59
Reply from 82.195.136.36: bytes=32 time=25ms TTL=59
Reply from 82.195.136.36: bytes=32 time=23ms TTL=59
Reply from 82.195.136.36: bytes=32 time=23ms TTL=59

Ping statistics for 82.195.136.36:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 23ms, Maximum = 25ms, Average = 23ms

daymobrew

RicardoSmith - I know you live near me (near Coolmine train station, Dublin 15). I am on ntl bb. I'm getting between 25 - 70 ms to www.jolt.co.uk.

I was onto ntl on Thursday who assured me that work on the ntl issues in the area would be completed by Tuesday morning.
I'll be checking then.

Dinner

My pings depress me. Now, the only time I can do some online gaming is after midnight.

Usually its playable until about 5 most days, but I cant even play it now. Pings of over 100 to boards at the moment.

I hate UTV.

muckwarrior

Pinging www.jolt.co.uk [82.133.85.65] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 82.133.85.65: bytes=32 time=911ms TTL=58
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Reply from 82.133.85.65: bytes=32 time=1712ms TTL=58

Ping statistics for 82.133.85.65:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 2, Lost = 2 (50% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 911ms, Maximum = 1712ms, Average = 1311ms


Believe it or not this is what its always like. Ripwave

Ciaran500

Since everyone else is showing off:

Pinging www.boards.ie [82.195.136.36] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 82.195.136.36: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=58
Reply from 82.195.136.36: bytes=32 time=9ms TTL=58
Reply from 82.195.136.36: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=58
Reply from 82.195.136.36: bytes=32 time=9ms TTL=58

Ping statistics for 82.195.136.36:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 6ms, Maximum = 9ms, Average = 7ms

Töpher

Pinging www.jolt.co.uk [82.133.85.65] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 82.133.85.65: bytes=32 time=25ms TTL=51
Reply from 82.133.85.65: bytes=32 time=24ms TTL=51
Reply from 82.133.85.65: bytes=32 time=27ms TTL=51
Reply from 82.133.85.65: bytes=32 time=23ms TTL=51

Ping statistics for 82.133.85.65:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 23ms, Maximum = 27ms, Average = 24ms

NTL 1500/256

apeking

Just wondering what u think of my pings, i have eircom homestarter plus package.

Since i've got a wireless router it seems to have affected my gaming. I'm only getting around 70 in game and when a lot of stuff is happening in game, like frags and rapid shooting all over the place, my pings jump up to about 120.

When i link the pc up direct it doesnt seem to make a difference.

Pinging www.jolt.co.uk [82.133.85.65] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 82.133.85.65: bytes=32 time=47ms TTL=59
Reply from 82.133.85.65: bytes=32 time=32ms TTL=59
Reply from 82.133.85.65: bytes=32 time=34ms TTL=59
Reply from 82.133.85.65: bytes=32 time=33ms TTL=59
Reply from 82.133.85.65: bytes=32 time=35ms TTL=59

Ping statistics for 82.133.85.65:
Packets: Sent = 5, Received = 5, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 32ms, Maximum = 47ms, Average = 36ms

vishal

mine on esatbt bbplus:

Pinging www.boards.ie [82.195.136.36] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 82.195.136.36: bytes=32 time=24ms TTL=56
Reply from 82.195.136.36: bytes=32 time=24ms TTL=56
Reply from 82.195.136.36: bytes=32 time=23ms TTL=56
Reply from 82.195.136.36: bytes=32 time=26ms TTL=56

Ping statistics for 82.195.136.36:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 23ms, Maximum = 26ms, Average = 24ms

Ciaran500

apeking wrote:

Since i've got a wireless router it seems to have affected my gaming.

apeking wrote:

When i link the pc up direct it doesnt seem to make a difference.

Its not the wireless so.

Those pings looks normal for Eircoms package mabye a little high, but that can be attributed to anything.

RicardoSmith

muckwarrior - thats really woeful.

Ciaran500 - wow! whats that one?

Ciaran500

I'm on IBB breeze 2mb.

apeking

Ciaran500 wrote:

Its not the wireless so.

Those pings looks normal for Eircoms package mabye a little high, but that can be attributed to anything.

Ye, but could it have something to do with the wireless router?? I have the normal modem given to me by eircom and the wireless router connected to that.

Ciaran500

Try it without the router, just straight into PC.

apeking

Ciaran500 wrote:

Try it without the router, just straight into PC.

Ye problem there though, my modem is set in bridge mode cause that only way to get it to work with the router so dont want the hassle of resetting everything up.

Imwas just wondering if it is the router or my connection that is causing the pings to be worse. Might try it anyway

Rabies

On Chorus Cablenet Broadband

Pinging www.boards.ie [82.195.136.36] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 82.195.136.36: bytes=32 time=53ms TTL=55
Reply from 82.195.136.36: bytes=32 time=58ms TTL=55
Reply from 82.195.136.36: bytes=32 time=53ms TTL=55
Reply from 82.195.136.36: bytes=32 time=54ms TTL=55

Ping statistics for 82.195.136.36:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 53ms, Maximum = 58ms, Average = 54ms

Nietzschean

Since its show off time.....

PING www.jolt.co.uk (82.133.85.65): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 82.133.85.65: icmp_seq=0 ttl=53 time=11.447 ms
64 bytes from 82.133.85.65: icmp_seq=1 ttl=53 time=11.646 ms
64 bytes from 82.133.85.65: icmp_seq=2 ttl=53 time=11.416 ms
64 bytes from 82.133.85.65: icmp_seq=3 ttl=53 time=11.424 ms

--- www.jolt.co.uk ping statistics ---
4 packets transmitted, 4 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 11.416/11.483/11.646/0.095 ms


PING www.boards.ie (82.195.136.36): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 82.195.136.36: icmp_seq=0 ttl=56 time=2.847 ms
64 bytes from 82.195.136.36: icmp_seq=1 ttl=56 time=3.070 ms
64 bytes from 82.195.136.36: icmp_seq=2 ttl=56 time=2.864 ms
64 bytes from 82.195.136.36: icmp_seq=3 ttl=56 time=2.629 ms

--- www.boards.ie ping statistics ---
4 packets transmitted, 4 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 2.629/2.852/3.070/0.156 ms




As for the ntl thing, my pings with it have been ****e of late aswell(that ^^ isn't ntl) as quite a few service outages(i'm in D4 btw)... not exactly what i'd like considering at the moment i'm paying more than DSL users for a slower service........ and considerbly less relyable of late.

Mutant_Fruit

Ping statistics for 82.195.136.36:
Packets: Sent = 423, Received = 421, Lost = 2 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 5ms, Maximum = 88ms, Average = 24ms
Control-Break

Its a bit high... but that could be cos i'm uploading at 210kB/sec in bittorrent.

For those nerds among you looking for the nerd equivilant of a soap opera, check out http://www.welcometothescene.com. Its pretty good stuff.

puma5k

Pinging for an IBB Breeze 2Mb in Galway

There not as good as i would think. but sure if your geographically closer to the boards.ie servers or your ISP is on the same backbone as the hosting company then your going to get better pings why boards?
pinging your Gateway or DNS servers would be better to see if your connection's response time.
Also boards would be a slow site compared to the big one's, google.ie

Pinging boards.ie [82.195.136.36] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 82.195.136.36: bytes=32 time=26ms TTL=56
Reply from 82.195.136.36: bytes=32 time=24ms TTL=56
Reply from 82.195.136.36: bytes=32 time=23ms TTL=56
Reply from 82.195.136.36: bytes=32 time=24ms TTL=56

Ping statistics for 82.195.136.36:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 23ms, Maximum = 26ms, Average = 24ms

what ya think?

Fionn_McCool

Pinging 82.195.136.36 (www.boards.ie) with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 82.195.136.36: bytes=32 time=9ms TTL=55
Reply from 82.195.136.36: bytes=32 time=11ms TTL=55
Reply from 82.195.136.36: bytes=32 time=10ms TTL=55
Reply from 82.195.136.36: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=55

Ping statistics for 82.195.136.36:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 8ms, Maximum = 11ms, Average = 9ms

Pinging 82.133.85.65 (www.jolt.co.uk) with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 82.133.85.65: bytes=32 time=17ms TTL=52
Reply from 82.133.85.65: bytes=32 time=18ms TTL=52
Reply from 82.133.85.65: bytes=32 time=17ms TTL=52
Reply from 82.133.85.65: bytes=32 time=18ms TTL=52

Ping statistics for 82.133.85.65:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 17ms, Maximum = 18ms, Average = 17ms



For Gaming at least, it doesn't matter so much if you have a high ping, only that you are are fraction of time behind everyone, play on USA servers and you will notice.
The main thing is that your ping is consistant, the worst thing to have for gaming is a ping that jumps all around the place, this is what makes players seem to warp all around the place.

Mutant_Fruit

For Gaming at least, it doesn't matter so much if you have a high ping, only that you are are fraction of time behind everyone, play on USA servers and you will notice.

Thats a bit contradictory... you just said a high ping doesn't matter, but then you went on to say a high ping makes a difference. A high ping IS what means you are a fraction of a second behing people...

Tbph, Anything below 80ms is fine. And most connections will give ingame pings of less than 80.

Cabaal

ping www.jolt.co.uk

Pinging www.jolt.co.uk [82.133.85.65] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 82.133.85.65: bytes=32 time=39ms TTL=56
Reply from 82.133.85.65: bytes=32 time=25ms TTL=56
Reply from 82.133.85.65: bytes=32 time=37ms TTL=56
Reply from 82.133.85.65: bytes=32 time=37ms TTL=56

Ping statistics for 82.133.85.65:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 25ms, Maximum = 39ms, Average = 34ms

Damn wireless connection from my pc to router is affecting my pings, it is soon to be replaced with a all wired setup

Drapper

RicardoSmith wrote:

08/05/2005
11:32

Pinging www.boards.ie [82.195.136.36] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 82.195.136.36: bytes=32 time=200ms TTL=46
Reply from 82.195.136.36: bytes=32 time=162ms TTL=46
Reply from 82.195.136.36: bytes=32 time=256ms TTL=46
Reply from 82.195.136.36: bytes=32 time=309ms TTL=46

Ping statistics for 82.195.136.36:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 162ms, Maximum = 309ms, Average = 231ms

told yah............ bad to worse ......................... what did thier customer support say?

muckwarrior

muckwarrior wrote:

Pinging www.jolt.co.uk [82.133.85.65] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 82.133.85.65: bytes=32 time=911ms TTL=58
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Reply from 82.133.85.65: bytes=32 time=1712ms TTL=58

Ping statistics for 82.133.85.65:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 2, Lost = 2 (50% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 911ms, Maximum = 1712ms, Average = 1311ms


Believe it or not this is what its always like. Ripwave

Any other ripwave users here that can tell me if this is normal or is there something up with my connection? I know Ripwave is supposed to have high latency but should it really be this bad?

RicardoSmith

Drapper wrote:

told yah............ bad to worse ......................... what did thier customer support say?

They keep telling me they are looking into it, but I haven't heard back from them in a while. The service is getting worse though. More downtime and worse connection speeds and pings.

Drapper

RicardoSmith wrote:

They keep telling me they are looking into it, but I haven't heard back from them in a while. The service is getting worse though. More downtime and worse connection speeds and pings.

Call and ask for Alma Gorman TECH MANGER !!

she knows the storey !!