Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Higher Maths Question

Options
  • 04-06-2005 3:06pm
    #1
    Registered Users Posts: 8,449 ✭✭✭


    hey i was going over differentiation and while doing one of the questions from the mock I got stuck on the last part of a (c) part and i'm wondering if any1 can clear this up. Basically it's asking me to find the equation of the tangent to the graph of a function that i just proved had no turning points and not points of inflection. So if the graph has no turning points and no points of inflection, does that not mean its a straight line? like slanty but straight? and if so then i have to find a point on it and a slope? or something like that? I am not sure if i have made much sense but if any1 can help i'de appreciate it :)


Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 1,496 ✭✭✭*Angel*


    like slanty but straight?

    Diagonal maybe? :)

    Yes well you could put the full question up cos it's kinda hard to tell, but you already got the first derivative (the slope), so you have a point on the line that you could sub in to get the slope.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Perhaps you were given a range and it didn't have turning points or a point of inflection in that range?

    I'd like to see the question too. :)


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,449 ✭✭✭Call Me Jimmy


    k i wasnt posting it originally coz i was concerned mainly with the question of the line with no asymptotes and no inflection being a (diagonal ;)) line, ok well heres the question

    f(x) = x
    ____
    x-3 where x E R and x doesnt = 3

    (i) Find the equations of the asymptotes of the graph f (check)
    (ii)Prove that the graph of f(x) has no turning points and no points of inflection (check)
    (iii) Given that 3x+y=k is a tangent to the graph of f where k is a real number, find two possible values of k.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,496 ✭✭✭*Angel*


    yeah so from 3x + y = k you can figure out that the slope is -3

    f'(x) = -3/(x-3)^2

    - 3 = -3/(x-3)^2

    (x - 3)^2 = 1
    x^2 - 6x + 8 = 0
    (x - 4)(x - 2) = 0
    x = 4, 2

    y = x/(x - 3)

    x = 4, y = 4
    x = 2, y = -2

    subbing into 3x + y = k

    k = 16, 4


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,028 ✭✭✭oq4v3ht0u76kf2


    Roysh then, let's get cracking...
    f(x) = x / (x -3)
    f'(x) = -3 / (x - 3)^2
    
    3x + y = k
    y = -3x + k
    
    Therefore the slope, m = -3    [due to y = mx + c]
    
    f'(x) = m
    - 3 / (x - 3)^2 = -3
    Simplifies to
    x^2 - 6x + 8 = 0
    (x - 4)(x - 2) = 0
    x = 4 OR x = 2
    
    x = 4
    f(4) =  y = 4
    
    x = 2
    f(2) = y = -2
    
    
    Two values for k: 
    3x + y = k
    
    x = 4, y = 4
    3(4) + 4 = 16 #
    
    x = 2, y = -2
    3(2) - 2 = 4 #
    

    So k = 16 or k = 4


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 8,449 ✭✭✭Call Me Jimmy


    thanks but in the first line, after you establish that the slope of tangent is -3 then you say
    f'(x) = -3/(x-2)^2 but THEN
    you put the tangent slope = to the graph f slope no?
    -3 = -3/(x-2)^2 ? how is this so? if the (diagonal) line has a tangent, then surely the tangent slope cant equal the line slope? i must be missing something sorry :(


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 362 ✭✭the smiley one


    *Angel* wrote:
    yeah so from 3x + y = k you can figure out that the slope is -3

    f'(x) = -3/(x-3)^2

    - 3 = -3/(x-3)^2

    (x - 3)^2 = 1
    x^2 - 6x + 8 = 0
    (x - 4)(x - 2) = 0
    x = 4, 2

    y = x/(x - 3)[/B]
    x = 4, y = 4
    x = 2, y = -2

    subbing into 3x + y = k

    k = 16, 4

    Can you use that fact, because surely that is the x value of a point on the curve, not neccessarily on the line? Therefore subbing in 2 and 4 will get you the corresponding points on the curve......not the line?!
    I get really confused about stuff like this......

    :)

    Anyone like to explain???!!!! :confused:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 362 ✭✭the smiley one


    thanks but in the first line, after you establish that the slope of tangent is -3 then you say
    f'(x) = -3/(x-2)^2 but THEN
    you put the tangent slope = to the graph f slope no?
    -3 = -3/(x-2)^2 ? how is this so? if the (diagonal) line has a tangent, then surely the tangent slope cant equal the line slope? i must be missing something sorry :(


    f'(x) is always the slope of the tangent to the curve - that is it's definition
    Not sure if you are asking that though...but anyway


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,028 ✭✭✭oq4v3ht0u76kf2


    Are you sure it's a diagonal line? See my attachment. That curve has no turning points and no points of inflection.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    It clearly isn't a diagonal line. A fraction like that would be as is in the diagram above.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,496 ✭✭✭*Angel*


    thanks but in the first line, after you establish that the slope of tangent is -3 then you say
    f'(x) = -3/(x-2)^2 but THEN
    you put the tangent slope = to the graph f slope no?
    -3 = -3/(x-2)^2 ? how is this so? if the (diagonal) line has a tangent, then surely the tangent slope cant equal the line slope? i must be missing something sorry :(

    you're given 3x + y = K, (y = mx + c), m = -3

    f'(x) of the 'curve' is the slope of a tangent to a curve

    therefore they are equal


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,449 ✭✭✭Call Me Jimmy


    oh yeah bob, ur absolutely right. Lol wasnt even thinking straight, now im good, thanks for the help people, much appreciated!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,028 ✭✭✭oq4v3ht0u76kf2


    No worries! Best of luck in the exam man!


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    f'(x) of the 'curve' is the slope of a tangent to a curve

    Indeed. The whole basis of that question was to see if you know that.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,496 ✭✭✭*Angel*


    f'(x) is always the slope of the tangent to the curve - that is it's definition
    Not sure if you are asking that though...but anyway

    you've found out that x is a point on the curve where a line is tangental, therefore the corresponding y value will be on the curve


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,449 ✭✭✭Call Me Jimmy


    yeah angel and aristotle i realise i just wasnt thinking right, thanks


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 362 ✭✭the smiley one


    *Angel* wrote:
    you've found out that x is a point on the curve where a line is tangental, therefore the corresponding y value will be on the curve


    So does that mean that the two points you have found are on both the line and the curve?

    :)


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    If you see the [URL=https://us.v-cdn.net/6034073/uploads/attachments/8386/14021.PNG[/URL] , you will see that the curve splits into opposite sides of the X and Y axis (I can't remember what that's called at the mo :( ). So you could have a line on either one of those.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,028 ✭✭✭oq4v3ht0u76kf2


    It's a rational function... that is f(x) = g(x) / h(x)

    The only two on our course are f(x) = a / (x + b) and f(x) = x / (x + b)

    The horizontal/vertical lines that the curve never meets are called the asymptotes.

    Vertical asymptote: the denominator = 0 (i.e. x + b = 0, x = -b)
    Horizontal asymptote: y = lim[x -> infinity] f(x)


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    rational

    That's the word I couldn't think of! :)


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,028 ✭✭✭oq4v3ht0u76kf2


    You don't do your nickname justice man! :p G'luck!


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    LoL! Cheers.


Advertisement